LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child

[reality check]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Who or what is Dewey? I've seen that come up a few times.

Yeah, lets see if she has the nerve to answer you!

If she doesn't, I will.

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Its not hard to understand that the article shared the views of its writer, not Mr Mary. But, the article also had a point or fact that Mr Mary found in agreement with his own view....on the thought he was trying to share on this forum.

And that point (NOT fact) was from a racist and lying persepctive with an agenda of its own.

Why are you finding it so hard to grasp why that's 1000% offensive?

If Mr Mary had stated that what he was trying to support was racism, then I'd think that what he's trying to support.

He said, MORE THAN ONCE, that he believes it to be valid views unless anyone can prove it to him otherwise.

People shouldnt HAVE to prove such stupidity to be false to THINKING people.

Yet, the article itself is the views of its writer, not its readers. They could be, yet its the reader who will tell me what he agrees with or not.

Try reading the ENTIRE ARTICLE IN CONTEXT to see what it is he's agreeing with.

You dont get to pick and choose sentences from articles out of context, call them valid, then whine when you're called on that kind of dishonest stupidity.

Many people read from a wide variety of sources, just because they are interested in views from all perspectives and not just their own.

MOST people that have open minds, dont take anti-semetic sites and racist ramblings for anything but what they are: sick and lame attempts at domestic terrorism.

The FACT is that there is NO data to support KKK Duke's claims, just as there's no data to support MOST of the KKK's claims.

There is no relevence to a doctors faith and a woman's CHOICE of abortion.

[Big Sky]

Lilrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Not articles by the leader of the KKK and neo-nazi parties (and other anti-semetic sites and articles) while keeping it in CONTEXT. No, I havent.
Using that logic, I could find sentences that I could agree with that Hitler stated, but I'd HAVE to take them out of context to agree with them.
This really isn't as complicated an issue as you're trying to make it be Big Sky.

Its okay. I think we've been clear about how we feel. We disagree on the matter of Mr Mary agreeing with all the kkk and racist stuff. And I've shared all that I wish to share on it. I think now its just deteriorating into name calling on the forum. I don't see new information being introduced only opinions.

If I'm all ignorant, discredited, a troll, and all that because I don't view him as racist, then that's what I am to those posters. I accept it.

Hopefully, that explains exactly why I don't buy the accusations....they're all too quickly dished out. And if this is all the evidence needed that I am all the above, etc., that's my point exactly.

[reality check]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
See, I'm not sure if that's who she means or not. But, heck, I've already likened Dew and CP (and Foo, pbfa, and many more).
:)

Nope that is NOT what she means.

She says that my daughter looks like Dewey, from Family Guy.

It is an insult to my daughter, because Rachie is deeply insecure, and insanely jealous of beautiful women that do not need a pound of make up and a trick photographer, to hide reality!

She said this the first time, after I posted a picture of my daughter, in MARCH and everyone kept saying how pretty she is. She just could not take it.

Poor Rachie!

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Kevin 56 wrote:

<quoted text>
I base my belief on the notion that once conceived, the baby rights now take precedence.

Don't know which oriface you pulled that "notion" from, but its complete nonsense. First off, babies HAVE NO RIGHTS until birth. Zygotes, embryo's and fetus's have no rights. That's the fact. Hike up your testicles and deal with it.

[Buckster]

marysaidyes2life wrote:

And as far as the KKK subject. It was about the high percentage of abortion doctors that were jewish. It also explained why that is. Yet not one person presented any facts to dispute the claims of the article

marysaidyes2life wrote:

I would apoligize for the information contained in the article, if anyone produces information that positively contradicts it. However I have seen other sites that support the claims made by Dr duke..

There you go sock puppet.

[Dinkie]

reality check wrote:

<quoted text>
Uh, little slow today. Granny? Are you banned???

Yes, I switched to that Ban deodorant this morning after my shower. Before I turned the water on I checked to make sure NR's Lala doll was not in there gagging on shampoo !! The poor baby has tried to hard to escape his gasp.~~oops~~ that's grasp. Pardon my typo.

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes it was his responsibility to check the credibility of his source. And he has apologized for it, okay.:0)
And yes, but no I think they would've been all over his source, but they would've accepted his apology and not tried to attribute all the views shared in the article or of the writer to him.

No they wouldn't. He would have failed the paper, and likely been if not thrown out of the course for using extremist racist propaganda, he'd have been put on a watch list for extremists at the school.

He didn't ISSUE an apology Big Sky, he was sorry he posted the source, not for what it said. You seem determined to ignore that.

[reality check]

Dinkie wrote:

Look what you did to Pupsy !!!! She didn't say that !!
pupsy wrote:
<quoted text>
hmmm
interesting......every one knows I am a worthless peice of shit and I that fuck everyting that will have me. I am a filthy slut.
<quoted text>
I'm telling, I'm gonna tell on youuuuu...let me run and tell Big Sky. He is the "offensive" policeman here. You were naughty. I bet you have to go sit in the corner !!! lol

Did I do thaaat? I think SHE wrote those things....it IS in her quotes!

Wait a dog gone minute! Poopy was doing the same to MY posts, so I thought it was OK. Who knew? Guess people should not do things they do not want done right BACK to them?

ANYWAY.....go ahead an tell! What are they gonna do...BAN ME??? LOLOLOLOLOLOL

But be sure to do the same thing to Muttley/Leslie. She should know that what she does to others, is gonna come back to haunt her!!! ;)

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Kevin 56 wrote:

<quoted text>
Anybody doing that would just be ignorant now, wouldn't they? But, tell you what. I consider that child abuse, even if our esteemed politicians don't.

Doesn't matter what you consider it. Your opinion means nothing to those making the choice.

[reality check]

Dinkie wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I switched to that Ban deodorant this morning after my shower. Before I turned the water on I checked to make sure NR's Lala doll was not in there gagging on shampoo !! The poor baby has tried to hard to escape his gasp.~~oops~~ that's grasp. Pardon my typo.

Exactly WHAT did you get banned for?

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Kevin 56 wrote:

It's really simple. You don't want to have and be responsible for a baby, then don't get pregnant.

Or, have an abortion. OR adopt it out. That's the three choices. YOUR approval dont mean squat.

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
I've already done that and Mr Mary has not said that in the posts I've read.

Then you're skipping the posts you dont want to read. Its sad how you are the ONLY one that doesn't see what everyone else has.

I'm only saying I don't think Mr Mary is racist.
Racism is unconscionable, Mr Mary is not.

Maryman is ignorant, a bigot, a racist and a liar. That's a fact based on his own postings here.

[Dinkie]

reality check wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope that is NOT what she means.
She says that my daughter looks like Dewey, from Family Guy.
It is an insult to my daughter, because Rachie is deeply insecure, and insanely jealous of beautiful women that do not need a pound of make up and a trick photographer, to hide reality!
She said this the first time, after I posted a picture of my daughter, in MARCH and everyone kept saying how pretty she is. She just could not take it.
Poor Rachie!

Thanks for telling us what a "dewey" is supposed to mean. Sorry, but I have never watched Family Guy.

[Dinkie]

Lilrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't know which oriface you pulled that "notion" from, but its complete nonsense. First off, babies HAVE NO RIGHTS until birth. Zygotes, embryo's and fetus's have no rights. That's the fact. Hike up your testicles and deal with it.

I just love you and your way with words.

~hugs

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
No, its not Foo. Its not a leap Maryman made. And I never ever made excuses for his racism and anyone else's.
No he didn't give any blanket validity to the kkk or relevance either, he apologized for using them as a source..

I'm tired of banging my head against the wall you've built so you dont have to look at reality.

He stated MORE THAN ONCE that he believes the article to have validity, and will do so until someone proves it wrong.

He's giving blanket validity to the articles from the KKK and other anti-semetic sites he's used as sources.

The FACT is that there is nothing anyone could post that would make him NOT see that source as valid, since he ADMITS it suits his agenda and mindset. He believes 50% of abortion doctors are Jewish based on NOTHING but a KKK article. That's a fact Big Sky, there's no studies or refrences on the faith of abortion doctors, because their faith has no RELEVANCE to the issue of CHOICE for women when it comes to abortion, so no ACTUAL and unbiased studies have ever been done. They dont exist.

The KKK and David Duke and other white supremesist sites create this kind of "data" out of wholecloth, knowing there's no actual goverment data out there to refute them. It simply doesn't exist. To them, Jews aren't white, and are anti-gentile, so its fair game to attack, hoping the stupid like Maryman will swallow their rhetoric. Clearly some do, which is not only sad, its sickening.

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Big Sky wrote:

<
No, I won't judge Mr Mary as a racist unless Mr Mary shares that he is a racist.

Well that's just stupid. David Duke himself deny's being a racist. So did Hitler. So do most neo-nazi's. What makes you think anyone would ADMIT to being a racist??

[Dinkie]

reality check wrote:

<quoted text>
Did I do thaaat? I think SHE wrote those things....it IS in her quotes!
Wait a dog gone minute! Poopy was doing the same to MY posts, so I thought it was OK. Who knew? Guess people should not do things they do not want done right BACK to them?
ANYWAY.....go ahead an tell! What are they gonna do...BAN ME??? LOLOLOLOLOLOL
But be sure to do the same thing to Muttley/Leslie. She should know that what she does to others, is gonna come back to haunt her!!! ;)

That new Ban deodorant I picked up at the grocery store has this really nice outdoor, free flower like scent. I am rather enjoying it.

I am learning your particular affection for it.

I do like Pupsy. She has always been sweet to me. What you did to her post was rather naughty. But I admit that I did laugh when I saw your "way" with words. Gosh, I have learned so much on this forum !!

[Lilrabbitfoofoo]

Big Sky wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did I say that? Post it.
I don't attribute to Mr Mary the views of the writer..

Maryman has said he AGREES with the writer. He uses white supremecist and anti-semetic sites AS his sources more often than not. He spent days trying to invalidate the tenants of the Jewish faith USING these kinds of sites that he clearly (and has said) he AGREES WITH. What part of that do you not grasp????????

[Kevin 56]

Dinkie wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for your OPINION. My post to you made as much sense as your idiotic post. That was my opinion, and you are welcome to it. Ya get what ya pay for.

So then your not on here to get other points of view or reason at all I assume. I have said nothing derogatory to you, so why do you? As far as opinion's, I thought that was the point of this whole website. Or is it only your opinion that counts?