Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 255314 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146669 Jan 2, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
The actual link is http://www.earthage.org/EarthOldorYoung/scien...
Copying links from google and pasting them is unreliable as the displays are sometimes abbreviated (thus the "..."). Better to go to the page and copy the link from the IP box.
Thank you.

BUt I'm at work, my pc doesn't show an IP box.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146670 Jan 2, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
But not everything is designed to be a weapon.
Right, just like a gun.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146671 Jan 2, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Clearly a great argument for free healthcare for all whilst addressing the gun availability issue in parallel.
There's no such thing as free healthcare, nitwit.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#146672 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know, you tell me.
Why is it so difficult for you gun-haters to admit that a gun CAN be a weapon or that a gun CAN kill?
A gun DOES not kill, the soft squidgy bit pulling the trigger is the murderer, not the tool

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146673 Jan 2, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
No another fact, when you can show me a talking snake I will withdraw my statement. Until that time, tough.
When you can understand theat there never was a talking snake, we can continue...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146674 Jan 2, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
I have repeatedly offered evidence, you have repeatedly poo poo’d it, ignored it, tried (and failed) to talk it round, made excuses, attempted re-direction and outright lied.
If you really want me to re-state the sources of my evidence I will but I feel it will be a complete waste of time because you will go round and round again in the pathetic attempts of yours to discredit DOCUMENTED evidence based on nothing more than you personal belief.
"DOCUMENTED"?!?

LMAO!!

Do you consider posting on Topix to documenting?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146675 Jan 2, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh then that excuses child murder by christians – right?
Nope.

Your hatred clouds your judgement.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146676 Jan 2, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
A gun DOES not kill, the soft squidgy bit pulling the trigger is the murderer, not the tool
Very good!

<CLAPS HANDS>
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#146677 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
When you can understand theat there never was a talking snake, we can continue...
So you cherry pick which scriptures to believe. On what basis?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146678 Jan 2, 2013
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
So you cherry pick which scriptures to believe. On what basis?
No cherry picking....

The talking serpent was Satan, not simply a "talking snake" as the athitards want to make it out to seem.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146679 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No cherry picking....
The talking serpent was Satan, not simply a "talking snake" as the athitards want to make it out to seem.
It's YOUR bible.

Maybe you need to speak to the editors.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#146680 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
When you can understand theat there never was a talking snake, we can continue...
More biblical interpretation? We know your make believe view of some parts of genesis from old and now it seems that we can add genesis 3 to that list

3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die

Never??? So tell me since when has the babble been so wrong in your eyes?

How about the talking donkey of Numbers 22:21-35

Listen butt breath - just because the babble is not written the way you want it to be written does not change the babble, it just means you are confused.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#146681 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No cherry picking....
The talking serpent was Satan, not simply a "talking snake" as the athitards want to make it out to seem.
Satan is a wholly fictional character. Same goes for the rest of the Genesis 1-11.

"athitards" - christian standards are really slipping since i deconverted.

Oh, and ALL christians cherry pick. Its impossible not to do so, as the chaotic books of the bible contradict each other even in basic doctrines.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#146682 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"DOCUMENTED"?!?
LMAO!!
Do you consider posting on Topix to documenting?
Nope but I consider the links that have been posted on topix to reputable sources lead you to the verified and multiple sources of documentation. You chose to ignore them, your problem, not mine

“I am but a humble duck.”

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#146683 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No cherry picking....
The talking serpent was Satan, not simply a "talking snake" as the athitards want to make it out to seem.
Reference where the Bible blatantly says that the snake is satan?

I've read the Bible through 3+ times, and I've never come across it. Not even once does it imply that the snake is satan - that is the work of deceptive Christian apologists, preachers, and so on.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#146684 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
Your hatred clouds your judgement.
I am not the one shooting children, and I am not the one condoning such actions

Disliking the idea that a person can have the freedom to kill my children at will is hatred. Whatever turns you on you sick and twisted moron

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#146685 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Very good!
<CLAPS HANDS>
Not plural and not hands, just the clap effecting your thinking process
rider

Marquette, MI

#146686 Jan 2, 2013
www.youtube.com/user/kidsinministryCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
We're redefining children's ministry and equipping the little saints to walk in the power of the Holy Spirit

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#146687 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No cherry picking....
The talking serpent was Satan, not simply a "talking snake" as the athitards want to make it out to seem.
Was the snake in the guise of a snake?

Or was the snake in the guise of a god?

The babble says a snake, what do you say?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146688 Jan 2, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
More biblical interpretation? We know your make believe view of some parts of genesis from old and now it seems that we can add genesis 3 to that list
3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die
Never??? So tell me since when has the babble been so wrong in your eyes?
How about the talking donkey of Numbers 22:21-35
Listen butt breath - just because the babble is not written the way you want it to be written does not change the babble, it just means you are confused.
I do believe you are hopeless.

Genesis isn't talking about a literal snake. It is Satan in the form of a snake, which is why the serpent has knowledge that God has.

Satan is called a serpent three times in the book of Revelation, 12:9, 12:15, 20:2.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Help ??? I'm 15 and ready for sex 7 min Truthiness 2
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 12 min RiversideRedneck 38,758
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 17 min Just Think 104,773
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 24 min Just Think 641,968
Why do white men hate white women who want blac... (May '11) 39 min Paul is dead 4,166
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 42 min MUQ2 44,470
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr spider1954 970,122
More from around the web