LOL Buck. So are you going to start arguing against Matthewism instead of Darwinism?<quoted text>
Who had a narrative with Darwin being the first to describe natural selection?
And who discredited that narrative with facts?
Nice story, Infinite Donut Boy.
Didn't think so.
Face it Buck, the term "Darwinism" says it all. The real "debate" started with Darwin's publication. As noted Matthew's publication barely counts as publication. It was an aside placed in an appendix..."hey, here is an interesting idea buy I have no data for it." And it barely caused a ripple. Hardly anyone noticed it. Darwin was certainly unaware of it.
And, as I pointed out, 1838, 1859, they are both long after the time of the Founding Father's. There could have been no debate over by the FF over natural selection as Barton claimed.
And, once again I want to thank you for the vile, hateful nicknames.
I conclude from being on this thread the the quantity of hate people will pour onto a person is directly proportional to his effectiveness at annihilating their arguments.
Let it roll, boys.