An explanation unknown within nature, or "supernatural", once discovered, would cease to be supernatural.<quoted text>
The instant science accepts that "there might be a supernatural explanation" is the instant the search for the truth ends.
Are you against explanations you don't know about yet?
Or are you only against finding them if they sound supernatural?
That really doesn't seem like objective investigation.
Many scientists resisted the Big Bang, as they thought it implied the "supernatural" beginning of the universe.
Are you against the Big Bang?