“BE BRAVE ENOUGH ”

Since: Oct 09

TO STEP IN MUD PUDDLES

#452037 Mar 12, 2013
Anti-Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello, Annie! How ya' been?
Hey AC! Glad to see you back posting again.

I enjoyed reading your post the other day about your "back to school". I am thinking about doing the same. The program that I want to do however does not begin until this fall...but will soon need to make a decision.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#452038 Mar 12, 2013
Xcntrik InVidor wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly what I meant by bloody. Angry Christians trying to slaughter the world as they destroy themselves from the inside.
It's gonna be great fun.
umm....i siad the "wrath of God". He told us as His children to step back from executing justice and to give place for His;)

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#452039 Mar 12, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Authorized? How much do you know about the Councils of Nicea? Indeed, how much do you know about the history of the Bible at all?
Your faith in Bible propaganda is astounding.
if i wanted to know what a homosexual's perspective on the bible was, i'd go to a catholic priest or half of the lutheran clergy;)
Gut Stomper

Dunlap, TN

#452040 Mar 12, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
How to be an agnostic - Russell & Socrates debate
An extract from How To Be An Agnostic.
What is an agnostic?
Russell: An agnostic is a man who thinks that it is impossible to know the truth in the matters such as God and a future life with which the Christian religion and other religions are concerned. Or, if not for ever impossible, at any rate impossible at present.
Socrates: I too have never found anything but uncertainty in divine matters, but that is a bad reason for unbelief. The same could be said about most matters we enquire into. My agnostic is someone who is religiously minded, but who, unlike the believer who speaks of his gods with confidence, lives so as to explore the mystery and uncertainty of these things.
Are agnostics atheists?
Russell: No. An agnostic suspends judgement … At the same time, an agnostic may hold that the existence of God, though not impossible, is very improbable; he may even hold it so improbable that it is not worth considering in practice.
Socrates: No – but not because it is not worth considering in practice. I do find many of the things people say about gods unlikely, but examining someone’s god-talk, for or against, often exposes the assumptions they make not about God, but about who we humans are.
Since you deny ‘God’s law’, what authority do you accept as a guide to conduct?
Russell: An agnostic does not accept any ‘authority’ in the sense in which religious people do. He holds that a man should think out questions of conduct for himself.
Socrates: We should certainly try to think out questions of conduct for ourselves, or perhaps a better way of putting it is to say we should cultivate those virtues within us that allow us to flourish. And that does not exclude respecting a higher authority, the resources wise people have developed, the ways they’ve tried to live. Sometimes we must defer to authority, for we cannot decide everything afresh for ourselves.
Does an agnostic deny that man has a soul?
Russell: The question has no precise meaning unless we are given a definition of the word ‘soul’. I suppose what is meant is, roughly, something non-material which persists throughout a person’s life and even, for those who believe in immortality, throughout all future time. An agnostic is not likely to believe that a man has a soul.
Socrates: I do not understand this objection to the idea of a soul – though it is no doubt hard to pin down. My pupil Plato, and his pupil Aristotle, used to argue endlessly about it. But that only goes to show it’s worth talking about, for must we not take care of ourselves as souls – as persons with imaginations, purposes, desires? A beautiful soul is like an excellent wine: it’s hard to say why, but you know it when you taste it.
What is the meaning of life to the agnostic?
Russell: I feel inclined to answer by another question: what is the meaning of ‘the meaning of life’? I suppose what is intended is some general purpose. I do not think that life in general has any purpose. It just happened. But individual human beings have purposes, and there is nothing in agnosticism to cause them to abandon these purposes.
Socrates: When death hangs over your head, the meaning of life is not academic, believe me! What is important is not life itself but a life lived well. But even that takes us only so far. For myself, I have the blessing of a keen sensibility that strives to understand how we are ignorant. When we get that right, it paradoxically seems that we get lots of other things more right too.
Is faith in reason alone a dangerous creed?
Russell: No sensible man, however agnostic, has ‘faith in reason alone’.
Socrates: We can agree on that.
Scroll worthy!

“What the Bleep? ”

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#452041 Mar 12, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Authorized? How much do you know about the Councils of Nicea? Indeed, how much do you know about the history of the Bible at all?
Your faith in Bible propaganda is astounding.
I can tell you haw much they know about bible history using a biblical metaphor; their knowledge about biblical history is the size of a (retarded) mustard seed. Matthew 13:31-32

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#452042 Mar 12, 2013
Anti-Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Paul did say in 1 Corinthians 9:22-23:
"I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. Now this I do for the gospel's sake, that I may be partaker of it with you.”
So when he was around gay men....
Says it all right there huh?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#452043 Mar 12, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
if he were all y'all would love him so since you don't, it proves he wasn't. now wilderide, that thar's your gay boy;)
Pharisee men all got married. Paul didn't. Paul was a typical swishy compulsive type.

“xcntrik.wordpres s.com”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#452044 Mar 12, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
you couldn't think rationally to save your soul (literally) when it comes to a biblical conversation!
what do you suppose was a more affluent position for paul in his day; to identify with the learned jews or with the newly-forming, despised and persecuted gentile church???
You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?

Paul never identified himself with the learned Jews. That comes from the Acts of the Apostles, a work or early Christian fiction.

Someone saying they were a Benjamanite Pharisee claiming to represent Israel, a Hebrew among Hebrews, was not saying that they were an influencial Jewish leader of Second Temple Era Palestinian Judaism. The "influencial Jewish leadership" wouldn't have even recognized him as a real Jew. A Hebrew and a Jew weren't the same thing, silly Christian. Samaritans claimed to be Hebrews, but they weren't Jews.

You do know that a Jew would have been someone who claimed Yehud as their nationality, right? Someone from America is American. Someone from Spain is Spanish. Someone from France is French. Someone from Samaria was Samaritan. Someone from Yehud was a Yehudite, a Jew.

There was no persecuted gentile church during Paul's time, dingleberry. The persecuted gentile church is a myth created by later Christianity.
Gut Stomper

Dunlap, TN

#452045 Mar 12, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey AC! Glad to see you back posting again.
I enjoyed reading your post the other day about your "back to school". I am thinking about doing the same. The program that I want to do however does not begin until this fall...but will soon need to make a decision.
He's flunkie emeritus at Paris Junior College. He also blows.

“What the Bleep? ”

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#452046 Mar 12, 2013
Xcntrik InVidor wrote:
<quoted text>
*blush* thanks
I would like to clarify the request, first, if you don't mind.
Are you a cannibal?
It's the internet, these kinds of questions are important.
Obviously you don't want to be invited to dinner, only to find you will be the main course...

“What the Bleep? ”

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#452047 Mar 12, 2013
T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>I like it when you quote Paul...
I like it when you disappear. You should make that a major part of your act, clown.

PS
You still aren't funny...

“BE BRAVE ENOUGH ”

Since: Oct 09

TO STEP IN MUD PUDDLES

#452048 Mar 12, 2013
Gut Stomper wrote:
<quoted text>
Scroll worthy!
It used to big of words for ya did it?

That's okay...next time I will try to find something dumbed down a little.

“xcntrik.wordpres s.com”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#452049 Mar 12, 2013
T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>I believe all of the teaching of a great man like PAUL
Well golly gee, clownie, why would I care what you believe?

“IMAGINE no religion!”

Since: Feb 09

usa

#452050 Mar 12, 2013
babysan wrote:
<quoted text>
KittenKotex got there first. Try something else you think shocks us.
what kitten said..........she is Asexual.
this site might help you understand kitten
http://www.asexuality.org

high beam said she is androgynous

Definition of ANDROGYNOUS
1: having the characteristics or nature of both male and female
2a : neither specifically feminine nor masculine

try this site

http://www.androgynousgirls.com/

“What the Bleep? ”

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#452051 Mar 12, 2013
AnnieJ wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey AC! Glad to see you back posting again.
I enjoyed reading your post the other day about your "back to school". I am thinking about doing the same. The program that I want to do however does not begin until this fall...but will soon need to make a decision.
Go for it girl! You'll regret it if you don't. May I ask what you want to study?

“xcntrik.wordpres s.com”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#452052 Mar 12, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
umm....i siad the "wrath of God".
Ayup. The wrath of God has always been whipped up by priests and preachers and delivered by deluded followers, just like you.

Bring that sh*t on.

“IMAGINE no religion!”

Since: Feb 09

usa

#452053 Mar 12, 2013
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
Kaitlin the Wolf Witch wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you like a photocopy of my ass?
<quoted text>
This is the best I can do.
(_._)
you could shake it for him

shake it to the left....(_\_)

shake it to the right....(_/_)

shake it all night long ((((_!_)))

LOL

“xcntrik.wordpres s.com”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#452054 Mar 12, 2013
Anti-Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously you don't want to be invited to dinner, only to find you will be the main course...
Exactly

“BE BRAVE ENOUGH ”

Since: Oct 09

TO STEP IN MUD PUDDLES

#452055 Mar 12, 2013
Try this one Gutty...it is a series of articles that I am reading.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/...

Exceprts...

Even if it falls short of knowledge, religion can be an important source of understanding.

*

Two of Simon Critchley’s recent Stone columns,“Why I Love Mormonism” and “The Freedom of Faith,” offer much-needed reflections, sympathetic but critical, on particular religions. Such reflections are important because religions occupy an ambivalent position in our world.

On the one hand, religions express perennial human impulses and aspirations that cannot plausibly be rejected out of hand as foolish or delusional. The idea that there is simply nothing worthwhile in religion is as unlikely as the idea that there is nothing worthwhile in poetry, art, philosophy or science. On the other hand, taken at their literal word, many religious claims are at best unjustified and at worst absurd or repugnant. There may be deep truths in religions, but these may well not be the truths that the religions themselves officially proclaim. To borrow a term Jürgen Habermas employs in a different context, religions may suffer from a “self-misunderstanding” of their own significance.
*
*
*
Contemporary atheists often assert that there is no need for them to provide arguments showing that religious claims are false. Rather, they say, the very lack of good arguments for religious claims provides a solid basis for rejecting them. The case against God is, as they frequently put it, the same as the case against Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny or the Tooth Fairy. This is what we might call the “no-arguments” argument for atheism.
*
*
*
Lot's of good stuff to read Gutty and contemplate...one both sides of the coin.

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#452056 Mar 12, 2013
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>
....
friends?:-)
Not a chance.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 3 min RiccardoFire 39,694
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min hojo 574,738
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 11 min Osmius 269,189
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 18 min Classic 2,035
bless the jews (Nov '08) 19 min thank u jews 7,122
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 27 min Seentheotherside 608,349
Last Word + 2 (Jul '14) 54 min Non _cents 1,062
Straight guys: Would you ever have intercourse ... (Jul '12) 1 hr busted 166
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 hr Christian with Jesus 810,808
More from around the web