Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

Full story: CBC News 574,123
The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ. Full Story

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#426430 Mar 8, 2013
And in case you guys are wondering........NO,I AM NOT EFFEMINATE. In fact, people are shocked when they do discover that I'm gay.

I have had many females come on to me and when I reveal to them that I prefer man,they are totally shocked and start saying no way and I'm such a waste,LOL.

Not even my parents knew I was gay when I was growing up as a kid. I remember my father found out when he caught me in our basement bent over our pool table and being "invaded" by one of my friends that was a neighbor. He would have disowned me amd disinherited me had it not been for my mother who intervened for me.

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#426432 Mar 8, 2013
This 'I'm Only Sort of Sorry' business that seems to be going around lately (well since the mid 60's):........

Stanley says: I'm sorry I've never said sorry.

'Sorry has always seemed to be the hardest word, but in 2013 Stanley has seen the error of the General Public's thinking.

Between 'bracelet aficionado Lance Armstrong, football coach Rob Ford, and anti-shirt activist Justin Bieber, Stanley now sees that 'sorry' is the quickest, easiest 'Path To Redemption'.

Whether you say 'sorry' on the twit thingy to Oprah or at a staged media event, you can take your dirty laundry and stuff it in the hamper of history, even if it never actually comes clean.

You'll notice Stanley never said that these men apologized. He only noted that they said the word 'sorry'. There's a difference. A Really & Truly big difference.

As I understand it, perhaps naively, an apology involves admitting you were wrong, offering no excuses, and owning your mistake.

Cyclist Armstrong appeared with Oprah and said 'sorry' for using performance-enhancing drugs but also said he never considered it cheating. Oprah, a.k.a. Pope No. 3, still offered absolution and said Armstrong could be 'a hero again'.

One NHL hockey (another bullschidt game bilking each fan out of hundreds of $$Dollars$$ each year) club coach - Rob ford - when it looked like he might lose his job, said he was "'sorry' to everyone who believes I should have done this differently". That's sincere in its half-heartedness, at least, though it's hard to fit on a HallMark Card.

And singer Bieber had to apologize for taking the stage at a London concert this week at 10#0pm, which is past his 'fan base's bedtime'. It's a minor transgression to be sure, but the fact he twitted that 'there is no excuse for that' while blaming 'technical issues' in the same breath has Stanley assuming he's begun the inevitable downward spiral on a teenage popStar and in eight (8) years will have the face of Keith Richards.

Seeing as I can say 'sorry' for my misdeeds without the pain of any emotional heavy-lifting has inspired me to stepUP. I'm going to follow the example set by these (3) wise men, and soon I'll be sorry too.

Here goes:

I'd like to say 'sorry' to my mother for stealing her Vogues and Redbooks when I was 11 years old so that I might peruse them for showing off to my buddies what the opposite sex was all about and how much I knew about them. I'd also like to say 'sorry' to the teenage girls who found my PlayBoy magazine stash in the woods and, after an initial flush of excitement, loomed gravely over the pages, looking sad and whispering aloud "Why would anyone do this?"

With your permission, ladies and gentlemen (you too 'truth' and 'LTM' amongst a few other eeejits hereIN), I'd like to be a hero again.

Furthermore, i'd like to say 'sorry' for the times that I have dropped a half-full cup of coffee into a mall garbage can because I'd been too lazy to find a sink. I apologize sincerely to anyone who thinks I possibly could have done this differently, though I frankly don't see how.

I also apologizd for when I do it in the future.

Finally, I'm sorry that I have coveted my neighbor's ox. Like, a lot. There's no excuse fot that, but i've had some technical difficulties.

Phew! Wow, that really works. I feel better!

Maybe you need to say sorry, too. Perhaps you have a hard time apologizing?

Well, Stanly and I challenge you to step forward and see how it feels to sort-of, kind-of, in-a-way apologize.

After all, you're better safe than sorry.

No wait.
Clay

United States

#426433 Mar 8, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
-
-
<quoted text>
-
-
*properly* explained?
-
If you take Jesus at his word, there needn't be further *explanation*. You just do what Jesus said to do, and He said, "Call NO Man Father."
-
That's not hard to understand. Jesus "properly explained" it to me and I don't need any explanation other than Jesus' own words. No one does. It's written in God's word, at Matthew 23:9. Protected and preserved by God's Holy Spirit.
If you choose to be that ignorant, its your right.
But don't come at us with that nonsense and falsely accuse us of doing something we shouldn't. Only God can see your heart; only He knows if you're just hiding behind a Bible verse or if you really mean it. I'll leave it at that.
Clay

United States

#426434 Mar 8, 2013
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes there were other denominations before the Reformation & Luther. There was the numerous Orthodox and the Waldensians, Nazarenes, Galatian, and several others Catholics like to pretend never existed.
Today the only way to find the true church or faith of Jesus is with God's word. Find the ones keeping God's law including the right Sabbath and you narrow it way down. And there goes the RC.
Yes Socci, there were cults in every decade and there will always be in future decades.
If they were on the side of truth, Christ would see to it that His message is brought to more than the handful who belong to these separate groups.
Conspiracy Christianity has no place in Christianity. Christ did not start a secret hidden sect with so much confusion. I encourage you to splash some cold water on your face and walk away from the ignorant infested cult you're in.
Clay

United States

#426435 Mar 8, 2013
Tony17 wrote:
And in case you guys are wondering........NO,I AM NOT EFFEMINATE. In fact, people are shocked when they do discover that I'm gay.
I have had many females come on to me and when I reveal to them that I prefer man,they are totally shocked and start saying no way and I'm such a waste,LOL.
Not even my parents knew I was gay when I was growing up as a kid. I remember my father found out when he caught me in our basement bent over our pool table and being "invaded" by one of my friends that was a neighbor. He would have disowned me amd disinherited me had it not been for my mother who intervened for me.
Wow. That is some testimony Tony. Your father caught some guy putting his sexual organ in your digestive system!
At what point did you and that guy, think it was normal to put each others sexual organ in your digestive systems? Do you see why there is a certain level of pervertness about that? There is nothing natural about it in anyway.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#426436 Mar 8, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
406 398
<quoted text>
Your info on the popes is further proof that the Catholics are not always following the Sacred Word of God...the Bible...
The Word of God does not teach celibacy one day, and the next day teach the opposite!!!!
Clerical celibacy is a discipline.
hojo

Saint Paul, MN

#426437 Mar 8, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
408
<quoted text>
Oxbow wrote:
The Bible does not teach that we are to believe in any "Church"...much less the Catholic Church.
It does teach:
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture
And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Show me one verse that contradicts these and you will have a fallible Bible...which is impossible...
I am still waiting......
Matthew 16 (regarding Jesus Christs One True Church) and John6 regarding Our Lords TRUE Body and Blood in the Eucharist "doesn't contradict ANY of the verses you listed----it only confirms, supports and compliments those verses because every thing that you have quoted, has,(for over 2000 years),is and will continue to be manifested (in and through) Jesus Christs One (and only TRUE) Apostolic Catholic Church (the Bride of Christ). It is the same message in both my Protestant bible as well as my Catholic Bible! Unfortunately, for you, the TRUTH has "escaped your anti-catholic mind and your "editorializing bible only (opinionated heresy) has "corrupted and confused your heart and soul! No surprise here coming from Protestant "fundies" who continue to live in the "same old distorted (500) year Reformation "bondage" of "relative truth" Christianity!

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 55:11--"MATT 10:27"

#426438 Mar 8, 2013
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Yep. I'm as queer as a three dollar bill. I just happen to be a homosexual that has been saved by grace that is no longer practicing that lifestyle. However my flesh is still attracted to men. And I am still honest enough to admit it because one thing about me is I AM NO HYPOCRIT.
~~~

You wrote..

I sometimes have to really strive to bring this flesh under subjection. As they say..the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.

You have a promise in God's word, that you will not be tempted above that you can bear.

It reads

1Co 10:13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man:
but God is faithful,

who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able;

but will with the temptation

also make a way to escape,

that ye may be able to bear it.

When and if you have an overwhelming temptation....then I would

recommend that you find a genuine/real Christian that can pray a prayer

of deliverance over/for you.

I would further recommend that you be very careful whom you choose, to

pray a prayer of deliverance...

Not every thing that glitters is a genuine diamond. there is a lot of

paste around.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 55:11--"MATT 10:27"

#426439 Mar 8, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
Matthew 16 (regarding Jesus Christs One True Church) and John6 regarding Our Lords TRUE Body and Blood in the Eucharist "doesn't contradict ANY of the verses you listed----it only confirms, supports and compliments those verses because every thing that you have quoted, has,(for over 2000 years),is and will continue to be manifested (in and through) Jesus Christs One (and only TRUE) Apostolic Catholic Church (the Bride of Christ). It is the same message in both my Protestant bible as well as my Catholic Bible! Unfortunately, for you, the TRUTH has "escaped your anti-catholic mind and your "editorializing bible only (opinionated heresy) has "corrupted and confused your heart and soul! No surprise here coming from Protestant "fundies" who continue to live in the "same old distorted (500) year Reformation "bondage" of "relative truth" Christianity!
~~~

I have a serious problem believing that The Blood of Jesus is created in a Mogan David Wine Press...

Or

His flesh is created by Nabisco...and experiences transubstantiation

through the ritual of a corruptible priest..

Jesus was first sired by the Holy Ghost...and His precious sinless body

and

blood cannot be recreated/re-produced by a corruptible man...

The very thought of doing so ..to me ..is beyond comprehension.

Our relationship with the heavenly Father is SPIRITUAL..

.A PHYSICAL ritual ...such as you Roman Catholics claim to do.... to

me...would be cannibalism.
Clay

United States

#426441 Mar 8, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
I have a serious problem believing that The Blood of Jesus is created in a Mogan David Wine Press...
Or
His flesh is created by Nabisco...and experiences transubstantiation
through the ritual of a corruptible priest..
Jesus was first sired by the Holy Ghost...and His precious sinless body
and
blood cannot be recreated/re-produced by a corruptible man...
The very thought of doing so ..to me ..is beyond comprehension.
Our relationship with the heavenly Father is SPIRITUAL..
.A PHYSICAL ritual ...such as you Roman Catholics claim to do.... to
me...would be cannibalism.
John 6: 52

That's precisely why you and the others walked out on Jesus, saying, "How can this man give us his flesh to eat"?

Well, Christ told us how. Paul told us how too, when he explained the Catholic Mass to the Church at Corinth "for I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night He was betrayed took bread, and when He had given thanks He broke it, and said, "This IS MY BODY, which is for you. Do THIS if remembrance of me"
"therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the wine unworthily, will be guilty of profaning the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ"

Cor 11: 23, 27
Dan

Omaha, NE

#426442 Mar 8, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
I have a serious problem believing that The Blood of Jesus is created in a Mogan David Wine Press...
Or
His flesh is created by Nabisco...and experiences transubstantiation
through the ritual of a corruptible priest..
Jesus was first sired by the Holy Ghost...and His precious sinless body
and
blood cannot be recreated/re-produced by a corruptible man...
The very thought of doing so ..to me ..is beyond comprehension.
Our relationship with the heavenly Father is SPIRITUAL..
.A PHYSICAL ritual ...such as you Roman Catholics claim to do.... to
me...would be cannibalism.
Well, Jesus said several times that it was so.

Are you telling us that God is incapable of bringing something about that He said He's do?
Clay

United States

#426444 Mar 8, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
I have a serious problem believing that The Blood of Jesus is created in a Mogan David Wine Press...
Or
His flesh is created by Nabisco...and experiences transubstantiation
through the ritual of a corruptible priest..
Jesus was first sired by the Holy Ghost...and His precious sinless body
and
blood cannot be recreated/re-produced by a corruptible man...
The very thought of doing so ..to me ..is beyond comprehension.
Our relationship with the heavenly Father is SPIRITUAL..
.A PHYSICAL ritual ...such as you Roman Catholics claim to do.... to
me...would be cannibalism.
You may mean well and truly love the Love, but you can't be undoing what Jesus Christ started.

Out of all the point topics you guys disagree with us, the Eucharist is the one that makes me the saddest. Please don't ever think you're personally insulting us by mocking the Eucharist. I don't think any Catholic would take it personal, because we know the Eucharist is Jesus Christ. Therefore, you're mocking Him, not us. This is why its sad.

You guys claim to be 'bible alone', but nothing is more obvious than the Eucharist described in scripture. Christ was blunt about it. He was clear as can be. All the early Christian writers support what the Apostles taught about it. It was always there until you guys undid it a few hundred yrs ago.
Clay

Saint Paul, MN

#426445 Mar 8, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
I have a serious problem believing that The Blood of Jesus is created in a Mogan David Wine Press...
Or
His flesh is created by Nabisco...and experiences transubstantiation
through the ritual of a corruptible priest..
Jesus was first sired by the Holy Ghost...and His precious sinless body
and
blood cannot be recreated/re-produced by a corruptible man...
The very thought of doing so ..to me ..is beyond comprehension.
Our relationship with the heavenly Father is SPIRITUAL..
.A PHYSICAL ritual ...such as you Roman Catholics claim to do.... to
me...would be cannibalism.
About 10 yrs after the last book of the NT was written, Ignatius of Antioch who was ordained by St. Peter as Bishop and who was a Disciple of the Apostle John wrote this: "Take note to those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ who has come to us. See how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. They abstain from the Eucharist and prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and the Father, in His goodness, raised up again. They who deny this gift are perishing in their disputes"

Do you believe the Apostle John messed up by explaining to Ignatius the wrong info?
Or do you believe Ignatius didn't know what he was talking about, and you, 1,900 yrs later know better than this man, who knew the Apostle John personally?

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 55:11--"MATT 10:27"

#426446 Mar 8, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
You may mean well and truly love the Love, but you can't be undoing what Jesus Christ started.
Out of all the point topics you guys disagree with us, the Eucharist is the one that makes me the saddest. Please don't ever think you're personally insulting us by mocking the Eucharist. I don't think any Catholic would take it personal, because we know the Eucharist is Jesus Christ. Therefore, you're mocking Him, not us. This is why its sad.
You guys claim to be 'bible alone', but nothing is more obvious than the Eucharist described in scripture. Christ was blunt about it. He was clear as can be. All the early Christian writers support what the Apostles taught about it. It was always there until you guys undid it a few hundred yrs ago.
~~~

We serve Communion but we make no effort (to desecrate reproduce, re-create the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ) by believing His body and Blood could be created re-produced by a priest...If what you claim is true...and a miracle takes place

WHY WOULD THE PRIEST HAVE TO HAVE ANY SUBSTANCE (BREAD AND WINE) to start with...
.FOR THE TRANSUBSTANTIATION..

THE MANNA THAT GOD GAVE FROM HEAVEN..which is a type of the body of Jesus Christ ...NEEDED NO PRIOR SUBSTANCE.

Jesus said..

Joh 6:57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

Joh 6:58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

Question...

Why is the communion... of so great importance to your Church ...

when you deny the rest of God's word, and make no effort to love a Holy

sanctified consecrated life.

King James version of the Bible says concerning Communion...

1Co_11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.

Yet you Roman Catholics take it with gusto...

and claim that it secures you salvation..

.

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#426447 Mar 8, 2013
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>You mean she survived? Did you make that story up,LOL?
Yes.....and No.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#426448 Mar 8, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
We serve Communion but we make no effort (to desecrate reproduce, re-create the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ) by believing His body and Blood could be created re-produced by a priest...If what you claim is true...and a miracle takes place
WHY WOULD THE PRIEST HAVE TO HAVE ANY SUBSTANCE (BREAD AND WINE) to start with...
.FOR THE TRANSUBSTANTIATION..
THE MANNA THAT GOD GAVE FROM HEAVEN..which is a type of the body of Jesus Christ ...NEEDED NO PRIOR SUBSTANCE.
Jesus said..
Joh 6:57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
Joh 6:58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
Question...
Why is the communion... of so great importance to your Church ...
when you deny the rest of God's word, and make no effort to love a Holy
sanctified consecrated life.
King James version of the Bible says concerning Communion...
1Co_11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
Yet you Roman Catholics take it with gusto...
and claim that it secures you salvation..
.
Um, the passage indicates that if you take communion and don't discern the body and blood of Jesus, you're eating and drinking unworthily.

You just condemned yourself, GIF.
Clay

Saint Paul, MN

#426449 Mar 8, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
I have a serious problem believing that The Blood of Jesus is created in a Mogan David Wine Press...
Or
His flesh is created by Nabisco...and experiences transubstantiation
through the ritual of a corruptible priest..
Jesus was first sired by the Holy Ghost...and His precious sinless body
and
blood cannot be recreated/re-produced by a corruptible man...
The very thought of doing so ..to me ..is beyond comprehension.
Our relationship with the heavenly Father is SPIRITUAL..
.A PHYSICAL ritual ...such as you Roman Catholics claim to do.... to
me...would be cannibalism.
Consider this video, Confrint. Justin Martyr wrote this letter to someone, about 50 yrs after the last book of the NT was penned:

youtube.com/watch...

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#426450 Mar 8, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
398
<quoted text>
"Priestly celibacy is somethin I think will be overturned in my lifetime."
Further proof that even Catholics know that their "church" does not always teach per Scripture...If celibacy was based on the Bible...it would never change...because the Word of God does not change...
BTW..your first supposed "pope" was married....so were some of the apostles...
LIAR thou arth,'oxBow'.

Stanley thinks that you harbour hate because you were raised in an environment of hate.....jamPacked in the middle of gorillas.

What sayeth you? No bullschiddt now, ya hear.

Or else I shall 'set' Stanley on you and when Stanley gets set on someOne, Stanley does not letUP. No sireee. Stanley just digs in and tears an arm off the hateful one and beats'em to death with it.
Clay

Saint Paul, MN

#426451 Mar 8, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
We serve Communion but we make no effort (to desecrate reproduce, re-create the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ) by believing His body and Blood could be created re-produced by a priest...If what you claim is true...and a miracle takes place
WHY WOULD THE PRIEST HAVE TO HAVE ANY SUBSTANCE (BREAD AND WINE) to start with...
.FOR THE TRANSUBSTANTIATION..
THE MANNA THAT GOD GAVE FROM HEAVEN..which is a type of the body of Jesus Christ ...NEEDED NO PRIOR SUBSTANCE.
Jesus said..
Joh 6:57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
Joh 6:58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
Question...
Why is the communion... of so great importance to your Church ...
when you deny the rest of God's word, and make no effort to love a Holy
sanctified consecrated life.
King James version of the Bible says concerning Communion...
1Co_11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
Yet you Roman Catholics take it with gusto...
and claim that it secures you salvation..
.
First and foremost, I've had the Eucharist before, I will testify to the special grace Christ gave us through it.
Can we experience the Holy Spirit from praying and reading the Bible? Yes, but its different with the Eucharist.
The Eucharist is the scriptures coming to life. Its not just reading something, its partaking in it.

And most importantly Confrint, its what Jesus Christ commanded of His Apostles and its what they taught.

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#426452 Mar 8, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
406 398
<quoted text>
Your info on the popes is further proof that the Catholics are not always following the Sacred Word of God...the Bible...
The Word of God does not teach celibacy one day, and the next day teach the opposite!!!!
LIAR thou arth 'oxBow'.

I believe that You are living proof that some form of human life exists with its head stuffed up its arseHole.

Ollie has confided in me that on reading some of your past messages, that you are one very mixedUP piece of work.

Ollie would never hire you as an extra on the set, unless you were used as the part of a 'turd' on the side of the road.

I disagree with Ollie on this one, as I think that there is more DNA in a 'turd' than in your hole (sic) form.

Ollie also believes that the only education that you have is that which you gleaned from the ILK that tossed swill over the rails of your pigpen.

Go Figure.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min BenAdam 809,899
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 5 min ANAL SEX ADVOCATE 97,892
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 6 min New Age Spiritual... 608,219
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 11 min WasteWater 5,553
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 16 min WasteWater 268,901
Mohammed was a pedophile, not a prophet 18 min PDX Dave 2
No one should blaspheme Prophet Mohammad, peace... 22 min PDX Dave 13
Dubai massage Body To Body full service 0559... (Mar '14) 8 hr coco 204
More from around the web