Okay Anthony a serious,question.<quoted text>
Bishops are in charge of their diocese. They weren't required to report accusations to Rome. They are required to handle issues with priests at the local level. They were required to report Crimen sollicitationis. That was the policy until 2002 when the CDF, under Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future pope, demanded the bishops start reporting to the Vatican. No, the HIGHER UP wasn't aware of the scope until then.
You have no idea what you're talking about, all you do is make grand accusations based on emotions, not fact.. If you want to discuss this intelligently, get your facts straight first.
Even in the decades when this was,reported ...
If a priest ..celibate in vows....breaks his with a child.
Hides it until its reported ..
If a Bishop transfers him to another parish. Also with children.
Aside from.the danger to other children...are they not also putting
This priest in s near occasion to sin.
And when mire reports came out in dioceses,..did not bishops confer with each other .
I find the idea,that Research from Kinsey or any psychologist who told men of God that this was,NOT a,problem. could be accepted.
Since SEX OUTSIDE OF MARRIAGE ..LET ALONE BY A,PRIEST..
WITH A CHILD could possibly be accepted as having any credibilty
I mean would you believe that ??? Ever ..
It straibs belief..sorry ..snd it was,HIDDEN you say from Rome .
I am of that generation..and I might not have had a name for it
But the whole idea,woukd be and is disgusting.
and would not need a,degree to tell me Kinsey and the shrinks were,fukk of baloney .
Its,SIN ..we all commit them but the Church is responsible for the priests. snd the sins they commit after they are aware of them and send them to be near OTHER CHILDREN.
WOUKD you buy psycho mumbo jumbo about this horrid act .
Woukd you want this man near YOUR CHILDREN ..