Kissinger to present elder Bush with ...

Kissinger to present elder Bush with award in Berlin

There are 3 comments on the The Straits Times story from Jul 3, 2008, titled Kissinger to present elder Bush with award in Berlin. In it, The Straits Times reports that:

MR Henry Kissinger will honor former US President George H.W. Bush on Thursday for his commitment to Germany amid the fall of the Berlin Wall and reunification.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Straits Times.

“...a river of conscience ...”

Since: Oct 07


#1 Jul 3, 2008
The relationship George Bush had with Germany pales into nothingness compared to the one his father Prescott Bush had. Much of this is shrouded in secracy, however there are certain indicators that suggest the Bush clan has certain debts of honour to pay back to both the German and the Jews based on possible actions by Prescott Bush.

The Following is an extremely interesting article and is well worth reading in its entirety.

“...a river of conscience ...”

Since: Oct 07


#2 Jul 3, 2008
One part of it really opened my eyes.

I always wondered why death facilities like Auschwitz were never bombed especially after accurate eye-witness reports by Jan Karski, the Polish underground chief emissary reported that the Jews were being exterminated in what was German occupied Poland.

Read this fragment:

<<Kurt Julius Goldstein, 87, and Peter Gingold, 85, began a class action in America in 2001, but the case was thrown out by Judge Rosemary Collier on the grounds that the government cannot be held liable under the principle of "state sovereignty".

Jan Lissmann, one of the lawyers for the survivors, said: "President Bush withdrew President Bill Clinton's signature from the treaty [that founded the court] not only to protect Americans, but also to protect himself and his family."

Lissmann argues that genocide-related cases are covered by international law, which does hold governments accountable for their actions. He claims the ruling was invalid as no hearing took place.

In their claims, Mr Goldstein and Mr Gingold, honorary chairman of the League of Anti-fascists, suggest the Americans were aware of what was happening at Auschwitz and should have bombed the camp.

The lawyers also filed a motion in The Hague asking for an opinion on whether state sovereignty is a valid reason for refusing to hear their case. A ruling is expected within a month.

The petition to The Hague states: "From April 1944 on, the American Air Force could have destroyed the camp with air raids, as well as the railway bridges and railway lines from Hungary to Auschwitz. The murder of about 400,000 Hungarian Holocaust victims could have been prevented."

The case is built around a January 22 1944 executive order signed by President Franklin Roosevelt calling on the government to take all measures to rescue the European Jews. The lawyers claim the order was ignored because of pressure brought by a group of big American companies, including BBH, where Prescott Bush was a director.

Lissmann said: "If we have a positive ruling from the court it will cause [president] Bush huge problems and make him personally liable to pay compensation." >>

“...a river of conscience ...”

Since: Oct 07


#3 Jul 3, 2008

<<The most tantalising part of the story remains shrouded in mystery: the connection, if any, between Prescott Bush, Thyssen, Consolidated Silesian Steel Company (CSSC) and Auschwitz.

Thyssen's partner in United Steel Works, which had coal mines and steel plants across the region, was Friedrich Flick, another steel magnate who also owned part of IG Farben, the powerful German chemical company.

Flick's plants in Poland made heavy use of slave labour from the concentration camps in Poland. According to a New York Times article published in March 18 1934 Flick owned two-thirds of CSSC while "American interests" held the rest.

The US National Archive documents show that BBH's involvement with CSSC was more than simply holding the shares in the mid-1930s. Bush's friend and fellow "bonesman" Knight Woolley, another partner at BBH, wrote to Averill Harriman in January 1933 warning of problems with CSSC after the Poles started their drive to nationalise the plant. "The Consolidated Silesian Steel Company situation has become increasingly complicated, and I have accordingly brought in Sullivan and Cromwell, in order to be sure that our interests are protected," wrote Knight. "After studying the situation Foster Dulles is insisting that their man in Berlin get into the picture and obtain the information which the directors here should have. You will recall that Foster is a director and he is particularly anxious to be certain that there is no liability attaching to the American directors."

But the ownership of the CSSC between 1939 when the Germans invaded Poland and 1942 when the US government vested UBC and SAC is not clear.

"SAC held coal mines and definitely owned CSSC between 1934 and 1935, but when SAC was vested there was no trace of CSSC. All concrete evidence of its ownership disappears after 1935 and there are only a few traces in 1938 and 1939," says Eva Schweitzer, the journalist and author whose book, America and the Holocaust, is published next month.

Silesia was quickly made part of the German Reich after the invasion, but while Polish factories were seized by the Nazis, those belonging to the still neutral Americans (and some other nationals) were treated more carefully as Hitler was still hoping to persuade the US to at least sit out the war as a neutral country. Schweitzer says American interests were dealt with on a case-by-case basis. The Nazis bought some out, but not others.

The two Holocaust survivors suing the US government and the Bush family for a total of $40bn in compensation claim both materially benefited from Auschwitz slave labour during the second world war. >>

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Berlin, Germany Travel Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Eastern Europe moves ahead despite looming thre... (Dec '14) Dec '14 HalKW 4
News The Taxes Hitting Hotels Across the World - Nex... (Dec '13) Dec '13 Aj dont know 1
News Germany on the Radar for International Hotel In... (Mar '13) Mar '13 MrCurious 2
News The Hoff joins Berlin Wall campaign (Mar '13) Mar '13 Alexis 1
News Appreciating the eclectic David Bowie (Mar '13) Mar '13 tigger31086 1
News London Hotels Have Been Given the Lowest Collec... (Sep '11) Jan '13 jamesonridley 4
News Germany Takes Tough Stance on Russia (Nov '12) Nov '12 Reich 106
More from around the web