Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 603877 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Fr Robert Dye

United States

#401998 Nov 13, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
WE NEED TO GO BACK TO THE SUBJECT OF THIS FORUM.
WHICH SUBJECT IS
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican.
~~~
QUESTION
DO YOU BELIEVE WHAT THE VATICAN SAYS?
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT JESUS DIED ONLY FOR THE ROMAN CATHOLICS...
If so
where is it written in the Bible..
Book chapter nd verse please.
And ... going back to that, the Vatican NEVER said that, because that would exclude some 20+ Rites within the Catholic Church.
.What the headline misinterprtes is a statement from a discussion at a conference, in which they were defining what the term "church" actually meant in their discussions.
.
The Jesuits are not, strictly speaking, a "church." They would be a "faith community."
.
The "Orthodox Church" would, strictly speaking, be a "church," even though they are not part of the Catholic Church (at least not formally. Informally is more than open to debate.
.
For purposes of discussion, the Baptists are closer to a "faith community" than a "church," because of some of the charateristics the term "church" implies ... governance by a bishop would be an obvious one, but not necessarily an essential one.
.
For example, using the imaginary "Baptist Rite of the Catholic Church:"
.
They might not, in fact, be governed by a bishop. I could see it as being governed by a board of governers, elected by representatives of each district, elected by each individual local faith community. These governors would then submit a letter requesting union with the Roman See, even though they would not be technically "subject" to it. Would THAT qualify as a "church?"
.
Yeah. I am pretty sure it would.
.
.But reading the statement about "true Church" he as having the opposite as "false church" would be a misreading.
.
Is the tomato a true vegetable?
.
If not, does that make it a "false vegetable?"
.
Or is it simply a matter of the tomato being, speaking under quite strict definition, a fruit?
.
.The statement was not to say that these other churches do not have salvation. That is NOT what the Vatican was saying. One has only to read "Lumen Gentium" to know better than that.
.
Theperson who wrotethe headline was a troll, trying to be inflammatory, and it worked quite well.
.
Rob
4GVN

Wentzville, MO

#401999 Nov 13, 2012
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, St. Paul told him to believe and he will be saved. However, St. Paul's idea of "believing", as supported by his substantial preaching on the matter, is different than what you and the OSASers think "believing" is.
I've tried to get some others to explain what belief means to them. Can you tell me what it means to you? Is loving Jesus part of your believing in Him?
So are you now reluctantly admitting and agreeing that Paul and Silas did indeed answer the jailors question. "what must I do to be saved?" And that answer was clearly given. Paul did NOT say and then I will add more to the requirement later. He did not tell the jailor that if he happened to see him again he would tell him the rest of the story. And he did not send him away unprepared to meet Jesus. Though you would like to tell us that he did, to fit you RCC beliefs, but it just ain't so Anthony. Read it. Think about it. Accept it. And embrace it. That is true GRACE!
LTM

Sault Sainte Marie, Canada

#402000 Nov 13, 2012
HOJO

Luke 4

King James Version (KJV)


4 And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,

2 Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered.

3 And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread.

4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.

7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.

8 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

9 And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence:

10 For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee:

11 And in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

12 And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

13 And when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season.

14 And Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee: and there went out a fame of him through all the region round about.

15 And he taught in their synagogues, being glorified of all.

16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read.

17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,

18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,

19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.

20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him.

21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.

22 And all bare him witness, and wondered at the gracious words which proceeded out of his mouth. And they said, Is not this Joseph's son?

23 And he said unto them, Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself: whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country.

24 And he said, Verily I say unto you, No prophet is accepted in his own country.

25 But I tell you of a truth, many widows were in Israel in the days of Elias, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months, when great famine was throughout all the land;

26 But unto none of them was Elias sent, save unto Sarepta, a city of Sidon, unto a woman that was a widow.

27 And many lepers were in Israel in the time of Eliseus the prophet; and none of them was cleansed, saving Naaman the Syrian.

28 And all they in the synagogue, when they heard these things, were filled with wrath,

29 And rose up, and thrust him out of the city, and led him unto the brow of the hill whereon their city was built, that they might cast him down headlong.

30 But he passing through the midst of them went his way,

31 And came down to Capernaum, a city of Galilee, and taught them on the sabbath days.

32 And they were astonished at his doctrine: for his word was with power.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#402001 Nov 13, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="Anthony MN"
Ok. What if someone says they are saved, but think that the "good things" being done in other denominations by saved people aren't necessary? Who decides?
**********
Easy...God does. Good things are always in order. Everyone should do good things. You just can't buy your salvation with them.
KayMarie
So you and your husband speak for God?
4GVN

Wentzville, MO

#402002 Nov 13, 2012
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, St. Paul told him to believe and he will be saved. However, St. Paul's idea of "believing", as supported by his substantial preaching on the matter, is different than what you and the OSASers think "believing" is.
I've tried to get some others to explain what belief means to them. Can you tell me what it means to you? Is loving Jesus part of your believing in Him?
So you are almost,though reluctantly agreeing with Paul and Silas. They did indeed answer his sincere and direct question, FULLY. The did not say that we will tell you the rest of the requirements later. Paul did not say that 'well if our paths ever cross again I might tell what ADDITIONAL requirements there are. They answered his question COMPLETELY! Read it again Anthony. Study it. Think about it. This is true.... GRACE.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#402003 Nov 13, 2012
who="Fr Robert Dye"
Wow.
.
Are you now saying you*do* worship the Bible?
.
I was just poking fun.
.
The last time a Catholic (think it was Clay) asserted that we (Catholics) do not worship saints, "you" (was it Kay Marie?) posted "Yes, you do. You say you don't, but you do."
.
I thought that was completely outrageous.
.
Then I saw you deny that you worship the Bible, and I figured the same reasoning must apply. No?
Rob

**********

The Bible is the single-most valuable item a man can own. Call that worship if you will. Yes, I said, "you say you don't, but you do" simply because that is the way that you present saints, crucifix's, Pope's and other Catholic items. CC's infer that we are un-Christian because we respect the Bible...thus declaring their dis-respect of it.

You think that is outrageous?

KayMarie
LTM

Sault Sainte Marie, Canada

#402004 Nov 13, 2012
HOJO
TELL ME THE MEANING OF THIS BIBLE VERSE.
Isaiah 55 >>
King James Version

----------
1Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.
2Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness.

3Incline your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall live; and I will make an everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David.

4Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.

5Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of the LORD thy God, and for the Holy One of Israel; for he hath glorified thee.

6Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:

7Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.

8For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.

9For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

10For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:

11So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

12For ye shall go out with joy, and be led forth with peace: the mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and all the trees of the field shall clap their hands.

13Instead of the thorn shall come up the fir tree, and instead of the brier shall come up the myrtle tree: and it shall be to the LORD for a name, for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off.

----------
preston

Waverly, OH

#402005 Nov 13, 2012
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
So you and your husband speak for God?
could you clarify this question.

are they talking for him when they are rolling on the floor or when they get up trough the help of a lift machine?

but if their conversation is through the jibber jabber that their denomination is famous for, who is correct, her or him hiding behind her skirt or pants since she seems to be de man!
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#402006 Nov 13, 2012
4GVN wrote:
<quoted text>So are you now reluctantly admitting and agreeing that Paul and Silas did indeed answer the jailors question. "what must I do to be saved?" And that answer was clearly given. Paul did NOT say and then I will add more to the requirement later. He did not tell the jailor that if he happened to see him again he would tell him the rest of the story. And he did not send him away unprepared to meet Jesus. Though you would like to tell us that he did, to fit you RCC beliefs, but it just ain't so Anthony. Read it. Think about it. Accept it. And embrace it. That is true GRACE!
If you're going to isolate this one verse from Acts to the exclusion of the gospels and the rest of the NT, I don't know why you even bother with the bible.

The jailer and his houehold were immediately baptized, so yes, there is more to "believing" than just mouthing the words. Notice that St. Paul also told him that his whole household would be saved based on faith of the jailer, which incidently supports infant baptism.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#402007 Nov 13, 2012
4GVN wrote:
<quoted text>So you are almost,though reluctantly agreeing with Paul and Silas. They did indeed answer his sincere and direct question, FULLY. The did not say that we will tell you the rest of the requirements later. Paul did not say that 'well if our paths ever cross again I might tell what ADDITIONAL requirements there are. They answered his question COMPLETELY! Read it again Anthony. Study it. Think about it. This is true.... GRACE.
BTW, I've tried to get some others to explain what belief means to them. Can you tell me what it means to you? Is loving Jesus part of your believing in Him?
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#402008 Nov 13, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="Fr Robert Dye"
Wow.
.
Are you now saying you*do* worship the Bible?
.
I was just poking fun.
.
The last time a Catholic (think it was Clay) asserted that we (Catholics) do not worship saints, "you" (was it Kay Marie?) posted "Yes, you do. You say you don't, but you do."
.
I thought that was completely outrageous.
.
Then I saw you deny that you worship the Bible, and I figured the same reasoning must apply. No?
Rob
**********
The Bible is the single-most valuable item a man can own. Call that worship if you will. Yes, I said, "you say you don't, but you do" simply because that is the way that you present saints, crucifix's, Pope's and other Catholic items. CC's infer that we are un-Christian because we respect the Bible...thus declaring their dis-respect of it.
You think that is outrageous?
KayMarie
"CC's infer that we are un-Christian because we respect the Bible...thus declaring their dis-respect of it."

If you were to observe the Liturgy of the Word in a Catholic mass you would realize how wrong you are.
preston

Waverly, OH

#402009 Nov 13, 2012
PHOENIX (Reuters)- An Arizona woman, in despair at the re-election of Democratic President Barack Obama, ran down her husband with the family car in suburban Phoenix on Saturday because he failed to vote in the election, police said on Monday

hopefully, this woman will get life with no chance of Parole. there is no reasoning behind some people and it shows with Az carrying the state for romney.
Fr Robert Dye

United States

#402010 Nov 13, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="Fr Robert Dye"
Wow.
.
Are you now saying you*do* worship the Bible?
.
I was just poking fun.
.
The last time a Catholic (think it was Clay) asserted that we (Catholics) do not worship saints, "you" (was it Kay Marie?) posted "Yes, you do. You say you don't, but you do."
.
I thought that was completely outrageous.
.
Then I saw you deny that you worship the Bible, and I figured the same reasoning must apply. No?
Rob
**********
The Bible is the single-most valuable item a man can own. Call that worship if you will. Yes, I said, "you say you don't, but you do" simply because that is the way that you present saints, crucifix's, Pope's and other Catholic items. CC's infer that we are un-Christian because we respect the Bible...thus declaring their dis-respect of it.
You think that is outrageous?
KayMarie
No, what I thought was outrageous was the statement that we worship saints, even when we deny that this is so.
.
I doubt that you actually worship the scriptures as an idol, although I have no doubt that there are some who call themselves Christian who *do* apprach the Bible very much the way pagans relate to an idol.
.
If you tell me that you do NOT worship the Bible, it is outrageous for me to claim otherwise.
.
YOU are the only one who can say what your relationship whith God is(Well, yes, God can, too, and one day will, but you knowwhat I mean).
.
By the same token, if the CC proclaims that saints are NOT to be worshipped, but only God is to be worshipped, it is outrageous for you to claim the exact opposite.
.
It is dishonest.
.
Which is surprising coming from you, KayMarie. That is not the sort of thing I have come to expect from you.
.
We may disagree theologically, but my impression what that you could be relied upon to be honest and logical.
.
Your "yes you do. You say you don't, but you do" was illogical, or dishonest, or both, and left me very disappointed with you.
.
I hope and pray you don't worship the scriptures. It is my firm belief that the "mark" made so much of in the Revelation is really speaking figuratively of idolatry. Anyone who worships idols, either literally or figuratively, will have "the mark."
.
And I don't think anyone with "great respect" for the scriptures worships them. Respect and love for the scriptures is greatly admirable.
.
That respect and love is HOLY.
.
It is SACRED.
.
Rob

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#402011 Nov 13, 2012
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. There is a lot of truth in what you say.
Basically, you believe the passage is read one way, through supposed years of unchanging words, and I've chosen to believe it to be another way - in regards to utilizing all of what Jesus spoke of.
I guess this is where we are at in our discussion, is it not?
Why do you think "John" is more enlightened than Jesus?
Interpretation is Perception.
Perception is Self.
Jesus believed in it, why shouldn't you?
NASL

You wrote," ...I've chosen to believe it to be another way - in regards to utilizing all of what Jesus spoke of."

Our discussion can move forward now...,

First off, I challenge you to demonstrate that Jesus said "all" of these things which Gnosticism holds, and are not in the Bible. Where does it say in Gnosticism that you have ALL of Jesus' sayings? What and where is the validation of these sayings(I didn't say rewritten manuscripts)?

Secondly, your belief system being gnostically based is "utilizing" what Jesus teaches rather than is based in Truth. To utililze is; to use, make a pratical use of, or to exploit. Therefore at best you could lawfully call the teachings of Jesus as being used, but morally not lived. That again goes back to breaking the moral law of the 10 Commanmdments again(Thou shalt not steal. And I will go ahead and declare it covets thy neighbors goods, and commits spiritual adultery. This makes 6 of the 10 Commandments broken.)

I never said John is more enlightened than Jesus.
preston

Waverly, OH

#402012 Nov 13, 2012
Fr Robert Dye wrote:
<quoted text>
No, what I thought was outrageous was the statement that we worship saints, even when we deny that this is so.
.
I doubt that you actually worship the scriptures as an idol, although I have no doubt that there are some who call themselves Christian who *do* apprach the Bible very much the way pagans relate to an idol.
.
If you tell me that you do NOT worship the Bible, it is outrageous for me to claim otherwise.
.
YOU are the only one who can say what your relationship whith God is(Well, yes, God can, too, and one day will, but you knowwhat I mean).
.
By the same token, if the CC proclaims that saints are NOT to be worshipped, but only God is to be worshipped, it is outrageous for you to claim the exact opposite.
.
It is dishonest.
.
Which is surprising coming from you, KayMarie. That is not the sort of thing I have come to expect from you.
.
We may disagree theologically, but my impression what that you could be relied upon to be honest and logical.
.
Your "yes you do. You say you don't, but you do" was illogical, or dishonest, or both, and left me very disappointed with you.
.
I hope and pray you don't worship the scriptures. It is my firm belief that the "mark" made so much of in the Revelation is really speaking figuratively of idolatry. Anyone who worships idols, either literally or figuratively, will have "the mark."
.
And I don't think anyone with "great respect" for the scriptures worships them. Respect and love for the scriptures is greatly admirable.
.
That respect and love is HOLY.
.
It is SACRED.
.
Rob
when you have been on here as long as I have, you will find that not all that say Lord, Lord actually belong to HIM.

any person like her and her husband that follow the likes of Benny Hinn cant be a Christian.

FALSE PROPHET ALERT!
Matt 24:23-26 Fulfilled in Your Hearing!

----------

Previous failed prophecies of Benny Hinn, made on New Year's eve of 1989:

The Spirit tells Benny that Castro will die in the 90's.(© 1989 by Benny Hinn)

Orlando Christian Center, Dec. 31st, 1989.

"The Spirit tells me - Fidel Castro will die - in the 90's. Oooh my! Some will try to kill him and they will not succeed. But there will come a change in his physical health, and he will not stay in power, and Cuba will be visited of God."

- Benny Hinn.


----------

The Lord tells Benny that homosexuals in America will be destroyed by fire by 1995.(© 1989 by Benny Hinn)

Orlando Christian Center, Dec. 31st, 1989.

"The Lord also tells me to tell you in the mid 90's, about '94-'95, no later than that, God will destroy the homosexual community of America.[audience applauds] But He will not destroy it - with what many minds have thought Him to be, He will destroy it with fire. And many will turn and be saved, and many will rebel and be destroyed."

- Benny Hinn

http://www.biblelight.net/tbn.htm .

dont want him and her to even remotely suggest that I am plagarizing this article(even tho he aint smret enough to know what the word means)
preston

Waverly, OH

#402013 Nov 13, 2012
continued;

Now with that kind of record for Benny Hinn, Trinity Broadcasting Network began its Spring 2000 fundraising Praise-A-Thon with some rather astounding claims. On the April 2nd TBN program, Benny Hinn claimed that God is about to make a major move to anoint the people of God, as soon as Israel signs a treaty with the ailing Hafez Al-Assad* of Syria, which will likely be within the next year. This will signal the impending large scale shift of financial wealth from the wicked to those obedient to God. But, in order to benefit from this unprecedented supernatural anointing, you must be obedient to God and sow your financial seed (to TBN) now!

However, its not the money that really concerns God, its your total obedience. The greatest danger that Christians face now, according to Hinn, is disobedience against God by not contributing financially to the coming harvest of God with your seed money! You must be willing to give your all, in order to demonstrate your true obedience. In fact, Benny revealed that God is even now healing those who call in their contributions to TBN. But this is not selling healing for money, he says, it is God blessing those who are truly obedient and worthy to receive his coming unusual anointing! Indeed, God will even be saving people you know as you are calling in your pledge to TBN. Great signs and wonders are anticipated this coming year, and Benny even told Paul Crouch to expect that there will be dead people raised this year!(R. W. Schambach claimed to have raised a dead man on another later TBN program, in addition to healing the blind, deaf, mute, and lame.) The implication is that you will be bypassed by God and miss out on the supernatural anointing to come if you are not totally obedient to God and call in your pledge to TBN now!

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#402014 Nov 13, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
The Bible is the single-most valuable item a man can own. KayMarie
No, it isn't - my house is.

Maybe you aren't speaking in materialistic value, then okay, I still disagree.

My Spirit is the most "valued" thing I own.
preston

Waverly, OH

#402015 Nov 13, 2012
ROB, dont take my word. ask Anthony about her and her husband.

but what you see is what you get when you know this is what they support.

The death of Assad on June 10th 2000 shows that Benny Hinn did not know what he was talking about, and is further proof that he is a false prophet, if any more evidence was needed.

Benny Hinn's failed prophecy of a peace treaty with Syria's Hafez Al-Assad (© April 2nd, 2000 by TBN) Note: this clip has been edited for the sake of file size, and has several places where content has been edited out. A brief pause occurs at those points.

On the 25th of July, 2000 (© July 25th, 2000 by TBN) when peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians broke down in Washington, Benny Hinn again appeared on a TBN program and said, regarding the recent death of Hafez Al-Assad and his failure to make peace with Israel,- "...it was God's plan for it not to happen, really."

kinda like the lie that PAD another Assembly of God follower told about billy graham and his prophecy about Kennedy AFTER THE DEATH
7th Day Catholics Rock

Poplar Bluff, MO

#402016 Nov 13, 2012
4GVN wrote:
<quoted text> But you would gladly go along with someone who would desire for God to cast Billy Grahm to hell. You are a pitiful,mindless follower of the devil.
Their two of a kind. here is their post and reply.
Note hoe he as the I I I I syndrom going on in his post.

Comments (Page 19,264)

#399844



Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
And, why would we care what Billy Graham has to say....
He is another false teacher...so you think it is fine to follow a

false teacher....come on now...

Preston wrote:

lol, I just got home and the phone rang and it was a telemarketer

who had a three question survey that they wanted me to answer.
and the first qustion was about billy graham and what he thought

about something and did I agree or disagree, well of course since I

cant stand Billy Graham, I hit that I disagreed with him and as soon

as I did that, they hung up and I never got to hear the other two

questions.

Now I will miss hours of sleep worrying about those other two

questions about billy graham.

graham ought tokeep his nose out of politics and I will never

forgive him for the ranting that he did against Israel.

May God find him a nice quite out of the way place in a hot

community. where the sun never shines.
7th Day Catholics Rock

Poplar Bluff, MO

#402017 Nov 13, 2012
4GVN wrote:
What could be more evil, and unGodly than asking that God would send someone to hell? Pray for him if you disagree. Ask God to change his heart. These might be things that a christian would do. But what Presto did is as unGodly and unchristian and full of hate as can be done. And yet He continually judges others and continually brings up anything he can to condemn. HERE is Preston's post....... You be the judge.........."" "graham ought tokeep his nose out of politics and I will never forgive him""".
"May God find him a nice quite out of the way place in a hot community. where the sun never shines." ..........
NOW UNTRUTH, the question is how ccould anyone follow or give thiere alligience to a person like this???
Yeppers That he did.

Comments (Page 19,264)

#399844



Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
And, why would we care what Billy Graham has to say....
He is another false teacher...so you think it is fine to follow a

false teacher....come on now...

Preston wrote:

lol, I just got home and the phone rang and it was a telemarketer

who had a three question survey that they wanted me to answer.
and the first qustion was about billy graham and what he thought

about something and did I agree or disagree, well of course since I

cant stand Billy Graham, I hit that I disagreed with him and as soon

as I did that, they hung up and I never got to hear the other two

questions.

Now I will miss hours of sleep worrying about those other two

questions about billy graham.

graham ought tokeep his nose out of politics and I will never

forgive him for the ranting that he did against Israel.

May God find him a nice quite out of the way place in a hot

community. where the sun never shines.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why do White people want to look black... (May '12) 5 min Johnny 67
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 8 min Critical Eye 882,141
The Christian Atheist debate 12 min Critical Eye 4,233
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 13 min new colony 596
Cleveland Cavaliers!: "Let Tristian Thompson GO... 21 min Doctor REALITY 1
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 39 min 15th Dalai Lama 8,474
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 41 min onemale 272,917
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 2 hr bad bob 177,913
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 6 hr The swamiji 7,718
More from around the web