Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 247442 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#213468 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
You can blame the sexually immoral for knowingly spreading the virus....
......
Hep C is not a sexually transmitted virus you fucktard.

You are still a lying POS like the rest of the Christ-stains here.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#213469 Feb 20, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
You are caught in 3 lies in the past 20 minutes.
Nice work.
Where's Dave, Buck?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213470 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
*Picard
Dammit!

[I tied mine in with a previous post, though]

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213471 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
I believe that God created AIDS.
And beset humanity with it. That deserves the death penalty if anything does..

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213472 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
You can blame the sexually immoral for knowingly spreading the virus. Then you can blame the medical industry that messed up. God did neither of those. So you can't blame the God you claim not to believe exists...

You can't make this god look good. You can only make yourself look bad trying.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#213473 Feb 20, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<<quoted text> The article was by a college professor writing within his field. It was not vindictive and if you have problems with the article then the proper thing to do is reference them and explain why you disagree. But to outright dismiss like Rosa did and you did by extension because it has some Christian connection is prejudice pure and simple. Which is fine. You need to take responsibility for what you write and not do flip flops or introduce alien material as justification.
I'm glad you're back--it's been a while.

Remember the good old days? I remember when I told a joke, about how once, the jury came back with a verdict of guilty against my client, and I whispered to him, "I'll work on the appeal; you try to escape."

You were outraged that I would encourage my client to attempt an escape.

Hahaha, that was cool.

At ease, soldier.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213474 Feb 20, 2014
TerryL wrote:
<quoted text>A witness in a court proceeding is caught lying while giving testimony. Should/would you give his remaining testimony still given the same level of 'trust' he may have had prior to getting caught lying?... or would you shade everything else he had to say based on the fact the he is known to lie?
All that lightbeamrider and Riverside Redneck have been able to contribute to the discussion is that information is either accurate or it is not, and that accurate information is accurate. This may account for their keen ability to discern what is the truth, which I believe is decided by picking one answer or its opposite and having faith in it..

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213475 Feb 20, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
The best we can do, is to try to combat the evil **idea** of this monster. And so we do...
And that we do, but I think it also helps to point out the flaws in the religion and in faith as a method of knowing.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213476 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Marriage is a religious act.
Nonsense. Religion isn't involved at all. The church and preacher are decorations like the cake, and just as optional.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213477 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
What does make right?
Not two wrongs, but I'm pretty sure that three lefts do.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213478 Feb 20, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you going to make a square shaft fit a round sleeve?
Let me know how that turns out.
I do not talk to wife beaters or pedophiles -- and you are both-- you've admitted as much.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213479 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never beaten a woman and I've never had sexual desires for kids.
G'head troll. Keep trolling.
I do not talk to wife beaters or pedophiles -- and you are both-- you've admitted as much.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213480 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
And just because *some* Christians did it doesn't mean you denigrate the entire religion.
The reasons for denigrating Christianity are not limited to witch burning.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213481 Feb 20, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> You just wrote you reject Christian apologetics websites for reasons stated here.
We reject them, because they have demonstrated a basic dishonest, and a very loose use of half-facts, partial truths and outright lies.

This is because their **agenda** is not facts or even reality.

Their **agenda** is to push their hideous religion onto the world-- whatever it takes.

THAT is why they are rejected.

“Turning coffee into theorems”

Since: Dec 06

Trapped inside a Klein Bottle

#213482 Feb 20, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
He didn't say it was God's punishment.
Another Dogwooden Head rebuttal to a point not made.
Nice work.
Now you may proceed to make up something I said here and then argue with it.
Actually, he did. RR said that AIDS was God's punishment for immorality and deviance.

As usual, you are full of shi'ite.

You say such stupid things because of your obsession to contradict me.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213483 Feb 20, 2014
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Hep C is not a sexually transmitted virus you fucktard.
You are still a lying POS like the rest of the Christ-stains here.
RR is just a wife-beater and a pedophile too.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213484 Feb 20, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
And beset humanity with it. That deserves the death penalty if anything does..
Indeed.

How do you kill a "god"?

Easy: you destroy it's credibility.

And the Internet is doing exactly that-- and non-believers are in a global rise.

Which is good.

Soon, their god will join Thor, Set and Imhotep on the dustheap of history.

“Turning coffee into theorems”

Since: Dec 06

Trapped inside a Klein Bottle

#213485 Feb 20, 2014
Just came across this...

According to the Bible, our modern (?) arithmetic is all wrong. Ezra 1:7-11 says that...

30 + 1000 + 29 + 30 + 410 + 1000 = 5469.

Gosh. How could we be so wrong?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#213486 Feb 20, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
It should anger you towards the sexually immoral.
I'm much more concerned with the intellectually immoral.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
That baby wouldn't have AIDS if the mom wasn't a slut. That wife wouldn't have AIDS if her husband wasn't cheating trash.
Yeah,. like that.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
In a Godless country, promiscuity runs rampant and the very real threat of STD's don't seem to knock sense into anyone.
But America is a Christian country - for the time being.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#213487 Feb 20, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
And that we do, but I think it also helps to point out the flaws in the religion and in faith as a method of knowing.
I agree-- and I would say that is part of destroying the idea of god.

Without blind faith?

All gods would already be myth-- just as Thor, Zeus and Imhotep are.

Soon, Yaweah/Johavah/Jesus/Moohumud will join those in the dustbin of history.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min Cherokee Prince 879,508
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Robert F 603,300
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 7 min -Stray Dog 8,151
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 10 min WasteWater 6,400
The Christian Atheist debate 15 min Critical Eye 3,882
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 27 min The swamiji 7,634
Though God is 'silent', His Creations EXCLAIM H... 30 min just saying 5
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr bad bob 177,878
More from around the web