Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 257121 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#133850 Oct 29, 2012
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
That was a better example of "The Church of La La Land Mathheadism", and its detachment from reality, than I could ever describe.
I thank you very much.
You are welcome to you davesworld dreams however if you want some reality I suggest you actually learn some facts

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#133851 Oct 29, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Just fine.
<quoted text>
The rapid expansion is part of the Big Bang theory. So I don't know what you are referring to as "doubtful".
The big bang was the explosion postulated from the hubble diagram

It is now seen more as a rapid and accelerating expansion from the outset. However the name is still used to keep consistency

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#133852 Oct 29, 2012
_BobLoblah_ wrote:
<quoted text>28Oct12.....
.....our 'christineM' places ALL members of the Roman Catholic Church in the same category as the small minority of those who sexually assulted young boys.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that there have been hundreds of thousands of good, kind, gentle, caring Popes, Bishops, Cardinals, Priests, Nuns, Brothers, and members of the Faith that have helped over the past 2000 years....and to judge them by the 'few' miscreants that showed up in their midst is not only stupid, but also ridiculous.
BobLoblah stands for the good people within the Roman Catholic Church, but at the same time will be the first one to 'stringUP' the very ones who preyed on the youth.
Our 'christineM' cannot unnerstan dat and dinks dat BobLoblah is an apologist paedophile....when nuttin' can be further from da Truth. ALL Real Christians hereIN know dat toooooooooo and she is so jealous and envious of BobLoblah. Meanwhile, she lives da life of a hypocrite.
....and da Truth always sets BobLoblah FREE.
Ps:....You didn't miss anything honey. But stay tuned while BobLoblah slays a few more dragons hereIN.....vit 'christineM' not being the least of 'em.
Forever and Ever
BobLoblah
Wrong – or just lying – either is expected

Just the catholic priests who committed paedophilia.(and those who defend them), that does not mean that all priests are paedophiles, but some are

It also does not mean that all catholics are apologist for paedophiles, but you are.

The IRA terrorist are also catholic that does not mean that all catholics are murderers, no it means that some catholics are

You fantasy and ignorant misunderstanding is become legend

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#133853 Oct 29, 2012
_BobLoblah_ wrote:
<quoted text>28Oct12.....
.....LIAR.....
You are just jealous of BobLoblah because you happen to have been born and continue to live in a 'welfare state'....while BobLoblah is berry, berry Rich.
Ps:.....Let's see you come up vit dat posting you say BobLoblah made!!!!!
...You are fulla schidt to the eyeballs.
Forever and Ever
BobLoblah
Wrong, you condoned and excused the paedophilic behaviour of catholic priests in at least 2 socks

And of course we get more chistian hateful guesswork because you have fook all to argue with

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#133854 Oct 29, 2012
_BobLoblah_ wrote:
<quoted text>28Oct12....
.....Be careful of vot you say.
While paedophilia is a most serious and dreadful crime, ours is not to judge.
...
Forever and Ever
BobLoblah
There ya go

Excuses

There ya go

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#133855 Oct 29, 2012
_BobLoblah_ wrote:
30Oct12.....
For da record and information of newComers.
Many of da 'hateful, hypocritical, hAtheist such as 'hidingDumbView,'snappyLesbro' ,'hateNecessarilySo', and udders have more than ONE moniker.
They routinely post messages using their different names, but the main reason they use their different names is that it allows them to 'SignOut' and 'SignIn' under a different alias to make 'Judgements' of their OWN postings. This cheating is included in BobLoblah's summation of calling hateful, hypocritical, hAtheists a bunch of schidt-for-brians. Eeejits ALL.
BobLoblah just wants to let those who recently entered the frey unnnerstan dis stuffys.
Forever and Ever
BobLoblah
Ahhhhh, you're so sweet.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#133856 Oct 29, 2012
Clementia wrote:
<quoted text>
morning! or should i say afternoon? it's 2.09pm here! how ya doin?
@liberty guy ........what r u ignoring me now coz i was right?
Okee! Good aftanewn!

Redneck's doin just fine!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#133857 Oct 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahhhhh, you're so sweet.
Careful! I called a dude "sweet" & now he calls me a colset(sic) gay...

;)

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#133858 Oct 29, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
It's amazing that he does it, hey? What mental disorder would drive a person to such incredible lengths?
Assholism

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#133859 Oct 29, 2012
Bob wrote:
Psalm 14:1-3 The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
And the evil ones say "I speak for God.".

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#133860 Oct 29, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Practicing medicine without a license again?
Isn’t that illegal?
Most states do not require a license to practice a variety of psychological therapies.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#133861 Oct 29, 2012
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>It's obvious the gay agenda has claimed yet another nubile young female for their devious plans. Will the evil machinations of the homosexuals never end? They indoctrinated you, after all, what could be more appealing than having a sexual orientation that the majority of society looks down upon?
Please give the verses that specifically mention lesbianism.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#133862 Oct 29, 2012
That logic is equivalent to claiming that it's ok to bar marriage between whites and non-whites on the basis that whites and non-whites have the "equal" right to marry someone from their same category. Nope, the USSC didn't buy that logic either.
Judge Moniters wrote:
Oh, the lame gay Loving case, which said nothing about same sex marriage
It said something about *marriage*, however, and the takeaway lesson is that states don't get to create arbitrary rules for marriage (such as ones based upon discrimination).
Judge Moniters wrote:
sorry in Oklahoma SCOTUS upheld the ban on same sex marriage, using the 14th Amendment.
SCOTUS hasn't ruled yet on same-sex marriage. I guess you missed that. And the last time I checked, SCOTUS was in DC, not in Oklahoma.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#133863 Oct 29, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
atheists begin with the premise of 'no God'
I'm an atheist, and I don't begin with that premise. I guess you're wrong.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#133864 Oct 29, 2012
Sexual orientation and race are two human categories that have some things in common. In particular, people have discriminated, by law and government policy, against certain people in those categories.
Judge Moniters wrote:
The is nothing in common with sexual orientation and race. Are you claiming the pedophiles are common to whites?
No, I'm saying that sexual orientation is analogous to race in that gays have suffered some forms of legal discrimination just as blacks have suffered some forms of legal discrimination.
Judge Moniters wrote:
Present the law and government policies which discriminate against the behavior commonly known as homosexuality.
Most of these have already been repealed, such as laws against same-sex behavior between consenting adults, and the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policies. The major one remaining is the discrimination against same-sex marriage.
Judge Moniters wrote:
Also, race and sex are suspect classes but the behavior of homosexuality is not.
If sex (gender) is a suspect class, then laws barring same-sex marriage discriminate on the basis of a suspect class (since Mary can marry John but can't marry Joan merely because of Mary's sex).

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#133865 Oct 29, 2012
No, the burden of proof falls upon the person who made the initial claim, and that burden has not yet been met. The initial claim is that the ratio of straights to gays (given as 20 to 1) is somehow relevant to the percentage of pedophiles who prey upon male victims. No such relevancy was provided. So the burden is still not met.
<quoted text>
No such study was presented.
Judge Moniters wrote:
That burden is on you, since you refuted the claim with your opinion.
No, I refuted the claim by pointing out that you had failed to make a supported case that "homosexual pedophiles" were actually gay (you know, the ones you're referring to in that 20 to 1 ratio?). I'm still waiting for you to meet your burden on that claim.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#133866 Oct 29, 2012
Dave Nelson wrote:
Any positive mutation will not be passed on if procreation does not occur.
It will be passed on if it is carried by siblings but not expressed by them.

Basic evolution. Hard fact.(Ever heard of hemophilia, as an example?)
Dave Nelson wrote:
Recruitment is usually done of adolescent boys with raging hormones being seduced and then told they are queer.
Let us know when you produce a study of gay males that says that they weren't gay until they were "recruited".

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#133867 Oct 29, 2012
Nope, the burden of proof is on the person claiming that homosexuality is a disorder.
<quoted text>
What evidence was that? Identify that evidence.
Judge Moniters wrote:
Wrong, the burden is on the gays who made the claim for the removal and reversal.
No, the burden falls upon those who claim that it is a disorder. If they fail to meet that burden, then it obviously doesn't belong in the DSM.

Got any evidence to support the "disorder" claim? No, I didn't think you did.

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#133868 Oct 29, 2012
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>You have just ventured into the realm of pure absurdity. Based on your logic, heterosexuals, should they choose to have sex with an animal, would have a preference toward the opposite sex. Do you really think that's how it works?
Amusing. You reveal a lot about yourself with that one.

A female, gay or straight, would require the proper apparatus on the animal to get any physical stimulation from it. Not too many animals they can count on to give them a satisfactory cunnilingus session.

A straight male would be interested in available orifices, the first instinct being the one designed for such use. Less teeth, and the tail wouldn't be so much in the way.

This would require an animal of the opposite sex.

Now, Timmy and his gay buddies can go with either sex. All they have to do is lift that tail and have at that universal orifice they consider a sex organ. Don't even have to lift the tail with their buddies.

You guys are nasty.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#133869 Oct 29, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Careful! I called a dude "sweet" & now he calls me a colset(sic) gay...
;)
Boblbalblhba or whatever his name is just likes to hate people. I don't really care what he thinks of me :)
:)
:)

And, RR, you're not gay.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min River Tam 69,982
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min Michael 658,353
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 6 min Hard Twin 445,512
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Aura Mytha 974,590
topix drops human sexuality forum.......this be... 13 min Kgroot1234 73
Horny snapchat usernames 15 min Kgroot1234 7
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 17 min gundee123 4,918
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 19 min here 282,833
More from around the web