Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 653750 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#421126 Feb 9, 2013
Dust Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
Evangelicals in Brazil use such things as fight nights, tatto parlors, video games, bands etc to attract young people. There is no solidified movement. Pentecostals do well as young people want to choose their own religion they say. What will happen is they will splinter and divide and choose alacarte what they wish to believe. They will become more confused and lose there faith all together. What is not mentioned is how many those who went to this movement have also fallen away. Megachurches will rise and fall to the tune of the pastor that fills their itching ears or provides them with social hour rather than a united message or sincere worship.
Have you ever read about or seen documentaries of the Jesus Movement? Movements rise and fall the church will remain. A bunch of competing sects to see who can outdo the other for fun and games rather than a focus on Christ. Catholic evangelicals can move to promote more social engagements, but not at the expense of the mass and greater learning. Movements often rise quickly and then people either fall away completely or they return and seek to study more. The propoganda literature will be abundant, those weak in their knowledge of the Church will learn to hate and slander and obedience or seeking out the truth will be set aside for personal choices of what they feel is good.
Dust Storm
Peace

I pretty much agree with you here.

Most of this has happened in my lifetime, to some degree.

Those that seek will find....
Fun Facts

Midland, MI

#421127 Feb 9, 2013
Pad wrote:
<quoted text>
"...I do not believe for one minute that Mary would come to me and tell me to make an image of her,and venerate her through that image,or to use the image to bless my house or protect it.I would never believe that she would want me to build a huge edifice that is named for her,and that great devotions,litanies and prayers should be said to her in appeasement for sin,or for her to approach her Son,as though He is more approachable only through her.
There is a big difference brother, between Mary sharing the beauty of her son to us,and or requiring our obedience to make images of her,say rosaries,and build fantastic cathedrals in her name..."
To my knowledge the only object the Blessed Virgin Mary has asked for is the 'Miraculous Medal'...
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10115a.htm
http://www.therealpresence.org/archives/Mirac...

And I wear one...I can use all the Graces I can get :)

Secondly...the Chapels that are in Mary's honor ...Worship God through the Mass and Eucharist...
http://www.therealpresence.org/index.html
http://www.catholic.com/tracts/the-sacrifice-...
Questions?
http://avemariaradio.net/catholic-online-radi...
Saban fan

Decatur, AL

#421128 Feb 9, 2013
truth wrote:
Why you call Mediator?
Whats deference between Mediator and Creator?
God is the creator. Sin separates us from our just God. In the O.T. there had to be a High Priest between sin and God. Christians are 'priests', yet we have to have a High Priest (Jesus) or a mediator between us and God. When we are "in Christ" his blood washes us clean of our sins.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421129 Feb 9, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
There must a certain mindset in protestantism where the absurdities coming from preston are considered just another opinion and so the reaction is complete indifferance. If I'm an evangelical and the preacher says something so crazy, I just move on down the road to another community until the next one says something I don't like.
lets look at some catholic facts before you and dusty start to judge me,ok?

Dust Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
One does have to wonder how many other parts of the bible are wrong and stupid and clueless people like Ananius just said stuff, but embryo theories and Jesus probably didnt have an umbilichal chord and Mary was dumb and a horrid mother is in the bible

[[Joseph was a rotten Dad too]]] it would seem as

according to cc and other catholics, Jospeh was a old dottering man on his last legs.

according to catholics, joseph was not his dad, just a caretaker for mary.

those are just two fallacies that you catholics teach.

while conerning the embryo factor, I use my medical knowledge. and all you catholic do is mock since you can provide no defense against my words.you prefer to believe that Jesus is half man/half god.since you believe that God fertilized her eggand I provided proof of two distinct hybryds being produced and that is what we are talking about. a woman and a Spirit.

I dont expect it to make sense to a catholic. look at your intelligence, if you were smart, you wouldnt be a catholic.your piece of grain is a good indicator of your lack of intelligence and the ability to think for yourself.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421130 Feb 9, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
There must a certain mindset in protestantism where the absurdities coming from preston are considered just another opinion and so the reaction is complete indifferance. If I'm an evangelical and the preacher says something so crazy, I just move on down the road to another community until the next one says something I don't like.
again, Jesus NEVER told ananias to baptise paul. you will NEVER find those words. NEVER!!!!!

you take one little word [do] and make your false doctrine of baptising "washing away his sins".

I have said time and time again, just because something is said in the Bible doesnt make it true.

for instance, the Bible records a person saying these words' we know that God doesnt hear the prayer of a sinner", and to the Chrisitan that is Saved,we know that not to be true.
and lets look at what you people say when You speak of Jesus 'not having any brothers and sisters when the Bible even names them".

you pick and choose but for me, If it isnt said by Jesus, I dont have to abide by it when I know better and know what is right.

AGAIN, YOU NOR DUSTY, AND LETS INCLUDED THE SATAN WORSHIPPER, CAN NOT FIND THE WORD [BAPTISE] USED BY JESUS CONCERNING PAUL

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421131 Feb 9, 2013
Robert F wrote:
<quoted text>
Dust Storm
Peace
I pretty much agree with you here.
Most of this has happened in my lifetime, to some degree.
Those that seek will find....
you certainly are not like john the baptist, you are like a reed that [does blow with every wind of doctrine] and "concened" hadnt forgot how unstable a person that you are.

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#421132 Feb 9, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>lets look at some catholic facts before you and dusty start to judge me,ok?
Dust Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
One does have to wonder how many other parts of the bible are wrong and stupid and clueless people like Ananius just said stuff, but embryo theories and Jesus probably didnt have an umbilichal chord and Mary was dumb and a horrid mother is in the bible
[[Joseph was a rotten Dad too]]] it would seem as
according to cc and other catholics, Jospeh was a old dottering man on his last legs.
according to catholics, joseph was not his dad, just a caretaker for mary.
those are just two fallacies that you catholics teach.
while conerning the embryo factor, I use my medical knowledge. and all you catholic do is mock since you can provide no defense against my words.you prefer to believe that Jesus is half man/half god.since you believe that God fertilized her eggand I provided proof of two distinct hybryds being produced and that is what we are talking about. a woman and a Spirit.
I dont expect it to make sense to a catholic. look at your intelligence, if you were smart, you wouldnt be a catholic.your piece of grain is a good indicator of your lack of intelligence and the ability to think for yourself.
preston

lol....And this is how we know you are not born-again, because you don't know that Jesus had his humanity through Adam's race, born of God and Mary, and not some hybrid embryo that appeared to be human, but is somehow not of Adam's race, with the Blessed Mary as an incubator. It would be impossible for such a being to then be a sacrifice of God/Man.

Somehow your antiquated medical training has gotten, mixed up with some kind of movie, like "Alien", to produce this bizarre alien embryo hybrid!

Your whole theology is a fantasy because on your hybrid embryo theory. But of course it is self-substantiating because you say God told you.... Funny God hasn't told anyone else..., It must be your super-advanced medical training in embryology.....Hmmmm.

Catholics do not say Jesus is half man/half God. That is your stupid strawman.

He is fully human, fully God, conceived in her womb(Mary), overshadowed (by the Holy Spirit).(That is the Bible word for word. I can give you...Luke 1:31, 1:35)

Repent.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#421133 Feb 9, 2013
130
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>again, Jesus NEVER told ananias to baptise paul. you will NEVER find those words. NEVER!!!!!
you take one little word [do] and make your false doctrine of baptising "washing away his sins".
I have said time and time again, just because something is said in the Bible doesnt make it true.
for instance, the Bible records a person saying these words' we know that God doesnt hear the prayer of a sinner", and to the Chrisitan that is Saved,we know that not to be true.
and lets look at what you people say when You speak of Jesus 'not having any brothers and sisters when the Bible even names them".
you pick and choose but for me, If it isnt said by Jesus, I dont have to abide by it when I know better and know what is right.
AGAIN, YOU NOR DUSTY, AND LETS INCLUDED THE SATAN WORSHIPPER, CAN NOT FIND THE WORD [BAPTISE] USED BY JESUS CONCERNING PAUL
Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth.

Question....If this does not teach that God hears not the prayer of a sinner...what, exactly, is it saying??????

Does not this parallel verse teach God does not answer all prayers???? Quote: They cried, but there was none to save them: even unto the LORD, but he answered them not.

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#421134 Feb 9, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>you certainly are not like john the baptist, you are like a reed that [does blow with every wind of doctrine] and "concened" hadnt forgot how unstable a person that you are.
preston

Isaiah 42 :3

"A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth justice unto truth."

I would explain it to you. But your the expert on the O.T....
Clay

Melrose Park, IL

#421135 Feb 9, 2013
Texas Baptist Church to offer hand gun (conceal and carry) classes.

Wow. I suppose why not. The Bible doesn't say hand guns are wrong, so I guess they are covered. lol
www.foxnews.com

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421136 Feb 9, 2013
Robert F wrote:
<quoted text>
preston
lol....And this is how we know you are not born-again, because you don't know that Jesus had his humanity through Adam's race, born of God and Mary, and not some hybrid embryo that appeared to be human, but is somehow not of Adam's race, with the Blessed Mary as an incubator. It would be impossible for such a being to then be a sacrifice of God/Man.
Somehow your antiquated medical training has gotten, mixed up with some kind of movie, like "Alien", to produce this bizarre alien embryo hybrid!
Your whole theology is a fantasy because on your hybrid embryo theory. But of course it is self-substantiating because you say God told you.... Funny God hasn't told anyone else..., It must be your super-advanced medical training in embryology.....Hmmmm.
Catholics do not say Jesus is half man/half God. That is your stupid strawman.
He is fully human, fully God, conceived in her womb(Mary), overshadowed (by the Holy Spirit).(That is the Bible word for word. I can give you...Luke 1:31, 1:35)
Repent.
USING WIKI TO HELP YOU OUT. I ALREADY KNOW THIS:

The development of the embryo is called embryogenesis. In organisms that reproduce sexually, once a sperm(God has no sperm, since he isnt human) fertilizes an egg cell, the result is a cell called the zygote, which possesses {{{half the DNA of each of its two parents}]]]. SEE THIS: GOD HAS NO DNA.

NOW LOOK CLOSELY AT THIS ONE WORD[IMPLANTATION]:

5–7 days after fertilization, the blastocyst attaches to the wall of the uterus (endometrium). When it comes into contact with the endometrium it performs implantation. Implantation connections between the mother and the embryo will begin to form, including the umbilical cord.

HERE IS WHERE THE EMBRYO BEGINS TO TAKE THE HUMANIZATION FROM MARY(SINCE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HER).

this isnt the least difficult to understand, it is very simple and it occurrs with every child born.

the Bible speaks of the Holy Ghost "overshadowing' Mary. that in and of itself clearly indicates that God the Father used Him to infuse Jesus into Her body, just as on several occasions, we find that the Holy Ghost moved Jesus from one place to another.

and dusty lied when she said that I beleive that Jesus was born without the umbilical cord since that begins to form in this process of implantation as mentioned beforehand.

to say that God the Father had intercourse with mary is heresy at its worst.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421137 Feb 9, 2013
Robert F wrote:
<quoted text>
preston
Isaiah 42 :3
"A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth justice unto truth."
I would explain it to you. But your the expert on the O.T....
I cetainly understand enough to know that I am not like you flitting from ONE religion to another.

when I was filled, He said I would never thirst again. and that means for the spiritual things of life, not water or other drinks.

your ignorance leads you to believe that your intelligence is drafting you into this other knowledge that only leads to destruction

and you are correct, I dont need you to explain that [prophecy] to me.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421138 Feb 9, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
130
<quoted text>
Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth.
Question....If this does not teach that God hears not the prayer of a sinner...what, exactly, is it saying??????
Does not this parallel verse teach God does not answer all prayers???? Quote: They cried, but there was none to save them: even unto the LORD, but he answered them not.
what part of these words do you have a problem understanding?

for instance, the Bible records a person saying these words' we know that God doesnt hear the prayer of a sinner", and to the Christian that is Saved,we know that not to be true.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#421139 Feb 9, 2013
The teaching "Mary ever virgin" is tripe....

Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife:

The next verse says that did not happened until she gave birth to Christ. Quote: And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.

However, when this occurred is immaterial. The fact that it did, at some point in time, per Scripture, is undeniable.

So, she remained a virgin as much as any other wife who has had intercourse with her husband....

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421140 Feb 9, 2013
EVEN DUCT TAPE CANT FIX STUPID(catholicism),

all it can do is muffle the sound
Saban fan

Decatur, AL

#421141 Feb 9, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>again, Jesus NEVER told ananias to baptise paul. you will NEVER find those words. NEVER!!!!!
you take one little word [do] and make your false doctrine of baptising "washing away his sins".
I have said time and time again, just because something is said in the Bible doesnt make it true.
for instance, the Bible records a person saying these words' we know that God doesnt hear the prayer of a sinner", and to the Chrisitan that is Saved,we know that not to be true.
and lets look at what you people say when You speak of Jesus 'not having any brothers and sisters when the Bible even names them".
you pick and choose but for me, If it isnt said by Jesus, I dont have to abide by it when I know better and know what is right.
AGAIN, YOU NOR DUSTY, AND LETS INCLUDED THE SATAN WORSHIPPER, CAN NOT FIND THE WORD [BAPTISE] USED BY JESUS CONCERNING PAUL
How did Ananias know Paul needed to be baptized?

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#421142 Feb 9, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
USING WIKI TO HELP YOU OUT. I ALREADY KNOW THIS:
The development of the embryo is called embryogenesis. In organisms that reproduce sexually, once a sperm(God has no sperm, since he isnt human) fertilizes an egg cell, the result is a cell called the zygote, which possesses {{{half the DNA of each of its two parents}]]]. SEE THIS: GOD HAS NO DNA.
NOW LOOK CLOSELY AT THIS ONE WORD[IMPLANTATION]:
5–7 days after fertilization, the blastocyst attaches to the wall of the uterus (endometrium). When it comes into contact with the endometrium it performs implantation. Implantation connections between the mother and the embryo will begin to form, including the umbilical cord.
HERE IS WHERE THE EMBRYO BEGINS TO TAKE THE HUMANIZATION FROM MARY(SINCE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HER).
this isnt the least difficult to understand, it is very simple and it occurrs with every child born.
the Bible speaks of the Holy Ghost "overshadowing' Mary. that in and of itself clearly indicates that God the Father used Him to infuse Jesus into Her body, just as on several occasions, we find that the Holy Ghost moved Jesus from one place to another.
and dusty lied when she said that I beleive that Jesus was born without the umbilical cord since that begins to form in this process of implantation as mentioned beforehand.
to say that God the Father had intercourse with mary is heresy at its worst.
preston

Biology 101 is not a good support for your theory....We are talking the miracle of the Incarnation.

Basically you are saying that the Blessed Mary did not have egg cells which God could use.....That is the absurd part of your theory.

(The overshadowing has other typology, I am not going into at this time. It is a little over your head....)

You never, never, never respond to my objection(which is not just my personal, but from my readings upon the subject, especially St. Anselm), on the point that if God created another human being, outside the lineage of Adam, be it in egg, sperm, embryo form, then this makes null and void the sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross, specifically because it is that humanity(from Adam) and your embryo theory is outside of the lineage of Adam....!!!

You cannot. Why? Because your theory makes no sense. In fact, it is just some imaginary geneology you made up. Go back and read the Bible.

Catholics do not know the unknown. You say you do.
Catholics do know how God created a miracle. You say you do know.
All that Catholics know is that Jesus is a sinless human being and God.
You say Jesus is a sinless creation of a human being by God and God....

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#421143 Feb 9, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>I cetainly understand enough to know that I am not like you flitting from ONE religion to another.
when I was filled, He said I would never thirst again. and that means for the spiritual things of life, not water or other drinks.
your ignorance leads you to believe that your intelligence is drafting you into this other knowledge that only leads to destruction
and you are correct, I dont need you to explain that [prophecy] to me.
preston

One of the Psalms, I frequent is Psalm 29....verse 5

"The voice of the LORD breaketh the cedars; yea, the LORD breaketh the cedars of Lebanon."

Don't be a cedar of Lebanon....

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421144 Feb 9, 2013
Saban fan wrote:
<quoted text>
How did Ananias know Paul needed to be baptized?
he didnt know that Paul [needed] to be Baptised since he was already saved.

no minister should ever tell any person when they should be Baptised. that person should tell the minister when they feel that it is time to be Baptised as they are moved by the Holy Ghost.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#421145 Feb 9, 2013
Robert F wrote:
<quoted text>
preston
Biology 101 is not a good support for your theory....We are talking the miracle of the Incarnation.
Basically you are saying that the Blessed Mary did not have egg cells which God could use.....That is the absurd part of your theory.
(The overshadowing has other typology, I am not going into at this time. It is a little over your head....)
You never, never, never respond to my objection(which is not just my personal, but from my readings upon the subject, especially St. Anselm), on the point that if God created another human being, outside the lineage of Adam, be it in egg, sperm, embryo form, then this makes null and void the sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross, specifically because it is that humanity(from Adam) and your embryo theory is outside of the lineage of Adam....!!!
You cannot. Why? Because your theory makes no sense. In fact, it is just some imaginary geneology you made up. Go back and read the Bible.
Catholics do not know the unknown. You say you do.
Catholics do know how God created a miracle. You say you do know.
All that Catholics know is that Jesus is a sinless human being and God.
You say Jesus is a sinless creation of a human being by God and God....
lol, the sacrifice of jeuss on the Cross is valid of one simple reason. it took the Lamb of Of God, not man to take away the sins of the world. and if you were a Christian, you would know that.

and it is not my theory that makes no sense, it is teh lies that your church tells that makes no sense.

for instance, your piece of grain being jesus. that is so rediculous that people who are mature should be so ignorant and stupid enough to follow this ritual.

Jesus said that when we take the Lord Suppers, do it in remembrance of Him, not the witchcraft of pedophile priests.lol

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min Aura Mytha 63,512
herbal incense and legal buds for sale (Aug '11) 21 min lee 8
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 28 min Lbj 106,475
US Marines Mostly Gay (Oct '11) 29 min Semper anal USMC 69 28
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 32 min Student 45,231
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 38 min trifecta1 973,687
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 hr Peter Ross 445,462
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 3 hr Pegasus 281,845
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 8 hr Steve III 618,728
More from around the web