Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 257121 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#158454 Mar 4, 2013
CunningLinguist wrote:
<quoted text>
ID?
Hmmm - what is intelligent about disease?
What created all of these and why?
For the Xtian believer, these strange events are nothing more than the mysterious ways of God. To a freethinker, the alleged phenomena are an indicative subset of the widespread superstitious beliefs held by our ancestors. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of ridiculous statements made by the authors of the Bible. Whether you enjoy reading about plumb lines or talking donkeys, the Xtian religion carries more than its fair share of absurdities. In fact, some of the biblical reports are illogical enough to disqualify explanations through supernatural means.
However, we still haven’t fully covered the absurdity of God’s presence. Most poets, prophets, and historians certainly believed him to be a human-like personage. God shoots flames from his mouth and smoke from his nostrils like a dragon (Psalms 18:8).
God has eyes, ears, a nose, a mouth, a finger, a hand, a back, loins, and feet just to name a few of his physical human attributes.
Deuteronomy.
1st God doesn’t want anyone to boil a young goat in its mother’s milk (14:21). If you’re going to boil a young goat in milk, is it that much more deviant to do it in its mother’s? Why is an eternal, omnipotent god concerned with such trivial and outdated matters?
This god also doesn’t want you to plow a field with an ox and a donkey on the same yoke (22:10).
God gives no reason for this useless regulation. Instead of making certain that his holy word included clear abolishment of slavery so that millions of his creations wouldn’t needlessly suffer, God decides to set foolish rules for plowing fields and boiling goats. This should provoke indignation from any moralistically reasonable person, regardless of religious conviction.
Read thy BuyBull™ for more fun things.:-)
Have you ever designed a disease-causing microbe?

Do you know someone who has?

If so, did it require intelligence?

You are a moron. Thus, I predict you will not design anything.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#158455 Mar 4, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Yes there is a difference between "conjugation" and evolution, you'd do well to learn the difference. This is what happens when you are scientifically ignorant, you think you have found something that refutes what someone has presented. Unfortunately, you never understood the original point, so your rebuttal becomes extremely humorous!!!!!! Keep trying though, if nothing else you are entertaining!!!!
You are the one who proposed "the fact" of evolution being hereditary change over generations.

You assigned conjugation as evolution!

Don't blame someone else, you moron.

“Proud Member”

Since: Dec 10

The Basket of Deplorables

#158456 Mar 4, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, it's a very useful tool. You don't have malaria, right? Probably never had it - or helminth worms. Well done, science.
Not to mention smallpox, cholera, and bubonic plague.
But on another note...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#158457 Mar 4, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Yes there is a difference between "conjugation" and evolution, you'd do well to learn the difference. This is what happens when you are scientifically ignorant, you think you have found something that refutes what someone has presented. Unfortunately, you never understood the original point, so your rebuttal becomes extremely humorous!!!!!! Keep trying though, if nothing else you are entertaining!!!!
You don't really know how to define evolution, do you?

“Proud Member”

Since: Dec 10

The Basket of Deplorables

#158458 Mar 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Abiogenesis would have to occur before evolution.
As is obvious, abiogenesis is NECESSARY for evolution.
Put another way, life cannot evolve until life occurs.
As is obvious, abiogenesis is NECESSARY for evolution.
Put another way, a pig can't decide to dive into a salt-water ocean and eat nothing but seafood and fuck underwater until there is life.
Duh, but does this mean the creation story is true?
Mr. Mud Pie Man.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#158459 Mar 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what you offered as the "fact of evolution".
Now you offer a new "fact of evolution".
See how it works? You offer your "fact"; it gets shot down, so you think of another one.
Natural selection cannot be both a "component" of evolution and at the same time be "evolution".
If natural selection is evolution, they are the same thing.
They are not.
Natural selection only means some of a population fail to survive, and others with a particular trait survive.
That involves NO EVOLUTION. It involves a population, a hostile environment, death, and then a population in which more members have the aforementioned trait.
No "evolution" happened there, unless you define evolution so loosely that it looses any identity.
And that is exactly what you want to do.
Evolution is the change of a population due to genetic mutations and selected by natural selection. Learn you relationships in science or just give up, we know you're good at giving up.

“Proud Member”

Since: Dec 10

The Basket of Deplorables

#158460 Mar 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
They define atheism as "no belief".
So we all start as atheists, then some go astray.
Nice setup, huh? You can win any argument if you get to decide the meaning of terms, right?
My dog, Mongo, has no beliefs.
He eats his own shit.
I'm convinced, given this evidence, that he is an atheist.
Your dog...believes in you. If you taught him not to eat his shit you did something. Knowledge is power.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158461 Mar 4, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> I dont have a problem with crosses, they are good defense against vampires and such ...heheheh
No really wtf is the problem?
I don't know, man. A few aheists got all butt hurt by it and "demanded" for it to be removed. Then they enlisted the FFRC...

I really don't see the probelm, it DOES keep the vampires out of Riverside.

“Fortes Fortuna Juvat, ”

Since: Dec 09

Wichita. Ks.

#158462 Mar 4, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Eh?
"Life started from nothing out of the mind of a god."
...then...
"Still the same nothing out of nothing."
O_o
God isn't nothing...
Then please show me this god.
Jimmy

Hove, UK

#158463 Mar 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what you offered as the "fact of evolution".
Now you offer a new "fact of evolution".
See how it works? You offer your "fact"; it gets shot down, so you think of another one.
Natural selection cannot be both a "component" of evolution and at the same time be "evolution".
If natural selection is evolution, they are the same thing.
They are not.
Natural selection only means some of a population fail to survive, and others with a particular trait survive.
That involves NO EVOLUTION. It involves a population, a hostile environment, death, and then a population in which more members have the aforementioned trait.
No "evolution" happened there, unless you define evolution so loosely that it looses any identity.
And that is exactly what you want to do.
Why are religious people so obviously stupid?
CunningLinguist

Winter Garden, FL

#158464 Mar 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever designed a disease-causing microbe?
Do you know someone who has?
If so, did it require intelligence?
You are a moron. Thus, I predict you will not design anything.
Unfortunately there is no vaccine for stupidity and in your case the wheel is still spinning but the hamster died long ago.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#158465 Mar 4, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are religious people so obviously stupid?
Because their religion elevates stupid, making it seem like a good thing, so they latch onto the religion because they know they are stupid and couldn't find acceptance in anything else because of that.
CunningLinguist

Winter Garden, FL

#158466 Mar 4, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are religious people so obviously stupid?
Their problem is simply RELIGION aka Organized Superstition.
Some are literally obsessed with it.

The Christian view that all intercourse outside marriage is immoral was based upon the view that all sexual intercourse, even within marriage, is regrettable.

A view of this sort, which goes against biological facts, can only be regarded by some people as a morbid aberration. The fact that it is embedded in Christian ethics has made Christianity throughout its whole history a force tending towards mental disorders and unwholesome views of life.

The Church had devastating impact upon society. As the Church assumed leadership, activity in the fields of medicine, technology, science, education, history, art and commerce all but collapsed.

Technology disappeared and the Church became the most cohesive power in Western society. The extensive aqueduct and plumbing systems vanished.

Orthodox Christians taught that all aspects of the flesh should be reviled and therefore discouraged washing as much as possible.

Toilets and indoor plumbing disappeared. Disease became commonplace as sanitation and hygiene deteriorated. For hundreds of years, towns and villages were decimated by epidemics.

Europe entered the Dark Ages.

“Organised religion is violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism, tribalism, and bigotry, invested in ignorance and hostile to free inquiry, contemptuous of women and coercive toward children.”
~Christopher Hitchens

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#158467 Mar 4, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Please give me your objective evidence of how life began?
Again, the point you seem to be missing is that just because science is not omniscient doesn't mean it's wrong about what it does know. And religion doesn't "know" anything, it's all made-up mythology. I'll take science any day over superstition. If you want the latter, you are welcome to it.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#158468 Mar 4, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
All I can say there is a following among theologians that believe, the Great Wh*re to be a power influential Church with a troubled history as described in Revelation 17.
You don’t have to believe it. I’m just sharing with you the thought of what many to believe is the Great Wh*re in Revelation 17.
Well, again, that just highlights the dangers of clinging to an ideology that is not founded in objective evidence. How can you prove or disprove what that passage in Revelation says? It ultimately comes down not to facts, but what everyone agrees is the most pleasing to them.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#158469 Mar 4, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are religious people so obviously stupid?
Not all religious people r stupid and not all atheists are intelligent!

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#158470 Mar 4, 2013
Clementia wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all religious people r stupid and not all atheists are intelligent!
True.

But Fundamentalism of any kind does sorta tend in that direction.
blacklagoon

Jamaica Plain, MA

#158471 Mar 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't really know how to define evolution, do you?
i have, dozens of times, you're apparently just to stupid to understand. Pitiful, really pitiful.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#158472 Mar 4, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>True.
But Fundamentalism of any kind does sorta tend in that direction.
Yh, but we got too many crazy nuts in all directions!

Religious people who don't truly understand their religion are the nutters, but the thing is that MOST religious people don't understand, so that's why we got too many nuts in religion. But i still think they will always be nuts even if they give up PRETENDING to be religious. I think some people r just born with it!!
blacklagoon

Jamaica Plain, MA

#158473 Mar 4, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Great, got it.
Now who is the mason that puts all the "blocks" together?
Amino acids made of atoms; carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen, some even have sulfur.
They are combinedby way of peptide bonds to form proteins.
But what good are amino acids without the help of nucleic acids?
In turn, what good are nucleic acids without amino acids?
Both are needed to have life as we know it.
Both are more complex than you can hope to understand.
And you think they are just random occurances?
Silly boy.
Make me a sammich.
No, they're obviously more complex than YOU can understand. "It's too complex and I can't understand it so it must have been made by my invisible god thingy." he whines!!!! Science is just a little bit ahead of you here, they actually understand things that you remain credulous over.

Nothing "random" about it. They combine in a very complex and exacting fashion. Either that or a magical being scooped up some dirt and blew on it and out popped a fully formed male.....hummmm tough choice here, but since I refuse to believe in magic, I'll take complex chemicals mixing in just the right environment, especially since many of those elements are what make up all stars. A star exploded, and strews its essence into the universe, over and over again, and you think life began with a scoop of dirt....REALLY NOW!!!!! HUMMMM

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Brian_G 70,028
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 3 min MUQ2 45,561
Horny snapchat usernames 5 min josh 8
Websleuths & Tricia Griffith is a fraud. Especi... 5 min MMgonzo 1
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 15 min Aura Mytha 974,603
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 25 min ImFree2Choose 4,929
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 26 min Brian_G 282,861
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr Anthony MN 658,358
More from around the web