Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 243513 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#176552 Sep 6, 2013
CatholicHolyGhost wrote:
<quoted text>A person is given Life to honor and love and obey GOD.
To kill onself is a sin in the eyes of GOD.
Down on your knees slave or I'll send you to burn forever and i love you and need money

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#176553 Sep 6, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
All magnetic field lines have a source.
No, magnetic field lines always go in circles. No source point like for electric fields at a charge.
Those lines pass through everything. You can only offer paths of least resistance to bypass an object.
Why do you think they 'bypass' anything?
I am not aware of being able to drain a magnet, a source of the flow, by the load put on it. Remove the load and it goes back to strength. You have to alter the structure within the magnet itself to do that.
Actually, the magnetic field will gradually diminish with use. How this is relevant to space moving is unclear.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#176554 Sep 6, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
because there is no material that *blocks* instead of diverting magnetic fields. So there is no possible test. it is also not clear how that would test whether space is moving around an object or not.
<quoted text>
Huh? Really? How about because the eyelids don't interact with the particles?
<quoted text>
EM is carried by photons. Well known particles. Some types (radio, microwave) go through eyelids. And how this is relevant to your claim that space moves around an object is very unclear.
<quoted text>
Please at least attempt to be specific and coherent. How is any of this testable? Give a specific experiment.
<quoted text>
Charges do not 'wrap'. Why there should be one is unclear anyway.
<quoted text>
be more specifc about your claims. Why you think there is anything displaced is unclear.
<quoted text>
Let's not. How about finding an experiment that is actually possible that will distinguish your ideas from the standard ones?
So, if you don't like a distant star, how about some other motion in a vacuum? Don't want air messing up the data.
You are sputtering and bullshitting like crazy.

So your refrigerator magnet is spewing photons? Any particular frequency? Where is it getting its energy to produce those?

The field along a current carrying wire produces a magnetic field in right hand twist. It spirals, it wraps. Has to do with the progression of charge and thus induction.

Your magnetic field passes through a vacuum, and very, very, very well. As well as it can. What's in a vacuum, little green men with virtual particles in their pockets?

You got ridiculous in your dodging.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#176555 Sep 6, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, magnetic field lines always go in circles. No source point like for electric fields at a charge.
<quoted text>
Why do you think they 'bypass' anything?
<quoted text>
Actually, the magnetic field will gradually diminish with use. How this is relevant to space moving is unclear.
No they don't go in circles. They flow pole to pole the best way they can, then back through their source. Most travels within the object and on its surface. About 10% or so gets above the surface, I believe. That is the weak stuff, and that is why it rises up. There is a more complicated secondary flow to that.

Magnets get weaker from the environment working on them, not the load. That is why they make keepers. You can consider those full loads. That field will last as long as the material does absent outside influences.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176556 Sep 6, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sorry that is your opinion. MY life has plenty of meaning without any deities.
<quoted text>
Simply false. it is simple human nature to enjoy these things. no belief in a deity is required, or desired.
<quoted text>
Rather arrogant of you to assume what other believe, don't you think? Your myths are just that: myths. Your incorrect psychology doesn't help your failed beliefs.
No it is not just 'simple human nature'. It is something within that makes one behave like that and that something is the inner self believing in a Great Creator.

Arrogant.....moi!!!!!

Assumptions make the world go round and quite a few members have you figured out to a 'T'.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176557 Sep 6, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not in the situation described, it isn't. In general, even figuring out what it means to say 'space is compressed' is non-trivial and *way* beyond the mental capacities of the fundies around here.
Yes, and No.

Go figure.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176558 Sep 6, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
What, are you three years old or something? Kaka? Do you also go make tinkie?
Naw. Unlike you, we don't keep a pissPot under the bed.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176559 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Again? You write nothing useful or even argumentative.
Just more evidence of your massive ego, along with your deep hatred for all unbelievers.
You are one sick duck...
Is it unbelievers or should it be non-believers?

Could never figure that one out.

Meanwhile, calling a fellow member a 'sick duck' is not very nice of you. Can't you control yourself, you sick hack.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176560 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
You think your hate is FUNNY, now?
Okay-- I can see why you would-- you are a psychopath.
Likely you sit at home planning on how to murder your neighbors...
... fortunately, your grossly obese body isn't up to getting off your couch, let alone up those basement stairs...
... so the world is relatively safe from your hate.
... for now.
We just cannot help but say that you are one hateful sick prick.

Seek help.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176561 Sep 6, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah.
That's it.
This BobOfQuantumFaith sure applies himself towards being ever so hateful.

What's the score on this sicky.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176562 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps.
But they are 100% more **HONEST**, when it comes to the evil bible, than 99% of the rest of Genuine Christianity™.
The rest are just Salad Bar Christians™-- picking here and there as they see fit.
Hypocrites, in other words.
The Westbouroh bunch are far less hypocritical.
Please supply and explain your source of data and numbers.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176563 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Hate speech noted from the Pedophile Enabler.
Thanks for playing.
More hate speech notes from CharlieManson's spawn.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176564 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
More hate speech from a Pedophile Enabler.
More hate speech from CharlieManson's spawn.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176565 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
So how do you explain the PEDOPHILIA rampant in your hideous Bastion Of Child Abuse?(cat'lick church)
Hmmmm?
So how do you explain the PAEDOPHILIA 'MORE' rampant child abuse caused by you atheists?

When did you visit your daddy CharlieManson last for some up-to-date indoctrination.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176566 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!
How do you explain the cowardly ducking of your PREVIOUS Pedophile-in-Chief?
He cowardly ducked out, just before the Nets Of Justice were about to close in-- to reveal him for the child-abusing MONSTER we all know he is.
Hmmm?
How do you explain that MOST child sexual abuse takes place in families where the parents are atheists....like you.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. What goes on in your shack we all wonder.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176567 Sep 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I am **forced** to use the word "hate", every time I'm describing the likes of **you** and people **like** you.
Of course you hate that-- this is why you project your own seething hatred onto me.
But you cannot explain your Pedophile-In-Chief (pope), can you?
Your hatred towards your fellow man knows no bounds while you are surrounded by your fellow atheists that commit the worst kind of atrocities around the world including the rape and sexual abuse of children.

The Pope is the Pope is the Pope. God will judge the Pope...as He will judge YOU....and that you can never get away from, you hateful excuse for a piece of humanity. You fit right in with Himmler and Stalin and Mao.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176568 Sep 6, 2013
False Religion wrote:
If your god is real because we have no evidence that he does not exist, then I can say that I have no evidence that my dog can fly, and you have no evidence that my dog can not fly; therefore, I am justified in believing that my dog can fly.
This is because a flying dog is the sort of thing that can be supported with evidence (if a dog could fly, we would expect to find evidence of the dog zooming through the skies, for example), whereas one would actually expect a non-existent thing to produce no evidence whatsoever. Thus, in the case of non-existence, the absence of evidence is exactly what we would expect to observe.
If God wants humans to believe in him and to follow his will, then he would deliver his message directly, and not leave it up to fallible, sinful humans to deliver an endless plethora of confused and contradictory messages. If God is in fact a supremely powerful being who wants us to set things right and wants to prevent us from getting things even more wrong, then he should have made his views eminently clear to us all. If he has not given the strong evidence required by his desire to have us believe in him, then he clearly does not exist
There should therefore be no more confusion about which religion or doctrine is true than there is about the fundamentals of medicine, engineering, physics, chemistry, etc. But that is manifestly not the case, and even believers in God cannot agree on the content of God's message. Therefore, either God is telling them different things (either deliberately or otherwise), which seems unlikely, or there is no God.
Pigs may fly etcetera.

GOD did send his only Son to show mankind the way to Heaven

Some choose to follow Him. Some do not

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176569 Sep 6, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
Down on your knees slave or I'll send you to burn forever and i love you and need money
There is no shortage of idiots in this topic and you are one of them.

The only thing that makes sense is that you 'need money'. Your kind always does living in your car.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#176570 Sep 6, 2013
That should do it.

Are we having fun yet.

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#176571 Sep 6, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I forgot to mention this in the other response.
"But there is no space or any volume of it , we know of... not occupied by at least some matter . No matter how sparse the matter is."
With matter you have "substance" in it. That fills in the wake.
Say you have a dust cloud a planet moves into. Much gets pushed out of the way, then much gets sucked into its wake. Space carried it. The dust couldn't hold any position relative to other particles or the planet unless space was displaced. If space is something that occupies volume,then it is a component of the universal transfers of energy and force.
Mass warps space, but space is the volume, much like the sea, space is the water. I have no idea what you are trying to say.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate 4 min The_Box 1,082
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Estelle 596,700
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 12 min Clearwater 855,907
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 23 min ChristineM 444,366
ye olde village pub (Jun '07) 27 min Ricky F 53,431
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 30 min Rosa_Winkel 100,770
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 33 min Porkpie Hat 272,099
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Epiphany2 612,656
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 4 hr Henry_Joseph 177,231
More from around the web