Well that's my whole point einstien.And how does science disprove any of that?
Evidence?(From actual peer-reviewed scientific research articles, not from popular newspapers or magazines.)
If the the most influential body of scientists that are backing atheism, backing the view that God does not exist. That body of influence are evolutionary biologists. And as I showed you yesterday, this body of scientists are under the most assault with the threat of losing their jobs because of so limited institutions and places of employment, reason they tow the line of "No God", what do you think will become of "peer review"??...huh?
You atheists really only consider evolutionary biologists the only source of credibility on evolutionary theories. Any other scientists that criticize your beliefs are "not real" scientists or not relevant critiques you all say. So if there is peer review among a body of scientists where many are only trying to keep their jobs to pay their bills, the result of those peer reviews pretty much will result in group think.
In other words, a classic Catch 22. The only legitimate criticisms atheists will consider, are those from evolutionary biologists. And many of those evolutionary biologists cannot criticize or give their true assessment of the theories...because they are afraid to lose their jobs. Those are facts. There are evolutionary scientists that have lost their jobs because they claim belief in God and criticize ToE.
The result: simpletons like you therefore can cling maniacally to an absurd belief system and throw up the defense anytime...'evolutionary biological scientists agree no God...so there must be no God'.
Your religion has been figured out, the scheme is up.