Why I’m no longer a Christian

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#455151 Mar 27, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
It's true. My experience only involves males and females.
What the fcuk were you, again?
Asexual, I don't care what you do with your genitals as long as it doesn't involve me at all.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#455152 Mar 27, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
It's true. My experience only involves males and females.
What the fcuk were you, again?
You must not know many of either males or females, but then if you saw one that contradicted your stupid assertions you'd still think they were transgendered anyway because you couldn't admit you're completely uneducated and a social outcast.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#455153 Mar 27, 2013
UidiotRACEMAKEW0RLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>Chris Hedges, Christian Right and Rise of American F "
All debates with the Christian Right are useless. We cannot reach this movement. It does not want a dialogue. It cares nothing for rational thought and discussion... They hate us. They hate the liberal, enlightened world formed by the Constitution. Our opinions do not count.
This movement will not stop until we are ruled by Biblical Law, an authoritarian church intrudes in every aspect of our life, women stay at home and rear children, gays agree to be cured, abortion is considered murder, the press and the schools promote "positive" Christian values, the federal government is gutted, war becomes our primary form of communication with the rest of the world and recalcitrant non-believers see their flesh eviscerated at the sound of the Messiah's voice.
You almost won me over to your side with this....

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#455154 Mar 27, 2013
UidiotRACEMAKEW0RLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>OOPS missing words'...RISE OF AMerican Fascism
....and then you posted this America-hating piece of shit.
high beam

Upper Darby, PA

#455156 Mar 27, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
high beam wrote:
Oooooo!
I'd love to bitch-slap waassp with my size 52 breasts.
But I'm only available on weekends...lol
<quoted text>
No - you would get a couple of black eyes!!
Them thar "slappin'" you, can be dangerous "missiles" if you are looking the wrong way.
:o)
Love ya high beam!!
:o)
LOL

Luv u2
:D

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#455157 Mar 27, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
The statistical universe would have to take notice of those odds... And does.
The Universe? Don't you mean men?

“Talk Nerdy 2 me (>-<)”

Since: Dec 08

Reno

#455158 Mar 27, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
No, we think you're a hypocrite. You pretend to believe in something that you don't actually believe in; otherwise, your behavior would match what you claim to believe.
Well, if you read the bible it was written by men for men. Women aren't people. They are children and should be treated as such (according to the bible) so in accordance to that, he is treating us like he "should". A warm place to put his dick.

And I just realized why the church has such a massive problem diddling innocent children.

“Talk Nerdy 2 me (>-<)”

Since: Dec 08

Reno

#455159 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
If Jesus saves, why is he always broke?
I am so happy I swallowed my water before I read this. LMAO

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#455160 Mar 27, 2013
duststorm wrote:
<quoted text>1.The Messiah will be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2).
The average population of Bethlehem from the time of Micah to the present (1958) divided by the average population of the earth during the same period = 7,150/2,000,000,000 or 2.8x105.
....
"Your", and I use that term loosely, probability analysis is nonsense.

First, cite your sources. Your source, either directly or indirectly, is a summary by David Reagan of chapter 2 of Peter Stoner's book, Science Speaks: Scientific Proof of the Accuracy of Prophecy and the Bible.

Interestingly enough, Stoner appears to have been a thief, too, having used the work, also without attribution, of George Davis in his book, Fulfilled Prophecies that Prove the Bible. Being a professor at a minor college, he *had* to know better.

Regardless, fulfilling prophesy works only if the events really happened and the prophesy is accurateely interpreted. With respect to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, it is a late addition to the gospel narrative designed to allow Jesus to be born in Bethlehem.

The first canonical gospel, Mark, is silent about that dubious story. Matthew's and Luke's authors added it decades later. As Raymond Brown notes with respect to Luke's account:

Minor difficulties [with Luke’s narrative] are that there was no single census of the whole Roman Empire under Augustus, and that there is no evidence that the Roman censuses required one to go to one's place of ancestry (unless one had property there). More serious is Luke's connection between the reign of Herod the Great (1:5)[See also Matthew 2] and the census under Quirinius. Herod died in 4.B.C.; Quirinius became governor in Syria and conducted the first roman census in Judea in A.D. 6-7 - and notice it was a census of Judea not of Galilee as Luke assumes.[Also note in] Acts 5:37, Luke mistakenly mentions the revolt of Judas the Galilean (provoked by the census of Quirinius) after the revolt of Theudas which occurred in A.D. 44-46.

-- Raymond E. Brown, Christ in the Gospels of the Liturgical Year (Liturgical Press, 2008), p. 119, n. 2.

Brown was a Catholic priest and a professor at Union Theological Seminary. You can imagine non-believing scholars are even less gentle when it comes to that story. And even the earliest Christian commentators have struggled to make the claims in it fit historical reality.

But forget the historical problems for a moment, the notion that Augustus ordered the mass migration of a whole people for a census and that was follow by Herod's mass slaughter of those folks' toddlers but no historian -- only NT fiction writers -- noticed those events is beyond the pale.

Your other claims fare no better.

So what do you have when you got a false claim Jesus fulfilled prophesy and a claim that that falsity proves something statistically?

You have a high probability that lying (and in this case thieving) Christians were involved.
Huh

Franklin, NC

#455161 Mar 27, 2013
I'm Sorry if my big Boner offends any one. It's just all this gay talk on this gay thread.

Loosen up fer Gawd's sake!

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#455162 Mar 27, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
The Universe? Don't you mean men?
Even then, only the deceived.

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#455163 Mar 27, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Great - we can see you can add, subtract, multiply and divide.
*applauds*
What is your point?
Where is your support to this "mathematical theory"?
Who really cares?
The proof is a myth, wrapped in lies, inside a work of fiction, to borrow loosely from Churchill.

“FAITH IN MANKIND”

Since: Mar 13

AT PEACE WITH NATURE

#455164 Mar 27, 2013
Huh wrote:
I'm Sorry if my big Boner offends any one. It's just all this gay talk on this gay thread.
Loosen up fer Gawd's sake!
LOL As long as you keep it in your pants you should be good to go. If you pull it out then you might need to worry. Someone might panic and shoot it off.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#455166 Mar 27, 2013
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
Even then, only the deceived.
.....or the uninformed.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#455167 Mar 27, 2013
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
The proof is a myth, wrapped in lies, inside a work of fiction, to borrow loosely from Churchill.
Or.....

"It's a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. "
- Groucho Marx

:o)

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#455168 Mar 27, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
.....or the uninformed.
True.

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#455169 Mar 27, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Or.....
"It's a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. "
- Groucho Marx
:o)
That works too.
Huh

Franklin, NC

#455170 Mar 27, 2013
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
"Your", and I use that term loosely, probability analysis is nonsense.
First, cite your sources. Your source, either directly or indirectly, is a summary by David Reagan of chapter 2 of Peter Stoner's book, Science Speaks: Scientific Proof of the Accuracy of Prophecy and the Bible.
Interestingly enough, Stoner appears to have been a thief, too, having used the work, also without attribution, of George Davis in his book, Fulfilled Prophecies that Prove the Bible. Being a professor at a minor college, he *had* to know better.
Regardless, fulfilling prophesy works only if the events really happened and the prophesy is accurateely interpreted. With respect to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, it is a late addition to the gospel narrative designed to allow Jesus to be born in Bethlehem.
The first canonical gospel, Mark, is silent about that dubious story. Matthew's and Luke's authors added it decades later. As Raymond Brown notes with respect to Luke's account:
Minor difficulties [with Luke’s narrative] are that there was no single census of the whole Roman Empire under Augustus, and that there is no evidence that the Roman censuses required one to go to one's place of ancestry (unless one had property there). More serious is Luke's connection between the reign of Herod the Great (1:5)[See also Matthew 2] and the census under Quirinius. Herod died in 4.B.C.; Quirinius became governor in Syria and conducted the first roman census in Judea in A.D. 6-7 - and notice it was a census of Judea not of Galilee as Luke assumes.[Also note in] Acts 5:37, Luke mistakenly mentions the revolt of Judas the Galilean (provoked by the census of Quirinius) after the revolt of Theudas which occurred in A.D. 44-46.
-- Raymond E. Brown, Christ in the Gospels of the Liturgical Year (Liturgical Press, 2008), p. 119, n. 2.
Brown was a Catholic priest and a professor at Union Theological Seminary. You can imagine non-believing scholars are even less gentle when it comes to that story. And even the earliest Christian commentators have struggled to make the claims in it fit historical reality.
But forget the historical problems for a moment, the notion that Augustus ordered the mass migration of a whole people for a census and that was follow by Herod's mass slaughter of those folks' toddlers but no historian -- only NT fiction writers -- noticed those events is beyond the pale.
Your other claims fare no better.
So what do you have when you got a false claim Jesus fulfilled prophesy and a claim that that falsity proves something statistically?
You have a high probability that lying (and in this case thieving) Christians were involved.
Translation: I got no rebuttal.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#455171 Mar 27, 2013
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
True.
When posts like Huh show up - referencing a "statistical universe", just makes me think of how fractals have played such a large part into those statistics.

;o)
Huh

Franklin, NC

#455172 Mar 27, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
When posts like Huh show up - referencing a "statistical universe", just makes me think of how fractals have played such a large part into those statistics.
;o)
Fcuk. Another Google physicist.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 7 min Jeb Stewart 24,926
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 14 min DENG 39,257
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 17 min Anthony MN 685,532
Got any good jokes?? (Mar '07) 59 min Gray Box 1,830
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Aerobatty 985,597
Sade and Mel Blanc 1 hr Doctor REALITY 2
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr curtjester1 46,285
More from around the web