Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 703573 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#535267 May 6, 2014
I suggest that every group that started a new religion were certain they could do better than those in the previous religions to in turn create a world that would be far more "pleasing to GOD."

The result was murdering those who they were certain OFFENDED "God."

IDIOTS!!!
Dust Storm

Minneapolis, MN

#535268 May 6, 2014
Regina wrote:
<quoted text>
The UN also said that denying women abortions is considered torture. I wouldn't put much store in anything the UN says anymore.
The UN also has a deplorable record of abuse by diplomats and coutnries who do nothing about child trafficking. But as has been noted many times their credibility is lacking severely. I propose the contrinters let the UN tell them what faith and morals they must embrace and abide by as this should be no problem for them. lol

1 Corinthians 7
10 To the married, however, I give this instruction (not I, but the Lord): 7 a wife should not separate from her husband
11 --and if she does separate she must either remain single or become reconciled to her husband--and a husband should not divorce his wife.
12 To the rest 8 I say (not the Lord): if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she is willing to go on living with him, he should not divorce her;
13 and if any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he is willing to go on living with her, she should not divorce her husband.
14 For the unbelieving husband is made holy through his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy through the brother. Otherwise your children would be unclean, whereas in fact they are holy.
15 If the unbeliever separates, 9 however, let him separate. The brother or sister is not bound in such cases; God has called you to peace.

"Now that the Scripture counsels marriage, and allows no release
from the union, is expressly contained in the law,'Thou shalt not
put away thy wife, except for the cause of porneia;' and it
regards as porneia, the marriage of those separated while the
other is alive....'He that taketh a woman that has been put away,' it is said,'committeth adultery; and if one puts away his wife, he makes her an adulteress,' that is, compels her to commit adultery. And not only is he who puts her away guilty of this, but he who takes her, by giving to the woman the opportunity of sinning; for did he not take her, she would return to her husband."
Clement of Alexandria,Stromata,2:24(A.D. 202),in ANF,II:379

http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php...

I believe it was St Thomas Moore who was beheaded for refusing to Grant King Henry a divorce. It is admitted by Orthodox depends on the priest who invokes economia, but it is a fact that the Orthodox did not allow any divorce up to the 9th century. You may not call it an annulment but the Orthodox do in fact grant them in not recognizing certain marriages and would not recognize someone in the Catholic Church as having been validly married. The church quite often loses members due the fact that a priest finds grounds not to perform a marriage even if its their first no annulments involved. They seek somewhere else which likely ends up in their divorce regardless. Yes, many concerns have been raised about the amount of annulments and the process. I have no misconception it is abused just as I have no misconception that economia is applied liberally amongst the Orthodox. However, I dont think anyone believes false accusers like the church wants people to remain in abusive marriages and the absurd argument its a money maker as its a fact the church loses money. As Fr. Rob said he and others argued that expenses should come from the General fund.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#535269 May 6, 2014
Seraphima wrote:
<quoted text> Wrong...Christ Church was there from the very beginning...not Catholicism...The catholic word meaning Universal NOT Catholicism
Morning Sera, and yes that's what I believe also..they met wherever they could, houses, preached in synagogues.

The CHURCHES of Jesus,Christ spread HIS word. The,CHURCH is,his bride...reading a wonderful book called

The Divine Romance ...Jesus created us TO HAVE US,LOVE HIM as a bride loves, he's not going to marry a CHURCH denomination, but the universal souls,of believers all have a,part of His spirit with in them ..law, sin, ritual is not in this ... we are His Eve ....perfected by His sacrifice ..
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#535270 May 6, 2014
Regina wrote:
<quoted text>
You certainly were wrong...but not about the $500. Now who's laughing at whom?
(Gee, do you think you can come up with your own childishness and not copy off of something preston always types.)
Who's laughing at whom????

Well.....your church preys on vulnerable people who will pay out hundreds of dollars just to say the church never acknowledged the marriage.

Actually that's not funny it's sad.

Your church is a joke and you justify this type of behavior.

I'll bet if you have time, you and your catholic friends could come up with a verse of scripture that supports the church getting paid for annulments.

Catholics showing the love of Christ!!!!!
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#535271 May 6, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
It should be more. What does your sect do if a husband or wife, or two husbands or two wives wanna divorce each other?
Does pastor Bob tell them to go to the courthouse, because Holy Matrimony is of no concern to the church?
Lol
He does marriage counseling all the time, The only difference is, he doesn't hold his hand out for money.

Still laughing dumb dumb???

It should be more....you're an idiot.
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#535272 May 6, 2014
Regina wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what he paid for, but it wasn't an annulment. I don't believe a word he says.
Don't care if you believe me or not sweetheart. It happened and you don't want to believe it because it's your church.
Regina

Toms River, NJ

#535273 May 6, 2014
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
If you had your way, more women would be dead from botched abortions.
Whether abortions occur in clinics or in back alleys, the fetuses always perish. Do you WANT the women to perish along WITH the fetuses ... you heartless idiot???
Oh, so its okay for the BABY to be murdered just as long as the women doesn't go with it? You're placing value on one life over another. If abortion is illegal, there will be far fewer sought.

And don't kid yourself that there aren't "botched" legal abortions. Plenty of women die from complications, they just don't publish them because it doesn't serve the secular liberal agenda.

Be honest....you don't give one whit about the women or the BABIES. You just like the idea of abortion, women's "rights" and all that trash. Never in the history of mankind have women been so demeaned, degraded, and poverty stricken as since feminism and women's "rights" have come into play. It's been a tragedy and an ongoing nightmare.
Regina

Toms River, NJ

#535274 May 6, 2014
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't care if you believe me or not sweetheart. It happened and you don't want to believe it because it's your church.
You must care plenty or you wouldn't keep posting to me about it. You made up a little story there, sweetface, and it's killing you that we have your number.

But, hey....thanks for reading my posts!

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#535275 May 6, 2014
Chess wrote:
<quoted text>
Dang.
You hit the replay button again?
Slither back under your favorite rock...lying snake..

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#535276 May 6, 2014
Chess wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Angry rant.
Baptist, eh?
Slither back under your favorite rock...lying snake..

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#535277 May 6, 2014
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. The ex-Catholic denomination is made up of plenty of excommunicated thrice married, twice divorced folks.
And if it weren't for the millions of Catholic German, Irish and Italian immigrants there probably wouldn't be any Catholics in the US today. Are you suggesting the Latinos are inferior human beings than those other immigrants? Are White Anglo Saxon protestants the master race Adolf?
I will be eternally grateful that your pedophile cadre disregards Scripture...Quote:But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.


Otherwise, I would still be on that broad path that leads to destruction...

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#535278 May 6, 2014
Regina wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so its okay for the BABY to be murdered just as long as the women doesn't go with it? You're placing value on one life over another. If abortion is illegal, there will be far fewer sought.
And don't kid yourself that there aren't "botched" legal abortions. Plenty of women die from complications, they just don't publish them because it doesn't serve the secular liberal agenda.
Be honest....you don't give one whit about the women or the BABIES. You just like the idea of abortion, women's "rights" and all that trash. Never in the history of mankind have women been so demeaned, degraded, and poverty stricken as since feminism and women's "rights" have come into play. It's been a tragedy and an ongoing nightmare.
Totally agree. Before it was legal there may have been SOME botched abortions ...but abortion WAS NOT a norm..if you got pregnant you had the baby....kept it or gave it for adoption....
That's why they had homes for unwed mothers and a,lot of adoptions..girls sent to relatives , etc.......that's a fact ....NO ABORTION even brought up in discussion..
No millions of killed babies.

Today we see stories of women hurt inside either mentally or physically, though they do not acknowledge this ever happens ...nonsense..these,women are the other victims,of this culture of death . Babies sacrificed on the altar of CHOICE ..
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#535279 May 6, 2014
Regina wrote:
<quoted text>
You must care plenty or you wouldn't keep posting to me about it. You made up a little story there, sweetface, and it's killing you that we have your number.
But, hey....thanks for reading my posts!
I keep posting to you because you keep running your cake hole saying the annulment didn;'t happen the way I said.

If you want me to stop posting about it, shut it. K?

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#535280 May 6, 2014
Anthony MN wrote:
My Church has a large population of immigrants from Nigeria and Vietnam. Some of the most gentle and caring Christians I've ever encountered. Does this make my Church less of a Church because it's not exclusively white Anglo Saxon? What would John Hagee say? Lol.
Thanks for proving my post to be 110% correct!!!

Quote: If it weren’t for the infusion of Catholic immigrants, especially from Latin American, the American Catholic Church would be shrinking pretty fast.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#535281 May 6, 2014
pusherman_ wrote:
<quoted text> That doesn't seem unbelievable June..
Well I might not be suspicious of her behavior, IF when came back to the forum she cared to answer the questions put to her before she had to "go to work" ... but ... she never does that. So I tend to believe that "going to work" is a copout!

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#535282 May 6, 2014
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
Disagreements , yes-------but not to the extent of splitting, dividing and starting a new denomination !!
These are the words of a devout Catholic..."And if it weren't for the millions of Catholic German, Irish and Italian immigrants there probably wouldn't be any Catholics in the US today."

Thanks ...you and this other idiot have shown complete dissension on this forum!!!!
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#535283 May 6, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
What does your sect do if a husband or wife, or two husbands or two wives wanna divorce each other?
Does pastor Bob tell them to go to the courthouse, because Holy Matrimony is of no concern to the church?
Lol
I suggest you keep in mind without Judaism there would BE no Catholic religion, as the Catholic church fathers (metaphorically stating) would not have had any rotten roots from which to grow another rotten branch.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>

Discovery Channel

Polygyny, the most common form of polygamy, describes when a man has multiple wives at the same time. In plural marriages of this kind, the men frequently father dozens of children, because they're able to impregnate their many wives at the same time.

The practice dates back to Biblical times. Ancient Jewish doctrines encouraged polygyny because Jews were a minority, and they could reproduce more rapidly. Today, some orthodox Jewish sects continue to support polygyny, and some believe the Talmud even encourages it.

http://curiosity.discovery.com/question/what -...
Gods R Delusions x Mine

Orlando, FL

#535284 May 6, 2014
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd make jokes too if it were my church charging folks just so the church never recognized their marriage.
What a joke
Can you buy your way out of any Protestant sacraments?

If you take their Bible, then you should, right?

What does your stolen Bible say about divorce?

Why not come to the one true God?

Ramen
Regina

Toms River, NJ

#535285 May 6, 2014
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
I keep posting to you because you keep running your cake hole saying the annulment didn;'t happen the way I said.
If you want me to stop posting about it, shut it. K?
Can't control your temper either. That's two strikes in one day there, Chuckles. You need a time out to reflect on your behavior here.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#535286 May 6, 2014
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for proving my post to be 110% correct!!!
Quote: If it weren’t for the infusion of Catholic immigrants, especially from Latin American, the American Catholic Church would be shrinking pretty fast.
Maybe when the Wiccans "share" their religion with yet more Protestant university students, Protestant moms and dads will be surprised that they find out that their cradle indoctrinations weren't as powerful as they thought was the case.

I've conversed with ex-Catholics and ex-Protestants that joined Wicca. It's the new fad of religions and it's catching on comparable to a house on fire.

I suggest that as long as religion is popular, there will more and more new ones spring up out of ever-living fantasies.

Where there is demand, there will be supply.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 5 min USAsince1680 87,507
The American Dream is DEAD DEAD DEAD. (Oct '17) 34 min Hock Fung Soc Tu 23
Looking to finally settle down. Need some sugge... 59 min Plock Yan Yuk Foo 2
Why are women from USA prefer casual dating ove... 2 hr MGTOW 2
The Good Man Donald Trump 3 hr MexicoWill Pay4Wall 2
Prostitutes at Taiji Massage in Port Charlotte 3 hr FredG5 1
School honoring Confed general 2B Renamed 4 Bar... 3 hr Omg 2
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 hr science is god 996,409