Which is why I said Those laws may or may not exists outside the domain of this universe<quoted text> Okay let point out the fallacy in your arguments.
"outside this universe"?
This will take much speculation.
I made no reference to tuning, fine tuning or anything of the nature.
"Nope, the heart of this mystery is being investigated and with all probability within my lifetime this mystery will no longer be a mystery. Whether you or anyone else accepts that progress is your choice"
Arrogance and wishful thinking.
"Actually not arrogant and haughty reasoning but the reasoning of world renowned (physicists and cosmologist as there knowledge)"
Argument from authority.
"involved in pre big bang cosmological hypothesis"
Another way of saying conjecture.
"science and mathematics has taken over"
This is a conflicted statement, exactly what have science and math taken over?
I agree some of us use reasoning and science as tools to better understand the world, but has science taken over?
Will science conquer Iran's Theocracy?
The universe itself IS a paradox , can you say why there is something instead of nothing?
Why a infinitesimal became infinite, or even how is it not paradoxical in nature right down to Schroeder's cat and the time that passed for a photon to exist both 13 bya and now , despite your protest it is.
Just how old is a photon that originated shortly after the BB and has traveled 40 billion light years? Hint how does a photon appear to break causality?
The universe is a conglomeration of paradoxes.
I am sure you did mention tuned (or similar) which is why I answered in that way having just checked I apologise, you wrote turned and I misread it, dyslexia is a bugger eh? However see later in this post regarding infinite
Scientific projects in the process, you may of course consider it arrogance and wishful thinking to want to understand, but thats your problem. Refer to http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/research/res... if you dont want to look so foolish, they have plenty of papers for public view in the sciences related to cosmology
Which other way is there to argue, I realise you make the most of it but arguing from naivety does not really count
Nope a way of saying hypothesis, conjecture is something entirely different so dont try and tell me what I am saying when you cant even understand the difference.
Well if you will cherry pick then you will be left with incomplete statements. Here let me cite the complete sentence The time of some bronze age guy saying godidit is gone, science and mathematics has taken over.
Well science certainly allows you to post on topix and has allowed Iran to create a nuclear industry and rockets (for whatever purpose). Your personal politics is bugger all to do with the science.
No, can you say why there is something instead of nothing? Just because the creation event is not yet understood it does not mean its contradictory, it just means its not understood.
Once again there is nothing in the universe that is contradictory. It is a completely logical and predictable environment from 10^-34th of a second after its creation to now and for trillions of years into the future. Prior to 10^-34th of a second is not understood but is conjectured.
It is possible that the universe is infinite but as far as we know and in probability it is not. More probably there are infinite finite universes.
Schroeder is said to have said in later life that he wished he had never met the cat.