Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310661 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

pupsilicious

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#256538 Sep 5, 2012
OLD LADY wrote:
<quoted text>
My sister-in-law think this year will be bad, especially food prices. So bad,she is frightened something will give,like chaos,among people all over the united states. I do hope she is wrong.
Foodbanks are running out of food already. I am afraid there will be riots and more breakins etc.

pupsilicious

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#256539 Sep 5, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> So, you are saying that a fully delivered baby is still technically fetus because it is still attached to the cord.
""" So long as you recognize it's still technically a fetus, without any guarantee of normal survival"""
What?
What?
I heard Obama used the term a born fetus.... Dang this world is getting evil . RealKatie is real evil.

“Rockabye”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#256540 Sep 5, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? Because your proof wasn't proof at all, that's why. We proved it wasn't proof, provided proof that you were wrong and you couldn't accept then like you can't accept now, that you're a deluded mental case.
Says you. Nah, all you did was prove you were confused and somehow tried to equate it with my stance on abortion. Not good.

I can accept when I'm wrong just fine. I love learning. Perpetual learners never know everything. It's those who think they know everything who have a hard time accepting they're wrong, imo.

“Rockabye”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#256541 Sep 5, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text>Foodbanks are running out of food already. I am afraid there will be riots and more breakins etc.
Yes, it's called Social Darwinism and encouraged by the Republican Party. It's classic irony what with the Republicans linking pockets and wallets with religious clergy.
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#256542 Sep 5, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Your parents were not pro-life "if" they "allowed" you to make up your own minds. Killing in my home is NEVER even considered,therefore,I would never even dream of thinking of accepting it for anyone,let alone my kids. Your parents are proaborts like the kids that they raised.
Sorry Pete,but I don't buy into that proabort line of reasoning. You sound like Chicky who claims that EVERYONE is prolife or those proaborts who support abortion but claim NEVER to want to have one ever. WHO CARES if you would never have one? If you support it as choice,that is evil enough.
You're unbelievable.

Do you have a taser that you unleash on your children when they dare to think for themselves?

“Rockabye”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#256543 Sep 5, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text> I heard Obama used the term a born fetus.... Dang this world is getting evil . RealKatie is real evil.
<jumps out atcha>
Ooga Booga!
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#256544 Sep 5, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text> I heard Obama used the term a born fetus.... Dang this world is getting evil . RealKatie is real evil.
The capacity for "evil" is equal within each one of us, but I'm sure you have a sky-high opinion of yourself, don't ya?

“Rockabye”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#256545 Sep 5, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> So, you are saying that a fully delivered baby is still technically fetus because it is still attached to the cord.
""" So long as you recognize it's still technically a fetus, without any guarantee of normal survival"""
What?
What?
No I'm NOT saying "...a fully delivered baby is still technically fetus because it is still attached to the cord."

Imo, if baby is fully delivered, the cord's been cut and baby's breathing (with or without assistance) on its own, not through the umbilical cord.

This conversation is over. If you have difficulties understanding, scroll back to last Spring and find the pertinent posts. So sorry they'll be found in other's replies only. That's the consequences of a wrongful banning. Thank yourselves for that one.
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#256546 Sep 5, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the role God gave us.
You make the claim, now back it up with evidence.

Until then, you're just talking out of your behind.
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#256547 Sep 5, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I glossed over what post?
This one made today!
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text> No one who is pro life would support roe v wade.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#256548 Sep 5, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
You make the claim, now back it up with evidence.
Until then, you're just talking out of your behind.
Sure Genesis 1:28

And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#256549 Sep 5, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I glossed over what post?
Apparently a non-existant one.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#256550 Sep 5, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
This one made today!
<quoted text>
Not with their heart and soul but if it meant that it would prevent the death of a woman, most pro life people would support legal abortion. She may not feel that way. What's your point?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#256551 Sep 5, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently a non-existant one.
Oh, you're back. Are you going to ignore the fact that I gave you the post number, AND the links that prove what I said?
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#256552 Sep 5, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth.
That was quite amusing. Surely, you must be joking.

A quote from an uncited, unreferenced, 2000 year old book written by unknown authors is certainly not evidence and you know this.

Get back to me when you can truly provide evidence for "Gods plan".

Kenose

Westbury, NY

#256553 Sep 5, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Not with their heart and soul but if it meant that it would prevent the death of a woman, most pro life people would support legal abortion. She may not feel that way. What's your point?
You missed it. You can't even keep up with the topic of conversation. You're too dense to grasp anything beyond your narrow minded point of view.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#256554 Sep 5, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
That was quite amusing. Surely, you must be joking.
A quote from an uncited, unreferenced, 2000 year old book written by unknown authors is certainly not evidence and you know this.
Get back to me when you can truly provide evidence for "Gods plan".
Right after you provide evidence for God.
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#256555 Sep 5, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Right after you provide evidence for God.
You can go play games with yourself, instead.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#256556 Sep 5, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Lily check these links out for starters. Very important.
http://liveaction.org/blog/abortion-to-save-t...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =4Kf16qExpZQXX&autoplay=1
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/...
Think of Andrea Bocelli and Tim Tebows moms too.
On the first link, it states this as the modern Hippocratic Oath, "The modern Hippocratic Oath reads:“Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given to me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.”

Also states on the link what we've been stating as well, "In the case where the doctor knows without a doubt that is reasonable that the baby will not survive on its own, my opinion is that if she has to perform an operation to save the mother’s life that results in the death of the baby, it is a tragedy for which she is not morally responsible. Facing it with “great humbleness and awareness of her own frailty,” she knows she will not be able to save everyone’s life. In the case, for example, of a first trimester baby whose mom has uterine cancer that is spreading rapidly, the baby must be removed knowing he will not survive outside the womb. This saves the mother’s life and is consistently pro-life because the purpose of the surgery was not to kill the baby, but to save the mother."

True also, "Pro-choicers, with more often than not the agenda to stump the pro-lifer, might argue,“Why save the mother’s life, then? How do you decide which life to save, the baby’s or the mother’s?” In realistic terms it is not an either/or situation. Most commonly, it is the mother who can be saved and the baby would die anyway. On extremely rare occasions in later stages of pregnancy, the mother cannot be saved but the baby can. The moral doctor will save whoever she can. With that in mind, I want to clarify that operations to save the mother’s life are different than performing an abortion because it is convenient for the mother. "

Fetal abnormalities have always been something that should be left to nature, in my opinion, and not up to someone "playing god", for lack of a better term.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#256557 Sep 5, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just not workable. They still get around viability. Tiller did with signed form letters indicating continuing the pregnancy could affect her health. Evidently most of the women had the same health issues, Pregnancy.
The point I'm making, Ink, is that despite that some will go the illegal route and do what they know is illegal, that doesn't mean that we should allow something to be or remain legal for that reason. Otherwise, why have any laws at all?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Television Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Cruz embraces supporters on fringe of GOP 1 hr Belles Echoes 92
News Why the female generational divide for Clinton? 2 hr Cordwainer Trout 5
News Fox News Drags Out John Bolton To 'Explain' Sai... 3 hr Ritual Habitual 2
News Judge Jeanine DESTROYS Obama During Explosive R... 4 hr Ritual Habitual 1
News Tim Allen: The Clintons 'are like herpes' 5 hr WasteWater 90
News Major TV cast reunion coming to Texas comic con 7 hr JANICE LYNN 1
News Clinton satisfies sweet tooth at Dunkin' Donuts 12 hr Ritual Habitual 3
More from around the web