Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310476 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292468 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not confusing anything. Again, you dodge a clear question.
I'll try again...
Would you tell a woman who has never had children, but has had a miscarriage (or more), and who tells you she has not been able to have children and will keep trying, that indeed she IS a mother of dead children?
Would you tell her that?
Would you speak your disagreement to her face? Would you?
Yes or no?
Why would I? You make no sense. Fact is she CONCEIVED her child. She WAS the biological mother of that deceased child.

If she is grying to have another child to "mother" then thats her right. I would hope she could. Why would i remind her of her deceased child if she eagerly wants to mother a new child?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292469 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
You support exceptions for life threat, so that makes you a "proabort", by your own defintion.
Oh I do?
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292470 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
What other medical conditions or medical treatments do you want to send people to jail for Skanky? Aids perhaps?
You are one of the stupidest and nastiest bitches I've ever had the misfortune to have met, even on a forum.
You stupid shit, abortion wasn't hindered at all, even when it WAS illegal, it simply went underground with women dying.
You're fine with women dying tho.
I almost forgot you'd rather your child die than have a life saving abortion. I suppose you'd go see her on visitors day in the prison you'd put her in for making that decision.
You're as dumb as it gets Skanky.
BTW, where's hubby? Out schtupping a REAL woman for a change? You do always seem to be more bitter when you're posting late at night, alone, as usual.......
Shoulda read ahead :)
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292471 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
"Bet our abortion rates wouldnt be in the millions annually if a woman faced prison."
Eh, a lot of them would probably be dead. Which, of course, is perfectly acceptable to you. Prison or death is your solution.
Hey, but that aside, do you believe a pregnant woman should have the legal right to refuse prenatal care? To refuse taking prenatal vitamins? To refuse the monthly or weekly check ups? You know, all the stuff pregnant women who want to gestate do in order to have a healthy pregnancy?
Prison is your solution. Its acceptable to you. You just said it.

Me? Yes...a woman or man who kills or pays to have someone killed ESPECIALLY a premeditated killing should be punished.

Once upon a time(days of my own two grandmas) they didnt have prenatal care. They knew they were pregnant and took extra care of themselves. Prenatal care is not mandatory for childbirth. Since the beginning of time women birthed children alone with no Dr giving crappy prescribed vitamins. I didnt take them. I got whole food real vitamnins andtook ggod care of myself.
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292472 Apr 15, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Only if she WANTS to be. If she doesn't want pregnancy or children, she doesn't have to continue the pregnancy.
Are you on auto-reply? Repeating the same crap over and over swithout even readjng what your replying to?

I said; A WOMAN WHO CONCEIVES IS THE BIOLOGICAL MOTHER.

What does not wanting to be pregnant have to do with that fact?

""Not if she doesn't want to be"""" ""

What?

@@
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292473 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Excuse me but this questioning came about when you, michele and other proaborts claim that prolifers shouldn't call out women who abort or women/men who support this evil. You call us self-righteous Xtians. Michele even got a "amen sister" from you for telling someone that Jesus said let those without sin cast the first stone. NO judging. Remember?
But it's okay for YOU to judge another apparently. Sending another sinner to prison as punishment. Youre without sin that you can cast a stone?
Hypocrite. We are only allowed./justified to judge people as long as we arent involving killing/abortion? Your mother paid someone to kill Gods creation but thats okay. Another killing is bad bad bad in your eyes and belongs in prison. HOW CONVENIENT.
Again your askinv the same question? Really?...... again for the tenth time...NO I DONT THINK A WOMANS OLD RECORDS SHOULD BE OPENED UP..WHY?...BECAUSE ABORTION NOW IS LEGAL...BUT I THINK THE LAW SHOULD CHANGE AND THEN WHOMEVER KILLS/ABORTS SHOULD GO TO JAIL.
Shall I repeat it?
Did Jesus tell us not to have a justice system? No He did not. So, if you call me a hypocrite for not disagreeing with Jesus, then I suppose you're accusing Him of being a hypocrite, too.

Why don't you want the hypothetical penalty (25 years to life) for abortion to be retroactive? You equate it with murder, so I would guess you'd want all those "murderers" to be charged with murder. No?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292474 Apr 15, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
No there's not. A theraputic abortion and an elective one is the same thing. The ONLY difference is the reasoning behind it, and that makes ZERO difference to the end result.
An ABORTION.
Twist that all you like Lynniekins - but its a FACT.
<quoted text>
What part of what STO said that he was repeating what he was told did you not grasp?? He didn't LIE you jackwit, and YOU dont have a damn clue what went on in that room with that woman.
What I proved, is that it certainly COULD happen, and definetly has. My BIL's sister is dead proof of it.
STO said that this girl had an abortion at 8 months pregnant because of preeclampsia.

He lied. They would have done an emergency csection if her life was in IMMEDIATE danger....not kill the baby in order to remove it.
worships reality

United States

#292475 Apr 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Well, it was stupid, but it's early...I have every confidence they'll come up with something even more moronic.
<quoted text>
look no further than yourself, stupid. any one of your dumbass posts on "deadly force" is in a stupidity class all it's own.
Katie

Renton, WA

#292476 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Prison is your solution. Its acceptable to you. You just said it.
Me? Yes...a woman or man who kills or pays to have someone killed ESPECIALLY a premeditated killing should be punished.
Once upon a time(days of my own two grandmas) they didnt have prenatal care. They knew they were pregnant and took extra care of themselves. Prenatal care is not mandatory for childbirth. Since the beginning of time women birthed children alone with no Dr giving crappy prescribed vitamins. I didnt take them. I got whole food real vitamnins andtook ggod care of myself.
"Since the beginning of time women birthed children alone with no Dr giving crappy prescribed vitamins. I didnt take them. I got whole food real vitamnins andtook ggod care of myself."

Huh. You would be a hypocrite, though, and determine women carrying unwanted/unhealthy pregnancies be mandated to remain pregnant and under doctor's care or face prison/death?
<SMH>
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292477 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Why would I? You make no sense. Fact is she CONCEIVED her child. She WAS the biological mother of that deceased child.
If she is grying to have another child to "mother" then thats her right. I would hope she could. Why would i remind her of her deceased child if she eagerly wants to mother a new child?
"Why would i remind her of her deceased child if she eagerly wants to mother a new child?"

How could you remind her of her deceased child when she has told you she has never had children, miscarried, and is trying to have children?

Are you telling me you would not correct her when she tells you she has never had children, and she that has no dead children?

Are you telling me you would not say to her something along the lines of, "No, you did have a child. It died. No matter what you think, you're child is dead."

No corrections from you? You'd just go on letting her believe she was never a mother, when you vehemently disagree?
sasylicious

Jackson, NJ

#292478 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Did Jesus tell us not to have a justice system? No He did not. So, if you call me a hypocrite for not disagreeing with Jesus, then I suppose you're accusing Him of being a hypocrite, too.
Why don't you want the hypothetical penalty (25 years to life) for abortion to be retroactive? You equate it with murder, so I would guess you'd want all those "murderers" to be charged with murder. No?
Sorry STO but dont attempt to twist this. YOU and otbers say that we have no right to call out baby killer(those who kill living, developing humans that God has created) becajse we are fake Xtians and self-righteous judgemental people.

You can justify OTHER people and their sins but hour not judgemenfal or self righteous"??? HOW CONVENIENT!!!!

What happened to "Gods the judge not you" crap that you people hand us?

Hypocrite.If you think a wkman who kills her born children should be in jail then your mom belongs there too.
Katie

Renton, WA

#292479 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Oh I do?
No, you'd rather your daughter (and her fetus) die than abort an unhealthy pregnancy. Not sure how STO forgot...
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292480 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Me? Yes...a woman or man who kills or pays to have someone killed ESPECIALLY a premeditated killing should be punished.
Once upon a time(days of my own two grandmas) they didnt have prenatal care. They knew they were pregnant and took extra care of themselves. Prenatal care is not mandatory for childbirth. Since the beginning of time women birthed children alone with no Dr giving crappy prescribed vitamins. I didnt take them. I got whole food real vitamnins andtook ggod care of myself.
Fair enough.

So, if a pregnant woman is sick for weeks and does not seek medical care, you wouldn't have her charged with a crime?

Or if she's abusing drugs while pregnant, she should not be charged with a crime?

IOW, if she completely disregards her condition (being pregnant), and the health of her pregnancy suffers for it, you believe she should not be charged with a crime? Remember now, this is in context of abortion being illegal and the sentence for having one is 25 yrs to life.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#292481 Apr 15, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
What the hell are you talking about? Katie did mention "full term" and preeclampsia, which is what I was talking about in my post you responded to with that dribble.
I never said 32 weeks was full term. I have, however, stated that abortion isn't how pre-eclampsia or eclampsia is treated LATE term.
Why do you post? You can't follow what's being said in the posts you respond, and you talk about things that weren't said in the posts you reply to, so you make yourself look like a dimwit.
No she didn't say anything about full term and preeclampsia or abortion being the treatment if the woman is full term. She quoted from the website..."The only safest way to cure pre-eclampsia is to abort or deliver the child. She also said....."This conversation, regarding pre-eclampsia and abortion or early delivery". Early delivery is not full term.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292482 Apr 15, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Sorry STO but dont attempt to twist this. YOU and otbers say that we have no right to call out baby killer(those who kill living, developing humans that God has created) becajse we are fake Xtians and self-righteous judgemental people.
You can justify OTHER people and their sins but hour not judgemenfal or self righteous"??? HOW CONVENIENT!!!!
What happened to "Gods the judge not you" crap that you people hand us?
Hypocrite.If you think a wkman who kills her born children should be in jail then your mom belongs there too.
You asked if a person convicted of crimes against humanity should not be in prison. I answered they should be. You called me a hypocrite for agreeing we should have a justice system. I asked you if Jesus ever said we should not have a justice system. You still haven't answered.

I asked if your hypothetical law with the sentence of 25 yrs to life should be retroactive. I asked if that is what you would want to see happen. And you haven't answered that question, either.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#292483 Apr 15, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you'd rather your daughter (and her fetus) die than abort an unhealthy pregnancy. Not sure how STO forgot...
You're right! I forgot she'd watch her daughter die, rather than be treated!

Shoulda had a V8!

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#292484 Apr 15, 2013
Nobody goes to jail for sin; they go for breaking a civil law. If you jesus-suckers could understand that, these pointless diatribes wouldn't waste band-width.
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Excuse me but this questioning came about when you, michele and other proaborts claim that prolifers shouldn't call out women who abort or women/men who support this evil. You call us self-righteous Xtians. Michele even got a "amen sister" from you for telling someone that Jesus said let those without sin cast the first stone. NO judging. Remember?
But it's okay for YOU to judge another apparently. Sending another sinner to prison as punishment. Youre without sin that you can cast a stone?
Hypocrite. We are only allowed./justified to judge people as long as we arent involving killing/abortion? Your mother paid someone to kill Gods creation but thats okay. Another killing is bad bad bad in your eyes and belongs in prison. HOW CONVENIENT.
Again your askinv the same question? Really?...... again for the tenth time...NO I DONT THINK A WOMANS OLD RECORDS SHOULD BE OPENED UP..WHY?...BECAUSE ABORTION NOW IS LEGAL...BUT I THINK THE LAW SHOULD CHANGE AND THEN WHOMEVER KILLS/ABORTS SHOULD GO TO JAIL.
Shall I repeat it?
Katie

Renton, WA

#292485 Apr 15, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>No she didn't say anything about full term and preeclampsia or abortion being the treatment if the woman is full term. She quoted from the website..."The only safest way to cure pre-eclampsia is to abort or deliver the child. She also said....."This conversation, regarding pre-eclampsia and abortion or early delivery". Early delivery is not full term.
You know what you're talking abort, Ayaka. It's the op projecting her inability to follow the conversations.
Katie

Renton, WA

#292486 Apr 15, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
You're right! I forgot she'd watch her daughter die, rather than be treated!
Shoulda had a V8!
Fruit Fusion! Two servings of fruits and veggies :)
Katie

Renton, WA

#292487 Apr 15, 2013
Heh! Ayaka, see my typo? S/b about, not abort.
:-|

<groan>

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Television Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Clinton: Republicans Want to Round Up Illegal I... 18 min LeDuped 12
News Univision reporter removed from Trump news conf... 52 min reailitly 28
News Simon Cowell wants to produce TV election coverage 2 hr A celebrity 2
News Si Robertson, 'Duck Dynasty' Star, Says Atheist... 3 hr Shizle 51
News Tila Tequila Kicked Off CBB For Hitler Praise 10 hr Jonesreport 2
News Extreme Makeover: Home Edition Looks for Anothe... (Apr '11) 18 hr Natacha 90
News Josh Duggar in rehab after admitting to pornogr... 20 hr Mets Fan Forever 1
More from around the web