Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 673407 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.


Huntingdale, Australia

#451305 Jun 13, 2013
you not tell me about tile=as you see symbol on canada
and see simular sicily..and like from india

i drove that ove map before..i think must be india have more and more information about canada and italy..must be then mongolia near chine border..i drove before


who have paralel life or financial or secret center..

oh kruzi mi u stomakuuuuuu..its connected

its killing me every day more and moreee ohhhhhhhhh

i liked run away from my self


what india do..who

did you drove elephant geometric godes surla hand lags ..every direction as geometric as tiny ove map as one letter meaning must be chine japaneze korea or what..ohhhhhhhhhhhhh

its killing meeeeeeeee
my stomach..every nerveeeeeee

look pakistani and arabic..oh look hand over shelf as you pool as as so fast as millions per second i fill that beforeeeeeeee


every nerve working in my stomachhhhhhhh

Huntingdale, Australia

#451306 Jun 13, 2013
i am not care any more for myselffffffffffff
its killing meeeeeeeeeeee

Minneapolis, MN

#451307 Jun 13, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote
"The Catholic Church has Her own definition of marriage."
The problems with their definitions (as with all their conjecture)
they do not agree with what the Bible says...
Where does it say in the bible that the bible is the "only source of truth and the Bible is the "ONLY STANDARD" that God chose to transmit His divine and infallible word. NOWHERE!!!! You Confrinting continue to "make things up" like you always have done, ever since you came on this forum. For the 1st 400 years of the history of the Church, there was no bible-=--NONE what-so-ever so your statement is an "outright lie and you know it"! For the 1st 1500 years there was "no bible" as we know it today. The bible wasn't even printed until 1440 when John Guetenberg invented the printing press. The only Christian standard that "you yourself" claim is from your "own bible only" preaching according to the "personal opinionated" standard of Confrinting. When you speak of "conjecture" your (editorialized) bible only ministry is the "trumpet section" that is "out of tune" with the rest of TRUE CHRISTIANITY.... Jesus Christ and His One (and only one)TRUE Church, has,(as it has been for over 2000 years)--- is and will continue to be :the way, the truth and the life" in and through Jesus Christ and His One True Apostolic Catholic Church--the Bride of Christ!!! As Paul said in I Timothy 3:15 "The Church (not the bible alone) is the pillar, pinnacle and foundation of the TRUTH"! It is about time that you refrain from this habit of yours of this "ongoing lying and distorting" of the TRUTH of the bible and TRUE Apostolic Church History, that you are "so famous for"!!

Huntingdale, Australia

#451308 Jun 13, 2013
better not be against me..

Huntingdale, Australia

#451309 Jun 13, 2013
someone will look how its going..

Huntingdale, Australia

#451310 Jun 13, 2013

please find word
rasketed ad ed id od ud
as es is os us
naw aeiou jaw
id jaw jew jiw jow juw rasket
don't be great liar

its just 5 letters aeiou
your face looks as young but long face=goat
gat get git got gut
get ed=2

Huntingdale, Australia

#451311 Jun 13, 2013

Huntingdale, Australia

#451312 Jun 13, 2013 !%252Fimg%252FhttpImage%252Fim age.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fw 52Fj-ai-pleur%2525C3%2525A9-po ur-toronto-1.621326%253FlocalL inksEnabled%253Dfalse%3B3000%3 B2080

Huntingdale, Australia

#451313 Jun 13, 2013

did you charge me and spy..o well id evil words
ad ed id od ud

Huntingdale, Australia

#451314 Jun 13, 2013

Garden City, MI

#451315 Jun 13, 2013
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
No not israel, dispensationalsim is the false spirit. Most all Christianity admit the three frogs are at work today.
Gog & Magog
Rev 20:7 "And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea."
The only part of the Book of Revelation you should be interpreting is this:
"I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book; if anyone adds to them, God will add to them the plagues described in this Book"

Soc, how could you be so reckless with the word of God? Don't you have any concern for John's warning to you?

Since: Nov 08


#451316 Jun 13, 2013
Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Catholics do not pay money to confess their sins. Whoever told you this has lied to you.
Catholics confess sins to God in the presence of a priest. Is this something you have the courage to do?
no i wouldn't do it,because it is a waiste of time,confessing to a priest is meaningless according to the bible,there can be only one mediator and a priest is not it,jesus is the only mediator,the bible tells you that,so why would anyone waiste their time talking to a priest which is not going to absolve you of your sins,i see it as just a way to get people into the church so it can make money,why else make up this phony confessional thing?

Omaha, NE

#451317 Jun 13, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought we'd agreed they 'preached the word', oral tradition sounds like its from man.
Well, it IS men speaking.

I know the word "tradition" sets off alarm bells with protestants.

Huntingdale, Australia

#451318 Jun 13, 2013
Real Creator created what is visible and not visible..what you can see an d not see.
Creator created every creature every living things and not moving things as well everything on earth as well in heaven..nothing hide to your Creator.
What can you ed if its already known to him before you think move or anything decided.

Omaha, NE

#451319 Jun 13, 2013
Tiger Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess they were "Sola Scriptura" and already had copies of the Torah in their own language.
Clay would say they were unauthorised to interpret that scripture and probably not intelligent enough to understand it.
One would examine the Torah to validate the lessons of Christ taachught by Paul?

marge's theorem was that the multitudes would hear Paul's teaching, go home, learn to read, then read the Gospels to cross-check what Paul taught.

Guarantee that St. Paul's teachings don't feature in the Torah.

Omaha, NE

#451320 Jun 13, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
I didn't.
Me: Why would Jews transcribe the teachings of Jesus Christ?
You: "To spread it ..the words of their teacher that's why"
Jews don't believe in Jesus. Jewish scribes wouldn't transcribe the teachings of someone they didn't believe in.
The first several thousand members of Jesus' church WERE JEWS !
.........that believed in the teachings and divinity of Jesus.

Jesus' teachings aren't part of Judaic teaching. Jewish scribes wouldn't have transcribed non-Jewish teaching.

Since: Nov 08


#451321 Jun 13, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
I never joined any group, as group mentality simply keeps on reflecting the same thought-process back and forth to members, and that type of habitual mental behavior stagnates mentalities.
I prefer to travel on my own, studying as many ancient and new religions as possible ... plus beliefs of Agnostics and Atheists.
And of course from what I post, you are already are aware that I no longer entertain the idea of the existence of a creator.
you have a good point,you only have one source to the existence of a creator and how far can you go with it without constantly repeating yourself like HOJO does,he talks about all this authenticated history about the church/jesus yet he never posts it,he just repeats the same thing in every post.I to have read about other religions dating back way before christianity was created,and i notice they all contain basically the same story lines but different names,is history repeating itself? did these people actually exist? there is more evidence out there about the fact that "WE ARE NOT ALONE" than there is about a single diety that supposedly created this praradise,yet he chooses not to reveal himself to us with the lame excuse,that we could not comprehend his being,it's beyond our scope of reasoning i guess,which does not make sense,if we are designed in his/her likeness,why couldn't we comprehend it? and this great plan he has for everyone,what plan could possibly be better than life itself? i can't think of a better one.

Minneapolis, MN

#451322 Jun 13, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes!! We, as Catholics can ALL READ and know the TRUTH! The fact is that (you Confrinting)can also read BUT cannot interpret TRUTH!!!(only what YOU want your "long list" of bible verses to mean!!
This is just more of the same old Confrinting bible only interpretation (or better yet misinterpretation of sacred scripture in which you keep "digging a hole"---deeper and deeper for yourself!!!!! WHERE DOES IT SAY ANYWHERE in these verses that you listed that Jesus was giving more than "one set of keys" other than to Peter in Matthew 16:19., when Jesus said "To YOU, Peter I give the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven"..... Confrinting, you just continue to "make things up" and make the bible mean "only what YOU want it to mean", which comes as "no surprise to ANY of us Catholics. The fact is that NOT ONE authoritative Apologist historian author or writer (Catholic or Protestant) agrees with your (own personal) anti-catholic editorialized interpretation of what Jesus actually said regarding "keys to the kingdom of heaven". You just "throwing things out" on this forum- "desperately hoping" that someone is gullible, ignorant and uniformed enough to "buy into" the distorted comments that you "again" are so famous for!!!!!

Omaha, NE

#451323 Jun 13, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't speak for the world...but I was excommunicated because my wife divorced me!!!!! And to make it worse yet...fornication was involved!!!!!
And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
You were excommunicated from what for getting divorced?

Omaha, NE

#451324 Jun 13, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
I am thinking TH a t Dan thinks they were mostly illiterate..But the Jews taught the Torah before bar mitzvah. And some kids went on to study more and become teachers them selves.
PAUL was certainly writing to people who could read. The Romans had conquered most if that world which had contained many literate people's.
And common sense says they made some copies to pass to other congregations..imo
I'M sure many were not literate but it stands to reason..many were.
Yes the disciples preached the word..But at some point they write things down to preserve them .THEY were Jews used to having the. Written word preserved.
Someone spoke to and recorded details only MARY would know. John or Luke would be my guess..
And not to argue on Mary again..She was not the star of the show. I am sure they loved and respected her greatly..But after the Crucifixion we don't hear about this humble Jewish mother. Though common sense says she was helping the ministry. But they were also a patriarchal people.
And I am guessing here from what we know of her she would nit allow herself to be the focus of devotion..Imo
The writings to me ..some if them ..we're there from as soon as they moved around. And who knows what was burned in Jerusalem..luckily mist if them left.
Just my take on it based on the very books themselves.
I'm not thinking that they were illiterate in the main; they were illiterate in the main.

"common sense" tells us that there wasn't a means to produce mass copies of anything and nothing tells us that copies were made and handed around.

Clearly, you're simply creating "facts" out of whole cloth to support the written word requirement that protestant theology demands. It simply wasn't the case back then.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 10 min trifecta1 981,407
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 15 min Lonestar 104,828
News Judge allows Oregon resident to be genderless 41 min East Coast Larry 2
News Michael Jackson broke down racial barriers (Jun '09) 43 min Mojo Hojo 1,562
News Continue reading O'Reilly wig comment just the ... 56 min slick willie expl... 3 I KNOW I won't buy with 2 hr Pizza Delivery 2
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 7 hr bad bob 184,628
More from around the web