Well since the DotS is not a complete document - I would hesitate in saying that I do understand the text in its completeness. How can anyone make a conclusion on what something means if the complete information is lacking?<quoted text>
Interesting first link. Do you understand what is being said?
Look at it from a strictly material view, meaning physics. I have posted quite a bit about it in my "alternative" physics discussions.
Jesus was a scientist. Started out watching trees grow.
Or something like that.
Do you have the missing words - those that are not in the text?
How is it that you can conceive a conclusion with this missing information.
Please send me a link to what you think this says and I'll read your commentary and then respond back to you here.
Are you willing to do that?