All Liberals Will Go To He11

All Liberals Will Go To He11

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

First Prev
of 5
Next Last
Meme

Chicago, IL

#1 Aug 19, 2013
////////Matthew 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#3 Aug 19, 2013
love how right wingers pervert Bible text to suit their warped agenda.
Knock off purse seller

Denver, CO

#4 Aug 20, 2013
The bible doesnt say anything about the left or the right. How silly.

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#5 Aug 20, 2013
rollin wrote:
love how right wingers pervert Bible text to suit their warped agenda.
Love how libs pervert original intent of the Constitution to suit their warped Socialist agenda.......
UiDiotRaceMAKEWO RLDPEACE

United States

#6 Aug 20, 2013
U all ignorant! Left is right and Right is left! Those in power, fooled you all, they use left and right political paradigmn as mean to confuse and keep you real busy you all from seeing the real picture, dividing you into left and right! Wake up time Stupid! WHAHHAHAHAHAH

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#7 Aug 20, 2013
rollin wrote:
love how right wingers pervert Bible text to suit their warped agenda.
God is on their side, they say so. Any problem anyone might have with that is not with them, it's with God, because God agrees with them, they say so. God knows better than to stand in the way of their Christianity dammit, so should you.
Knock off purse seller

Denver, CO

#8 Aug 20, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>God is on their side, they say so. Any problem anyone might have with that is not with them, it's with God, because God agrees with them, they say so. God knows better than to stand in the way of their Christianity dammit, so should you.
:-)
Cisco Kid

Clements, CA

#9 Aug 20, 2013
Meme wrote:
////////Matthew 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.
The difficulty with your claim is that the majority of Congress is predominantly Christian, similar to the demographics of America as a whole.

While I am a staunch conservative, I find it difficult to Biblically condemn liberal Christians to everlasting hellfire.
I find no proof my God would do that.

"CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATION: AMERICA STILL A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

While some wish to deny that America is a predominantly Christian country, Buzzfeed's religious map of the House of Representatives suggests otherwise.

Of the 435 members of the House, there are 22 Jews, 2 Muslims, 2 Buddhists, 1 Hindu,(Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii) and one atheist (Pete Stark of California.)

The rest of the House is almost completely comprised of those who practice a religion in which Jesus Christ is their Lord and Savior.

There are 136 Catholics, 66 Baptists, 45 methodists, 35 Anglicans/Episcopalians, 28 Presbyterians, and 10 Mormons, with many other Christian faiths represented.

In the Senate there are 28 Catholics, 13 Presbyterians, 10 Jews, 10 Baptists, 8 Methodists, 7 Mormons, 5 Lutherans, 6 Protestants, 4 Episcopalians, 2 Evangelical Christians, 1 member of the Church of Christ, one member of the Church of God, 1 Congregationalist, 1 Buddhist, and three members who are unaffiliated."

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#10 Aug 21, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>Love how libs pervert original intent of the Constitution to suit their warped Socialist agenda.......
Love watching right winger run away from direct questions like the one I am about to ask.

Can you give ONE example how A: The left perverted the Constitution as you say, and B: Show any SPECIFIC example of the left doing anything that fits the description of socialism.

Now that was a direct question.....run away from a direct answer just like the republitard playbook call for.

FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
independent common sense

Coffeyville, KS

#11 Aug 21, 2013
rollin wrote:
<quoted text>
Love watching right winger run away from direct questions like the one I am about to ask.
Can you give ONE example how A: The left perverted the Constitution as you say, and B: Show any SPECIFIC example of the left doing anything that fits the description of socialism.
Now that was a direct question.....run away from a direct answer just like the republitard playbook call for.
FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
OBAMACARE!!!!!BAM!

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#12 Aug 21, 2013
independent common sense wrote:
<quoted text>
OBAMACARE!!!!!BAM!
Bam what republitard?
What about it? Did the word SPECIFICS confuse you? Obamacare was found CONSTITUTIONALLY legal by the Supreme Court made up of a majority of conservative republican appointees.

FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
independent common sense

Coffeyville, KS

#13 Aug 21, 2013
rollin wrote:
<quoted text>
Bam what republitard?
What about it? Did the word SPECIFICS confuse you? Obamacare was found CONSTITUTIONALLY legal by the Supreme Court made up of a majority of conservative republican appointees.
FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
As a new TAX, you know, the one thing Obama promised not to raise on the poor and middle class when in fact it is the LARGEST INCREASE in tax in HISTORY!!!!

FACT!!!!!
independent common sense

Coffeyville, KS

#14 Aug 21, 2013
rollin wrote:
<quoted text>
Love watching right winger run away from direct questions like the one I am about to ask.
Can you give ONE example how A: The left perverted the Constitution as you say, and B: Show any SPECIFIC example of the left doing anything that fits the description of socialism.
Now that was a direct question.....run away from a direct answer just like the republitard playbook call for.
FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
Obama...."the left" perverted the Constitution, well just plane ignored it altogether when he ignored the Constitutional requirements for appointees.....does the term CZAR ring a bell???? Yet another little favorite of Bush's that Obama was not going to do and then he expands it like so many other Bush things he was going to end!

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#15 Aug 21, 2013
independent common sense wrote:
<quoted text>
As a new TAX, you know, the one thing Obama promised not to raise on the poor and middle class when in fact it is the LARGEST INCREASE in tax in HISTORY!!!!
FACT!!!!!
FICTION

Obamacare is ... the largest tax increase in the history of the world." got a rating of PANTS ON FIRE by politifact
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#16 Aug 21, 2013
independent common sense wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama...."the left" perverted the Constitution, well just plane ignored it altogether when he ignored the Constitutional requirements for appointees.....does the term CZAR ring a bell???? Yet another little favorite of Bush's that Obama was not going to do and then he expands it like so many other Bush things he was going to end!
Czar rings a bell. The term czar was created by the media which are simply political appointees. That being said Bush appointed 47 czars, far more than Obama's 32 and not one peep from republicans in 8 years that these appointments were illegal or unconstitutional? Why?
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-search/
FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
independent common sense

Coffeyville, KS

#17 Aug 21, 2013
rollin wrote:
<quoted text>
Czar rings a bell. The term czar was created by the media which are simply political appointees. That being said Bush appointed 47 czars, far more than Obama's 32 and not one peep from republicans in 8 years that these appointments were illegal or unconstitutional? Why?
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-search/
FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
You might want to ask a Republican why there was no "peep" from them about Bush's czars. I kind of made it clear, or at least I thought, that I was NOT a Republican by the name I posted.....but then you are a liberal so I perhaps should have typed the work "independent" slower.

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#18 Aug 21, 2013
rollin wrote:
<quoted text>
Love watching right winger run away from direct questions like the one I am about to ask.
Can you give ONE example how A: The left perverted the Constitution as you say, and B: Show any SPECIFIC example of the left doing anything that fits the description of socialism.
Now that was a direct question.....run away from a direct answer just like the republitard playbook call for.
FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
Lets see how fast you deflect or run away from the answers I give you....

A.) Just what part of "shall not be infringed...." do libs not understand in the 2nd Amendment? Anti-gun laws are and of themselves such an infringement. They are generally accepted because we've been collectively mentally conditioned they are for public safety when statistics show time and again they are not.

A.1)The NSA's violation of the 4th Amendment with it's domestic survelience program.

A.2)The drone killing of American citizens overseas without benefit of a trial.

A.3) The government's investigation into AP/reporters in an attempt to intimidate the media's from exercising it's 1st Amendment rights.

B.) Social Security.....

B.1) Public sector unionization.....

B.2) ObamaCare.....

B.3) The numerous entitlement programs funded at taxpayer expense.....

B.4) Liberal's insistence on big government programs and regulations that control every aspect of daily life.....

“Voters elect Big Bird”

Since: Jan 07

Dump American Eagle

#19 Aug 21, 2013
rollin wrote:
<quoted text>
Czar rings a bell. The term czar was created by the media which are simply political appointees. That being said Bush appointed 47 czars, far more than Obama's 32 and not one peep from republicans in 8 years that these appointments were illegal or unconstitutional? Why?
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-search/
FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973
47 Czars over 8 years? Not bad.... When compared to Obama having appointed close to 40 in a mere FIVE years. 30 plus at the SAME TIME..... I doubt Bush had more than a couple dozen at most at the same time.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#20 Aug 21, 2013
independent common sense wrote:
<quoted text>
You might want to ask a Republican why there was no "peep" from them about Bush's czars. I kind of made it clear, or at least I thought, that I was NOT a Republican by the name I posted.....but then you are a liberal so I perhaps should have typed the work "independent" slower.
You asked if I heard of them did you not? Then I enlightened you on it since you seemed ignorant on what the term meant.

Facts - confounding republicans since 1973

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#21 Aug 21, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>Lets see how fast you deflect or run away from the answers I give you....
A.) Just what part of "shall not be infringed...." do libs not understand in the 2nd Amendment? Anti-gun laws are and of themselves such an infringement. They are generally accepted because we've been collectively mentally conditioned they are for public safety when statistics show time and again they are not.
A.1)The NSA's violation of the 4th Amendment with it's domestic survelience program.
A.2)The drone killing of American citizens overseas without benefit of a trial.
A.3) The government's investigation into AP/reporters in an attempt to intimidate the media's from exercising it's 1st Amendment rights.
B.) Social Security.....
B.1) Public sector unionization.....
B.2) ObamaCare.....
B.3) The numerous entitlement programs funded at taxpayer expense.....
B.4) Liberal's insistence on big government programs and regulations that control every aspect of daily life.....
Libs, as you call them believe in the ENTIRE second amendment. Beyond (or before) "shall not be infringed" are the words "WELL REGULATED" Why do republitards ignore that part of the second amendment?

a:1 the Patriot act gave the NSA that authorization and that was a bush era law. footnote: I agree it should be changed

a2 - example or proof?
a3 - proof?

B what about it?
B1 what about it?
B2 what about it?
B3 examples?
B4 examples?

I guess even though I capitalized the word SPECIFICS you can't seem to provide any.

FACTS - confounding republicans since 1973

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min UIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR... 93,165
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr bad bob 183,743
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Neville Thompson 286,139
Israel End is Near (Feb '15) 1 hr Neville Thompson 1,110
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 hr Richardfs 979,592
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 hr kent 668,185
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 4 hr Peace_Warrior 619,267
More from around the web