Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 679024 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#428741 Mar 19, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well - you do quote alot of Jewish texts, inside of Jesus.
You are right, my sarcasm should not be posted.
Please stop misleading others with your personal interpretation of Jewish texts.
My apology...I never realized that the KJV is loaded with Jewish text!!!

How do I correct this disaster????
Free Mind

Saint Petersburg, FL

#428742 Mar 19, 2013

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#428743 Mar 19, 2013
716 702
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post to FM:
Free Mind wrote:
Again, Oxbow edits the Bible.
"Judge not ... " is nowhere to be found in the Oxbow Bible.
lmao
Oxbow wrote:
Not judging....simply showing you from Scripture what your words say about you...
The Word of God speaks of and your ilk...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
New Age writes:
So I asked you to post where I can see what you see about "fools".
Please post a link that shows evidence that the passage you reference is applicable to those individuals.
I don't believe you know who is a 'fool' and who is not, but will sure judge others as such (with this passage), because they don't believe like you.
You are foolish to think like this.
Live in love.
Abi yi ro. Duro yire pa na lutaneh tosi. Niro yo decare teleno se hecixeh wi nahino fekucat? Eto simacieg dibo rilom abe rusivi taho. Capoco nenunot yi denadak ienulec! Ca liyo no cezesu darenis nomahu cien vucal nesako lerafa. Terepi itoma yotepen tone? Li ilevas nepe ecu nera run cila vu. Tan caceg gosipot siper peli pasesal bomu lelutoh neduh cet. Peyi ediebe veda ifasumup nati olam ogeto gepat. Sare eteduhe oyugos ri ti. Owin la ris to itienilier ope tepalir. He rikin tore bagat nitiese.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#428744 Mar 19, 2013
717
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you beleive the Bible, even when this passage clearly dictates that anything writen by men is foolishness.
Thank you fro proving yet again that Christianity is a fraud made for fools, like you.
But still.....you and all of Christendom think certain men were infallible.
*sighs*
Why don't you believe Jesus?
Herein is your problem regards your inability to understand Scripture...and it will not change until you are no longer a natural man.

Quote: But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#428745 Mar 19, 2013
735
Free Mind wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. I am "spiritually discerned."
Webster:
1. To perceive with the eyes or intellect; detect.
2. To recognize or comprehend mentally.
Simple question: does Oxbow follow the spiritual in practical, real life terms?
Does Oxbow seek out a medical science specialist when ill, a doctor who uses intellect and seeks to comprehend mentally -- or does Oxbow seek spiritual cures?
How exactly does Oxbow apply his sure-thing superior spiritualism beyond this board?
Herein is your problem regards your inability to understand Scripture...this will not change until you are no longer a natural man.

Quote: But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#428746 Mar 19, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
-
-
<quoted text>
-
NO. not geneD. but by this post you are showing, once again, what you are. Someone who "thinks" they *know everything* and can even go so far as to call themselves a *Spiritual Leader*... a *New Age* one ... at that ... lol.
I don't know everything....although my Grandma does. Just go and ask her.

:o)

Not gened. Darn.

Thought I would ask, just to get it out in the open.

Thanks for letting us know and clearing the air. Carry on.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#428747 Mar 19, 2013
Free Mind wrote:
<quoted text>
Ethical teachings - dogma = no hatred and no self-validation.
They skip over this part of the teachings in ther bible studies.

Like I've stated, they don't want to understand the Self, they would rather have others tell them what to believe.

ThHis is why I couldn't be a follower - I just had too much of a hard time with someone else telling me how to believe.

Then I saw the Light - which was brilliantly exposed!

Cheers!
guest

United States

#428748 Mar 19, 2013
guest wrote:
-
jethro8, NASL takes great joy in attacking others and will only show "interest" in their posts when he thinks he can attack them and not be refuted.
-
-
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
Also - I respond to call you out on your false claims.
Funny thing is though, I'll call you out, post a refutation, and all I ever see from you and others like you, are just insults and name calling....NEVER an intelligent refutation with links to support your position or anything.
When you can actually "grow a pair, then post again to me. At this point, you have no substance to add to the forum.
-
-
What *New Age Spiritual Leader* and *Biblical Canon* call false claims are truly two different things. Therefore, you can't possibly *call me out* on your hogwash - because in the end, it's just hogwash.
-
Grow a pair, now? a pair of what?
-
"No substance to add to the 'forum'?" as compared to you who 'adds' so much ... hogwash?
-
When you add lies to the truth and pass it ALL off as truth ... do you not realize at that point, it ALL becomes a lie? more ... hogwash?

Since: Nov 08

usa

#428749 Mar 19, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
710 638
<quoted text>
"4:41 pm,with light rain and snow showers temps in the high 30's" is not the day of the week!!!!
i get it you were looking for a number,lets see Sunday is day 1, Monday day 2, Tuesday is day 3,i still figured it out,sign the paperwork,i want my farm,hope it's big and worth money,i need a lot of it.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#428750 Mar 19, 2013
I bet you weasel out now. oxyboy

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#428751 Mar 19, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
My apology...I never realized that the KJV is loaded with Jewish text!!!
How do I correct this disaster????
believe in Jesus.

Very simple to do, not so simple when others tell you not to.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#428752 Mar 19, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
716 702
<quoted text>
Abi yi ro. Duro yire pa na lutaneh tosi. Niro yo decare teleno se hecixeh wi nahino fekucat? Eto simacieg dibo rilom abe rusivi taho. Capoco nenunot yi denadak ienulec! Ca liyo no cezesu darenis nomahu cien vucal nesako lerafa. Terepi itoma yotepen tone? Li ilevas nepe ecu nera run cila vu. Tan caceg gosipot siper peli pasesal bomu lelutoh neduh cet. Peyi ediebe veda ifasumup nati olam ogeto gepat. Sare eteduhe oyugos ri ti. Owin la ris to itienilier ope tepalir. He rikin tore bagat nitiese.
Ah yes - the Oxbow dialect.

Give it up - I've passed by this post and won't be returning to it.

Cheers!

Since: Nov 08

usa

#428753 Mar 19, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
-
-
<quoted text>
-
jethro8, NASL takes great joy in attacking others and will only show "interest" in their posts when he thinks he can attack them and not be refuted.
that's OK it's an open say as you think forum,granted some don't think before they speak.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#428754 Mar 19, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
717
<quoted text>
Herein is your problem regards your inability to understand Scripture...and it will not change until you are no longer a natural man.
Quote: But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Please state the difference between what you call a "natural man" and a man who is "not natural".

Since: Nov 08

usa

#428755 Mar 19, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
-
-
<quoted text>
-
yeah. I know it was common practice - and most of them called themselves Christian. What an insult to Christ, huh? Just as the Catholic hierarchy insults Christ when they protect and shelter pedophiles.
ya i guess you could say that.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#428756 Mar 19, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
-
-
<quoted text>
-
-
What *New Age Spiritual Leader* and *Biblical Canon* call false claims are truly two different things. Therefore, you can't possibly *call me out* on your hogwash - because in the end, it's just hogwash.
-
Grow a pair, now? a pair of what?
-
"No substance to add to the 'forum'?" as compared to you who 'adds' so much ... hogwash?
-
When you add lies to the truth and pass it ALL off as truth ... do you not realize at that point, it ALL becomes a lie? more ... hogwash?
You sure have a load of big words you are using, but nothing to refute anything I say.

Please stop. You are embarrassing yourself - by showing your ignorance everytime you post.
Saban fan

Decatur, AL

#428757 Mar 19, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course water-baptism is not a sin where did you get that?
What i'm saying is that born-agains will testify they were saved after they received the Holy Spirit Baptism when they believed, not when they were water-baptized.
Your saying the water-baptism plays a part in saving them, quite different than getting water baptised after one is saved.
I'm not saying it, Acts 2:38 says it.
There's no evidence to suggest the eunuch was saved before his baptism either.
Paul said there is ONE baptism. Wouldn't it be sinful to continue to practice two or more?
guest

United States

#428758 Mar 19, 2013
guest wrote:
-
NO. not geneD. but by this post you are showing, once again, what you are. Someone who "thinks" they *know everything* and can even go so far as to call themselves a *Spiritual Leader*... a *New Age* one ... at that ... lol.
-
-
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
I don't know everything....although my Grandma does. Just go and ask her.
:o)
Not gened. Darn.
Thought I would ask, just to get it out in the open.
Thanks for letting us know and clearing the air. Carry on.
-
Oh. Well then, perhaps your GRANDMA should be called by the name "New Age Spiritual Leader" and you should be called "New Age Spiritual Leader-in-Training" ... of course, the New Age stuff is just so much hogwash - no matter if you are the 'expert' or the pupil. Being an expert in hogwash doesn't appeal to me in the least ... even amateur status is not, in the least bit, thought provoking.
Free Mind

Saint Petersburg, FL

#428759 Mar 19, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
735
<quoted text>
Herein is your problem regards your inability to understand Scripture...this will not change until you are no longer a natural man.
Quote: But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Again == I 100,000% agree. I am "spiritually discerned."

So are you.

Again == a simple question you must missed: When ill, does Oxbow seek out a "discerned" medical science doctor who uses intellect and seeks to comprehend mentally -- or does Oxbow seek spiritual cures?

How exactly does Oxbow apply his non-discerning spiritualism beyond this board?

Does Oxbow even know what discerned means?

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#428760 Mar 19, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Please state the difference between what you call a "natural man" and a man who is "not natural".
~~~

1Co_2:14 But the --->natural<--- man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

THE WORD -->NAYURAL<-- DEFINED IN GREEK

Natural
G5591
&#968;&#965;&#967; &#953;&#954;&#959; &#769;&#962;
psuchikos
psoo-khee-kos'
From G5590; sensitive that is, animate (in distinction on the one hand from G4152, which is the higher or renovated nature; and on the other from G5446, which is the lower or bestial nature):- natural, sensual.
~~~

The natural man us the unregenerated carnal MINDED man ( man not Born again) that walks by his five senses..

The man that depends upon the prompting of the Adamic nature, as appose to the Spiritual man ...

THE MAN THAT IS BORN AGAIN, THAT RECEIVES SPIRITUAL INPUT...

THE MAN THAT IS QUICKENED...made ALIVE ...as it is written

Rom_8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

---

Rom_8:6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 1 min RiversideRedneck 2,563
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min RiversideRedneck 119,101
I want my BF to have sex with another girl (Jan '13) 2 hr Freaky2 41
Adult dating minors (Mar '09) 4 hr 17_y-o_older_sister 27
Who's the best fighter: Jackie Chan, Bruce Lee,... (Jan '08) 4 hr hideous 583
Illegal to hoard or store extra food under USA ... (Jun '08) 6 hr UMAKEWORLDPEACEUM... 28
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 hr UMAKEWORLDPEACEUM... 982,141
More from around the web