Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 20 comments on the Jul 18, 2009, Webbunny tumblelog story titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

LargeLanguage

Chester, UK

#161254 Mar 19, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Junior ground? Ya that just about sums it up.
Goodbye turd.
:flush;
<quoted text>
Did you know that Riverside Redneck said that he enjoyed that his children would jump when he tells them to jump without even saying how high? Sounds like a dictator.
CunningLinguist

Hernando, FL

#161256 Mar 19, 2013
If Operating Systems Ran The Airlines...

UNIX Airways
Everyone brings one piece of the plane along when they come to the airport. They all go out on the runway and put the plane together piece by piece, arguing non-stop about what kind of plane they are supposed to be building.

Air DOS
Everybody pushes the airplane until it glides, then they jump on and let the plane coast until it hits the ground again. Then they push again, jump on again, and so on...

Mac Airlines
All the stewards, captains, baggage handlers, and ticket agents look and act exactly the same. Every time you ask questions about details, you are gently but firmly told that you don't need to know, don't want to know, and everything will be done for you without your ever having to know, so just shut up.
Windows Air
The terminal is pretty and colourful, with friendly stewards, easy baggage check and boarding, and a smooth take-off. After about 10 minutes in the air, the plane explodes with no warning whatsoever.

Windows NT Air
Just like Windows Air, but costs more, uses much bigger planes, and takes out all the other aircraft within a 40-mile radius when it explodes.

Windows XP Air
You turn up at the airport,which is under contract to only allow XP Air planes. All the aircraft are identical, brightly coloured and three times as big as they need to be. The signs are huge and all point the same way. Whichever way you go, someone pops up dressed in a cloak and pointed hat insisting you follow him. Your luggage and clothes are taken off you and replaced with an XP Air suit and suitcase identical to everyone around you as this is included in the exorbitant ticket cost. The aircraft will not take off until you have signed a contract. The inflight entertainment promised turns out to be the same Mickey Mouse cartoon repeated over and over again. You have to phone your travel agent before you can have a meal or drink. You are searched regularly throughout the flight. If you go to the toilet twice or more you get charged for a new ticket. No matter what destination you booked you will always end up crash landing at Whistler in Canada.

OSX Air:
You enter a white terminal, and all you can see is a woman sitting in the corner behind a white desk, you walk up to get your ticket. She smiles and says "Welcome to OS X Air, please allow us to take your picture", at which point a camera in the wall you didn't notice before takes your picture. "Thank you, here is your ticket" You are handed a minimalistic ticket with your picture at the top, it already has all of your information. A door opens to your right and you walk through. You enter a wide open space with one seat in the middle, you sit, listen to music and watch movies until the end of the flight. You never see any of the other passengers. You land, get off, and you say to yourself "wow, that was really nice, but I feel like something was missing"

Linux Air
Disgruntled employees of all the other OS airlines decide to start their own airline. They build the planes, ticket counters, and pave the runways themselves. They charge a small fee to cover the cost of printing the ticket, but you can also download and print the ticket yourself.
When you board the plane, you are given a seat, four bolts, a wrench and a copy of the seat-HOWTO.html. Once settled, the fully adjustable seat is very comfortable, the plane leaves and arrives on time without a single problem, the in-flight meal is wonderful. You try to tell customers of the other airlines about the great trip, but all they can say is, "You had to do what with the seat?"

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#161257 Mar 19, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
A non-vacuum media...
Light travels though unoccupied space at 1c (empty space; a vacuum).

Light *only* travels through unoccupied space, and *always* at 1c.

Don't stop reading, RR.

When a photon encounters a particle of matter, it gets absorbed by the particle.

Shortly thereafter, a new photon gets emitted from the particle.

There's a brief duration of time between absorption and emission. It's a very, very brief duration... but, it is quantifiable.

The new photon travels at a speed of 1c until it encounters another particle of matter, where and when it gets absorbed and a new-new photon is re-emitted.

The processes is repeated, over and over, as light traverses what we're referring to as “occupied space”... which really consists of mostly empty space.

Have you ever heard that an atom consists of mostly empty space? It's true.

Molecules consists of atoms. Thus, molecules are mostly empty space.

The stuff that occupies space consists of molecules. Thus, the stuff consists of mostly empty space.

Light's speed is constant, at 1c, when it's traveling. Otherwise, it's waiting to be emitted.

The overall effect is that light's “apparent speed” varies. The variability depends upon the duration of time between absorption/emission of photons when they encounter matter... and the distance they travel between encounters.

Thus, it's perfectly acceptable to posit that light's speed is constant.
LargeLanguage

Chester, UK

#161258 Mar 19, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Light travels though unoccupied space at 1c (empty space; a vacuum).
Light *only* travels through unoccupied space, and *always* at 1c.
Don't stop reading, RR.
When a photon encounters a particle of matter, it gets absorbed by the particle.
Shortly thereafter, a new photon gets emitted from the particle.
There's a brief duration of time between absorption and emission. It's a very, very brief duration... but, it is quantifiable.
The new photon travels at a speed of 1c until it encounters another particle of matter, where and when it gets absorbed and a new-new photon is re-emitted.
The processes is repeated, over and over, as light traverses what we're referring to as “occupied space”... which really consists of mostly empty space.
Have you ever heard that an atom consists of mostly empty space? It's true.
Molecules consists of atoms. Thus, molecules are mostly empty space.
The stuff that occupies space consists of molecules. Thus, the stuff consists of mostly empty space.
Light's speed is constant, at 1c, when it's traveling. Otherwise, it's waiting to be emitted.
The overall effect is that light's “apparent speed” varies. The variability depends upon the duration of time between absorption/emission of photons when they encounter matter... and the distance they travel between encounters.
Thus, it's perfectly acceptable to posit that light's speed is constant.
Can you prove particles are mostly empty space? I suppose not. Believing what you hear, you aren't hardcore, you must be getting it secondhand if you are not an expert.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#161259 Mar 19, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
Lemme fix it...
<quoted text>
I like a KDE for its “tweakablity”. I also like several of the resource friendly desktop environments >>> LXDE, XFCE, Fluxbox, etc.
The fact that it (KDE) is similar to Windows is the reason Kubuntu is recommended for those wanting something besides Windows. Most of the people I install it for are really just looking for a dependable way to access the Web, check email, office apps, etc. It works well to those ends provided the machines aren't antiquated.
Haven't messed with Totem too much. If it works, stick with it. For me, it's VLC.
<quoted text>
It's a shame too. I have a copy of OS/2 Warp 3, floppy disks, that's never even been installed.
<quoted text>
I'm getting there myself. But, just imagine if Linux didn't exist and there was nothing to play with.
I hate to tell you how many dozens and dozens of times I installed using those diskettes, and the Fixpacks. You can't be in any rush.

Virtualbox handles it pretty well. I managed to get it in and the fixpacks. You will find a Virtualbox image with guest additions torrent download for Warp 4 with fp6 that should fire up if you have virtualization turned on in the BIOS. Warp 4 is difficult to install on Virtualbox from scratch.

Something to play with.:-)

Years ago I had an old 486dl 66 with a 200 MB drive and 12 MB RAM. Real tight. I managed to strip Warp3 down to the bare essentials and installed Office 4.3, Netscape, Procomm4, and a fax program. Was a necessity at the time.

Funny, I haven't got one single floppy disk laying around anywhere, anymore. Had a couple of big boxes full.

You should see the old Compaq c552 laptop I have. The lid has come loose from the base, it is missing keys from the cat hanging off it, and several dings from falling over the years, plus flat getting used a lot. I have it mounted to some siding to hold up the screen with, you guessed it, duct tape. I use it as a jukebox and backup, with Vista and Ubuntu on it. I love that laptop.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#161260 Mar 19, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"believes that nothing is known", not "knows nothing is known"...
Read, my man. Read.
You are without knowledge pertaining to your god.

You qualify as agnostic.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#161261 Mar 19, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Omg dude... I thought OCB was anal retentive.
You take the cake.
All this time, I've been talking about that post of yours that started with "Light's speed is constant."
There was only one post of yours that started with that particular sentence.
That was the only post I've been referring to.
I know it sucks to lose, but you just did.
You still aren't paying attention.

You are still being ignorant.

You're busted.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#161262 Mar 19, 2013
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you prove particles are mostly empty space? I suppose not. Believing what you hear, you aren't hardcore, you must be getting it secondhand if you are not an expert.
The theory works.

Application is the proof.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#161263 Mar 19, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Light travels though unoccupied space at 1c (empty space; a vacuum).
Light *only* travels through unoccupied space, and *always* at 1c.
Don't stop reading, RR.
When a photon encounters a particle of matter, it gets absorbed by the particle.
Shortly thereafter, a new photon gets emitted from the particle.
There's a brief duration of time between absorption and emission. It's a very, very brief duration... but, it is quantifiable.
The new photon travels at a speed of 1c until it encounters another particle of matter, where and when it gets absorbed and a new-new photon is re-emitted.
The processes is repeated, over and over, as light traverses what we're referring to as “occupied space”... which really consists of mostly empty space.
Have you ever heard that an atom consists of mostly empty space? It's true.
Molecules consists of atoms. Thus, molecules are mostly empty space.
The stuff that occupies space consists of molecules. Thus, the stuff consists of mostly empty space.
Light's speed is constant, at 1c, when it's traveling. Otherwise, it's waiting to be emitted.
The overall effect is that light's “apparent speed” varies. The variability depends upon the duration of time between absorption/emission of photons when they encounter matter... and the distance they travel between encounters.
Thus, it's perfectly acceptable to posit that light's speed is constant.
It encounters a field in that empty space passing through the molecules. That is what does the absorbing and re emitting. And not in the same direction.

Fields exist in outer space, too. Disrupt part and you encounter resistance. It isn't as tight as within a molecule, but it is there.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#161264 Mar 19, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Light travels though unoccupied space at 1c (empty space; a vacuum).
Light *only* travels through unoccupied space, and *always* at 1c.
Don't stop reading, RR.
When a photon encounters a particle of matter, it gets absorbed by the particle.
Shortly thereafter, a new photon gets emitted from the particle.
There's a brief duration of time between absorption and emission. It's a very, very brief duration... but, it is quantifiable.
The new photon travels at a speed of 1c until it encounters another particle of matter, where and when it gets absorbed and a new-new photon is re-emitted.
The processes is repeated, over and over, as light traverses what we're referring to as “occupied space”... which really consists of mostly empty space.
Have you ever heard that an atom consists of mostly empty space? It's true.
Molecules consists of atoms. Thus, molecules are mostly empty space.
The stuff that occupies space consists of molecules. Thus, the stuff consists of mostly empty space.
Light's speed is constant, at 1c, when it's traveling. Otherwise, it's waiting to be emitted.
The overall effect is that light's “apparent speed” varies. The variability depends upon the duration of time between absorption/emission of photons when they encounter matter... and the distance they travel between encounters.
Thus, it's perfectly acceptable to posit that light's speed is constant.
Interesting and "RedneckReadable"...

"Light's speed is constant, at 1c, when it's traveling."

Question:

When is light not traveling?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#161265 Mar 19, 2013
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU are. Why aren't you discussing computers like the rest of them are, little pup? Don't even know the name of the computer you use?
No, it's "sociopath", you idiot. Not sociapath...

Am I discussing computers???

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#161266 Mar 19, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
It encounters a field in that empty space passing through the molecules. That is what does the absorbing and re emitting. And not in the same direction.
Fields exist in outer space, too. Disrupt part and you encounter resistance. It isn't as tight as within a molecule, but it is there.
Okay...

errr...

Okay.

I'm not trying to get overly specific with RR.

I'm simply pointing out that my statement was not incorrect... and still isn't.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#161267 Mar 19, 2013
LargeLanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you know that Riverside Redneck said that he enjoyed that his children would jump when he tells them to jump without even saying how high? Sounds like a dictator.
Yup.

RR says "jump"

RR's kids jump.

They don't even ask how high....

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#161268 Mar 19, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
Well, everyone, I am going to be out of country for the next week or so and probably out of communication with topix. I hope everyone enjoys discussing whether c is constant!
c is not constant.

Sometimes it takes on the ssss sound and sometimes the k sound. Sometimes it's used a number and sometimes a musical note. I hear it's also used as a static variable in mathematical equations.

So, not only is c not constant, it's quite versatile.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#161269 Mar 19, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay...
errr...
Okay.
I'm not trying to get overly specific with RR.
I'm simply pointing out that my statement was not incorrect... and still isn't.
It appears you are correct.

"The speed of light depends on the medium through which the light travels. In empty space, the speed is 186,000 miles per second. It is almost the same in air. In water, it slows down to approximately 140,000 miles per second. In glass, the speed of light is 124,000 miles per second. In other words, the speed of light decreases as the density of the substance through which the light passes increases."

"The velocity of light, which is the same as the velocity of other electromagnetic waves, is considered to be constant, at 186,000 miles per second. If expressed in meters, it is 300,000,000 meters per second."

http://www.tpub.com/neets/book10/39h.htm

I apologize and concede.

“Spelin 'n' tpyin...”

Since: Feb 08

...are my strong suits!

#161270 Mar 19, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate to tell you how many dozens and dozens of times I installed using those diskettes, and the Fixpacks. You can't be in any rush.
Virtualbox handles it pretty well. I managed to get it in and the fixpacks. You will find a Virtualbox image with guest additions torrent download for Warp 4 with fp6 that should fire up if you have virtualization turned on in the BIOS. Warp 4 is difficult to install on Virtualbox from scratch.
Something to play with.:-)
Years ago I had an old 486dl 66 with a 200 MB drive and 12 MB RAM. Real tight. I managed to strip Warp3 down to the bare essentials and installed Office 4.3, Netscape, Procomm4, and a fax program. Was a necessity at the time.
Funny, I haven't got one single floppy disk laying around anywhere, anymore. Had a couple of big boxes full.
You should see the old Compaq c552 laptop I have. The lid has come loose from the base, it is missing keys from the cat hanging off it, and several dings from falling over the years, plus flat getting used a lot. I have it mounted to some siding to hold up the screen with, you guessed it, duct tape. I use it as a jukebox and backup, with Vista and Ubuntu on it. I love that laptop.
OS/2 Warp was like Linux, in that it shipped with suite of applications. That was nice of 'em.

PM me with a mailing address, and I'll send ya all my diskettes. I'll even coin the postage.

Run Puppy Linux on the laptop. It barks... literally. Might help dissuade the cat from removing the remaining keys from it.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#161271 Mar 19, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay...
errr...
Okay.
I'm not trying to get overly specific with RR.
I'm simply pointing out that my statement was not incorrect... and still isn't.
The speed of light is not an absolute. It is based on lab experiments.

Be advised that if the BB happened as said, there was an expansion of the pre-existing material, and then a condensation and creation of matter as we know it. Since we are here, and other thingies are elsewhere, that means the space in between has been transversed by that original material, and then the condensates that form us now. So there are charged fields, pieces of matter, and maybe some beer bottles left along the path, so this "vacuum" of space is not real pure. Plus good old gravity crossing between even distant objects.

The perfect vacuums that c is derived from was done within the EM and gravity signatures of this planet.

Or something like that.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#161272 Mar 19, 2013
Hukt on Fonix wrote:
<quoted text>
OS/2 Warp was like Linux, in that it shipped with suite of applications. That was nice of 'em.
PM me with a mailing address, and I'll send ya all my diskettes. I'll even coin the postage.
Run Puppy Linux on the laptop. It barks... literally. Might help dissuade the cat from removing the remaining keys from it.
Puppy Linux is awesome. I use it as my recovery boot so I can fix files I screw up.

“ Knight Of Hyrule”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#161273 Mar 19, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I know. But outside of a vacuum, light's speed is not constant.
That's all I'm saying.
That's like saying, not every car goes full throttle on the highway.
No duh, but the constant denoted by the "c" notation is the speed limit. It's posted and not optional to exceed by anyone's will to do so.
Jimmy

Yeovil, UK

#161274 Mar 19, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
It appears you are correct.
I apologize and concede.
Get used to doing this when talking to atheists.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min oxbow 584,259
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 min TIM958 611,852
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min True Truth 828,568
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 10 min dollarsbill 3,479
News Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 13 min Just Think 121,658
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 22 min Liam 40,148
Any girls wanna sex Skype? (Jan '13) 30 min Yoitsmang0 113
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 5 hr duststorm 442,869
More from around the web