Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 244966 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Thinking

Dalry, UK

#138077 Nov 16, 2012
But maybe they'd call for disarmament talks regarding our stockpiles of antibiotics.
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
hahaha! Nice.
Bacteria would just vote for the status quo, they're doing pretty well.
Thinking

Dalry, UK

#138078 Nov 16, 2012
Glad someone can do that amazing work instead of just praying helplessly.
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a friend who's brother is a heart surgeon for children. He is an atheist. He says "if there is a God, why am I fixing children born with defective hearts, who would die without surgery?"
Thinking

Dalry, UK

#138079 Nov 16, 2012
I vote for nothing. Nothing ever.
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Me too. Boblbbalahala, is like a spacer between potentially interesting and articulate posts.
Let's take bets as to what happened to him! I vote dropped into gasoline as a child.
Thinking

Dalry, UK

#138080 Nov 16, 2012
Crohn's, asthma, eczema. All examples of what an immune system gets up to when it's out of a job.
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
That's interesting. It's possible. We eat three times less bacteria and have three times less bacteria in our guts than hunter-gatherers. That has effects on our immune system.
Thinking

Dalry, UK

#138081 Nov 16, 2012
If no one was starving, religion would collapse.
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask these people why bacteria is so important;
***Making Artificial Bacteria
www.astrobio.net/pressrelease/2598/making-art...
26 Jan 2008 – A team of researchers has created the largest man-made DNA structure by assembling the 582970 base pare genome of a bacterium..
https://www.google.com.au/search... ***
***Scientists create 1st bacteria strain from man-made DNA - USA Today
usatoday30.usatoday.com/.../2010-05-21-genome... ...
Dan Vergano
by Dan Vergano - in 112 Google+ circles
20 May 2010 – The advance is a $40 million milestone in the nascent field of synthetic biology and points toward a future of artificial life
https://www.google.com.au/search... ****
Gosh and darn it ~ we need more bacteria, so much so that we will spend millions and millions learning how to make new life in an over populated world (according to the experts) and why bother feeding the starving people when we can play GOD?
*** A trickle ofinformation about the germ warfare program has turned into a stream and now a torrent. Half a century after the end of the war, a rush of books, documentaries and exhibitions are unlocking the past and helping arouse interest in Japan in the atrocities committed by some of Japan's most distinguished doctors.
Scholars and former members of the unit say that at least 3000 people and by some accounts several times that number were killed in the medical experiments; none survived. No one knows how many died in the "field testing"
It is becoming evident that the Japanese officers in charge of the program hoped to use their weapons against the United States. They proposed using balloon bombs to carry disease to America and they had a plan in the summer of 1945 to use kamikaze pilots to dump plague infected fleas on San Diego.
The research was kept secret after the end of World War II in part because the U.S. Army granted immunity from war crimes prosecution to the doctors in exchange for their research data. Japanese and U.S. documents show that the United States helped cover up the human experimentation and instead of putting the ringleaders on trial, it gave them stipends.
The accounts now emerging are wrenching to read even after so much time has passed: a Russian mother and daughter reportedly left in a gas chamber, for example, as doctors peer through the thick glass and time their convulsions, watching as the woman sprawls over her child in a futile effort to save her from the gas.
http://www.toddlertime.com/bobbystringer/unit... ***
Yeah, it must really suck only believing in science..... IMO
blacklagoon

Hyde Park, MA

#138082 Nov 16, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Land mammals predominantly move their tales from side to side. A deer is the same, with side to side movement but when alarmed it will raise it’s tale up as a warning.
An exception might be the beaver which uses it’s tale for swimming. A skunk will raise it’s tale vertically in order to spray. There is no indication that whales evolved from neither skunks or beavers.
Whales and dolphins as you have previously pointed out have this very powerful specially designed tale that propels them forward with a up and down movement.
My question to you Doctor, where are the transitional fossils that show this spectacular change from a tale that moves from side to side to a whales that moves up and down?
One jawbone or one bone doesn’t constitute a slew of transitional fossils. There should be hundreds of fossils that show each phase of the transition. But there’s not but a few sparse examples. Very sparse examples are known Doctor.
If you are going to win me over with evidence, it slim pickings out there Doctor.
Have you never wondered why a creature that spends its entire life in an aquatic environment doesn't have gills? You can deny the evolution of Whales but must face the fact that this may be one of the worst examples of design by your almighty designer. Billions of sea dwelling creatures, all marvelously designed for their environment (they evolved these design over millions of years) yet three species of mammals share the same environment with non of the designs the others have. Dolphins, Porpoises, and Whales all are air breathers. Very poor design for finding food, and giving birth. Newborns drown if the female doesn't get under it in time to bring it to the surface to breath. Sperm whales must hold theta breath to dive almost a mile down for food. It has very little time to hunt once down, very poor design.

You missed to point on the movement through the water. All fish and sharks swim with a side to side motion of the tail, an obviously superior action to move throughout the water, the whale has a vertical shape to its spine much more adapted to running. Watch any land dwelling animal run and you will see EXACTLY the same motion as a whale moving throughout the water. Couple that with the fully formed wrist bones found in the Right Whale, and the vestigial hind legs in most whales, and you have a species that was obviously a prior land mammal.

So if the evolution of whales if untrue, and there is simply way to much information to then contrary, then your Creator God is one terrible designed.

Since: Sep 10

San Francisco, CA

#138083 Nov 16, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Land mammals predominantly move their tales from side to side. A deer is the same, with side to side movement but when alarmed it will raise it’s tale up as a warning.
An exception might be the beaver which uses it’s tale for swimming. A skunk will raise it’s tale vertically in order to spray. There is no indication that whales evolved from neither skunks or beavers.
Whales and dolphins as you have previously pointed out have this very powerful specially designed tale that propels them forward with a up and down movement.
My question to you Doctor, where are the transitional fossils that show this spectacular change from a tale that moves from side to side to a whales that moves up and down?
Tall tales, eagle?
Thinking

Dalry, UK

#138084 Nov 16, 2012
Good on you... but sometimes, you can have a bit too much sport. No, really.

Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
Shane Watson in second Test!
Game on!
As you can guess, Double Fine is on a sporting high

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#138085 Nov 16, 2012
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>Sometimes I think you are a cleverly disguised atheist troll.
Why? Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#138086 Nov 16, 2012
Joe Fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
If there was a world wide flood that covered everything to the highest peaks there had to of been a lot of arks floating around for all these religions to have survived. I'm sure there have been tons of local floods that seem to the people of that particular area the flood covered the world. Which would be the something behind the flood stories.
Or it could be that the story had some sort of metaphorical meaning? I don't know, I'm just saying.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#138087 Nov 16, 2012
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Casey Luskin is the co-founder of Intelligent Design and Evolutions Awareness. He's on the Staff at the Discovery Institute. Try posting some articles by REAL scientists, not those who have been laughed out of existence by real scientists.
This is exactly what I have been talking about, 135,000 articles supporting the facts of evolution and not ONE presented to refute this fact. He has articles published in religious periodicals like the Christian Science Monitor, non in reputable peer review journals. There is NO science behind ID, you can't name one scientific discovery that came from ID and is accepted and supporters by mainstream science.
Read the whole article and you will see they never said the timeline, which a question, made it IMPOSSIBLE for Whales to have evolved from land mammals, only that they EVOLVED more quickly than previously thought.
Posting things from creationists only make you look --------I'll be polite....less informed!!!
The points made by whomever is merely discredited because they are associated with a different point of view?

I don’t know this Casey Luskin personally Doctor. I look at the content of what was said and judge it accordingly. So I have went to find out about Casey,

{I am an attorney who works in Seattle, Washington as Program Officer in Public Policy & Legal Affairs with The Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Before pursuing law, I studied geology, devoting much of my time to studying evolution and conducting geological research at Scripps Institution for Oceanography}.

He’s no different than you Doctor, he’s intelligent, accomplished, and studies outside of his discipline.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#138088 Nov 16, 2012
_BobLoblah_ wrote:
<quoted text>14Nov12.....
.....Do you mean Noah and da Ark!!!
Forever and Ever
BobLoblah
Yes dear, but the hindu story is abit different. When I can remember it, I will tell you about it.:)

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#138089 Nov 16, 2012
Clementia wrote:
<quoted text>
Or it could be that the story had some sort of metaphorical meaning? I don't know, I'm just saying.
Then the bible is not fact.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#138090 Nov 16, 2012
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Have you never wondered why a creature that spends its entire life in an aquatic environment doesn't have gills? You can deny the evolution of Whales but must face the fact that this may be one of the worst examples of design by your almighty designer. Billions of sea dwelling creatures, all marvelously designed for their environment (they evolved these design over millions of years) yet three species of mammals share the same environment with non of the designs the others have. Dolphins, Porpoises, and Whales all are air breathers. Very poor design for finding food, and giving birth. Newborns drown if the female doesn't get under it in time to bring it to the surface to breath. Sperm whales must hold theta breath to dive almost a mile down for food. It has very little time to hunt once down, very poor design.
You missed to point on the movement through the water. All fish and sharks swim with a side to side motion of the tail, an obviously superior action to move throughout the water, the whale has a vertical shape to its spine much more adapted to running. Watch any land dwelling animal run and you will see EXACTLY the same motion as a whale moving throughout the water. Couple that with the fully formed wrist bones found in the Right Whale, and the vestigial hind legs in most whales, and you have a species that was obviously a prior land mammal.
So if the evolution of whales if untrue, and there is simply way to much information to then contrary, then your Creator God is one terrible designed.
{the whale has a vertical shape to its spine much more adapted to running. Watch any land dwelling animal run and you will see EXACTLY the same motion as a whale moving throughout the water}.

I’m sorry Doctor I don’t see any correlation with whales and land animals running. None what so ever. Neither am I aware of any land animals with blow holes.

Again it takes a stretch, I mean a hell of a stretch of the imagination to believe a deer or whatever animal was running near the ocean and then turned into a whale. Hey, it’s your life, if you want to believe that, ok, but I just can’t. It’s waaaaaaaaaaay too far fetched for me.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#138091 Nov 16, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
{the whale has a vertical shape to its spine much more adapted to running. Watch any land dwelling animal run and you will see EXACTLY the same motion as a whale moving throughout the water}.
I’m sorry Doctor I don’t see any correlation with whales and land animals running. None what so ever. Neither am I aware of any land animals with blow holes.
Again it takes a stretch, I mean a hell of a stretch of the imagination to believe a deer or whatever animal was running near the ocean and then turned into a whale. Hey, it’s your life, if you want to believe that, ok, but I just can’t. It’s waaaaaaaaaaay too far fetched for me.
You just don't pay attention to anything, do you? Unless it's in that book of fables, you don't even want to know it exists.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#138092 Nov 16, 2012
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Tall tales, eagle?
lllllol! You and eagle are toooo funny!

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#138093 Nov 16, 2012
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Have you never wondered why a creature that spends its entire life in an aquatic environment doesn't have gills? You can deny the evolution of Whales but must face the fact that this may be one of the worst examples of design by your almighty designer. Billions of sea dwelling creatures, all marvelously designed for their environment (they evolved these design over millions of years) yet three species of mammals share the same environment with non of the designs the others have. Dolphins, Porpoises, and Whales all are air breathers. Very poor design for finding food, and giving birth. Newborns drown if the female doesn't get under it in time to bring it to the surface to breath. Sperm whales must hold theta breath to dive almost a mile down for food. It has very little time to hunt once down, very poor design.
You missed to point on the movement through the water. All fish and sharks swim with a side to side motion of the tail, an obviously superior action to move throughout the water, the whale has a vertical shape to its spine much more adapted to running. Watch any land dwelling animal run and you will see EXACTLY the same motion as a whale moving throughout the water. Couple that with the fully formed wrist bones found in the Right Whale, and the vestigial hind legs in most whales, and you have a species that was obviously a prior land mammal.
So if the evolution of whales if untrue, and there is simply way to much information to then contrary, then your Creator God is one terrible designed.
{worst examples of design by your almighty designer}.

Here I disagree with you again. I think whales and dolphins are magnificent breathtaking creatures. They are the elite of the ocean creatures.

They tell me our submariners can hear them singing for hundreds of miles in the ocean. I don’t know if they are singing the Blues or Country & Western. But they’re damn sure singing some type of heartache song.

I just hate the thought of countries hunting these magnificently designed intelligent creatures. They have such beauty Doctor. They couldn’t have been designed any better. I’m surprised Doctor at your statement and you being a seaman.
Thinking

Dalry, UK

#138094 Nov 16, 2012
The bible is a fact. Without one, my garden table would wobble like a
bastard.
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Then the bible is not fact.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#138095 Nov 16, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Then the bible is not fact.
Padon me Miss and you are?

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#138096 Nov 16, 2012
Holy cow, I meant Pardon me Miss.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Let's talk masturbation (Apr '08) 2 min Marvinbutdo 16
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min kent 599,903
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Marvinbutdo 865,314
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 45 min REASHMA 7,503
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 50 min dollarsbill 6,517
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 51 min andet1987 6,313
Boobs 1 hr gasmtastet 2
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 1 hr ajanta 462
The Christian Atheist debate 8 hr Kaitlin the Wolf ... 2,016
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 21 hr Frannie 44
More from around the web