Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 589264 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#433940 Apr 19, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes we are fortunate---however-- we all have to (eventually)----"before we die"----come to the "ultimate decision and conclusion" as to "What is TRUTH and "What is "editorialized (opinionated) "RELATIVE TRUTH"!.... The result of over 42,000 contradicting and conflicting bible only divided doctrine of inconsistent beliefs that have "sprung up" from over 450 years since Protestant Reformation should give you "your first clue"!! God is not the author of your agnostic, atheistic or bible only (self editorialized interpretation" which is mass confusion and chaos.......... The difference is that Catholics have the "Mass"!!! Protestants, atheists and agnostics have (chosen) the "confusion and chaos"
daily mass is the creation of the pagan/christian church so it can make a daily dollar.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#433941 Apr 19, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know anything of Ms Ann Coulter. She definitely isn't a authority on Christian teachings. Neither is Confrint or his wife.
The Holy Eucharist is the the pinnacle of Judaism. This is what Our Lord Jesus Christ established. He began His Church on Earth (the Catholic Church).
The CC does not contradict Judaism, they fulfill it.There is an unbroken line of continuity. No protestant sect can claim this. They conveniently steal our scriptures and design their own Christianity. Its new and foreign to what Jesus Christ started.
jesus did not establish the catholic church,there is no scripture that supports that theory,no apostolic succession exists,the pope does not head the true church,only jesus does.show me in non-catholic scripture where jesus claims the catholic church is the true church,and states to use christian/pagan beliefs to create it? and kill anyone who refuses to follow it's teachings??
Clay

United States

#433942 Apr 19, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
btw- if i wanted to participate in this 'Eucharist', could i do so together with my family at home (for instance) or do i have to got through ROME/VATICAN ordained means in order to partake?:)
You can have the Eucharist anywhere you want. But you need to be in communion with the Catholic or Orthodox faith.(the Orthodox were set up by the Apostles and have validly ordained Bishops, therefore the Eucharist is a reality in those Churches too)
Also, I think, but I'm not sure, that anyone can have the Eucharist as a form of 'last rite'. I'm almost positive any Protestant can have a Catholic Priest give them the host on their death bed. Jews or Muslims could request it too (I think) because its assumed they've made a heartfelt decision to embrace Jesus Christ. So I would imagine they would be quickly Baptized and administered the Bread immediately after.
You too - as a devout atheist -could turn towards Jesus on your deathbed and receive the Eucharist even if you've never stepped foot into a Catholic Church. Remember that.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#433943 Apr 19, 2013
have a good day people,got a lot to do,may not be back today,,,calm down hojo no need to cry,i'll be back another day.
Clay

United States

#433944 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>jesus did not establish the catholic church,there is no scripture that supports that theory,no apostolic succession exists,the pope does not head the true church,only jesus does.show me in non-catholic scripture where jesus claims the catholic church is the true church,and states to use christian/pagan beliefs to create it? and kill anyone who refuses to follow it's teachings??
Yeah, Jesus did establish the Catholic Church.

Remember Jethro, most of Protestantism agrees with my statement. Lutheran, Methodist, Anglicans all acknowledge this historic truth. The new radical evangelical fundies ignore it or add their own conspiracy scenario to the origins of the Church and her scriptures.
BibleSays

AOL

#433945 Apr 19, 2013
.

Many Believers NOT Jesus'..."brother, sister"

http://youtu.be/rdUNJ-EVw20

.
hojo

Saint Paul, MN

#433946 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>first off you have not posted "2000 years of AUTHENTICATED AND VERIFIABLE True Church History,where is it? second "One TRUE Apostolic Catholic Church" no you have nothing as far as true history except what the church "MADE UP"
The fact is jethro8, it is YOU that has NOTHING except what your heretical anti-catholic authors, writers, and other (fiction)sources of history--- including "you yourself" has "invented, concocted and "MADE UP"!..... It is called "editorialized church history"!!!!!.... Bible only Protestants, agnostics and atheists have become "experts" at (personal opinionizing) "anything and everything" regarding Church History, interjection "their own" interpretation of the bible and "making it up" as they go along!! I'll stick to the TRUE sources of Church History that has "weathered the storm" from heretics and Protestant propagandists, agnostics and atheists for centuries. You, can do what you want!!......I/we as Catholics will just continue to "keep you (and other anti-catholics) in our prayers" each day at Daily Mass and in the Eucharist, that God will "open your eyes" to the TRUTH of His Grace, Salvation and Faith in Jesus Christ, in and through His One TRUE Catholic Church---that He initiated, gave and left for His Apostles, disciples and followers, over 2000 years ago!!!
hojo

Saint Paul, MN

#433947 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>inherited,?? you joking right? everything inside the walls of vatican city is stolen property, taken from lands conquered by the romans,the church did not inherit anything except the art of deception.
More anti-catholic BS!.... You, jethro8 have become "inundated with corrupted and perverted sources of "fictitious (National Inquirer kind of) trash news and distorted history that is "nothing but editorialized (opinions)---which is nothing new to ANY of us Catholics!!!

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433948 Apr 19, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
The orthodox Catholics canonized the Bible...(which means they compiled it...Put the books together)...They did not write the Bible...
After a few centuries of squabbling and killing each other, the Catholics "approved" all that they compiled in the bible. So when you read the bible, study the bible, and interpret the bible ... I suggest you remember that whatever was compiled IN the new testament was first APPROVED by Catholics.

Because the ex-Catholic Protesters (Protestants) came long after the Catholics ... it was the Protestants that CHANGED the thought-processes of the meanings of the bible with their own interpretations ... which is exactly what occurred when the ex-Jew Catholics morphed the old testament into the new testament and changed the whole thought-process from Judaism to Catholicism.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433949 Apr 19, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
The Roman Catholics put themselves down ...When they attempt to control the love and grace of God by claiming that they are the only one true apostolic Church....
So according to you the Protestants were and are aligned to the love of a god, and the Catholics are the evil deceivers of the supposed HOLY word ... HUH???

I suggest you study the founder of the Protestant religion and see what interpretations he took from the new testament.

Martin Luther was every bit as blood-thirsty as were the popes.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>

From the book,“History of Christianity,” by Clyde L. Manschreck … comes the following…………..

Luther believed that the sword of government had been given by God to the princes, and the peasants, even though treated unjustly, were not justified in taking the sword into their own hands. In his eyes they had become robbers and murderers, faithless and perjured. In his infamous essay, in May, 1525, Against the Robbing and Murdering Hordes of Peasants, Luther called on the nobles to use any means available to suppress the rebels.“Smite, slay, and stab, secretly and openly … as if among mad dogs,” he urged,“lest the whole land be ruined.” The peasants deserved death, Luther argued, because they had broken their oath of fealty, resorted to rioting and plundering, and masked their terrible sins with the name of the Gospel.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433950 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>no,he would do that,a few here do that,if you put them to the test,they stay away from here until it is forgotten,one person started a whole new forum because they couldn't handle the truth.knowledgable people scare the religious.
The issue is whether or not any of us actually post as being aligned to truth. I can't know if what I post from history is, or is not based on truth, as the winners and losers of any situation write what most pleases them, and so history itself is questionable.

Being on threads of forums IS confronting, but that confrontation can help us to understand that there are many ways of perceiving issues, and that is about all the benefit that we can learn from each other.

Other people have taught me by their words to perceive from different angles rather than just my own narrow way of perceiving, and I'm thankful to them for so doing.

I've been called ignorant many times, and I agree that I am ignorant. They didn't suggest anything I already didn't comprehend in that regard.

:)

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433951 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>fear was one of their weapons,parents used it to,to help keep their children from mis-behaving.
I used to believe that fear was all that held people in religion, but now I see that is not always the case.

The modern Pagans worship a goddess that they suggest loves unconditionally.

And the man who refers to himself at the second coming of Jesus preaches (from the new testament) that there never was a devil and there is no sin and that the "god" loves every body.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>

I watched a program on Primetime OWN.

The man who calls himself the second coming of Jesus told the person interviewing him (verbatim)... "So you tell the millions of followers I have ...’Dat guy's a liar.’ You know what dey gonna say?...‘I prefer his lies.’"

Here he is in person …

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433952 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>fear was one of their weapons,parents used it to,to help keep their children from mis-behaving.in my house it was simple you stepped out of line you got smacked right back into place,and it worked,a good old butt kicking now an then will keep a child in place.i was the wild one in the family,the little daredevil,not afraid to try anything type.
"Spare the rod and spoil the child" was a favorite "reason" for many devout religious believers to beat children. And peer pressure among the parents escalated the abuse, as a child that "talked back" was perceived as not having parents that controlled the child. So to prevent such harsh judgment from other parents, many parents beat their kids to make sure the neighbors would think they were indeed "good" GOD-fearing parents.
Clay

United States

#433953 Apr 19, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
After a few centuries of squabbling and killing each other, the Catholics "approved" all that they compiled in the bible. So when you read the bible, study the bible, and interpret the bible ... I suggest you remember that whatever was compiled IN the new testament was first APPROVED by Catholics.
Because the ex-Catholic Protesters (Protestants) came long after the Catholics ... it was the Protestants that CHANGED the thought-processes of the meanings of the bible with their own interpretations ... which is exactly what occurred when the ex-Jew Catholics morphed the old testament into the new testament and changed the whole thought-process from Judaism to Catholicism.
Most of your post is correct accept the first sentence. Catholics weren't killing each other prior to the compilation of the NT. But, they were being killed by the Roman Empire. At least 30 Bishops of Rome (Popes) lived and died prior to the NT. Most were executed.
This quote doesn't exactly fit your post, but I like it anyway.
"I would far rather hear of a rival to my throne, then another Bishop of Rome"
Empire Decius upon beheading Pope Fabian in 250 AD.
This quote says allot about a couple things.
1. The Papacy was seen as a threat to the Empire.
2. The Roman Empire saw the Church - not sacred scripture - as a enemy.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433954 Apr 19, 2013
[QUOTE who="jethro8this time someone who is a world leader,who is able to solve problems not through war but through words.[/QUOTE]

I believe that many wars were avoided by leaders who calmed the situation with common-sense words.

One man of Russian-decent comes to mind. But for his calm attitude, other Russians in a submarine would have started a major war.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>

The Man Who Saved the World
Watch the Full Episode

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/episodes/the-...

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433955 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>if everyone thought alike not much would get accomplished,think about it.
That's true in one context, but when people kill each other over whose myths are aligned to one or another supposed deity, most certainly nothing can be accomplished except to spill more blood.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433956 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>loved it,you have a gift of word,hope you use it.ever consider writing a book? no joke.
I wrote the makings of a book at one time.

I was in religion at the time, and the title I was going to choose was "The atheist and the preacher." One woman who read it said she wanted more, so I guess it would have been of interest to at least some people. The two characters grew up together and one man became an atheist and one a preacher, and although they stayed friends, they couldn't agree on what they believed. The book would have been the discussions they had as they both shared experiences from their lives. Without indulging the names of members of his congregations, the preacher shared his confusion about how to counsel them with their problems ... and the atheist of course wanted to know why the preacher put such faith in myth, etc.

Anyway, it died from lack of enthusiasm from me.

Thanks for the compliment.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433957 Apr 19, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
tell me ms. June VanDerMark,what are your thoughts of ancient aliens,that supposedly visited earth thousands of years ago,
Archaeologists have dug up remains of our ancient ancestors, and the thought of those ape-like creatures riding in on a modernized space ship doesn't fit together well in my mind.

I believe we evolved on earth and simply morphed over millions of years into what we are today.

As for the technology mystifying us ... I should hope that scientists keep an open mind that maybe other people learned to use other means, such as maybe harnessing the power of "sound-waves" to lift those huge rocks without effort.

Technology today is different than it was in those ancient civilizations ... but from my perception, those ancient people came across some technology that was lost, and no longer exists in our era.

Arrogance often keeps us from learning, and the modern scientists, as is the case with all of us, are not immune to arrogance.
Religion - A Delusion

Titusville, FL

#433958 Apr 19, 2013
Pad wrote:
<quoted text>The religious if aware of their true identity to what they believe,realize that the body is temporal,and the spirit and soul live on beyond the mortal remains of what lies in the grave.
The deepest ingredient to faith is knowing that we have a spirit,soul and body.Those three parts of our being all have a separate purpose to our individual life,yet,we can be blind to it,and that is why we need to tap into the spiritual element or facet of our being.
Now you may think that it is an illusion,but life has proven there is more to us than our end in the grave.Whether we are blessed to have a miracle,or that science can temporarily heal our mortal bodies in peril,remains a mystery to us,as we all have to die sometime."It is appointed unto all men to die,but than comes the Judgment."Our bodies are fleeting as the wind,you can see that even this past week in Boston.
That 8 year old and the two young women who died,senseless deaths,now know that there is an eternity.Think of it,their deaths were tragic,in that life was stolen from them,in regards to the limited human life here,but what about the unknown eternity they are now in? Is it an illusion? You are so quick to say yes?
Well I can tell you with an assurity that if you say yes,than you have no respect for those three individuals who died so needlessly,that there will not be some accounting for their untimely deaths.I am not judging you,but I am saying that delusion or illusion,does not apply to realizing that life does exist after our temporal bodies are in the grave,but still the spirit and the soul are very much alive.
Pad, I thought your posts were relatively reasonable --- until this one.

Your delusion has sent you over the edge. I posted a statement about the nature of science - a truthful statement you simply cannot refute -- so you claim I "have no respect for those three who died needlessly" in the Boston bombing.

Pad, your delusion has made you post an absurd lie and on some level you surely know it.

Why not condemn me for having "no respect" for the thousands of children who die in car accidents every year? Why just the Boston bombing?

Pad, stop standing on the graves of innocent victims to attack others here. I made a statement about science. If you disagree with the statement, please express your reasons.

Your emotional outburst has nothing to do with the topic of my post -- the fundamental nature of science.

The outburst does speak volumes about your delusion. You will tell an absurd lie to protect it -- which is typical.

BTW, I have never denied the possibility of a higher power. I am an agnostic. Throughout history, no god has seen fit to reveal anything to us which is provable. B

Be honest. If any god had done so, this board and emotional attacks like yours wouldn't exist.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#433959 Apr 19, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, Jesus did establish the Catholic Church.
Remember Jethro, most of Protestantism agrees with my statement. Lutheran, Methodist, Anglicans all acknowledge this historic truth. The new radical evangelical fundies ignore it or add their own conspiracy scenario to the origins of the Church and her scriptures.
From your point of view, why would a perfected Jewish Rabbi have any yearning to start a new religion?

Do you believe he thought his own religion was not perfect enough?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min Buck Crick 836,901
Mark Fuhrman PLANTED the glove @ Simpson's estate 10 min BenAdam 4
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 12 min BenAdam 4,051
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 15 min lovewithin 40,443
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 41 min Porkpie Hat 271,244
Would a Somali girl marry a non-Somali man in L... (Dec '13) 43 min LMH1983 44
No one should blaspheme Prophet Mohammad, peace... 58 min MUQ2 412
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Freebird USA 176,745
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 3 hr Naveen kumar 7,154
More from around the web