Think "Hubble Space Telescope."
How do you figure that scientists are "religious leaders?" That's an oxymoronic statement.
That is about as uninformed an opinion as I've heard yet. And you attempt to push such uninformed opinions as "fact."<quoted text>
partner, whenever 'scientist's' leave off from focusing on what they can prove and begin specualting about what they can't, they become religious believers of whatever form of morality/immorality they're trying to push.
There is no such thing as a "scientist religion." So there you go lying to me again.<quoted text> 'they-sayers', as i like to call the followers of the scientist religion,
Why do you feel you must lie to me?
You need to look up the definition of the word "religion." Or do you merely rely on your own definitions?<quoted text> put humanism before God and it's a religion
You cannot prove that there -is- a god.<quoted text> that says "mankind is in control of their own destiny" and thus they've established a religion which removes God from the equation and puts man at the the head, tho they can't prove God is not there.