Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 316300 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291576 Apr 2, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask P.T. Barnum.
He would probably say it was a miracle.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291577 Apr 2, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't know about 6inches, but you WERE supposedly holding a dead fetus.
You are not fond of facts I see.
I thought you said they were babies after they were out of the womb.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291578 Apr 2, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
And Foo wrote up her arguments in detail and then added the supporting scriptures and showed why they supported her stance. It filled 2 whole posts and I read it all. You post a link..and tell me there's enough to keep me "looking things up for a week", but me looking things up for a week is not you supporting your own stance. I could very easily look all that up and come to the same answers as Foo.
Foo did the work to support her position. You did pretty much nothing. Big difference.
She made it easy for you but all she said was nothing in scripture has come to pass. I showed you where it has.

You can buy what she says hook line and sinker but it is a stupid conversation to have with you because you don't believe anything in Judaism either. Dead man walking.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291579 Apr 2, 2013
Bit-O-Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL whatever.
It's interesting you are afraid to respond to the substansive post actually directed to you, but you'll pick right up on the bullshit.
Guess you're not as different as foo would like us to believe.
She got the 'substansive' part. You didn't and never will.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291580 Apr 2, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
"The NAF noted the deficiencies at Gosnells clinic, they reported it and they rejected his application."
Reported it to who?
Nobody. How many others are they not reporting for the sake of killing?
gommom

Pittsburgh, PA

#291581 Apr 2, 2013
youtube.com/watch... Ugly got awesome
and the Decisions Tough

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#291582 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
dead arms
Yeah, that happens when you post from morning to night every day.
computer is sticking on some letters
More like your one brain cell is sticking to your ear wax.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#291583 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
She made it easy for you but all she said was nothing in scripture has come to pass. I showed you where it has.
I didn't say nothing in scripture has come to pass.

Stop lying y'dumb bitch.

I pointed out what DIDNT come to pass, and without meeting ALL of the prophicies, he didn't meet the criteria. FACT.

The crap on the link you posted weren't prophicies moron, as I also proved.
You can buy what she says hook line and sinker but it is a stupid conversation to have with you because you don't believe anything in Judaism either. Dead man walking.
In your case, its dead brain cell talking.

Not believing in a faith doesn't mean there's an inablitiy to discuss scripture.

YOU dont know shit about your OWN scriputre as you've shown.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#291584 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody. How many others are they not reporting for the sake of killing?
Its the duty of the STATE to do the reporting idiot. They failed, yes, everyone has acknowledged this. However the BIGGER failure, the more important one, is the STATES failures.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#291585 Apr 2, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
A spontanious abortion isn't a deliberate act. Thankfully we live in a country where we can work to change laws.
I understand, but it would still fall under your blanket statement/desire that "abortion should be illegal because it ends a human life.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#291586 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
She got the 'substansive' part. You didn't and never will.
Learn to read moron.(S)he said "substansive post".

DAMN you're stupid.
Forum

Hobbs, NM

#291587 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
He would probably say it was a miracle.
Thunder.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291588 Apr 2, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't say nothing in scripture has come to pass.
Stop lying y'dumb bitch.
I pointed out what DIDNT come to pass, and without meeting ALL of the prophicies, he didn't meet the criteria. FACT.
The crap on the link you posted weren't prophicies moron, as I also proved.
<quoted text>
In your case, its dead brain cell talking.
Not believing in a faith doesn't mean there's an inablitiy to discuss scripture.
YOU dont know shit about your OWN scriputre as you've shown.
What you don't grasp is that I have no interest whatsoever in what Jews or atheists think of my religion. Christianity isn't going away and I have plenty of people to discuss it with.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#291589 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What you don't grasp is that I have no interest whatsoever in what Jews or atheists think of my religion. Christianity isn't going away and I have plenty of people to discuss it with.
We understand perfectly that you have no interest in what ANY other faiths have to say. You're a bigot that way. You're perfectly content to wallow in your ignorance, both practical AND spiritual, and we're happy to spotlight your stupidity.

You're simply incapable of discussing your "faith" with anything resembling intelligence or knowledge.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291591 Apr 2, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
We understand perfectly that you have no interest in what ANY other faiths have to say. You're a bigot that way. You're perfectly content to wallow in your ignorance, both practical AND spiritual, and we're happy to spotlight your stupidity.
You're simply incapable of discussing your "faith" with anything resembling intelligence or knowledge.
I have no interest in what people of other faiths or of no faith ve to say about mine.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#291592 Apr 2, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
"You guys have a habit of reading too much into inconsequential things and not enough when it's pertinent."
Like all the human lives that have been killed in the name of "choice", or the way pro"choicers" ignored Gosnell's "clinic"?
Not even close. Stupid assumption on your part.

Since: Nov 11

Marengo, OH

#291593 Apr 2, 2013
The liberal media know an abortion outrage when they hear it. Sadly they only seem to hear them from the mouths of Republican candidates, and it only takes a statement to outrage the press. Can’t they find a single abortion outrage inside an abortion clinic? Such is their radicalism that nothing, absolutely nothing regarding this gruesome procedure raises their eyebrows, never mind their ire.

One emerging story proves the degree to which our “objective” media's views on abortion are dogmatic and extreme. Abortionist Kermit Gosnell is on trial in Philadelphia, and not just for killing babies outside the womb, but also for killing a mother through reckless use of anesthesia. Network TV coverage of the trial? Zero on ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NPR, and PBS. CNN’s entire coverage seems to be one sentence from Jake Tapper on March 21.

The New York Times wrote one story before the trial began on March 19 (buried on page A-17). The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and USA Today couldn’t be “national” newspapers and report this trial.

They’re not unaware of it. CBS aired one story after the initial clinic raid in 2011. NBC offered 50 words. CBS even passed along that Gosnell's clinic was described as a "house of horrors." Now it’s in court, and the networks can't find any horrors.

Take the Associated Press report, which appeared on CBSNews.com :“The amount of drugs given to Karnamaya Mongar -- at least as suggested by the nearly illegible clinic note -- was likely to put her in a coma,” said Dr. Andrew Herlich, a medical-school professor.

Mongar was a very sympathetic figure. A native of Bhutan, she weighed less than 100 pounds, spoke no English, and had lived for decades in refugee camps in Nepal before coming to America four months before her death. But the storyline wasn’t lining up with the media’s feminist prejudices. Their “war on women” narrative didn’t include her.

I'll give you a story that falls in line with the media's narrative supporting the plight of women: on November 14, 2012, NBC News aired a report from Ireland, where Indian immigrant Savita Halapanavar died of blood poisoning after seeking an abortion. NBC blamed the government, because the woman and her husband “pleaded for an abortion but were refused because the fetus still had a heartbeat. This is a Catholic country, they were told.”

NBC never returned to the story as hospital officials reported previous “terminations” to save the mother’s life and denied a “Catholic ethos.” To listen to this network is to conclude that abortionists don’t kill women. Catholics do.

You can also see the anti-Catholic animus determining which trials are newsworthy in Philadelphia. On May 23, 2012, the “CBS Evening News” began with the trial of Monsignor William Lynn, accused of covering up child sexual abuse in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. Scott Pelley wasn’t shy about letting the prosecutor speak, as she compared the Catholic Church to the Nazis at Nuremberg.

But when a pro-lifer uses Holocaust metaphors for an abortion clinic, he is condemned.

The trial testimony is graphic, and should make “choice” advocates sick to their stomachs. Again, see the AP:“A medical assistant told a jury Tuesday that she snipped the spines of at least 10 babies during unorthodox abortions at a West Philadelphia clinic, at the direction of the clinic’s owner.”

Later, AP mangled the medical facts:“Abortions are typically performed in utero.” When babies are killed over a toilet, as alleged in this trial, this is not an “unorthodox abortion” of a “fetus.” This is a baby who is born and then murdered. Liberals claim to revere “science,” but this trial is not about tiny “zygotes.” It’s about viable babies.

Cont...

Since: Nov 11

Marengo, OH

#291594 Apr 2, 2013
Cont...

It gets more grotesque at every turn. Clinic assistant Adrienne Moton testified she took a photo of the child described as “Baby A” with her cell phone before Dr. Gosnell took the baby out of the room. "I just saw a big baby boy. He had that color, that color that a baby has," Moton said in court. "I just felt he could have had a chance.…He could have been born any day.”

Another Gosnell assistant said the abortionist joked about one child he murdered:“This baby is big enough to walk around with me or walk me to the bus stop.” But AP reported that Gosnell sits serenely in the courtroom, undisturbed by the accusations.

He's not alone. ABC, CBS, and NBC piled up 96 stories on Todd Akin’s medically inept comments on rape and abortion, and also wallowed in outrage over Richard Mourdock’s remarks on God’s will and a child conceived in rape. Their pro-life rhetoric was sold as a major scandal. It’s unbelievable that Dr. Gosnell’s trial for his actions inside his “house of horrors” haven't drawn one network story.

Sincerely,

L. Brent Bozell III
Founder and President
Media Research Center
Katie

Auburn, WA

#291595 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
The pertinent part was that I lost a grandson and you guys consider him nothing more than a dead fetus. Two views on the same subject.
You didn't answer me at all what is the point of measuring only half a baby?
Are you seriously this obstinate? You shared personal info in an attempt to justify your PL stand while gaining sympathy when you seldom extend it.

Foo responded, half correct, that at 20wks a fetus was 6 inches. Measured crown to rump, this is correct. But you told her she was wrong because you gave measurements of crown to heel.

I showed you both were correct in your claims and you've continued to remain obstinate.

Last hand-held explanation for you from me because you won't appreciate it anyway. AND you'll still manage to claim I am somehow in error when I am not.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#291596 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
She doesn't understand the 'pertinent' part of the conversation. It was about whether the child was a 'human being' or as foo said just a dead fetus. s about placing value on human life. As I said before, people like gosnell are able to continue because he is doing what he was paid for, killing babies and no one was complaining if they were killed slightly after birth.
Technically, it is a dead fetus. To anyone outside the family circle, it is a dead fetus.

So when you attempt to use/exploit your daughter's or daughter-in-law's spontaneous abortion as an example of your POV that ALL fetuses are human beings when this is not technically correct, you will be corrected.

If you're going to be offended by it, then don't exploit somebody else's miscarriage.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Television Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Author/Actor Raymond E. Lumsden Gets Thumbs Up ... (Mar '09) 34 min Dustin R 1,864
News The Team from "The Case of Jon Benet" (Feb '17) 6 hr Tex- 4
News John Oliver blasts Trump on Charlottesville: 'D... 11 hr Mick 28
News Trump insists there's no chaos at White House 11 hr kopel khazar kings 47
News What to watch and listen to this weekend: JonBe... (Sep '16) 14 hr Tex- 3
News From JonBenet Ramsey's Murder to the Disappeara... 14 hr Tex- 6
News Why TV is obsessed with the JonBenet Ramsey mur... (Aug '16) 19 hr Tex- 11
More from around the web