Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 247283 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158902 Mar 7, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Just when I thought you couldn't be more stupid...
I see you have no thoughts.

Thanks for clearing that up.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158904 Mar 7, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
Try harder RR
Você já se perguntou o que sua vida teria sido se você tivesse oxigênio suficiente no nascimento?
Portugese, Spanish....

What's the difference.....
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#158906 Mar 7, 2013
Is it an axiom?
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Because it is.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#158907 Mar 7, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Einstein got his smarts from sitting in a patent office and reading the theories and applications that crossed his desk, then thinking and coming up with his own theories. Some of which is wrong. Why no grand unification theory.
He read. He thought.
You just read.
Yes and much of which is right, your sat nav would not work without his theories, television is an application of his theory of light. His musings helped to prove the existence of atoms and molecules.

Science is working an a unifying theory, your god is not so why no god magic?

I read an learn, read and learn and lets face facts here reading is far better than davesworld day dreaming

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#158908 Mar 7, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
...
you just continue to make the blind assertion that you are correct in spite of this, that is a sign of delusion, you are incapable of admitting you are wrong.
That is the davesworld way.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#158910 Mar 7, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
The infinite regression argument is invalid against existence of God, as it is stipulated as "eternal" - independent of time.
It works against items such as plants, animals, the universe, as they are not independent of time.
Where is the evidence of this, I would be very pleased to read it, as I am sure just about everyone else, god believers and otherwise would like.

In fact if you can provide such evidence I really think you would have it made, You would solve a millennia old quandary, people have been looking for thousands of years and no evidence found, anywhere. Just think you would be rich and famous beyond avarice.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158913 Mar 7, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes and much of which is right, your sat nav would not work without his theories, television is an application of his theory of light. His musings helped to prove the existence of atoms and molecules.
Science is working an a unifying theory, your god is not so why no god magic?
I read an learn, read and learn and lets face facts here reading is far better than davesworld day dreaming
That sat nav and most other thingies came about from building on existing technology and trial and error, not his theories. Those technologies were set up by others. Faraday for one.

You really don't know what you know. You are just too full of hate to think clearly.
Imhotep

Brandon, FL

#158914 Mar 7, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Portugese, Spanish....
What's the difference.....
English,Patois what is the difference?

What do you DARE to think?

Existe um Deus
¿Hay un Dios

It's that tower of babble that gas you confused.
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#158915 Mar 7, 2013
ChristineM is mildly dyslexic. Spell checkers don't catch everything.

btw, your last sentence doesn't even parse.
Lies Buster wrote:
<quoted text>Please learn to read before you write. I see that you have used commas, so I must conclude that you ran out of them, before you failed to utilize commas where needed.
Also, it should be "I read and learn", not "I read an learn".
Also, did you mean "Dave's world".
What is "Science is working an a unifying theory"? Did you mean "Science is working on a unifying theory.
If mathematicians are not working on solving 1+1 = 2 and why 1+1 is not = to 0, then why would God be working on a unifying theory?
What is 0 x %(infinity)- 1 /0 +(1/0)=?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158916 Mar 7, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
English,Patois what is the difference?
What do you DARE to think?
Existe um Deus
¿Hay un Dios
It's that tower of babble that gas you confused.
Eh?

Gas doesn't confuse me, you're thinking of dr shrink & Phil...

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#158917 Mar 7, 2013
Lies Buster wrote:
If mathematicians are not working on solving 1+1 = 2 and why 1+1 is not = to 0, then why would God be working on a unifying theory?
Huh?

Just a point: 1+1=0 if we are working modulo 2. This can be quite useful for those working in computers.
What is 0 x %(infinity)- 1 /0 +(1/0)=?
A meaningless stream of symbols.

“Mercury bubbles blast!”

Since: Mar 11

Mercury

#158918 Mar 7, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Portugese, Spanish....
What's the difference.....
Brazil.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#158919 Mar 7, 2013
Lies Buster wrote:
<quoted text>Please learn to read before you write. I see that you have used commas, so I must conclude that you ran out of them, before you failed to utilize commas where needed.
Also, it should be "I read and learn", not "I read an learn".
Also, did you mean "Dave's world".
What is "Science is working an a unifying theory"? Did you mean "Science is working on a unifying theory.
If mathematicians are not working on solving 1+1 = 2 and why 1+1 is not = to 0, then why would God be working on a unifying theory?
What is 0 x %(infinity)- 1 /0 +(1/0)=?
I guess you must be christian and are totally unaware of my disability so I can understand your ignorance whether it’s deliberate or not.

Actually no, this is a long standing joke that you would not understand and I meant davesworld, exactly as I wrote it. But again you were not to know that.

Yes I did mean on, not an, and not an, basic mistakes that many dyslexics make and mistakes that ignorant godbods love to pick on because they have fook all else to play with. Funnily enough it’s that exact same christian mocking of my disability that is the sole reason why I am no longer christian, good to see that you keep up the traditions.

Why would god not, it’s one of the things godbots love to rant about and it is claimed your god myth is omniscient is it not? Or perhaps you delusional enough to think, as do many such christians, that you know the mind of your god?
Lies Buster wrote:
<quoted text>You really are not smart. Basically, science on works with physics and at macro levels. When it comes to quantum mechanisms and singularities, time and physics can not be measured and therefore neither can God. Basic, which is why no scientist worth his salt ever ventures into the supernatural realms, because they understand that science can only measure the physical realms.
So because there is a question that YOU cannon answer then it is me who is not smart, OK, I follow your logic there, I think it’s called deliberate ignorance.

So you argue from ignorance, may I suggest you look at the mathematics of Dr Param Sing to see if the mechanisms of singularities can be considered.

And the argument from incredulity does not work either, what you are saying is “This is the option that best suites my sensibilities there it must be fact”

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#158920 Mar 7, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
That sat nav and most other thingies came about from building on existing technology and trial and error, not his theories. Those technologies were set up by others. Faraday for one.
You really don't know what you know. You are just too full of hate to think clearly.
Try using a sat nav without the relativity algorithm.

When fist designed for the US military they had to have a relativity switch that disabled that function because they were then as skeptical as you are now.

That switch has been superseded with ALWAYS ON

I know exactly what I know and where does hate come into it? I am not the one hurling mockery and abuse, that’s you.

Honey I don’t even hate the christians who tried to kill me but I must admit, there is s special place that I would live to see those christians that tried to kill my children

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158921 Mar 7, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess you must be christian and are totally unaware of my disability so I can understand your ignorance whether it’s deliberate or not.
Actually no, this is a long standing joke that you would not understand and I meant davesworld, exactly as I wrote it. But again you were not to know that.
Yes I did mean on, not an, and not an, basic mistakes that many dyslexics make and mistakes that ignorant godbods love to pick on because they have fook all else to play with. Funnily enough it’s that exact same christian mocking of my disability that is the sole reason why I am no longer christian, good to see that you keep up the traditions.
Why would god not, it’s one of the things godbots love to rant about and it is claimed your god myth is omniscient is it not? Or perhaps you delusional enough to think, as do many such christians, that you know the mind of your god?
<quoted text>
So because there is a question that YOU cannon answer then it is me who is not smart, OK, I follow your logic there, I think it’s called deliberate ignorance.
So you argue from ignorance, may I suggest you look at the mathematics of Dr Param Sing to see if the mechanisms of singularities can be considered.
And the argument from incredulity does not work either, what you are saying is “This is the option that best suites my sensibilities there it must be fact”
Hmmmm....

Maybe Polymath can plot a course from wherever you are out there back to home.

Of course, we will have to figure where you are. Any identifiable galaxies you can recognize? No, of course not. Let's see... Oh, I know. Start beeping out some signals in a pattern that can be recognized as intelligent. Maybe in a few years we can locate you.

On second thought, that may not work either.

You did pack a good lunch, didn't you?

Since: Mar 13

Point Pleasant, WV

#158922 Mar 7, 2013
All I know is Jesus loves Country music :

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158923 Mar 7, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Try using a sat nav without the relativity algorithm.
When fist designed for the US military they had to have a relativity switch that disabled that function because they were then as skeptical as you are now.
That switch has been superseded with ALWAYS ON
I know exactly what I know and where does hate come into it? I am not the one hurling mockery and abuse, that’s you.
Honey I don’t even hate the christians who tried to kill me but I must admit, there is s special place that I would live to see those christians that tried to kill my children
Lovey, your associating the acts of a few to a whole religion and wishing its destruction is not what they call rational.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158924 Mar 7, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Brazil.
Oh ya, there's that.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#158925 Mar 7, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh ya, there's that.
Reminds me of a GW Bush story. An aide came to him in the Oval Office. "Mr. President, I need to inform you that four Brazilian soldiers were killed this morning in Iraq."

Bush lowered his head and began to shake, sobbing uncontrollably. The aide, surprised at the overreaction, asked, "Mr. President, what's the matter?"

Bush replied with a question: "Tell me, how many is in a brazillion?"

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158926 Mar 7, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Reminds me of a GW Bush story. An aide came to him in the Oval Office. "Mr. President, I need to inform you that four Brazilian soldiers were killed this morning in Iraq."
Bush lowered his head and began to shake, sobbing uncontrollably. The aide, surprised at the overreaction, asked, "Mr. President, what's the matter?"
Bush replied with a question: "Tell me, how many is in a brazillion?"
I wonder if the California coast dropping into the ocean would bring fresher air to the rest of the country?

One last huge blast of "Bush did it" from those going down, and then clean fresh air.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
disgusting transgenders (Dec '10) 15 min Kiara2 3
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 16 min Bongo 878,319
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 16 min lightbeamrider 2,859
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 23 min Ajay 564
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 27 min USaWORLDWARMONGERER 272,846
The Christian Atheist debate 35 min Critical Eye 3,815
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 54 min RiccardoFire 7,980
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr June VanDerMark 603,224
More from around the web