Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 653902 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Truth

Leesburg, VA

#479505 Oct 1, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
EVIDENTLY IT AINT GOD
TRUTH WROTE
"Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ."
YOUR TRANSLATION TAKES THE TRUTH AND DISTORTS IT
THE KING JAMES SAYS...
Be ye followers of God, as dear children. Eph 5.
THERE IS A VAST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN IMITATOR AND A FOLLOWER
AN IMITATOR IS A
Imitatorship
IMITA'TORSHIP, n. The office or state of an imitator.
1.Copier
COPIER, COPYIST, n. One who copies; one who writes or transcribes from an original or form; a transcriber; an imitator; also, a plagiary.
2.Mimic
MIM'IC
MIM'ICAL, a.[L. mimus, mimicus; Gr. to imitate.]
1. Imitative; inclined to imitate or to ape; having the practice or habit of imitating.
Man is of all creatures the most mimical in gestures, speech, &c.
2. Consisting of imitation; as mimic gestures.
Mimic implies often something droll or ludicrous, or less dignified than imitative.
MIM'IC, n. One who imitates or mimics; a buffoon who attempts to excite laughter or derision by acting or speaking in the manner of another.
1. A mean or servile imitator.
NOT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN IMITATOR AND A FOLLOWER
3.Follower
FOL'LOWER, n.
1. One who comes, goes or moves after another, in the same course.
2. One that takes another as his guide in doctrines, opinions or example; one who receives the opinions, and imitates the example of another; an adherent; an imitator.
That ye be not slothful, but followers of them who, through faith and patience, inherit the promises. Heb 6.
3. One who obeys, worships and honors.
Be ye followers of God, as dear children. Eph 5.
4. An adherent; a disciple; one who embraces the same system; as a follower of Plato.
5. An attendant; a companion; an associate or a dependent. The warrior distributed the plunder among his followers.
No follower, but a friend.
6. One under the command of another.
7. One of the same faction or party.
NOTE
WHAT THE WORD SAYS IN THE KING JAMES TRANSLATION
Eph 5:1 Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children;
Eph 5:2 And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.
Eph 5:3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
Eph 5:4 Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
Eph 5:5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
Eph 5:6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.
Eph 5:7 Be not ye therefore partakers with them.
GIF,

Philippians 3:17

17 Brethren, be ye imitators together of me, and mark them that so walk even as ye have us for an ensample.

Philippians 3:17

17 Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an ensample.

Philippians 3:17

17 Brothers and sisters, join in imitating me, and observe those who live according to the example you have in us.

Are we not supposed to imitate Christ?

Imitate me as I imitate Christ.

These words need to be on every Christian’s lips.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#479506 Oct 1, 2013
having church with Rev. Don singing and Cathie lapping her hands behinds. for you Karen.

http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play;_ylt...
Michael

Canada

#479507 Oct 1, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
So you do not think He,will return as,He left ..in ISRAEl.
That there will be no Armageddon ...no millennial kingdom???
NEW,Jerusalem ..
Anti Christ
Wow,..ok ..adding a,bit??
..Most intelligent people believe we will be destroyed by a wayward asteroid long before Jesus decides to return. We have already had many near misses and close calls. Are you not paying attention?

[email protected]!!^^BOOOM!

Get prepared!

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#479508 Oct 1, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>and this filth coming from you is why many stand against OSAS.
you think that you can do what you please or say what anything that you wish and your soul is in good standing with God.
on Judgement Day, when You stand before God, you will know what it means to be Holy, but it will be late
AMEN

I agree wholeheartedly..

Mat_5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#479509 Oct 1, 2013
sorry, Cathie "clapping" her hands
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#479510 Oct 1, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
EVIDENTLY IT AINT GOD
TRUTH WROTE
"Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ."
YOUR TRANSLATION TAKES THE TRUTH AND DISTORTS IT
THE KING JAMES SAYS...
Be ye followers of God, as dear children. Eph 5.
THERE IS A VAST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN IMITATOR AND A FOLLOWER
AN IMITATOR IS A
Imitatorship
IMITA'TORSHIP, n. The office or state of an imitator.
1.Copier
COPIER, COPYIST, n. One who copies; one who writes or transcribes from an original or form; a transcriber; an imitator; also, a plagiary.
2.Mimic
MIM'IC
MIM'ICAL, a.[L. mimus, mimicus; Gr. to imitate.]
1. Imitative; inclined to imitate or to ape; having the practice or habit of imitating.
Man is of all creatures the most mimical in gestures, speech, &c.
2. Consisting of imitation; as mimic gestures.
Mimic implies often something droll or ludicrous, or less dignified than imitative.
MIM'IC, n. One who imitates or mimics; a buffoon who attempts to excite laughter or derision by acting or speaking in the manner of another.
1. A mean or servile imitator.
NOT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN IMITATOR AND A FOLLOWER
3.Follower
FOL'LOWER, n.
1. One who comes, goes or moves after another, in the same course.
2. One that takes another as his guide in doctrines, opinions or example; one who receives the opinions, and imitates the example of another; an adherent; an imitator.
That ye be not slothful, but followers of them who, through faith and patience, inherit the promises. Heb 6.
3. One who obeys, worships and honors.
Be ye followers of God, as dear children. Eph 5.
4. An adherent; a disciple; one who embraces the same system; as a follower of Plato.
5. An attendant; a companion; an associate or a dependent. The warrior distributed the plunder among his followers.
No follower, but a friend.
6. One under the command of another.
7. One of the same faction or party.
NOTE
WHAT THE WORD SAYS IN THE KING JAMES TRANSLATION
Eph 5:1 Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children;
Eph 5:2 And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.
Eph 5:3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
Eph 5:4 Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
Eph 5:5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
Eph 5:6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.
Eph 5:7 Be not ye therefore partakers with them.
GIF,

mimetai.....to follow a pattern of behavior set forth by another...

GIF, if we fail to imitate the Apostle Paul, as he imitated Christ, is to fail to live the way that Christ would want us to live by the Word of God.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#479511 Oct 1, 2013
Hermeneutics Smutics wrote:
<quoted text>You have to keep him alive so he can hear God's word. After you teach him, pray with him, etc.,then if he does not repent,he uses the condom to continue to commit the sin he now has had adequate counsel for. You do not sontinue to condone his using a condom.
Your defense of the pope's position on this is much appreciated Nick, however Oxbow has an agenda and telling him the truth just gets in the way. I find it best to ignore him.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#479512 Oct 1, 2013
Concerned in Brasil wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you miss the point and most importantly CONTEXT. Yes all agree as do I that a believer must be baptized.
How when and by whom has not.
This is TYPICAL RC cherry picking on your part
YOU refuse to be fair and honest with the context and continually play fast and lose with the truth, the meaning of the author whether human or divine.
You and Clinton would get along jsut fine I did not have sexual relations with that woman.
That is because you re-define the words so you can say your not lying.
Ya you are not lying you are just being a deceitful dishonest devil.
Thanks, I can always count on ad hominem attacks from you when you can't provide a cogent response.

Do they all agree?

Do they (and you) agree that;

"From the early days of the Church, baptism was universally perceived as the means of receiving four basic gifts: the remission of sins, deliverance from death, regeneration, and the bestowal of the Holy Spirit."

???

There isn't a protestant on this board, with the possible exception of PAD, who agrees.

My question is, if you do as you say "agree", what happens to people who AREN'T regenerated, bestowed with the Holy Spirit, have their sins remitted and delivered from death?

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#479513 Oct 1, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop "distorting 2000 years of proven biblical and historical (substantiated) FACTS, New Age.......... You have become an "expert" at deceiving others by your "one sided modernistic author and writer sources that were all "born yesterday"....... EVERY ONE of these sources that consider themselves to be (so-called) expert writers, including: Udo Schnelle, Hans Conzelmann, Joseph Fitzmyer, F.F. Bruce, Echhard Plumacher, Helmet Koester, Steven Davies, Burton Mack, Raymond Brown, Ben Witherington ----EVERY ONE OF THEM are pro-protestant, bible only, anti-catholic writers and authors who even go so far as to write papers on "Debunking Christianity"...... ALL of them wrote from (1992-1998) and "throw their (Protestant opinions around" like (clay pigeons that are wildly shot our of skeet launcher). We, as Catholics (all know) where you are coming from and the (confused, chaotic and dis-oriented)direction that you are heading. I/we as Catholics will continue to follow, believe, worship and adhere to the TRUTH of Jesus Christ and His Historically and Biblically PROVEN One True Apostolic Catholic Church. You, my friend, can continue (as always) to drift around "in circles" in your bible only boat of distortions, lies and deceit---(one your own). NO ONE!! NOT ONE CATHOLIC--is buying the "National Inquirer" (fictitious) anti-catholic bible interpreting "hack" writers that you keep promoting!!!
~~~
Your one true Apostolic Church ...

that is all you post about...like a warped record with the needle stuck..

If you spent one fraction of the time that you use extolling your Church

lifting up Jesus before the world you could become a profitable servant to Him

If you were born again the things of this earth would lose their value

and your obsession with the dynasty of Rome would fade.

While you are praising your authors and finishers of your Church ...Your

composers are decomposing into the dust of the earth..

You need to build you hopes on thing eternal and take hold of God's unchanging Hand.

Col 3:1 If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God.

Col 3:2 Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.

Col 3:3 For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#479514 Oct 1, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop "distorting 2000 years of proven biblical and historical (substantiated) FACTS, New Age.......... You have become an "expert" at deceiving others by your "one sided modernistic author and writer sources that were all "born yesterday"....... EVERY ONE of these sources that consider themselves to be (so-called) expert writers, including: Udo Schnelle, Hans Conzelmann, Joseph Fitzmyer, F.F. Bruce, Echhard Plumacher, Helmet Koester, Steven Davies, Burton Mack, Raymond Brown, Ben Witherington ----EVERY ONE OF THEM are pro-protestant, bible only, anti-catholic writers and authors who even go so far as to write papers on "Debunking Christianity"...... ALL of them wrote from (1992-1998) and "throw their (Protestant opinions around" like (clay pigeons that are wildly shot our of skeet launcher). We, as Catholics (all know) where you are coming from and the (confused, chaotic and dis-oriented)direction that you are heading. I/we as Catholics will continue to follow, believe, worship and adhere to the TRUTH of Jesus Christ and His Historically and Biblically PROVEN One True Apostolic Catholic Church. You, my friend, can continue (as always) to drift around "in circles" in your bible only boat of distortions, lies and deceit---(one your own). NO ONE!! NOT ONE CATHOLIC--is buying the "National Inquirer" (fictitious) anti-catholic bible interpreting "hack" writers that you keep promoting!!!
Still making incorrect claims. Here are just two of the errors you pomote above:

a. I am Protestant
b. I am bible only

Both have been addressed multiple times, but you still can't seem to grasp the truth of both - I'm neither.

Take your hate elsewhere hojo, it only shows your ignorance and ego.

Let go of both if you truly are a follower of Jesus'.
- which at this point, is very hard to accept and swallow.

Typical Catholic.
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#479515 Oct 1, 2013
Michael wrote:
<quoted text>
..Most intelligent people believe we will be destroyed by a wayward asteroid long before Jesus decides to return. We have already had many near misses and close calls. Are you not paying attention?
[email protected]!!^^BOOOM!
Get prepared!
And the same intelligent people say the earth is heating up...global warming. Experts now say that's not so...the earth is actually cooling.

LOL....you believe the intelligent people when they say we will be destroyed by an asteroid but you don't believe in an Almighty Creator...silly Canadians!

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#479516 Oct 1, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
NO ONE!! NOT ONE CATHOLIC--is buying the "National Inquirer" (fictitious) anti-catholic bible interpreting "hack" writers that you keep promoting!!!
This is false.

Please post where I've posted information from the "National Inquirer" or any "anti-Catholic bible interpreting 'hack' writers".

Making up things about others is "bearing false witness", thus you have broken a commandment, and now will need to repent.

Please see your priest immediately, if not sooner, as you are in dire need of their comfort now.

*sighs*

I'll pray for you.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#479517 Oct 1, 2013
Michael wrote:
<quoted text>
OLDJG says..........The Roman Catholic Church is a notable exception. The official church teaching still opposes all forms of birth control except abstinence and the rhythm method, saying, "it is necessary that each and every marriage act remain ordered per se to the procreation of human life." However, polls show that only 15% of U.S. Roman Catholics view contraception as morally wrong.
......and! by far most roman catholics do not attend mandatory sunday mass weekly.........and! millions of roman catholics are divorced which goes against church teachings.......and more catholics everyday are in accepting of same sex marriage.
Do these examples of church rules that are broken by most catholics indicate a church out of touch with its followers and in crisis?
ABSOLUTELY!
It indicates many "Catholics" are out of touch with Christ and His Church. We're working hard to change that.
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#479518 Oct 1, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
It indicates many "Catholics" are out of touch with Christ and His Church. We're working hard to change that.
catholics are out of touch with Christ because they were told they started a relationship with Christ when they were 3 months old because of the faith of their parents. This is an absolute lie but when it's drilled into your head from a young age as truth, when you get older it gets to a point where your brain won't allow you to believe any other way.

good luck trying to change that.
Concerned in Brasil

Aberdeen, UK

#479519 Oct 1, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, I can always count on ad hominem attacks from you when you can't provide a cogent response.
Do they all agree?
Do they (and you) agree that;
"From the early days of the Church, baptism was universally perceived as the means of receiving four basic gifts: the remission of sins, deliverance from death, regeneration, and the bestowal of the Holy Spirit."
???
There isn't a protestant on this board, with the possible exception of PAD, who agrees.
My question is, if you do as you say "agree", what happens to people who AREN'T regenerated, bestowed with the Holy Spirit, have their sins remitted and delivered from death?
I don't know I am regenerate when you receive your fate give me a post.

Man oh man who greased the pig.

The Bible the Apostles taught teach us to baptize those who confess with their mouth that Jesus is Lord and Savior. They have to be cognitive and able to accept Jesus as Savior

That is biblical

NOT one biblical example of baptizing an infant just out the shoot so to speak not one.

Because they can't confess Jesus as Lord and Savior as explicitly taught in scripture ignored by the RCC because it contradicts man made tradition made up so they could make all in the land under the state and force them to pay taxes.

If I say to you my whole household voted today and we are to go by dumb dumb RCC illogical irrational thinking then we are to believe even the 2 month old the 2 year old and the 12 year old in my household voted because for RC dogma to be true you can't let the natural meaning of the words the metaphor ring true no the RC must pour into words RC man made traditional meanings some 100s if not 1000s of years later thought up so the RCC can maintain all control over the folk.

On you go on now little greased piggy I am sure you will shuck and dive and continue to avoid this posts Point as you have in the past with all those who point out the glaring contradictions of RCC's so called holy Tradition.

Your mind will focus on a miss spelled word or some punctuation mistake and throw the baby out with the bath water once again.

Don't worry you can't help it that is what pharisees do major on the minor and ignore everything else.
marge

Leesburg, GA

#479520 Oct 1, 2013
The most frequent objections to the belief that a Christian cannot lose salvation are 1) What about those who are Christians and continually live an immoral lifestyle? 2) What about those who are Christians but later reject the faith and deny Christ? The problem with these two objections is the phrase “who are Christians.” The Bible declares that a true Christian will not live a continually immoral lifestyle (1 John 3:6). The Bible declares that anyone who departs the faith is demonstrating that he never truly was a Christian (1 John 2:19). Therefore, neither objection is valid. Christians do not continually live immoral lifestyles, nor do they reject the faith and deny Christ. Such actions are proof that they were never redeemed.

Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-lose-sa...

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#479521 Oct 1, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
No Ox!! You just love "lying" to yourself and to others with your bible only Protestant Propaganda!!!
Keep on keeping on calling your pope a liar!!!! Ah love it!!!!!

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#479522 Oct 1, 2013
marge wrote:
The most frequent objections to the belief that a Christian cannot lose salvation are 1) What about those who are Christians and continually live an immoral lifestyle? 2) What about those who are Christians but later reject the faith and deny Christ? The problem with these two objections is the phrase “who are Christians.” The Bible declares that a true Christian will not live a continually immoral lifestyle (1 John 3:6). The Bible declares that anyone who departs the faith is demonstrating that he never truly was a Christian (1 John 2:19). Therefore, neither objection is valid. Christians do not continually live immoral lifestyles, nor do they reject the faith and deny Christ. Such actions are proof that they were never redeemed.
Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-lose-sa...
seems mighty strange to me that you claim to be a Christian yet you harass a many who just has went through some very scary times, even close to death,

YET YOU REMAIN SILENT WHEN ONE OF YOUR OWN(osas) TELLS DIRTY JOKES ON A PUBLIC FORUM.

let that judge you, not some link.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#479523 Oct 1, 2013
Hermeneutics Smutics wrote:
<quoted text>Ox there is an entirely different world out there.
You talked of friendship...is it not customary to answer a friend's question in any civil discussion????

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#479524 Oct 1, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
catholics are out of touch with Christ because they were told they started a relationship with Christ when they were 3 months old because of the faith of their parents. This is an absolute lie but when it's drilled into your head from a young age as truth, when you get older it gets to a point where your brain won't allow you to believe any other way.
good luck trying to change that.
~~~

Psa_127:1 Except the LORD build the house,

they labour in vain that build it:

except the LORD keep the city,

the watchman waketh but in vain.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) 15 min teqy2000 79
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 31 min onemale 281,854
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 41 min bad bob 183,170
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 43 min lightbeamrider 106,495
rajkot to chotila gey sex (Nov '15) 1 hr samir 19
Looking for Female Yorkie to mate with my male ... (Mar '13) 1 hr Miguel 169
looking for male pomeranian to breed with 2 yea... (Apr '11) 1 hr Wanting new babies 113
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 hr Insults Are Easier 63,721
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr LAWEST100 618,736
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 5 hr Gabriel 973,749
More from around the web