Christanity vs. Dinosaurs & pehistori...
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Since: Jun 11

Lifelong conservative Arizonan

#42 Dec 13, 2011
davy wrote:
The bible is a handbook for retards.
Actually, retards are always attacking the Bible and Christians.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#43 Dec 13, 2011
Let me guess, evolution doesn't seem as scientific to you as a story about a talking snake.
Colt Cassidy wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, retards are always attacking the Bible and Christians.

Since: Jun 11

Lifelong conservative Arizonan

#44 Dec 14, 2011
davy wrote:
Let me guess, evolution doesn't seem as scientific to you as a story about a talking snake.
<quoted text>
If God created it, its believable - and its not a "story".

If the only way you can believe anything is by science, then why do you believe in a theory? If you prefer to believe that you came from slime and apes, go for it, but that's not science - that is and always has been theory.

You want science only? Then get away from your theories and prove that the Bible is totally wrong. The burden of proof is on the unbeliever - not the believer. Science has proven incredible amounts of Biblical "stories" as being factual.

You're obviously more against the idea of God, because God doesn't want people to be the "slime"balls they prefer to be.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#45 Dec 14, 2011
Religion kills brains dead. Why don't you try reading about the scientific method so you can at least understand what a "theory" is. It isn't what you think. The bible isn't true, it's a handbook for the retarded. If the burden of proof is on the non-believer, can you prove unicorns don't exist? Dumbass christian.
Colt Cassidy wrote:
<quoted text>
If God created it, its believable - and its not a "story".
If the only way you can believe anything is by science, then why do you believe in a theory? If you prefer to believe that you came from slime and apes, go for it, but that's not science - that is and always has been theory.
You want science only? Then get away from your theories and prove that the Bible is totally wrong. The burden of proof is on the unbeliever - not the believer. Science has proven incredible amounts of Biblical "stories" as being factual.
You're obviously more against the idea of God, because God doesn't want people to be the "slime"balls they prefer to be.

Since: Jun 11

Lifelong conservative Arizonan

#46 Dec 14, 2011
davy wrote:
Religion kills brains dead. Why don't you try reading about the scientific method so you can at least understand what a "theory" is. It isn't what you think. The bible isn't true, it's a handbook for the retarded. If the burden of proof is on the non-believer, can you prove unicorns don't exist? Dumbass christian.
<quoted text>
Thanks for proving us all right! You're a candidate for the Darwin Award! Now, go play with your monkey - you and the chimps have plenty in commom!
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#47 Dec 14, 2011
Why do crazy christian republicunts hate freedom so much? Why do they want welfare money to pimp their religious delusions?
Dino sore

United States

#48 Dec 24, 2011
davy wrote:
Let me guess, evolution doesn't seem as scientific to you as a story about a talking snake.
<quoted text>
Snakes don't talk nitwit but Satan does and guess what? Beguiled by a snake does not mean that you eat an apple either. never mind...this message is not meant for anyone other than the elect. The rest will just have to take what is given them.
the record straight

Los Angeles, CA

#50 Jan 21, 2012
Don Prince wrote:
Easy answer, the story of Jesus, like the Genesis creation story, is one of the biggest frauds perpetrated in human society since the dawn of man (by which we mean the point at which the human species evolved from Homo ancestors).
There's no reconciliation needed, and none to be made. Jesus, in terms of the supernatural stuff, didn't happen, the dinosaurs did arise and go extinct millions of years ago. Both conclusions follow from the facts, as we have them. End of story and have a great day.
There is plenty of evidence that proves outright that men and dinosaurs lived together. And there was never a gap between them. Dinosaur and human, side by side footprints are the most well known but in middle age Europe there was rewards given to those who killed dinosaurs because they a dangerous problem in some areas. Ancient south American cultures had VERY well preserved sculptures of dinosaurs on some of their temples. Many ancient cultures have Dino drawings and paintings . Not vague depictions but very clear depictions portraying specific groups like tricerotops, trex etc. MANY ancient writings and mideival writings from all over the world describe in detail various types of dinos.

This is well documented but those who are in positions of power in educational institutions have went out of their way to exclude all the facts in order to make evolution seem more believable. The only way u can make evolution seem believable is by censor facts.
the record straight

Los Angeles, CA

#53 Jan 21, 2012
lionkingbenson wrote:
...to carry on from my first message:
In Job’s narrative behemoth is described as a grass-eater that is very strong, with great muscles (vv. 15-16). He moves his tail like a cedar tree (v. 17). Even Frances Anderson, who identifies this creature as a hippo, admits:“It is hard to see how his tail can be compared to a cedar, for the tail of the hippopotamus is small and short”(1976, 276). Behemoth’s skeleton is like a massive framework of brass and iron (v. 18). He is “chief”(i.e., first in size, might) of the works (creatures) of God; so huge, in fact, that only his Maker dare approach him with the sword (v. 19).
Though the hippo weighs about four tons, some dinosaurs weighed thirty tons! Behemoth is so powerful that no man is able to capture him (v. 24). This descriptive can hardly apply to the hippopotamus for Egyptian monuments frequently picture warriors attacking the hippo single-handed. The vegetation of whole mountains is said to supply this behemoth’s food, yet the hippopotamus eats only about two hundred pounds of herbage daily, and he stays near the water.
One is almost forced to conclude that no creature on earth today fits the detailed description of behemoth in Job 40.
Modern Evidence
There is a growing body of evidence that dinosaurs and humans were contemporary. In 1970 newspapers reported the discovery of cave paintings in Zimbabwe. The paintings were made by bushmen who ruled that area from about 1500 B.C., until a couple of hundred years ago. Along with accurate representations of the elephant and the giraffe, is a painting of an Apatosaurus (brontosaurus). These art works have greatly puzzled scientists since bushmen are known to have painted from real life!(Bible-Science Newsletter 1970, 2).
About seventy years ago, Dr. Samuel Hubbard, curator of archaeology in the Oakland (California) Museum, discovered dinosaur carvings on the cliff walls of the Hava Supai Canyon in Arizona. One remarkable carving resembles a Tyrannosaurus. Nearby, dinosaur tracks were preserved in the rock surface.(For a picture of this carving, see our book, The Mythology of Modern Geology 1990, 31.)
What about the Paluxy Tracks?
When the discovery of what appeared to be human footprints, along with dinosaur tracks (in the Paluxy River bed near Glen Rose, Texas), was reported in the May 1939 issue of Natural History, it created a furor that has not subsided to this very day. For decades it seemed obvious to careful observers that this was clear evidence of human/dinosaur co-habitation.
<quoted text>
In God's description of behemoth He starts by saying, "behold now Behemoth which I made with you..." Job is very possibly the oldest book in The Bible yet God clearly addresses evolution , thousands of years ahead of time, by stating that he made behemoth " with you " either referring to the fact that job lived when this creature walked the earth or that mankind was created on the same day as the dinosaurs, on the 6th day of creation, as Genesis states. Both are true.
Reasonable and smart

Gig Harbor, WA

#54 Aug 30, 2012
curious and seaking wrote:
<quoted text>
In my search for some answers that I would like to know in order to make a conscience decision about religion, I have found that as we know Dinasaurs did exist, their remains are there for all to see but they are mentioned in the Bible numerous times by various writers and their existance does not conflict with biblical teaching at all.
Also there has never been a cross-over type of species of any kind from any ape-like creature ever. A question that I would like evolutionists to answer is; "Where is this sect of "cross-overs" located now"?...Why all of a sudden did these apes stop "crossing-over"? And if they are located somewhere, I would like to find out why we are still not evolving into something greater than man? Sorry for the silliness there, but obviously we didn't evolve, but we came from somewhere.
The "Big Bang Theory" is no longer accepted by science...so where? That is why I am looking to a greater power or religion.
It takes 1000s of years to evolve and ape/human crossovers never " stopped" being discovered and the big bang is still widely accepted by the way. Oh and how come people like you seem to think dinosaurs are anything like fire breathing winged lizards? Stop lying to yourself
Reasonable and smart

Gig Harbor, WA

#55 Aug 30, 2012
Colt Cassidy wrote:
<quoted text>
If God created it, its believable - and its not a "story".
If the only way you can believe anything is by science, then why do you believe in a theory? If you prefer to believe that you came from slime and apes, go for it, but that's not science - that is and always has been theory.
You want science only? Then get away from your theories and prove that the Bible is totally wrong. The burden of proof is on the unbeliever - not the believer. Science has proven incredible amounts of Biblical "stories" as being factual.
You're obviously more against the idea of God, because God doesn't want people to be the "slime"balls they prefer to be.
First of all let's review the first sentence... We can't believe in what god created if we know god didn't exist. Perhaps science has proven some biblical stories true but the vast majority is random nonsense with no proof or common sense to back it up.
blacknwhite

Indianapolis, IN

#56 Jan 2, 2013
As far as prehistoric man is not a fable virtually every credible scientist won't even ague this or debate it because of how long its been a proven fact ..just like the earth is round. And the earth took trillions of years to create and its age are just as long ..however as a Christian just BC these facts aren't worth debate in the 20 century. It need not be at odds. But know this these things are factual despite people so afraid it is. ....

Since: Sep 12

Tucson, AZ

#57 Jan 2, 2013
the record straight wrote:
<quoted text>
There is plenty of evidence that proves outright that men and dinosaurs lived together. And there was never a gap between them. Dinosaur and human, side by side footprints are the most well known but in middle age Europe there was rewards given to those who killed dinosaurs because they a dangerous problem in some areas.
I have researched this because it seemed outrageous to me, and found that this is merely fantastical supposition from religious affiliated organizations. It is not in any way supported by any scientific community. Putting forward outrageous evidence is only effective if there is unbiased support from those who do believe in the Christian versions of history and those who do not. Currently, there are no non-religious based organizations that support these claims.

Since: Sep 12

Tucson, AZ

#58 Jan 2, 2013
Why do so many people believe the Bible is a factual history of the world? Let's see. The Bible has been translated into over 450 languages (There are over 100 translations into the English language alone). Some versions of the Bible have more or less chapters than others, and contain different information than others. There comes a time when a person must accept the fact that the modern Bible is not the same one that existed when it was originally written. It has been altered, rewritten, and picked apart and put back together by so many people that to take everything in it as absolute fact is naive at best. In the Middle Ages, for example, the Bibles that came out of those times were written by illiterate artist monks who simply copied the letters as they saw them. Many of them had no idea what it said. Many of those Bibles contain massive errors and inconsistencies. How can one defend these books as gospel when there are many passages that cannot be translated because they make no sense? The words are created out of letters that did not exist. The words were misspelled, the sentences inverted and mangled.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Tucson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News arizona 360 12 hr misleading troll 2
News Border Patrol testing drones to be its 'eyes in... 14 hr Paul Syntor 1
News The Air Force has deployed one of its few elect... Jan 17 Marsha Carol Wats... 1
News Do policy makers care that people are dying on ... (Apr '16) Jan 15 Paul Syntor 5
News Cop Knocks Down 86-Year-Old Protester (Mar '17) Jan 15 Paul Syntor 2
Arizona School teachers less stress from noncit... Jan 15 Paul Syntor 1
News GOP Rep. Martha McSally calls on Republicans to... Jan 15 Bloondonhishands 3

Tucson Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Tucson Mortgages