Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 670211 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#551464 Jul 25, 2014
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
There you are lying again....the web site you gave is not Merriam-Webster....in the definition you gave from their web site, the following is a requirement for being guilty of such:"pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own"..
I have never ever presented info from anyone's web site as my own...and you can't show me where I ever did...I am not university educated...but I are not stupid....that sort of lie could be proven in a second...

Chess he say:
Websters:

plagiarize .... to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source....

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pla ...

Reference.com :

plagiarism ..... an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author: Synonyms:... theft ... passing off.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagia ...

You're a thief, thief.

Ah say:
Per your post:to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own ..

Not guilty...never happened...
----------

Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
A other example:
An academic is expected to publish papers but he doesn't have time to research because of family obligations. He looks through old professional journals in another country and he copies a 10-year-old article from someone else in the field. He submits the article as his own and hopes that no one finds the article from which he copied.
Never happened...not guilty

Chess he say:
Claimed the thief, as he plagiarized one of "some examples" of plagiarism from here:

http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-o ...

Mah reply:
Example:
A student is expected to write a book report about a book that his teacher has assigned. The student doesn't want to read the book and is bored with the subject. He visits websites that provide reviews and book reports and he copies from each of the different book reports to create one report of his own.

Never happened...not guilty
----------
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
If ever you get your foot out of your mouth....answer my post:
Their fathers abandoned them.
Give me the names of "their"...
You can't idiot.....that is why I said I had no idea who you were referring to when you referred to "their" in your post...now eat you idiotic words...quote: Of course you don't,'tard.

Chess:
Their is the possessive form of they, dummy. You claimed "they" -- the four statutory prongs of the fair use test -- make the determination. They don't. We do by applying the statutory prongs as well as other considerations to the facts at hand. And when a copyright owner and someone who uses the copyrighted material disagree about whether a use is fair, a judge may ultimately have to make the determination.

'Tard.

Mah response:
Their: belonging to or associated in some way with people in general not including the speaker or people addressed: in many countries they wash their clothes in the river.

I did not use the word "their"....you did....give me the names of these people....
Michael

Hamilton, Canada

#551465 Jul 25, 2014
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Most of the ministers on this forum are fakes, who have apparently received a perishable seed.
.....You post there are fake ministers on this forum. Why don't you name them?

.
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551466 Jul 25, 2014
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus speaks of the "Churches" in Revelation. Nothing about a universal church and nothing about Peter's church.
Keep in mind that there were other churches in Asia but these seven were singled out.

WHY???

Each of these churches had its strong points and weak points.

Didn't Jesus evaluated each of the seven churches to assess their preparedness???

Of course, He did.....

Isn't God active in His church???

Didn't God write to each of the seven churches,“I know your deeds???”

The universal church is comprised of saved <<<INDIVIDUALS> >> who are in fellowship with God.

In which there is no organization on earth.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#551467 Jul 25, 2014
StarC wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi June gloom,
No one said the Jewish faith was "vile and sinful" June bug.
Those are ur words.:(
FYI - Jesus was born PURE!
But.....Thank u June, for calling me holy!
:)
are you roman-vatican/babylonian/of-th e-world?

if so, you are NOT 'holy', but "you must be born again"!
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551468 Jul 25, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
"Jesus Church was built on the truth about the divine "person ", Jesus Christ".
I mean come on, That's true too. But it does not remove the new name of Simon nor the keys Jesus clearly gave him. Every description Protestantism gives the Christian Church is true. But its ALSO a Davidic Kingdom.... a hierarchy of Bishops who were charged with the task of bringing the Gospel to every decade. You couldn't be in this Church if you were some guy reading the scriptures by yourself preaching your interpretations. Peter and the fellas would have rebuked you. And so would their immediate successors.
You are too funny, Clay....

The church that Jesus built has no human foundation.....it is all spiritual......

Study the Transfiguration.

Jesus had gone up on the mountain with Peter, James and John, and revealed himself in His glory to them.

Moses and Elijah appeared to speak with Him -- what did Peter say?

“Lord, it is good for us to be here:~~~if thou wilt,~~~ let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.”

If there EVER were any MEN worthy of having a church named after them, it would have been Moses and Elijah, period.

But what did God say???

God said,“This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; HEAR ye him.”

God doesn't say Hear Moses or Hear Elijah or Hear Peter......

Peter’s confession that Jesus is the Son of the Living God is a REVELATION.....

What is the Transfiguration???

It is a CONFIRMATION that the basis of the Jesus' church that Jesus built is the TRUTH that 'Christ is the Son of God.'

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#551469 Jul 25, 2014
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
I like you, have a few family members who are catholic. Also some very good friend. They never promote their religion as the only true church.
It's almost hard to believe that Catholics here say we must be Catholic to be saved.
IMO, they are saying Christ's blood was not enough, we must be Catholic. If that's the way Catholic thinking is going, they'll end up the largest cult in the world.
Christ was beaten to a pulp, scourged, beard plucked, spit on, place on a cross with nails driven through His hands and feet until He slowly suffocated to death and that wasn't enough, you have to be Catholic.
That last paragraph shouts the message .

It's only HIS,DEATH AND RESURRECTION.....that washed away Sin ..our part is to believe in CHRIST as Saviour...repent our Sins ...and follow,Him, but ONLY HIS WORK counts to meet God's perfect justice ....no more temple sacrifices. No more lambs..Good works, penance, even Baptism which we should receive, if done with love of Christ are good things, but not one thing we do pays for sin ....including joining any Church ...we are not equipped , we are imperfect ....only HIS BLOOD is the cloak we can wear in our standing before God ...

He wants OUR LOVE ,HE SAID SO .....we should repent of sin..HIS SUFFERING AND DEATH saved us ....

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#551470 Jul 25, 2014
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
That last paragraph shouts the message .
It's only HIS,DEATH AND RESURRECTION.....that washed away Sin ..our part is to believe in CHRIST as Saviour...repent our Sins ...and follow,Him, but ONLY HIS WORK counts to meet God's perfect justice ....no more temple sacrifices. No more lambs..Good works, penance, even Baptism which we should receive, if done with love of Christ are good things, but not one thing we do pays for sin ....including joining any Church ...we are not equipped , we are imperfect ....only HIS BLOOD is the cloak we can wear in our standing before God ...
He wants OUR LOVE ,HE SAID SO .....we should repent of sin..HIS SUFFERING AND DEATH saved us ....
....and without the death and resurrection, Christianity wouldn't be existing.

Thus, one must think on the message that was being stated prior to this moment.

"Life" - "Love" - "Peace"

No religion required in order to achieve these commands.
Liam

Detroit, MI

#551471 Jul 25, 2014
Larry wrote:
Differences between the New World Translation and other translations.
Missing books. In their Bibles, the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches include books known by some as the Apocrypha. However, those books were not accepted into the Jewish canon, and it is noteworthy that the Bible says that the Jews were the ones who were “entrusted with the sacred pronouncements of God.”(Romans 3:1, 2) Thus, the New World Translation and many other modern Bible translations rightly exclude the books of the Apocrypha.
http://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/n ...
All originated after the cessation of prophecy, and they cannot therefore be regarded as inspired, nor are they ever cited by Christ or the apostles.
Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches include books known by some as the Apocrypha. http://www.bible.ca/catholic-apocrypha.htm
Your wrong. The Jews semi established a canon, but that didnt come before Christianity. To this da, not all Jewish sects have the same books. If you don't believe me, call a Jewish Rabbi and ask him.
This truth causes Protestanism to come crumbling down. You all removed 7 Books. Periodm
Liam

Detroit, MI

#551472 Jul 25, 2014
Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
What is the foundation of the church that Jesus built?
Peter confesses that Jesus is “the Christ, the son of the living God”
Jesus responds by saying,“And I say also unto thee,(you) That thou (you) art Peter, and upon this rock (confession) I will build my church
Built upon Peter’s confession
Does Jesus want us to confess Him before men, Clay???
Isn't that what Peter was doing???
"Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before my Father who is in heaven."
Shouldn't we be glad that Peter did the right thing by confessing Christ before men???
"For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed when he comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels."
Jesus Christ was well pleased with Peter's confession and He will be with ours also.
What your saying is true, but it doesnt change what happened, it coexists with it. Jesus gave Peter a prime minister type role. Men in 2014 A.D can study Bible verses all they want, it doesn't undo what took place in the first 1500 yrs of Christianity. Read your Bible Hank......did Jesus Christ start a book or a Church?
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551473 Jul 25, 2014
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>she ISNT spiritual, therefore she will not understand nor accept what she is told by Ministers on this Forum.
{eternal life} is the Promise that Jesus has made to us, but until we die, we don't receive that [eternal life].
Correct, Preston!
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#551474 Jul 25, 2014
Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
God HATES sin......
Sin CANNOT enter into heaven......
We MUST think spiritual with our mind, heart, and soul......
We MUST die to sin......
How can we accomplish this???
We MUST be baptized into the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ.......
Why is this so important and necessary???
Think about it!
What are you talking about? I never said anything different.
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551475 Jul 25, 2014
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that you Hank? What are you doing in San Fran?
YEP! It's me.....

I am not in San Fran......what a mix up!!!
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#551476 Jul 25, 2014
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
NOT the case at all!....It is you bible only's that have been " making things up" for over 450 years since the reformation and "continue to do so:::
1. Bible only Protestants "threw out 7 books of the original bible that was originated in 397AD
2. Bible Only Protestants have "I changed and invented their own "fictitious version" of over 2000 years of Church History
3. Bible Only Protestants have "conjured up" over 42,000 contradicting (hodge podge) inconsistent interpretations of the bible
4. Bible Only's have distortted, manipulated and lblantantly lied about the TRUTH regarding what the Catholic Church actually believes and teaches in its biblical and historical doctrinal Truths in it TRUE Gospel teachings commitment to Jesus Christ and His TRUE Church...@
Are you saying my Bible is not the Words of God and Christ, or that it cannot be understood unless you're catholic?
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#551477 Jul 25, 2014
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, either one receives Jesus as their Savior or one does not.
You so called believers here should preach Truth but you do not because you have yet to receive Eternal Life, because you don't believe God, that HE offers you this GIFT of eternal life through Jesus.
I believe God and Christ. Why would you tell people they cannot be saved by the blood of Christ?
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#551478 Jul 25, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus spoke Aramaic.
You're very good at limiting the Messiah.
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#551479 Jul 25, 2014
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
That last paragraph shouts the message .
It's only HIS,DEATH AND RESURRECTION.....that washed away Sin ..our part is to believe in CHRIST as Saviour...repent our Sins ...and follow,Him, but ONLY HIS WORK counts to meet God's perfect justice ....no more temple sacrifices. No more lambs..Good works, penance, even Baptism which we should receive, if done with love of Christ are good things, but not one thing we do pays for sin ....including joining any Church ...we are not equipped , we are imperfect ....only HIS BLOOD is the cloak we can wear in our standing before God ...
He wants OUR LOVE ,HE SAID SO .....we should repent of sin..HIS SUFFERING AND DEATH saved us ....
IMO, to say that Christ's blood is not enough to save those who believe in Him, is not of God or Christ.
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551480 Jul 25, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
What your saying is true, but it doesnt change what happened, it coexists with it. Jesus gave Peter a prime minister type role. Men in 2014 A.D can study Bible verses all they want, it doesn't undo what took place in the first 1500 yrs of Christianity. Read your Bible Hank......did Jesus Christ start a book or a Church?
Sounds like you don't believe Peter's confession, Clay.......

"Simon Peter answered and said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus answered and said to him, Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven."

For flesh and blood has NOT revealed (in other words a mere MAN) this to you......

BUT MY FATHER WHO IS IN HEAVEN.....

If you don't believe Peter's confession then how can you believe God and His Word (MY FATHER WHO IS IN HEAVEN???)

That if thou shalt confess with my mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

Isn’t it interesting that the same confession that cost Jesus His life brings man eternal life???

Why was Peter's confession necessary???
marge

Leesburg, GA

#551481 Jul 25, 2014
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
IMO, to say that Christ's blood is not enough to save those who believe in Him, is not of God or Christ.
Exactly.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#551482 Jul 25, 2014
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
IMO, to say that Christ's blood is not enough to save those who believe in Him, is not of God or Christ.
Amen

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#551483 Jul 25, 2014
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying my Bible is not the Words of God and Christ, or that it cannot be understood unless you're catholic?
Hojo will not say such.....but I will.

The Bible is not the "word of God" nor is it of Jesus, but of men who wrote about these beings decades later.

None of the Bible has been legitimately proven to be written by the men that are attributed to in those texts.

The Bible also only contains a portion of what Jesus taught, so again, belief in a portion of a person is really a signifies for more research.

What other information would you like to know?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Rider on the Storm 99,850
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 9 min bad bob 184,265
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 56 min Rider on the Storm 980,047
the new gay skype 1 hr thedarkone40 3
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr ChromiuMan 6,135
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr Evanka Dump 286,442
Wife is gonna experience another man Sunday. 11 hr The Guy 1
More from around the web