Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313200 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#262682 Oct 8, 2012
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>She made her autonomous decision according to her personal ethics. Isn't that what we believe to be her right? She died, being true to herself. Dying isn't the worst thing to happen to a person, imo.
She IS (was) free to make her own choices. I in no way stopped her, or vilified her. I think it's a sad loss.
sassylicious

Jackson, NJ

#262683 Oct 8, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't really believe her story because a religious catholic woman would have no reason to die, according to Catholic doctrine.
I dont believe her story either.

I think that if this case did happen the woman still could choose to not end her childs.life(&#8734;if pre-viability and with NO alternative according to a Prolife Dr but to remove the uterus to save moms life). That's not an abortion. That is an indirect means to save mom with the unfortunate death of baby)

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#262684 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> IF indeed this is a true story then leave it to fooL to ONCE AGAIN exploit a woman.
She didnt tell about this poor womas tragic loss. She had an agenda to show her bigotry and her hypocrisy while using her and her "babys" death.
She is a monster.
IMO, I think Foo's post was one of grief induced anger. I don't think Foo was exploiting this but rather was venting her upset. The whole situation is indeed a tragic loss. A happy time gone seriously wrong. I feel sorry for all involved.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262685 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> In all honesty, we don't even have a story that is legit. Foo was.posting and SUDDENLY posts about this girl who died because she was a religious Catholic, then went on to continuing posting as if nothing happened.
Baby was late term. They didnt have to kill baby to save her. They couldve delivered that baby safe and saved mom too OR worst case completely remove the uterus and saved mom.
We'll never know now. She is gonna continue bullshitting now.
I just went to check and you're right. Within the same hour that she made that post, just prior she had been laughing and joking and mocking PLer's and THEN made that post beginning it with a "BTW". She began it with a [by the way], and supposedly it had just happened that afternoon.

In that same hour prior to that post she was posting things like,

"ROFLMAO! Lynne, you dont know shit about charting. Hell, I dont either, but I know YOU know less than the average idiot."

"Gee, you mean the records from when your pedphile BF "murdered" two of your "children" by punching them out of you? Or the "faulty sperm" death perhaps? Back in the 70's? THOSE records? The ones your "doctor" SHOULD have been giving to the police to have your pedophile BF arrested? Perhaps your parents too, you WERE a minor after all.....

ROFLMAO!!"

She made a few more posts trying to make ignorant claims about D&Cs and THEN wrote:

"Oh and BTW...
...My BIL's sister just died late this afternoon in Texas."

She was trying to prove me wrong in my claims about D&Cs and then throws this story in as though it was an afterthought, to try to attack pro-lifers, and once again uses Lynne's name instead of mine.

"Oh and BTW for all the ignorant bitches out there like YOU Lynne that like to claim that delivery of a non-viable baby is safer than abortion, you're wrong about that too.My BIL's sister just died late this afternoon in Texas..."

Supposedly happened yesterday afternoon, yet she tossed it in as an afterthought to her other attacks and ignorance about D&Cs yesterday.

She not only used that story as a "by the way" type of thing to attack and try to make a point, but she lied in her accusation.

I never claimed delivery of a non-viable fetus was safer than an LTA.

I have said that delivery of a VIABLE fetus was no more dangerous than an LTA, and when there's a chance to save the fetus and the mother, there's no reason for an LTA.

Katie

Graham, WA

#262686 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Women have abortions and at a later date (due heavy bleeding) will go to hospital. They get a D&C if a part of the baby has been left behind or some remenant of what you referrd to as 'conception'. According to you, she is pregnant?
Lala agrees with me that it's not.
No, according to me the aborted pregnancy isn't finished being aborted until all contents are expelled. Abortion = end to pregnancy before term. Imo, this is very elementary.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262687 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I didnt say that I am a grandma ;)
No, lol, I was talking about Lynne and that you said [she] was a grandmother.
sassylicious

Jackson, NJ

#262688 Oct 8, 2012
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink, pro-life doctors in the case of the 9 year old child all agreed that her uterus was going to burst. I think 4, if not 5, were involved in the consultation. They were (of course) ex-communicated as was the Mother of the pregnant child.
Not sure about the other situation, but "who" thought that a possibility existed to save both? Certainly not a medical professional - unless you know differently?
1. Nine year olds have given birth before(full term).

2. Perhaps going full term would result in a"burst" uterus and THAT is exactly WHY she couldve delivered at viability.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#262689 Oct 8, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
It is no different than suicide. She died feeling she was doing what was best.
As long as she wasn't coerced, it is really as it should be.
You're right, I just hate to see people die so unexpectedly and leave so many grieving people behind.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262690 Oct 8, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Why, she is not pro choice. She is only pointing out that PCers only respect the choice to abort and don't respect the choice to not abort regardless of the outcome. If the story is real, she didn't have to die.
Thank you. Proof that some here CAN read for comprehension and it's the pro-lifers.

"Why, she is not pro choice. She is only pointing out that PCers only respect the choice to abort and don't respect the choice to not abort regardless of the outcome. "
Katie

Graham, WA

#262691 Oct 8, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong.
Right!
<winks and grins>
sassylicious

Jackson, NJ

#262692 Oct 8, 2012
hmmm wrote:
<quoted text>Agree. Notice the stupid posts made from *Texas*, LOL, It was Foo . Foo's never been to Texas.
Notice she saidn"this woman and her baby" died? Suddenly this fetus is a "baby".

Meanwhile DAILY she fights us that the fetus is not a baby nor her child but now"it" is. She's a drama queen.LOL

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262693 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Many Drs will disagree that it is "necessary" to kill in order to save mom post viability.
I posted a link before that said, post viability; abortion is no less dangerous than delivery vaginally or c-section. That baby needs to be delivered anyway, dead or alive. Mothers who want their children will opt for their child to be delivered ALIVE.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262694 Oct 8, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
I know how to compare and contrast. And how to ask questions.
What about you? Can you do and say the same?
<quoted text>
The civil right to do so applies to individuals and those who hold durable power of attorney. So, all instances are comparable. Guess that answers one of the questions.
What part of she made her own choice to refuse an LTA makes you think that it's in any way comparable to someone else making a choice FOR her?
sassylicious

Jackson, NJ

#262695 Oct 8, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
No, lol, I was talking about Lynne and that you said [she] was a grandmother.
Oh. LOL

Yes, Lynne is a grandma.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262696 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Converastion has been active for MONTHS. You were in it from the beginning.
Interesting that when you found out that you were agreeing with me, you jumped out of it.
Whatever.
I have clearly moved on, don't remember, don't care, etc.

I have no problem with agreeing with you whatsoever, JM. You know that.

I truly don't even know what you are even referring to, as I've been scrolling by many, may posts and just picking here and there.

Please don't take it personally. It really is far from it, okay?
Kenose

Brooklyn, NY

#262697 Oct 8, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should I? I'm not the one claiming to be pro-CHOICE. You people are. My statement had to do with you people being hypocrites in the claims you're pro-choice.
So, you only care about choice and staying out of other peoples business when it's convenient for you. What a nice double standard you have.

“OUCH”

Since: Mar 07

Russell Springs, KY

#262699 Oct 8, 2012
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink, pro-life doctors in the case of the 9 year old child all agreed that her uterus was going to burst. I think 4, if not 5, were involved in the consultation. They were (of course) ex-communicated as was the Mother of the pregnant child.
Not sure about the other situation, but "who" thought that a possibility existed to save both? Certainly not a medical professional - unless you know differently?
While I read the article concerning this poor little girl,I didn't understand the church. I always thought the double effect would always come into play,especially that this was a child herself. Here's an article Age,I'm still confused.:(
http://www.pathsoflove.com/blog/2010/10/princ...

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262700 Oct 8, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Semantics Lil. Gender has nothing to do with ownership.
Gender has to do with it not being her body. You compared it to a kidney, which is a part of her body. A human life is not. it's just attached to her temporarily just because biologically, that's how babies are made.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#262701 Oct 8, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
But the pregnancy isn't over until the uterus is empty of all contents of conception. Period. From the loss of the embryo/fetus until uterus is bright, shiny, and ready to go again, it is all part of the abortion process. I posted an excellent link yesterday, but learned today it didn't post. I posted a follow-up to it, but that didn't post either. It did have Jill Stanek in it, using the same logic Triple L and you are, though. I think somebody in Topixland either wants you to remain ignorant or really believes in you. I pick the former. Bet you'll go for the latter.
I guess the fact that a woman can't get pregnant again with a dead fetus inside of her is no clue that the pregnancy doesn't end when the fetus is dead. The life ended, not the condition of being pregnant. That doesn't end until the fetus is removed. It's her Catholic upbringing I'm sure.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262702 Oct 8, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't really believe her story because a religious catholic woman would have no reason to die, according to Catholic doctrine.
I'm beginning to doubt her story as well, because of what Sassy had pointed out about Foo posting and laughing during the same time just before she made that post. Which this happening supposedly happened that very afternoon.

She used the post as an afterthought to make a different point from the topic she had been posting on which was D&Cs.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Television Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 4So, have Trump inauguration planners just give... 40 min Fcvk tRump 38
News DeGeneres says her show is no place for anti-ga... 3 hr Rainbow Kid 364
News Steve Harvey sorry for jokes about Asian men 6 hr Anon 7
News Sebastian Roche Talks About His Role in HBO's T... 8 hr ERIC 5
News Katherine Heigl announces birth of baby boy, Jo... 13 hr I Like Those 1
News Russian political elites revel in Trump's inaug... 18 hr Mikey 6
News Sources: KTVK drops 'Good Morning Arizona' pers... (Mar '09) 20 hr HotnPhx 1,091
More from around the web