Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 685932 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

LTM

Marathon, Canada

#434336 Apr 20, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
Which denomination in which religion??? OH WAIT ... let me guess ... YOURS ... RIGHT???
You're not a Muslim ... are you?
Silly people!
:)
I don't believe in denominational religions. I believe God, I believe in God. My faith is in Jesus Christ Nothing < nor anyone else.>
Just because a persons says they believe in God doesn't make them a Christian, satan believe in Him too.
What ever your problem with God is, it's because you have held Him in the same regard you do people, and believe God is exactly how they describe Him to you.
From what you have post so far I am tell you, you are wrong.
The world is an evil evil place, we can not speak for God, God speaks for Himself, through His Holy Word the Bible.
You seem to be happy in your misery, spewn out you hate on here against God, whom you don't even know.
Ella

Rockford, MI

#434337 Apr 20, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
I suggest you read the following.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>
From the book “Smith’s Bible Dictionary.
QUOTATIONS FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT IN THE NEW TESTAMENT.—The New Testament quotations from the Old form one of the outward bonds of connection between the two parts of the Bible. They are manifold in kind. In the quotations of all kinds from the Old Testament in the New, we find a continual variation from the letter of the older Scriptures. First, all the New Testament writers quoted from the Septuagint; correcting it indeed more or less by the Hebrew, especially when it was needful for their purpose; still abiding by it to so large an extent as to show that it was the primary source whence their quotations were drawn. Secondly, the New Testament writers must have frequently quoted from memory. Thirdly, combined with this there was an alteration of conscious or unconscious design. Sometimes the object of this was to obtain increased force. Sometimes an Old Testament passage is abridged, and in the abridgment so adjusted, by a little alteration, as to present an aspect of completeness, and yet omit what is foreign to the immediate purpose. In some cased even greater liberty of alteration is assumed. In some places, again, the actual words of the original text are taken up, but employed with a new meaning.
Yes, the Septuagint was the very first translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek. I use the RSV, KJV, Septuagint and the Complete Jewish Bible (which is from the masoretic text - it is also used in synagogues) in my studies.
ReginaM

Toms River, NJ

#434338 Apr 20, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="ReginaM"
God does take care of them, Kay, just as He takes care of all of us. The child was baptized. Original sin was remitted from his soul and the indelible mark of God has been placed upon him. When the priest traced the cross on his forehead with the Oil of Baptism, God said "You are mine".
God does not leave us subject to something as uncertain and mercurial as sentimentality. He values us far too much for that. He instituted His sacraments so that we don't have to guess about matters such as these. We can be sure.
**********
Jesus said, "He that believes AND is baptized shall be saved." No one can trace a cross on a baby's face and 'save' it.(What is more sentimental?) You must BELIEVE for yourself.
KayMarie
Pardon me, but that's private interpretation and not what the early Church believed or practiced. Christ instituted the Sacraments for our benefit, not His. The baby was baptized with water and the spirit. He was signed with the Oil of Baptism. His original sin has been cleansed. We don't have to rely on our emotions or the private interpretations of someone else, we can be absolutely certain. That's one of the beauties of obeying Christ and the church He established for our good.
Religion - A Delusion

Titusville, FL

#434339 Apr 20, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
He had the stain of original sin washed away when he was baptized 3 weeks after being born. Thanks for asking.
If the child was not baptized and died very soon after birth, then what?

Limbo? Hell?

You are saying that a simple ritual -- of which the infant has no knowledge -- gives that child special privileges with God.

Personally, I find such a belief absurd and delusional.

Question...

If the infant was born to a Hindu family and died with original sin, why would any God treat that child with less love and consideration?

Please explain why a Hindu infant is at such a disadvantage over an infant born into the "correct" denomination.

You can't.
Religion - A Delusion

Titusville, FL

#434340 Apr 20, 2013
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
We have God's word that tells us what he believes on this matter -- the Bible.
ISLAM was created in the 7th century by a false prophet mentioned a few times in the Bible.
HINDU comes out of Babylon mentioned in the Bible.
CATHOLIC is the harlot new Babylon mentioned in the Bible.
ATHEISM is from the pit / Satan mentioned in the Bible.
The real faith of Jesus, the Creator, is Christianity unchanging since creation.
So in essence, you claim God will torture in Hell for all eternity any and all humans who don't agree with you.

Is that correct?

Yes or no.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434341 Apr 20, 2013
LTM wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe in denominational religions. I believe God, I believe in God.
But you don't believe in salvation of Muslims and Hindus and Buddhists and Jews, etc ... right?
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434342 Apr 20, 2013
Religion - A Delusion wrote:
<quoted text>
If the child was not baptized and died very soon after birth, then what?
Limbo? Hell?
You are saying that a simple ritual -- of which the infant has no knowledge -- gives that child special privileges with God.
Personally, I find such a belief absurd and delusional.
Question...
If the infant was born to a Hindu family and died with original sin, why would any God treat that child with less love and consideration?
Please explain why a Hindu infant is at such a disadvantage over an infant born into the "correct" denomination.
You can't.
Of course they can't explain it, so they go back again and again and again searching for scriptures that they hope will convince them and others that what they believe justifies what they believe.

It's comparable to a dog attacking it's own leg and wondering why the confusion doesn't cease.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#434343 Apr 20, 2013
303
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="Oxbow"
"Not to mention the fact that this sinless child is destined to spend eternity in the presence of God."
What happened to original sin??? He ain't got it?? What about "All have sinned and come short of the glory of God"????
**********
Jesus left the honor, glory and luxury of heaven to come to earth and suffer the reproach, hatred and torture of the ungodly, IN ORDER TO PAY THE DEBT OF SIN FOR ALL MEN.
After the crucifixion He went into hell and preached the gospel (good news of God's love) to all those of Noah's time, giving them opportunity to receive that love.
(1Pe 3:18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
1Pe 3:19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;
1Pe 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.)
One Who suffered so much for us, and Who went so far to make provision for everyone who would receive Him, will not 'leave one stone unturned' in order to reach everyone.
As for 'all have sinned'... God knows ALL things...we don't...so I am happy to let HIM take care of those children. His judgment is ALWAYS fair and right...AND HE WILL NOT MISTREAT ONE OF THEM.. I don't have to worry about it for a minute.
KayMarie
I am not, have not, will not, question God's judgment, on anything...that is not what my post is about

Any way you cut it, slice it, dice it, vulcanize it, it does not, for one second, change, alter. erase, add to Scripture:

Ro 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#434344 Apr 20, 2013
St. Augustine: "Diligite homines, interficite errores; sine superbia de veritate præsumite, sine sævitia pro veritate certate" (Love men, slay error; without pride be bold in the truth, without cruelty fight for the truth)(Against Petilian 1.29).
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434345 Apr 20, 2013
I believe for their own entertainment, those people that owned the dog taught it to attack its own leg.

Theologians taught people mental confusion which in turn resulted in them attacking their own consciences ... such as occurred with Mother Teresa.

She was so confused she wanted to die in order to find peace.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>

Mother Teresa, Come Be My Light … The Private Writings of the “Saint of Calcutta”… edited and with commentary by Brian Kolodiejchuk, M.C.

The Documents

On some of the letters and notes about her interior darkness, Mother Teresa had written “matter of conscience.”

I have such a deep longing for God and death.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434346 Apr 20, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
303
<quoted text>
I am not, have not, will not, question God's judgment
Do you ever question why a Jewish god in "his" right mind would save a Christian, but shun a Jew?

I understand that you don't want to think about these confronting issues, but no-one can do it for you.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#434347 Apr 20, 2013
334
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
He had the stain of original sin washed away when he was baptized 3 weeks after being born. Thanks for asking.
Sheep dip.....Your Bible must have this teaching missing:

"And Jesus saw, as he passed on his way, a man who had been blind from his birth. Whereupon his disciples asked him, Master, was this man guilty of sin, or was it his parents, that he should have been born blind? Neither he nor his parents were guilty, Jesus answered; it was so that God’s action might declare itself in him."

Change "blind" with "down syndrome"...

And...it does not change nor make ineffective: For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God..

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#434348 Apr 20, 2013
332
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="ReginaM"
God does take care of them, Kay, just as He takes care of all of us. The child was baptized. Original sin was remitted from his soul and the indelible mark of God has been placed upon him. When the priest traced the cross on his forehead with the Oil of Baptism, God said "You are mine".
God does not leave us subject to something as uncertain and mercurial as sentimentality. He values us far too much for that. He instituted His sacraments so that we don't have to guess about matters such as these. We can be sure.
**********
Jesus said, "He that believes AND is baptized shall be saved." No one can trace a cross on a baby's face and 'save' it.(What is more sentimental?) You must BELIEVE for yourself.
KayMarie
Absolutely....truth based on Scripture...which Catholics have no problem denying in favor of the lie they believe from the vatacan...
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434349 Apr 20, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
332
<quoted text>
Absolutely....truth based on Scripture...which Catholics have no problem denying in favor of the lie they believe from the vatacan...
You question the belief of others as being wrong, but you refuse to question the idea that your beliefs could be wrong.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>

From the book “Twisted Scriptures,” by Mary Alice Chrnalogar, published in 1997.

Tricks to Keep You Controlled

Leaders get you to believe that they don’t interpret the Bible but just “teach what is in the Bible”—making the Bible synonymous with their interpretations.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434350 Apr 20, 2013
From the book-Cults—by Lowell D. Streiker. Published 1983.

The more intensely dissatisfied the individual is, the more he will project upon the mysterious other (be it person, deity, or movement) those qualities he finds most lacking in himself.
youtube

AOL

#434351 Apr 20, 2013
.

100% PROOF Pope Francis is ANTICHRIST_______




.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434352 Apr 20, 2013
Mother Teresa referred to those dying in Calcutta as "her" poor.

Once she adopted them as her own "fledglings" her next step was to make them over into Catholics so that in her mind, they could fly off to heaven.

Imagine knowing these people were dying in droves as unconverted to Catholicism Hindus and Mother Teresa being convinced her "poor" were going to burn in hell.

Try those two conflicting beliefs on for size and then you will understand WHY Mother Teresa was in conflict with her own conscience.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434353 Apr 20, 2013
youtube wrote:
.
100% PROOF Pope Francis is ANTICHRIST_______
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =moaXuWJryu8XX
.
Let me guess ... you are the proud owner of the title of Protestant.

:)
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#434354 Apr 20, 2013
GEE ... I'll bet it was theologians that taught being Christ-like equated to holiness.

What a coincidence that they wrote HOLY on the "covers" of the new testaments.

"Come read my book, join my cult, and I will teach you how to become HOLY. And by the way, make sure to bring your money."

:)
socci

Cameron, MO

#434355 Apr 20, 2013
Ella wrote:
Yes, the Septuagint was the very first translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek. I use the RSV, KJV, Septuagint and the Complete Jewish Bible (which is from the masoretic text - it is also used in synagogues) in my studies.

An older mss does not mean it is more reliable in textual criticism. The majority in agreement preserved among their original languages is what the KJV uses making no use of the Septuagint. The originals wear out as they are in more use. But by that time numerous copies are made. The originals are of no more importance. We did get the ancient DSS to confirm tho.

The more ancient and the uncorrupted mss streams both originating from the same yet the corrupt lay unused later found to be older is not more reliable.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 5 min Gabriel 985,758
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 48 min Doctor Trump 27,079
Why are so many black people so FAT? (Jul '09) 2 hr juliakk 230
Black women hate White men? (Feb '11) 2 hr juliakk 67
make money online. free. easy to start. no cred... (Sep '15) 2 hr juliakk 9
Leftists libs DONT KNOW their own history 4 hr Wake Up 2
David Duke: "We're going to take our country ba... 5 hr Johnny 69
More from around the web