Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146398 Jan 1, 2013
TheBlackSheep wrote:
<quoted text>
What is your limit on your number of people, both doing the killing and being killed? I need to know so that I can determine what else we need to ban or restrict.
"Or do you think there haven't been enough mass murders yet." That is just downright nasty. I wouldn't have expected something like that from you.
And I would have expected you to understand the issue.

Instead you just keep spouting NRA BS like it's bible.

You can't even admit that an assault weapon is designed for killing.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146400 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
My argument is addressed specifically towards assault weapons.
In general, I have no problem with sport and target weapons.
Assault weapons are neither.
They are not accurate enough for serious competition shooting OR hunting, really.
They are not necessary for anything other than killing and the "cool" factor.
Yes, they sure are COOL!

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#146401 Jan 1, 2013
HickUp wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you're smarter than the Supreme Court, prove it!
Lots of people are.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146402 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
And I would have expected you to understand the issue.
Instead you just keep spouting NRA BS like it's bible.
You can't even admit that an assault weapon is designed for killing.
And you can't conceive that an assault rifle (or any gun) is designed to shoot bullets, not just to kill.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146403 Jan 1, 2013
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:

* Heart disease: 599,413
* Cancer: 567,628
* Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 137,353
* Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,842
* Accidents (unintentional injuries): 118,021
* Alzheimer's disease: 79,003
* Diabetes: 68,705
* Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,692
* Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 48,935
* Intentional self-harm (suicide): 36,909

* Firearm murders: 8,563

And y'all wanna focus on gun control?!

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#146404 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
And THEN kill.
Do they use a different gun for that?
That must get cumbersome.
It take 2 people to carry a wounded man to the medic.

Its simple Aero wound as many as possible , taking at least one other trigger-man out the fight with each casualty.

That way you achieve numerical superiority.
Snipers have been known to defeat entire regiments using this philosophy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvin_C._York
HickUp

North Augusta, SC

#146405 Jan 1, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Lots of people are.
That is a matter of opinion, and could possibly be overturned.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#146406 Jan 1, 2013
HickUp wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a matter of opinion, and could possibly be overturned.
lol That was witty.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#146407 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
* Heart disease: 599,413
* Cancer: 567,628
* Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 137,353
* Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,842
* Accidents (unintentional injuries): 118,021
* Alzheimer's disease: 79,003
* Diabetes: 68,705
* Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,692
* Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 48,935
* Intentional self-harm (suicide): 36,909
* Firearm murders: 8,563
And y'all wanna focus on gun control?!
Gun control and nephrosis.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#146408 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
My argument is addressed specifically towards assault weapons.
In general, I have no problem with sport and target weapons.
Assault weapons are neither.
They are not accurate enough for serious competition shooting OR hunting, really.
They are not necessary for anything other than killing and the "cool" factor.
So are you against designer handbags too?

The criteria is simple cosmetics means nothing.

Limit the amount of rounds that can be fired from a weapon in a minute. But mind you this will only affect people who wish to comply with the law. Those who's intent is to break the law, in fact will and no laws will stop them.

So you see cosmetics and limits will have zero effect on those people. If it did they will make bombs.
The solution is spotting mental illness and meeting the threat with a greater ferocity. If you know it is suicide to try to attack a school and you will only succeed in minimal death and will be killed definitely. The threat is eliminated.

If you want to submit to a commonwealth Constitution then by all means move to one.

http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate...

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#146409 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
And I would have expected you to understand the issue.
Instead you just keep spouting NRA BS like it's bible.
You can't even admit that an assault weapon is designed for killing.
I do understand the issue and I am very willing to discuss it. I am not willing to discuss any issue with an ass that would write something like you did.

I have no association with the NRA. I don't quote them, pay them or read their propaganda.

I never said that they were not! You are just as blinded by your beliefs as any fundie is with theirs.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#146410 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
And I would have expected you to understand the issue.
Instead you just keep spouting NRA BS like it's bible.
You can't even admit that an assault weapon is designed for killing.
Assault weapons are designed to wound.

http://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/Xc...

Get that much straight Aero.

commonly, they have used cartridges of moderate size so that the individual soldier could carry more ammunition than was typical during the First World War or Second World War. Another consideration was that if an enemy were killed, only one soldier was put out of commission. If an enemy were wounded, then three or more were put out of commission as the wounded person was cared for. So, full-metal jacket bullets with moderate kinetic energy (except notably the US M-16) are typical of a true assault weapon designed to wound instead of to kill.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#146411 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
* Heart disease: 599,413
* Cancer: 567,628
* Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 137,353
* Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,842
* Accidents (unintentional injuries): 118,021
* Alzheimer's disease: 79,003
* Diabetes: 68,705
* Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,692
* Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 48,935
* Intentional self-harm (suicide): 36,909
* Firearm murders: 8,563
And y'all wanna focus on gun control?!
The order changes when you look at specific age groups:

Among those between the ages of 1 and 44, being the victim of homicide is always among the top 5 causes of death. Suicide is also among the top 5 for all groups between the ages of 5 and 44.

Since everyone *does* eventually die, from *some* cause, it should come as no surprise that the most common causes of death are those that are common among the elderly (heart disease, cancer, diabetes, etc.). The point, then, is to look for those causes then tend to prevent people from *becoming* elderly, not just the most common cause of death for *all* people.

Among the youngest (1 to 4), setting aside those with congenital diseases, it's accidents and homicides. Among those 5 to 14, again setting aside those with congenital diseases: accidents, suicides, and homicides are numbers 1, 4, and 5. And among those 15 to 24, the three leading causes of deaths are accidents, suicides, and homicides.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146412 Jan 1, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gun control and nephrosis.
lol

You'd think with the top killer in America, heart disease, which kills Americans 70 times more than gun murders, you people would be focusing on trying to froce people to eat better.....

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146413 Jan 1, 2013
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
The order changes when you look at specific age groups:
Among those between the ages of 1 and 44, being the victim of homicide is always among the top 5 causes of death. Suicide is also among the top 5 for all groups between the ages of 5 and 44.
Since everyone *does* eventually die, from *some* cause, it should come as no surprise that the most common causes of death are those that are common among the elderly (heart disease, cancer, diabetes, etc.). The point, then, is to look for those causes then tend to prevent people from *becoming* elderly, not just the most common cause of death for *all* people.
Among the youngest (1 to 4), setting aside those with congenital diseases, it's accidents and homicides. Among those 5 to 14, again setting aside those with congenital diseases: accidents, suicides, and homicides are numbers 1, 4, and 5. And among those 15 to 24, the three leading causes of deaths are accidents, suicides, and homicides.
uh-huh....

And that's related to gun control how?

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#146414 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
lol
You'd think with the top killer in America, heart disease, which kills Americans 70 times more than gun murders, you people would be focusing on trying to froce people to eat better.....
We're working on that, too.

Not to froce them (whatever that means), but to educate and inform.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#146415 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
* Heart disease: 599,413
* Cancer: 567,628
* Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 137,353
* Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,842
* Accidents (unintentional injuries): 118,021
* Alzheimer's disease: 79,003
* Diabetes: 68,705
* Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,692
* Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 48,935
* Intentional self-harm (suicide): 36,909
* Firearm murders: 8,563
And y'all wanna focus on gun control?!
It's a not a choice you moron, if you can save 9000 lives by giving up your stupid and arrogant right to carry murder machines, that's 9000 lives saved. Don't worry your pretty head about the other deaths, let the clever scientists work on the rest of them...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146416 Jan 1, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
We're working on that, too.
Not to froce them (whatever that means), but to educate and inform.
Would that be the liberl loons forcing McDonald's to have a nutrition label on a friggin burger?
Anon

Lakewood, OH

#146417 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
* Heart disease: 599,413
* Cancer: 567,628
* Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 137,353
* Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,842
* Accidents (unintentional injuries): 118,021
* Alzheimer's disease: 79,003
* Diabetes: 68,705
* Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,692
* Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 48,935
* Intentional self-harm (suicide): 36,909
* Firearm murders: 8,563
And y'all wanna focus on gun control?!
I don't think any of the 8,563 murdered will be throwing their hats in the air and jumping up and down with joy at that statistic, do you? Look, as you know I'm a gun owner, and I agree something should be done. My problem is the word "something". Everyone wants "something" done, but I've yet to find any coherent suggestion that would actually curb the problem. The core problem is the deranged mind that can concoct and carry out his desire for mass murder. If that individual is truly intent on completing his "mission", no legislative deterrent is going to stop him, period. Anyway, I believe this entire discussion is moot as the clamor for new gun control initiatives seems to be slowing to a crawl. The economy, jobs, the deficit will slowly come back to the forefront, and gun control will quietly slip through the cracks as it has in the past.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146418 Jan 1, 2013
...oops, meant "frocing"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Wake up, Black America!! (Sep '13) 4 min UIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR... 4,814
O.J. Simpson murdered Nicole Brown. End of story. 5 min Doctor REALITY 1
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 6 min RiccardoFire 96,838
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Lumajuice 777,327
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 8 min onemale 265,369
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 11 min atheist girl 605,258
I absolutely LOVE the music @ the end of the 'G... 19 min Doctor REALITY 1
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 24 min June VanDerMark 560,125
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Clearwater 175,773
More from around the web