If "christian" companies were up in arms about blood transfusions (like JWs), would we respect a christian hospital's right to deny life saving blood transfusions?<quoted text>
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.."
Just ponder of this statement for a moment, and then apply it to the issue of contraceptives for "Christian" companies.
It is a problem with Obamacare.
Just thinking out loud. Mainly off-topic, but it is an interesting take on "the separation of church and state".
No, we wouldn't. It's not an issue when an archaic, groundless religious tradition flies in the face of modern medical science and socioeconomic realities. "Free exercise" does not mean the right to infringe on other people's rights.