Who says Mormons aren't Christians?

Who says Mormons aren't Christians?

There are 31994 comments on the CNN story from Oct 12, 2011, titled Who says Mormons aren't Christians?. In it, CNN reports that:

Editor's note: Dean Obeidallah is an award-winning comedian who has appeared on TV shows such as Comedy Central's "Axis of Evil" special, ABC's "The View," CNN's "What the Week" and HLN's "The Joy Behar Show." He is executive producer of the annual New York Arab-American Comedy Festival and the Amman Stand Up Comedy Festival.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CNN.

“Good day to you!”

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#23124 Apr 6, 2013
concerned in Egypt wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you even know what Canon means NOPE
Rhetorical question
It means that which one measures by.
A ruler of Truth.
If God anointed an Apostle today to bring new revelation today Christians would treat him with the same test of authenticity as the Bereans did Paul.
Glad you're so optimistic about the topic. Because Christianity as a whole isn't.
That which is considered canon of Jesus is in the NT. In 1700 years Christianity hasn't made an exception to anything else but what is within the Bible. That very well states Christianity isn't accepting of anything new.
So you think if God put a prophet on this earth with apostles, you think Christianity would accept them by tests against the Bible? Well God himself walked this very earth 2000 years ago and wasn't recognized by his own people. They rejected him as a Jewish prophet and rejected his followers and they killed him and killed many of his followers. If those people 2000 years ago couldn't even recognize God by testing him against their scriptures, how in the *ell do you think Christianity would recognize a prophet claiming to be of God now? They wouldn't.
Nice to know you're keeping a positive outlook about it though :)

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23125 Apr 6, 2013
A web site dedicated to getting women ordained in the priesthood:
http://ordainwomen.org/

They are shipping Depends by the truckload to church headquarters these days.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23126 Apr 6, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that you have made yourself into a whoring rumour monger perpetuating rumours you have read others said has nothing to do with scriptures either. Now what?
You're being an idiot, that's what.
concerned in Egypt

Aberdeen, UK

#23127 Apr 6, 2013
Father overtime wrote:
<quoted text>
You are unreasonable to think Mormons aren't Christian. Unreasonable, irresponsible, willfully ignorant, which makes you a dumb dumb drama queen in your own right. Go to bed child. Your arguments are making the populace less intelligent.
You are unreasonable to think Mormons are Christian. Unreasonable, irresponsible, willfully ignorant, which makes you a dumb dumb drama queen in your own LDS way. Go to bed child. Your arguments are making dumber by the post.

Can you actually show any evidence that supports Mormonism's claims?

Or like in so many similar LDS threads is this the only thing you LDS can do is gang up and be bullies and name call and mud sling at those who post evidence and facts that show it is impossible for Mormons to be Christians??

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23128 Apr 6, 2013
sportxmouse wrote:
<quoted text>
Dana,
You never answered the question:
How many LDS women feel this way?
Ask these people: http://ordainwomen.org/

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23129 Apr 6, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
lol....No. Reading comprehension is your issue because you take what is perfectly understandable and twist it to mean what it never said. That's called deceit and lying for your god that urges you to do such a thing and he pats you on your back for calling it truth.
For instance, in the following do note that in this verse, it isn't stated God had allowed all the children of Israel to partake in this principle and doctrine. As a matter of fact God spells it out that only certain individuals were allowed by God to partake in this practice, read the fricking verse as it was written, not as you deceitfully twist it to mean.
1 Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you my servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of my hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord, justified my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also Moses, David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the principle and doctrine of their having many wives and concubines—
Next, God states in this verse... "...for all those who have this law revealed unto them must obey the same." That means not everyone as a whole would have this law revealed to them, but only select individuals.
That means this principle and doctrine wasn't a matter of salvation FOR EACH AND EVERY CHURCH MEMBER. But it was a matter of salvation to those of whom it was required of to partake of that principle and doctrine.
And you reverting to your usual pathetic lies you use to make a really stupid twisted point only prove how far you will go to foster your lies.
The doctrine of plural marriage was never given for all church members male and female. It was never stated and it was never written that all male and female church members had to be part of a polygamous marriage or risk going to hell etc. And you're reverting to pathetic twisted lies stating that is how it reads.
So remain a liar or read the information as it was written "..for all those who have this law revealed unto them must obey the same."
Playing child word games again, pathetic. Not playing this time.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23130 Apr 6, 2013
sportxmouse wrote:
You also never answered the question:
Since you don't believe in the Church Jesus Christ set up in his ministry "The Church of Jesus Christ"
and you don't believe in the Church Jesus Christ set up after the Dark Ages from hidden manuscripts "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"
What do you believe?
Are you an atheist?
I've already said I wasn't. How many times do you have to read it?

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23131 Apr 6, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
According to what was written in that conversation, Jesus never even attempted to teach the Sadducees that there was an resurrection let alone an afterlife. There was no teaching about either in the Torah. They were like you. They believed in the literal writing of the Torah as you believe in the NT. And like them, if it wasn't in the scriptures as you also claim it, God never said it.
Jesus understood what they believed and what they didn't believe. You can remain as ignorant of this conversation Jesus had with them to your hearts delight but you will suffer for your own idiocy of thought.
Jesus's first response was that they knew not the power of God just as you don't know it because like them, you deny the power of God by containing it to what you think the power of God is and what you state the power of God isn't just as the Sadducees proclaimed it.
Nothing Jesus told them they accepted nor did they believe because they didn't believe in a resurrection or an afterlife. So anything Jesus said was a waste of his breath. Those like you and the Sadducees that contain the power of God to what one comprehends it to be and nothing more will never understand the power of God has never came with limitations.
He clearly made a statement about the resurrection, talking to you is a waste of breath. You're boring.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23132 Apr 6, 2013
Father overtime wrote:
I have heard the saviors name over 40 times in the last four hours of conference. I do believe Mormons are more than Christian. They are disciples.
Good for you.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23133 Apr 6, 2013
concerned in Egypt wrote:
<quoted text>
I love anti-mormon sites
I love anti-Racist sites
I love anti-devil worship sites
I love anti-muslim sites
I love anti-hidu sites.
I love anti-abortion sites.
Any site that is (Anti) against falsehoods and lies is right up my alley
I am even anti you as you think because you call something Anti-Mormon that means your position is right with having to refute the evidence they give.
You your so stupid that you think because you call something a name that your authority to do so makes something not true.
This shows you are a brainwashed dumb dumb.
If you are seeking truth about the LDS Mormon Sect.
If you want access to verifiable footnoted sources that you can verify yourself
Then these sites all document their assertions with EVIDENCE Biblical Historical and verifiable.
ALL THESE ANTI-MORMON SITES NOT ONE LDS MORMON EVEN DARES TO REFUTE AS THEY KNOW THEY CAN NOT WIN A DEBATE WITH THE TRUTH BEING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THEIR ASSERTIONS
Because the Truth Matters not vial name callers.
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.asp...
http://www.leaderu.com/offices/michaeldavis/d...
http://www.mrm.org/
http://www.wivesofjosephsmith.org/
http://www.utlm.org/
http://irr.org/
http://carm.org/
http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/search/colle...
http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/index.h...
k
It's a common Mormon tactic to avoid reality.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23134 Apr 6, 2013
NoMo wrote:
So, paKKKer steps in it again. Can you make a petition or something, to ban him permanently from the speech list?
http://fox13now.com/2013/04/06/lds-leader-war...
More proof that Packer has never known Jesus, let alone is his Apostle.

Good link, thanks.
concerned in Egypt

Aberdeen, UK

#23135 Apr 6, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad you're so optimistic about the topic. Because Christianity as a whole isn't.
That which is considered canon of Jesus is in the NT. In 1700 years Christianity hasn't made an exception to anything else but what is within the Bible. That very well states Christianity isn't accepting of anything new.
So you think if God put a prophet on this earth with apostles, you think Christianity would accept them by tests against the Bible? Well God himself walked this very earth 2000 years ago and wasn't recognized by his own people. They rejected him as a Jewish prophet and rejected his followers and they killed him and killed many of his followers. If those people 2000 years ago couldn't even recognize God by testing him against their scriptures, how in the *ell do you think Christianity would recognize a prophet claiming to be of God now? They wouldn't.
Nice to know you're keeping a positive outlook about it though :)
If God has not anointed anyone in 1900 years to bring new revelation so be it God is sovereign his will be done not yours not mine.

But Jesus left so the Holy Spirit could come and be our great comforter till the second coming he has not left us alone.

I am seeing now as I write why LDS what there to be new revelation so badly they believe a lie. You are alone, your spirit is alone and empty lacking the indwelling of Holy Spirit as you are not Christian. So you fill the void with fake man made substitutions as your pride is great and you will not admit you are wrong.

Ro 1:19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.
Ro 1:20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
Ro 1:21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.
Ro 1:22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools
Ro 1:23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.
Ro 1:24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
Ro 1:25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

You are not Christians LDS that is, you see Christians are indwelt with the truth the one true God the Holy Spirit we are not alone we have that which revelation previously alluded to living and dwelling with in us.
We are filled and indwelt with that which is made of Revelation God himself.

Like in Jesus's day God's true followers saw Jesus and knew who he was, they were all Jews and on pentecost these Jews were filled with the Spirit of Truth.

LDS can't see truth and know when its in front of them with out the Spirit. You don't even realize that which posted about the Jews rejecting the true Messiah is exactly what you and the LDS do today by accepting Mormon Doctrine which denies the same Jesus the Jews rejected and crucified.

Like then if God Sends a true messenger his true Christians will know. They are in dwelt with God's Holy Spirit and can't miss it.

Like then we too who are true followers of Jesus know in the Spirit Mormonism is False.

The Holy Spirit confirms his word the Bible to us and reveals to us through his word that Joseph Smith and Brigham Young were false Prophets, tools of the evil one, sellers of a false Gospel.

anonymousnetruth teller

Omaha, NE

#23136 Apr 6, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a common Mormon tactic to avoid reality.
Mormons do not avoid reality

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23137 Apr 7, 2013
anonymousnetruthteller wrote:
<quoted text>
Mormons do not avoid reality
When they refuse to read something without the approval of the church leaders it is avoiding reality.
Father overtime

United States

#23138 Apr 7, 2013
These Internet preachers so not know what a true Christian is. Go picket at conference you wolves in Sheep clothing.

“Too much LDS in the 60's”

Since: Sep 10

Marysville, CA

#23139 Apr 7, 2013
Father overtime wrote:
These Internet preachers so not know what a true Christian is. Go picket at conference you wolves in Sheep clothing.
Temper tantrums isn't going to make Mormonism Christian.

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23140 Apr 7, 2013
concerned in Egypt wrote:
<quoted text>
... blah blah blah...
You play games...

I know what they are moron because I went to them in the past when you or Dana post from them to try to prove Mormonism is not true. I looked at them and decided for myself they were not for me.

I WILL NOT LOOK AT YOUR HATE FILLED RESOURCES.

Think for yourself. Provide your own assumptions, not what you have been told.

Read the Churches authorized resources compare and come out with analytic comparisons that determine the Church is not true.

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23141 Apr 7, 2013
Dana Robertson wrote:
<quoted text>
When they refuse to read something without the approval of the church leaders it is avoiding reality.
No... I read some of them... I seen what they were about. I decided on my own they were not true or right for me.

Reality is you want your own Church... you are an Apostate Mormon, an Apostate Christian. Who won't answer the simple question purposed to you...

You don't believe in the church Christ set up during his ministry
"The Church of Jesus Christ".

and

You don't believe in the church Christ set up after the Dark Ages
"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints".

Are you an atheist?

sportxmouse

“Duty is a Privilege!”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23142 Apr 7, 2013
concerned in Egypt wrote:
<quoted text>
I love anti-mormon sites
I love anti-Racist sites
I love anti-devil worship sites
I love anti-muslim sites
I love anti-hidu sites.
I love anti-abortion sites.
...
I noticed what you don't love is

Historical Information
Documented evidence not opinionated theories

Truth
Duty
God's Word
Obedience
Authority
Order

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23143 Apr 7, 2013
Toma wrote:
<quoted text>
That's exactly what Christians do. The problem with you guys, you rely on your good works to save you.
Doesn't this quote by Bruce R Mckonkie sound familiar?
"salvation is free, but must also be bought"! Hahaha. And listen to this. He said the price for salvation is by keeping the law and ordinances of the lds church. Now, where does that leave Christ dying on the cross to pay for our sins? Mormons totally disqualified Christ work on the cross!
Well that kinda make sense, cause you Mormons believe that on the garden of gethsemane was where he bled from every pore and paid for our sins, not on the cross. Unbiblical !!!!
Hold on... Christ DID pay for our sins in gethsemane and on the cross. I chose this quote because you seem to have an affinity for Bruce R. McConkie.

"And truly he was, for while he was hanging on the cross for another three hours, from noon to 3:00 P.M., all the infinite agonies and merciless pains of Gethsemane recurred.

And, finally, when the atoning agonies had taken their toll—when the victory had been won, when the Son of God had fulfilled the will of his Father in all things—then he said,“It is finished”(John 19:30), and he voluntarily gave up the ghost."

(The Purifying Power of Gethsemane)

He suffered both on the cross and in Gethsemane.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Television Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sources: KTVK drops 'Good Morning Arizona' pers... (Mar '09) 8 hr Phil 862
News From Amish to Ozarks, not the same old stories (Jun '08) 13 hr Maringrove Beast 28
News What's Going On 17 hr bozo 1
News 'ER' star faces paternity suit (Jul '07) Sat George 6
News Americans don't like Hillary Clinton or Donald ... Sat WasteWater 40
News Over the top: Trump sews up delegates to seal G... Sat WasteWater 2
News Dr. Drew On Why Loveline Is Ending After 3 Sex-... Sat Three Psyche 6
More from around the web