Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258476 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#171465 Jul 9, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
"(Time) it does not 'come from' anything. "
Correct! You've cleared this up once again, thanks.
Times existence is impossible got it!
Uncaused funny!
Time is a dimension, so what caused height? or length or width?
What ever caused them caused time. Must have been the expansion in the Big Bang?
blacklagoon

Brookline, MA

#171469 Jul 9, 2013
Roman Apologist wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, this is where we disagree.(Yes I finally registered so this is my username now) I believe there is evidence that God has restored life. Now whether you believe that evidence amounts to conclusive proof is another matter entirely. That evidence is the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
If the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John are true eyewitness reports (as I believe they are) then yes God has restored limbs when Jesus cured lepers. Leprosy is a very nasty disease that causes people to lose limbs. And if there is going to be a world-wide resurrection of the dead at Christ's second coming, then we can expect that we will be given new bodies that are superior to what we possess now.
<quoted text>
Yes people should be skeptical. But not all things are made up. In truth, Christians are called to be open minded (even if fundamentalists don't believe it). Open minded does not mean being gullible. It means considering both natural and supernatural processes. We should consider natural processes up to the point where natural processes cannot sufficiently account for a majority of the data. At that point we are to begin looking to see if there is a supernatural explanation, but without forcing it to fit our beliefs.
I think you need to revisit the definite of evidence. There ARE THREE interacting words here....EVIDENCE....FACTS....a nd INFORMATION.....FACT..."t his which is INDISPUTABLY the case".......EVIDENCE..... ."Available body of FACTS or INFORMATION indicating whether a belief is true or valid." ....INFORMATION..."FACTS provided or learned about something or someone."

You have NO evidence that Jesus rose fro the dead. You have an ancient book, who's authorship is unknown, telling a story about a resurrection. You may believe it if you like but it hardly counts as any kind of evidence. Once again your holy book is basically a male dominated bureaucracy deriving its authority from anonymously authored ancient tales and antiquated edicts.

Evidence ALWAYS amounts to conclusive proof. Thats how we determine if something is true or not. How can you for one moment think that a story from an ancient book constitutes evidence?

The gospels are not eyewitness accounts, even theologians will tell you that. Here are some quotes by biblical scholars i regards to the gospels.

"The Gospels written by MARK were NOT actually written by Mark. We know little of who the author was circa 65 CE. We don't even know his name. Mark's name has been used as a primary source over the course of thousands of years. The Gospels have been altered multiple times."

"The evidence for the existence of Jesus all comes from AFTER HIS LIFETIME." Most scholars believe not everything contained in the gospels to be historically reliable. The elements whose historical authenticity is disputed include, but are not limited to, the 2 accounts of the Nativity of Jesus, as well as the resurrection and the crucifixion."

"The evidence for the existence of Jesus ALL came from after his lifetime. Biblical scholars have created this historical Jesus in their own image. The gospel accounts are so mythical in nature that nothing, not even the existence of Christ can be determined from them."

I have more, but as you can see, even biblical scholars are uncertain of the existence of Christ let alone his resurrection.

NEVER.....EVER in recorded history has there been an instance where a missing limb has been miraculously replaced. Theists all proclaim that prayers are in fact answered, but NEVER those of an amputee.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#171470 Jul 9, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did Time come from?
This is not a religious question.
This is not a lack of faith question.
This is a science question pertaining to your 3 myths.
Your 3 BIG Myths:
1) the Big Bang when nothing exploded
and created everything.
2) rain falling on rocks and settling in a mud puddle and spontaneous self generating life sprang forth.
3) plants evolving into plant eating animals.
And when I snap my fingers you will wake up and believe these 3 myths as if they were fact.
"SNAP"
Time was man made...you should already know that.

“YO BOO”

Since: Sep 07

land of BOO

#171471 Jul 9, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
I am none of these things, and I am a non-believer.
in spiritual darkness,
under the power of Satan,
separated from Christ,
without hope,
without God in this world,
foolish,
disobedient,
deceived,

you're all these things IMO

“YO BOO”

Since: Sep 07

land of BOO

#171472 Jul 9, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
Time was man made...you should already know that.
GOD made day & night!!!
blacklagoon

Brookline, MA

#171473 Jul 9, 2013
Roman Apologist wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, this is where we disagree.(Yes I finally registered so this is my username now) I believe there is evidence that God has restored life. Now whether you believe that evidence amounts to conclusive proof is another matter entirely. That evidence is the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
If the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John are true eyewitness reports (as I believe they are) then yes God has restored limbs when Jesus cured lepers. Leprosy is a very nasty disease that causes people to lose limbs. And if there is going to be a world-wide resurrection of the dead at Christ's second coming, then we can expect that we will be given new bodies that are superior to what we possess now.
<quoted text>
Yes people should be skeptical. But not all things are made up. In truth, Christians are called to be open minded (even if fundamentalists don't believe it). Open minded does not mean being gullible. It means considering both natural and supernatural processes. We should consider natural processes up to the point where natural processes cannot sufficiently account for a majority of the data. At that point we are to begin looking to see if there is a supernatural explanation, but without forcing it to fit our beliefs.
Of course things are made up. Christians have made up heaven and hell. At one point the Catholic church made up a place called LIMBO. Some years later they renounced this made up place. Religion in general has made up many different accounts of the creation of the universe and our planet. Christians made up the global flood, angels, demons, Satan, the parting of the Red Sea, they make up all sorts of things.

How can you ever arrive at a "supernatural explanation?" There is only ONE realm, that of the naturalistic realm, in it is contained all we know and experience. NOTHING can be known of the supernatural realm, a non-existent realm. So no, we do not look for explanation in the supernatural, its pointless as there can be NO information gathered from that which does not exist. We should consider natural processes only, at the point were natural processes cannot sufficiently account for the data, then it simply becomes UNKNOWN. Here is the great downfall of the Theist, its called...GOD OF THE GAPS. When science cannot account for data, the Theists LEAPS quickly and fills the gap with GOD. Rather than search for the real answer, God becomes a substitute. The major problem for the Theist here, is that for thousands of years science has slowly replaced God causes, with the real answers. Thunder and lightning, disease, volcanos and earthquakes, all Gods realm, then science told us the real answers. Those who play the god of the gaps games face the fact that as science discovers more and more, God becomes an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#171474 Jul 9, 2013
atheism is evil wrote:
<quoted text>
Another Satan-bot spamming the "Big Bang Did It" junkery.
Satan is part of YOUR belief...not mine.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#171475 Jul 9, 2013
T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>GOD made day & night!!!
Day and night occur because of our orbit around the sun, and I have no idea if "god" had a hand in it, but so far science has given me more answers than "god" ever did.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#171476 Jul 9, 2013
T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>
in spiritual darkness,
under the power of Satan,
separated from Christ,
without hope,
without God in this world,
foolish,
disobedient,
deceived,
you're all these things IMO
You have a right to your opinion, but you are incorrect in all of these except for separated from Christ, without "god" in this world.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#171477 Jul 9, 2013
atheism is evil wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it was documented , you lying bigot.
No actually...it was not.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#171478 Jul 9, 2013
atheism is evil wrote:
<quoted text>
If the accounts of the Bible did not occur, then why didn't a group of atheists ever "free think" to write an anti-Bible? I think we all know they are liars.
Lol...this has got to be one of your best ones yet! Why would anyone have a need to write an anti-bible? lol

“YO BOO”

Since: Sep 07

land of BOO

#171479 Jul 9, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
Day and night occur because of our orbit around the sun, and I have no idea if "god" had a hand in it, but so far science has given me more answers than "god" ever did.
GOD made them all

“YO BOO”

Since: Sep 07

land of BOO

#171480 Jul 9, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Satan is part of YOUR belief...not mine.
thats what you think! I think satan owns your soul

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#171481 Jul 9, 2013
atheism is evil wrote:
<quoted text>
If the accounts of the Bible did not occur, then why didn't a group of atheists ever "free think" to write an anti-Bible? I think we all know they are liars.
Because it isn't concerned with your religious dogma.
Feel free to write your anti-science book.

“YO BOO”

Since: Sep 07

land of BOO

#171482 Jul 9, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a right to your opinion, but you are incorrect in all of these except for separated from Christ, without "god" in this world.
He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters" (Matt. 12:30).
"There is a judge for the one who rejects me and does not accept my words; that very word which I spoke will condemn him at the last day" (Jn. 12:48).
being an atheist is like playing Russian Roulette with a fully loaded gun... real dumb

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#171483 Jul 9, 2013
T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>thats what you think! I think satan owns your soul
I thought that you believed that "god" held everyone's soul....???? Isn't he the one that's supposed to own everyone's soul?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#171485 Jul 9, 2013
T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters" (Matt. 12:30).
"There is a judge for the one who rejects me and does not accept my words; that very word which I spoke will condemn him at the last day" (Jn. 12:48).
being an atheist is like playing Russian Roulette with a fully loaded gun... real dumb
The only thing that this verse says to me is that you worship a "god" who is so egotistical he thinks he should be able to scare me into loving him. I will never believe in the biblical "god", and that is only one of the reasons why.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#171486 Jul 9, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
No Dave the fact is until 325 the belief was so variable from sect to sect to consolidate a fixed doctrine and standard set of scriptures was absolutely necessary. Otherwise one side of the empire is arguing about whether the nails were driven in the neck or not vs one right between the eyes, stupid crap.
Just like exists between different flavors of cryptostupidity now.
Love your posts.

BTW, did they ever settle that "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin" thingy? If they did.....uhhhh.....how many;0)?

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#171487 Jul 9, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to get some sleep Davy!
You've been giving the devil two black eyes for too long!
Hmm... something about Socrates?
OK
"Do not do to others that which would anger you if others did it to you." -- Socrates (the Greek philosopher), circa 470-399 BCE
In ancient Greece, Socrates was reputed to hold knowledge in the highest esteem.
One day an acquaintance met the great philosopher and said, "Socrates, do you know what I just heard about your friend?"
"Hold on a minute," Socrates replied. "Before telling me anything I'd like you to pass a little test. It's called the Triple Filter Test."
"Triple filter?"
"That's right," Socrates continued. "Before you talk to me about my friend, it might be a good idea to take a moment and filter what you're going to say.
The first filter is Truth. Have you made absolutely sure that what you are about to tell me is absolutely true?
"No," the man said, "I actually just heard about it and..."
"All right," said Socrates. "So you don't really know if it's true or not. Now let's try the second filter, the filter of Goodness. Is what you are about to tell me about my friend something good?"
"No, on the contrary..."
"So," Socrates continued, "you want to tell me something bad about him, but you're not certain it's true. You may still pass the test though, because there's one filter left: the filter of Usefulness. Is what you want to tell me about my friend going to be useful to me?"
"No, not really."
"Well," concluded Socrates, "if what you want to tell me is neither true nor good nor even useful, why tell it to me at all?"
This is why Socrates was a great philosopher and held in such high esteem.
It also explains why he never found out his best friend was banging his wife.!
Socrates never existed. There is no proof he did.

You are worshiping the words of a myth.

That philosophy is common enough among men of centuries and before that never even heard of him. Plato probably plagiarized one of them using mythical Socrates as a tool.

“YO BOO”

Since: Sep 07

land of BOO

#171488 Jul 9, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought that you believed that "god" held everyone's soul....???? Isn't he the one that's supposed to own everyone's soul?
until you are saved! satan owns your soul

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 2 min Quivering Lips Li... 60,181
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 5 min Tellthetruth 994,098
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min hojo 695,704
Black women White men Dating Site (May '14) 1 hr Murray 16
Is America 'Mystery Babylon,' mentioned in the ... 3 hr Yshua ha Mashiach 1
Depressed girlfriend. Don’t know what to do 4 hr Truth 4
Last Post Wins !!! [ game time :) ] (Jan '11) 9 hr texas pete 2,500
wierd situation with my mom. (Jul '14) Feb 19 Pimpy 23
More from around the web