Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 256139 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#191424 Dec 11, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Could it be that you already have a name lined up for the celebration?
<quoted text>
Uh-huh...

So when you're talking about ramming a child's ass, you're just prepping?

Or are you being sarcastic?

Think, Chris. Think.

If you can.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191425 Dec 11, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing wrong with your irony bar, you use it often
Is that what you call it?

I call it the Buck Member.

But thanks.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191426 Dec 11, 2013
Thinking wrote:
But I can't prove that all those christians eating turkey on the 25th aren't celebrating your life.
;)
<quoted text>
Did the turkey give it away?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#191428 Dec 11, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
You mean despite what he says buck is lying and he has never but fooked you?
Google translate can't figure out what you're trying to say.

Help, please.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#191429 Dec 11, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>The corporations are greedy and profit driven.

When you open a business and only care about your employees and your product, then you can talk.

Every public company must produce a good GMROI.

Look it up.
Well then, I guess we should cut everybody's wages.

He'll, let's eliminate wages altogether.

That'll really drive profits through the roof.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191430 Dec 11, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought he place their heads over the well so their cries would echo
This line of discourse seems inappropriate, Christine.

I think I speak for all on this thread when I suggest you clean it up, or exit our presence.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191431 Dec 11, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then, I guess we should cut everybody's wages.
He'll, let's eliminate wages altogether.
That'll really drive profits through the roof.
Did you hear about the doctor who does free circumcisions?

He only takes tips.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191432 Dec 11, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
ChristineM wrote:
Moans of pleasure dear, cries of ecstasy, It’s only your kids that thurg when you are ramming their tiny child like and once so innocent butts with you diseased prick
<quoted text>
Beautiful couple of atheists, you are.
My sentiments also.

Christine and Bart Baboon are demeaning the conversation.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191433 Dec 11, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>

Honey, How could I possibly be jealous of you violating your children, personally I think the whole thing is sick.
This is beneath contempt. Have some decency, Christine.

Child molestation is not something to joke about.

It ruins lives.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#191434 Dec 11, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then, I guess we should cut everybody's wages.
He'll, let's eliminate wages altogether.
That'll really drive profits through the roof.
Ya it would. But that's a bit ridiculous.

Let's leave minimum wage alone, how bout that?

It ain't gonna do no good anyway.
Thinking

Merthyr Tydfil, UK

#191435 Dec 11, 2013
Some will no doubt argue it is better to keep the minimum wage artificially low and oblige people to be in debt.
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then, I guess we should cut everybody's wages.
He'll, let's eliminate wages altogether.
That'll really drive profits through the roof.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191436 Dec 11, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Some will no doubt argue it is better to keep the minimum wage artificially low and oblige people to be in debt.
<quoted text>
Artificially low??

The minimum wage is entirely artificial.

How could it be "artificially low"?

You are a moron, Thumper.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#191437 Dec 11, 2013
UIDIOTRACEMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
very few real conservative left most are NeoCONs!
Why aren't Neocons real conservatives?

There are several types of conservatives, and the fascistic ones like the Neoconservatives are among them. The Tea Baggers are another type. The Dominionists - the Christian theocrats - are another. The Eisenhower and Goldwater conservatives - the most liberal and least conservative of them all - are another type.

They're all real conservatives to me.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#191438 Dec 11, 2013
Bongo wrote:
Ouch, but I can understand the lack of desire to debate with a pugilistic pontificating pundit of pretentiousness.
Buck has two principle modes of interaction. One is pleasant to work with, the other pointless. Certain issues bring out that second mode, and such issues are not worth discussing apart form dissenting and offering an alternate viewpoint. Buck becomes extreme, inflexible, aggressive, dismissive, and self-congratulatory. When I see that, I disengage and wait for the other Buck to return.

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#191439 Dec 11, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
YUP!
Meanwhile, they knock up a few dozen crack whores, don't take any responsibility for them, neither does the "single mother", and we have to foot the bill for their lack of good judgment and lack of responsibility.
And the libs all pat themselves on the back thinking they're helping the needy...
This problem is brought to you by The War on Drugs™, a Conservative® product.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191440 Dec 11, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Buck has two principle modes of interaction. One is pleasant to work with, the other pointless. Certain issues bring out that second mode, and such issues are not worth discussing apart form dissenting and offering an alternate viewpoint. Buck becomes extreme, inflexible, aggressive, dismissive, and self-congratulatory. When I see that, I disengage and wait for the other Buck to return.
I'm back, Sawbones.

I'm thinking of starting a group of muslim conservatives.

I have made close friends with one on the Richard Dawkins is a Pedophile thread.

His name is Hazel Sealshit.

I call him Uncle Hazel.

I learned a new greeting:

Al's Salami Abatome Epoxy to you.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191441 Dec 11, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
This problem is brought to you by The War on Drugs™, a Conservative® product.
I took to the front lines on the War on Drugs.

But everything I captured seems to have disappeared.

Al's Salami Abitome Epoxy to you, Snide.

(thinking of converting to muslimism)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#191442 Dec 11, 2013
Shit. I can't get the hang of this:

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#191443 Dec 11, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Why aren't Neocons real conservatives?
There are several types of conservatives, and the fascistic ones like the Neoconservatives are among them. The Tea Baggers are another type. The Dominionists - the Christian theocrats - are another. The Eisenhower and Goldwater conservatives - the most liberal and least conservative of them all - are another type.
They're all real conservatives to me.
I know you'd prefer a government-knows-best, one-size-fits-all system, but all that does is take away choice.

It lets the goverment tell you what's best for you and your family.

Historically, not great.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#191444 Dec 11, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
OMG, I hoped the Federal Government had learned it's lesson then the Obama Admin goes and sells guns to the Cartels???? I don't hate the President but his administration is rogue.
You had hoped that the Federal Government had learned a lesson? I'm sure it has, but probably not the one you were hoping for.

Do you recall my pointing out that the "courageous" pardoning of Nixon and the walks given to Reagan and Bush were lessons? Why would you expect a president to fear repercussions. Even the impeachment of Clinton was just a slap in the face, not a real punishment for breaking a law.

Seriously - get used to it. America made its choice. Besides, we were told that America doesn't have the stamina for justice. It gets too weary. Isn't that why you called the pardon of Nixon courageous - because it put the issue behind a country that had already been through too much? That was why most people praised it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 29 min truth 650,852
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 56 min River Tam 971,903
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 1 hr Demon Finder 18,667
sexy sister and my girlfriend family holiday 2 hr cool 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr Steve III 45,018
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr onemale 281,495
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 hr Rosa_Winkel 56,497
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 3 hr bad bob 183,001
More from around the web