Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

[professor2020]

Why is it the most honest, intelligent and scientific people are atheist?

[Eagle12]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
Because all Creationists are trolls. In fact I've never met a Creationist who wasn't trollish in one way or another online.

Trolling is something you do when you go deep sea fishing.

In my life I have met some really fine people as atheist. Good law abiding citizens and intelligent, productive people in society.

I have also met some real low class atheist who are ignorant and dumb as rocks.

Then there are those in the middle, narcissistic and vain. Militant a##holes who think they are geniuses. Everything they say is correct merely because they said it was. I see you in this category. You think more highly of yourself than 99.999999 percent of the human race thinks of you.

This is probably the reason you suck in personal relationships. You love yourself way too much. You don’t need to try so hard to be an a**hole. Trust me, it comes natural for you.

[Eagle12]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
The only person dumb here is the one who thinks a single book knows it all.

Bless you, you are just too sweet and kind.

[-Skeptic-]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
It just seems to me that you are as dumb as a igneous rocks.

This is what we're up against folks. This level of inanity.

[-Skeptic-]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're right its ridiculous for me to base my entire worldview on one book written by uneducated humans thousands of years ago. But f*ck it I say. F*ck rational enquiry and intelligence to the core. I WANT to be and stay stupid.

You're demonstrated this well.

[Richardfs]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
If I were you I wouldn’t be so confident about that second statement. Lots of sane people are murderers. Premeditated calculating murderers who plan meticulously to rid themselves of business partners and spouses to name a few.
Do you even think about what you are going to say?
It just seems to me that you are as dumb as a igneous rocks. Surely Geo Physicist can’t be that damn stupid. That’s another reason I don’t believe you are a physicist because you are about as sharp as a bowling ball.

Another pile of nothing from a know nothing creationist.

[Eagle12]

professor2020 wrote:

Why is it the most honest, intelligent and scientific people are atheist?

Very good question.

Here is another one.

Why is it that the majority of these scientific atheist are also irreverent, narcissistic and vain a**holes?

So narcissistic that they believe the majority of scientist are atheist even if they're not.

[-Skeptic-]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're right I can't back up a single bullsh*t religious point that I've made against atheists and scientists.

A clever man might know to shut the f*ck up now, but I'm a Creationist, so I must go into attack mode instead.

Because that's how they taught me - If I question my beliefs, I must expect to be insulted...yes...

So sad that you can't back up a single word of your bullsh*t hallucinated cult.

[Richardfs]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
Trolling is something you do when you go deep sea fishing.
In my life I have met some really fine people as atheist. Good law abiding citizens and intelligent, productive people in society.
I have also met some real low class atheist who are ignorant and dumb as rocks.
Then there are those in the middle, narcissistic and vain. Militant a##holes who think they are geniuses. Everything they say is correct merely because they said it was. I see you in this category. You think more highly of yourself than 99.999999 percent of the human race thinks of you.
This is probably the reason you suck in personal relationships. You love yourself way too much. You don’t need to try so hard to be an a**hole. Trust me, it comes natural for you.

You are very good at meltdowns.

[Eagle12]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
This is what we're up against folks. This level of inanity.

We have atheist gang, how nice!

I’ll call you two the,“Parrot Gang.” Because when you talk to one the other one answers.

How nice you two perched together on the high wire.

[Eagle12]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
So sad that you can't back up a single word of your bullsh*t hallucinated cult.

I feel privileged, it takes two numb nut atheist to respond.

[Richardfs]

professor2020 wrote:

Why is it the most honest, intelligent and scientific people are atheist?

Because we don't have to make up lies for a myth.

[Eagle12]

Richardfs wrote:

<quoted text>
You are very good at meltdowns.

You don't know anything about a meltdown.

That’s a chemical and nuclear physics term.

[Eagle12]

Richardfs wrote:

<quoted text>
Because we don't have to make up lies for a myth.

Of course not, how about these in Evolution.

Evolution:

Ramapithecus

Harckel’s Embro’s

Piltdown man

Nebraska man

Java man

Australopithecus afarensis, or "Lucy,"

Homo habilis

Toumai skull found in Chad

Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis: Fake Dinosaur-bird ancestor China | post #107712)

Nope you don't have to make up lies for Myths?

[Eagle12]

Richardfs wrote:

<quoted text>
Because we don't have to make up lies for a myth.

Harckel’s Embro’s had to be one of the all time great lies that make all the way into students books.

[Richardfs]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
I feel privileged, it takes two numb nut atheist to respond.

You come to an atheist thread and make stupid comments and you wounder why we hammer you into the deck like a tent peg.

LOL

[Richardfs]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course not, how about these in Evolution.
Evolution:
Ramapithecus
Harckel’s Embro’s
Piltdown man
Nebraska man
Java man
Australopithecus afarensis, or "Lucy,"
Homo habilis
Toumai skull found in Chad
Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis: Fake Dinosaur-bird ancestor China | post #107712)
Nope you don't have to make up lies for Myths?

You have been told about those before but choose to forget.

By the way how are the errors in the bibull going?

[Roland_Deschain]

Eagle12 wrote:

<quoted text>
Harckel’s Embro’s had to be one of the all time great lies that make all the way into students books.

No one is claiming science to be infallible. It's not. After all, it's practised by humans. That's why it has controls (the scientific method) built in. Eventually any errors (deliberate or not) will come to light through the process of peer-review.

Furthermore, you fail to understand an important aspect of understanding how things work is making mistakes, realising they have been made and learning from them.

[Eagle12]

Richardfs wrote:

<quoted text>
You have been told about those before but choose to forget.
By the way how are the errors in the bibull going?

Don't change the subject homes,

Ever heard of the Yale DNA Hybridization Scandal?

Research it, you find it was about lies coming from one in the science community to support his myth.

[Eagle12]

Richardfs wrote:

<quoted text>
You have been told about those before but choose to forget.
By the way how are the errors in the bibull going?

How about this one?

http://www.nature.com/news/1998/040301/full/n...

Scientists behaving badly
Journal editors reveal researchers' wicked ways.

I bet you are eager to redirect the subject.