Of course it's a rule of logic. You don't understand logic however.<quoted text> BS. That is not a rule of logic. That is nothing more than rhetorical device. Besides all that, the existence of Jesus as history is not an extraordinary claim. You are responding to created phantoms. Stop abusing logical arguments. <quoted text> You have not proven anything. Why should anybody take your wortd over Ehrman's who i believe is a double PH.D with 30+ years experience?
It is an extraordinary claim to say that he was dead and then not dead. You make the claim so it is up to you to provide the proof. You try to get others to prove that your claims are not true when it is you that needs to prove that they are.
Erhman doesn't say what you think he says. On top of everything else, you do not seem to be able to understand ordinary writings.
People who do not believe in phantoms don't create them. You are the one creating phantoms.