Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#169605 Jun 21, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
They made me do it.
Poor baby.

You are so victimized.

Sob.

Did "they" also make you into the buffoon that you are?

Or did your god do that?

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#169606 Jun 21, 2013
What historical evidence would that be?
Favorite Adversary wrote:
<quoted text>Not always. Some of us (myself specifically) are convinced by the historical evidence. Intuition does play a part of it without a doubt. But I don't trust human emotions as a general rule. They can be very misleading.

Intuition is that small voice that speaks to us inaudibly. It speaks to us on a different level than that of emotion. The same goes for our conscience. I'm sure you'll disagree, saying that it's all a product of chemical reactions within the human brain. I disagree, but I'll leave that debate for another day. It's been an interesting dialogue. Thank you.=)

Since: Sep 08

Olney Springs, CO

#169607 Jun 21, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor baby.
You are so victimized.
Sob.
Did "they" also make you into the buffoon that you are?
Or did your god do that?
Are you on the rag today? Noticed you have an sharper edge than usual here and on the other thread. You do this periodically.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#169608 Jun 21, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you on the rag today? Noticed you have an sharper edge than usual here and on the other thread. You do this periodically.
Thank you. You are observant, but a bit off on the cause.

I had some serious success this week.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#169611 Jun 21, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>LOL. ;)

One tequila, two tequila, three tequila, floor.

Wilson runs a nail factory and decides his business needs a bit of advertising. He has a chat with a friend who works in marketing and he offers to make a TV ad for Wilson's Nails.

"Give me a week," says the friend, "and I'll be back with a tape."

A week goes by and the marketing executive comes to see Wilson. He puts a cassette in the video and presses play. A Roman soldier is busy nailing Jesus to the cross. He turns to face the camera and says with a grin "Use Wilson's Nails, they'll hold anything."

Wilson goes mad shouting: "What is the matter with you? They'll never show that on TV. Give it another try, but no more Romans crucifying Jesus!"

Another week goes by and the marketing man comes back to see Wilson with another tape. He puts it in the machine and hits play. This time the camera pans out from a Roman standing with his arms folded to show Jesus on the cross. The Roman looks up at him and says 'Wilson's Nails, they'll hold anything'.

Wilson is beside himself. "You don't understand: I don't want anything with Jesus on the cross! Now listen, I'll give you one last chance. Come back in a week with an advertisement that I can broadcast."

A week passes and Wilson waits impatiently. The marketing executive arrives and puts on the new video. A naked man with long hair, gasping for breath, is running across a field. About a dozen Roman soldiers come over the hill, hot on his trail. One of them turns to camera and says 'If only we had used Wilson's Nails!'.
I'd go with the last one.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169612 Jun 21, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, your weird.
My weird what?

your = possessive case of you used as an attributive adjective

you're = a contraction of you are

An illiterate tzar, who would have thought it?

Since: Mar 11

United States

#169613 Jun 21, 2013
English isn't his strong point regardless of what screen name he uses.

Critical thinking isn't on his list either.:)
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>My weird what?

your = possessive case of you used as an attributive adjective

you're = a contraction of you are

An illiterate tzar, who would have thought it?

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169614 Jun 21, 2013
Thinking wrote:
It's "you're", religitard.
<quoted text>
Now, now dear. It's not nice to make fun of the mentally challenged religi...erm...idio....erm...s tupi...oh heck, go ahead;0)

Since: Mar 11

United States

#169615 Jun 21, 2013
Crazy old Dave! Always good for a laugh :))
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>Are you on the latrine today whipper snapper? Noticed you have an sharper edge than usual here and on the other thread. It is because you like that rock and rolling music and them fancy flush toilets! I bet you use them fancy reading books with no pictures for your a learning! You do this periodically. When I was a boy we learned by daddy hitting us across the head! A pox on those fancy shmancy reading books!

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169616 Jun 21, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>Humanity was killed in Noahs' flood because they were wicked. Pharoah caused the judgment of the death of the firstborn to fall upon himself by plotting to kill the first born of Israel. If you want to play hardball, God can play hardball.
I wondered who would come up with that, I just wonder why your god couldn't put a stop to it if he's such a hardball kind of guy.

Alas, you conveniently left out the third example; "as for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves”.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169617 Jun 21, 2013
Favorite Adversary wrote:
<quoted text>
Since God can neither be proven nor disproven by humanity, it requires some kind of faith to believe either way. If you don't believe in God, there are reasons to support that conclusion, but you're not 100% certain at all times. The only way to know or believe there is a God is to have an experience that defies all competing arguments. Short of that, it's all a matter of faith for both sides.
For natural born fence sitters, yes. Thousands of years worth of complete lack of proof pretty well satisfies me. Otherwise you must completely consider and accept as entirely possible that my toaster flies around the kitchen at night and my invisible pink unicorn is happily grazing grass in my back yard as I type this.

As Wilderide pointed out succinctly, skepticism requires no faith.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169618 Jun 21, 2013
Favorite Adversary wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I understand what you're saying, but I do believe it's a matter of faith either way. Perhaps "faith" isn't the correct word to be debating. Think on this if you will:
Confidence in Probability
I don't know if this is an existing term or not,(if not, you heard it from me first- lol)but allow me to explain my position.
If you're an atheist, and you don't believe there's a God (any God) then there must be a reason. It can be an experiential reason (such as the case with Christine M - my condolences on the way you were treated Christine) or, because the atheist places more priority on other subjects such as science or philosophy, or a combination of both. The atheist consciously makes a choice to not believe based upon his or her respective confidence in competing thoughts, and/or negative experiences within a specific context in their lives.
Likewise, if one is a theist (Christian, Muslim, Jew, etc.) then one also may have a positive experience or find sufficient evidence to make a conscious choice to believe. Again, the choice is influenced by the experiential and/or evidence.
It all comes down to individual priority and confidence in probability. I find there is sufficient evidence to enjoy confidence in the probability that there is a God (yes, the Christian God), while you do not.
Faith is the word used, but in the final analysis, it's how much confidence we have in the probability and it's based upon choice that is rooted in experiences both good and bad.
Well said, confidence in probability has my vote;0)

Since: Sep 08

Olney Springs, CO

#169619 Jun 21, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
For natural born fence sitters, yes. Thousands of years worth of complete lack of proof pretty well satisfies me. Otherwise you must completely consider and accept as entirely possible that my toaster flies around the kitchen at night and my invisible pink unicorn is happily grazing grass in my back yard as I type this.
As Wilderide pointed out succinctly, skepticism requires no faith.
You are missing something.

Thousands of years and the beliefs are still here. Those people were just as intelligent and logical, maybe more so, than we are today. Must be something evidence wise to span the generations.

Atheism and its beliefs have existed, too. But the percentage has always been negligible. Must be a lack of evidence to support them.

Since: Sep 08

Olney Springs, CO

#169620 Jun 21, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
For natural born fence sitters, yes. Thousands of years worth of complete lack of proof pretty well satisfies me. Otherwise you must completely consider and accept as entirely possible that my toaster flies around the kitchen at night and my invisible pink unicorn is happily grazing grass in my back yard as I type this.
As Wilderide pointed out succinctly, skepticism requires no faith.
It requires faith in the judgment of the skeptic by the skeptic..

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169621 Jun 21, 2013
Lelouch0 wrote:
Forgive me for asking, but where is the evidence? I have not seen any evidence so far that can convince me that the God of the Bible exists. Everything I have read feels like a farce. I read Lewis's book Mere Christianity, and to me it felt like something hollow and artificial.
So far, this God figure has not made any attempts at all to show himself to us since the past 2000 years, if indeed he did at all. Why not? If people are in such a need to know he exists, why does he not appear before them? Why need someone else to tell us that God exists?
Precisely. The xtian "we will all know someday" just doesn't do it for me, neither does "God works in mysterious ways." He is omnipotene and loves us. Why does s/he allow cancer, wars, natural disaster then? Is this how we should love our own children?

I have had the same questions. If such a maniacal, contradictory and and unreachable entity did exist....why should I care? Worship him/her/it? Surely they jest.
Siro

Brisbane, Australia

#169622 Jun 21, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
For natural born fence sitters, yes. Thousands of years worth of complete lack of proof pretty well satisfies me. Otherwise you must completely consider and accept as entirely possible that my toaster flies around the kitchen at night and my invisible pink unicorn is happily grazing grass in my back yard as I type this.
As Wilderide pointed out succinctly, skepticism requires no faith.
But you are expecting physical proof of a non physical being, there is cause and effect but you are expecting if not demanding that cause to be purely physical.
You can say that skepticism requires no faith, but the skeptic expects to consistantly find failure (like the moron here who posts under that name)or no physical proof that they themselves can touch, see, hear, taste or feel.
You have marxist 'critical theory' which tries to validate itself as skepticism but cannot be because it seeks to redefine the meanings of effects in order to get the desired negative result.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169623 Jun 21, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
People get sensitized and reactive when they are called idiots and names for their beliefs. That is why I react to these Topix atheist idiots. I started out and made a mistake of not calling theists idiots and they jumped on me. They made me do it.
No one has made you do anything Davey boy. This is not the 6th grade playground. Accept responsibility for your own words or get on your knees and pray for your god's guidance. Either way, it's up to YOU.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169624 Jun 21, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
English isn't his strong point regardless of what screen name he uses.
Critical thinking isn't on his list either.:)
<quoted text>
On the other hand, I think we can put Megalomania and Delusions of Adequacy at the top of the list;0)

Since: Sep 08

Olney Springs, CO

#169625 Jun 21, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has made you do anything Davey boy. This is not the 6th grade playground. Accept responsibility for your own words or get on your knees and pray for your god's guidance. Either way, it's up to YOU.
Little girl, you haven't been on here long enough to know Davey boy.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#169626 Jun 21, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
But you are expecting physical proof of a non physical being, there is cause and effect but you are expecting if not demanding that cause to be purely physical.
You can say that skepticism requires no faith, but the skeptic expects to consistantly find failure (like the moron here who posts under that name)or no physical proof that they themselves can touch, see, hear, taste or feel.
You have marxist 'critical theory' which tries to validate itself as skepticism but cannot be because it seeks to redefine the meanings of effects in order to get the desired negative result.
Did not the god of the bible send physical proof in the form of manna from heaven, his only begotton son or the fire of pentecost?

He supposedly gave us the rainbow...but oops! we now know it's a refraction of light and a natural phenomena. Doesn't the bible say that he can touch our hearts? Then why must we have faith?

Don't get me wrong, I was raised in the church, tithed and taught a SS class for 10 years, all on "faith." I studied the bible from cover to cover and finally the contradictions, the supernatural nonsense and the evasive non answers to my questions brought me round. I left the church, a weight seemed to lift from my shoulders and I've never regretted it.

Even the story of doubting Thomas exhorts us to not question, not search too terribly closely or doubt any line that is spoon fed to us.

The final hook is eternal life, very few can turn that one down. If not by factual knowledge, at least by fervent hopes do they cling to that.

You cling to hope and barring a 'divine touch' I'll stick with verifiable facts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 min karl44 795,571
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 3 min bad bob 175,865
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 10 min marge 568,282
Panelvan 14 min amcat 1
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 26 min WasteWater 267,462
Scientific proof for God's existence 31 min lightbeamrider 587
DIY may not be a smart choice (Oct '13) 1 hr jjimprovements 3
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr Truth from dr Sh... 607,212
More from around the web