Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281266 Sep 18, 2014
And the pedo does not remember any of these.

(Pedo Tommy trying to prove he is not Timesten)
JudgeNJury wrote:
So tell me Sheen, why do I only post in this forum and not in any of the others Tom started ..... You are not very inquisitive are you Sheen ?
<quoted text>
Pedo Tommy, Why do you lie?

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TVMURRF...

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/TKD...

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TVMURRF...

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TCC3TPN...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281267 Sep 18, 2014
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281268 Sep 18, 2014
Or these

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TKDEMC1...

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/war-wv/T8N29E...

AND ON AND ON!

FOUGERA!

Seems the pedo who never posts in a Timesten thread has done so many times, such is the sock puppet life.

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#281269 Sep 18, 2014
Do people ever mistake you for a man Sheen ??
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Spot the Pattern
----------
(FONTAINE IS A WOMAN)
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TKDEMC1...
----------
(WHEN I ACCUSED TOMMY OF HAVING A 14 YEAR OLD CHILD BRIDE)
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
(BUT NOW Timesten AKA JudgeNJury IS A WOMAN!)
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
----------
FOUGERA!

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#281270 Sep 18, 2014
can you prove Tom had a 14 year old wife ??...... Didn't think so you liar
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281271 Sep 18, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
The failure of logic is that I have been here since Dec 2010 and have 1,900 posts
Timesten has been here since July 2010 and has over 40,000 posts .... I guess JnJ doesnt have as much to say as Timesten ???
<quoted text>
So you were busy with your Timesten account and did not use you sock acount as much Pedo Tommy,

LMFAO! Socks should post in equal amounts, What a spurious claim
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281272 Sep 18, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
can you prove Tom had a 14 year old wife ??...... Didn't think so you liar
Can you link me to any proof you are not Pedo Tommy!

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/T1V...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281273 Sep 18, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
Do people ever mistake you for a man Sheen ??
<quoted text>
Did anyone ever mistaking think your wife was a woman and not a child Pedo Tommy. You may answer with a link, LMFAO!

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281274 Sep 18, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
can you prove Tom had a 14 year old wife ??...... Didn't think so you liar
---------- PEDO TOMMY, Why did you lie below, your sock sure is protective of your real self!
JudgeNJury wrote:
Well Stupid Sheen, I can only assume it's personal information since only Tom would know if it's accurate or not
<quoted text>
Lie much Pedo Tommy?
JudgeNJury wrote:
I'm not Tommy and Tommy never married a 14 year old bride .....stop being a Loser and telling lies<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281275 Sep 18, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
Just so everybody is aware Sheen won't be joining us anytime soon. Thanks to my efforts , Topix has banned him.

At first, Topix wasn't interested but when I presented to them over one hundred posts from Sheen where he accuse people of pedophilia, the Topix moderators stepped in ........ Good Bye Sheen ....... you douche !!
LMFAO! Pedo Tommy!



FOUGERA!
Pegasus

Newark, NJ

#281276 Sep 18, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
You are an idiot waterboy ..... Chuck was contacted by Topix .... he cant be banned becuase he is running multiple proxy servers to hide his identity
<quoted text>
I say again dickwad....you lied within your post claiming you had Charlie banned....shit canned.....you get it now moron.
No matter how you sugarcoat your shit the stench rises above it peckerhead.....get off the bullshitting.
By the way you're the who got your banana hammock in a knot...(I get the strange feeling you wear womens underwear backwards).......however the way I see it you are burning up your last sanctuary that being the world wide web because apparently you like skinning up children and you can try and fool people as you dance your dance of deceit .
Out in the real world you'd get your fucking head caved in if you were a known sex offender...but you pop on the internet and you think you absolve yourself of your despicable past as you pull the fantasia from your mind and become little Johnny everything, he can be most anything.......in your case everything is not inclusive of a human.
You and Onemale are a marriage made in heaven,
.......birds of a feather...flock together.....two peas in a pod.....and all that shit.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#281277 Sep 18, 2014
So nobody has a critique of NIST admitting the parameters of it's computer model accounted for no thermal conductivity of the WTC's structural steel?

If you want to rig a computer model to claim explosives or incendiaries weren't needed, you do what NIST did and assume the steel in WTC 1, 2 & 7 had no thermal conductivity to make the computer building fail and completely collapse.

http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-se...

NIST NCSTAR 1-5F

Computer Simulation of the Fires in the World Trade Center Towers

Figure 3–1. Centerline gas temperatures in a spray burner test.

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...

The steel used to construct the column and truss flanges was 0.64 cm (1/4 in.) thick. The density of the steel was assumed to be 7,860 kg/m3; its specific heat 450 J/kg/K (NIST NCSTAR 1-3E). The steel was assumed in the FDS model to be thermally-thin; thus, no thermal conductivity was used. Note that FDS performed a simple one-dimensional calculation of the steel temperature to be used as a boundary condition in the calculation. More detailed calculations of the steel and concrete temperatures were done using another model (NIST NCSTAR 1-5G).

Why NIST is Unscientific

http://youtu.be/2V0WQFztLyg

Debunking NIST

http://youtu.be/qL03aJZIlyE

The reason no other steel framed skyscraper has completely collapsed due to fire is it is made from steel that can conduct heat.

This is why

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#281278 Sep 18, 2014
The reasons why the Purdue study contradicts the NIST Reports that it pretends to validate.

http://stj911.org/ryan/PurdueLetter.html

Insults Are Easier

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#281279 Sep 18, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
So nobody has a critique of NIST admitting the parameters of it's computer model accounted for no thermal conductivity of the WTC's structural steel?
If you want to rig a computer model to claim explosives or incendiaries weren't needed, you do what NIST did and assume the steel in WTC 1, 2 & 7 had no thermal conductivity to make the computer building fail and completely collapse.
http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-se...
NIST NCSTAR 1-5F
Computer Simulation of the Fires in the World Trade Center Towers
Figure 3–1. Centerline gas temperatures in a spray burner test.
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
The steel used to construct the column and truss flanges was 0.64 cm (1/4 in.) thick. The density of the steel was assumed to be 7,860 kg/m3; its specific heat 450 J/kg/K (NIST NCSTAR 1-3E). The steel was assumed in the FDS model to be thermally-thin; thus, no thermal conductivity was used. Note that FDS performed a simple one-dimensional calculation of the steel temperature to be used as a boundary condition in the calculation. More detailed calculations of the steel and concrete temperatures were done using another model (NIST NCSTAR 1-5G).
Why NIST is Unscientific
http://youtu.be/2V0WQFztLyg
Debunking NIST
http://youtu.be/qL03aJZIlyE
The reason no other steel framed skyscraper has completely collapsed due to fire is it is made from steel that can conduct heat.
This is why
Insults Are Easier
They're afraid to put their thermally-thin dicks in the fire .
.
Without us truth seekers they got nothing to do. Maybe we need a little vaca and let em insult each other for a couple of week .
.
Uh Huh Eh !
Pegasus

Newark, NJ

#281280 Sep 18, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
So nobody has a critique of NIST admitting the parameters of it's computer model accounted for no thermal conductivity of the WTC's structural steel?
If you want to rig a computer model to claim explosives or incendiaries weren't needed, you do what NIST did and assume the steel in WTC 1, 2 & 7 had no thermal conductivity to make the computer building fail and completely collapse.
http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-se...
NIST NCSTAR 1-5F
Computer Simulation of the Fires in the World Trade Center Towers
Figure 3–1. Centerline gas temperatures in a spray burner test.
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
The steel used to construct the column and truss flanges was 0.64 cm (1/4 in.) thick. The density of the steel was assumed to be 7,860 kg/m3; its specific heat 450 J/kg/K (NIST NCSTAR 1-3E). The steel was assumed in the FDS model to be thermally-thin; thus, no thermal conductivity was used. Note that FDS performed a simple one-dimensional calculation of the steel temperature to be used as a boundary condition in the calculation. More detailed calculations of the steel and concrete temperatures were done using another model (NIST NCSTAR 1-5G).
Why NIST is Unscientific
http://youtu.be/2V0WQFztLyg
Debunking NIST
http://youtu.be/qL03aJZIlyE
The reason no other steel framed skyscraper has completely collapsed due to fire is it is made from steel that can conduct heat.
This is why
Insults Are Easier
You and Zordette try and dangle that hook that only goads.
You clowns have ran this shit a thousand times expecting that you'll pat your hapless backs as you insert Youtube after Youtube...after Youtube.......never proving one aspect of your lame disinformation rag.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#281282 Sep 18, 2014
So piggy, tell me do you verbally abuse your kids?
If you talk to them like you do on here you are a child abuser.

And Mr child abuser suspect: tell me how does a hollow aluminum structure knife through 4" of reinforced concrete (lengthwise and through all the steel floor beams) through fifteen floors... as if it was knifing through hot butter???

"In contrast, the jet that hit the South Tower, 18 minutes later, veered to the right just before impact and hit the rightmost third of the tower's southwest wall, producing an impact gash that extended from the 78th to the 94th floor."

In second paragraph: http://www.911review.com/attack/wtc/impacts.h...

onemale

Charleston, IL

#281283 Sep 18, 2014
Okay sixteen, around fifteen, either way how it get through one?



Pegasus

Newark, NJ

#281284 Sep 18, 2014
onemale wrote:
So piggy, tell me do you verbally abuse your kids?
If you talk to them like you do on here you are a child abuser.
And Mr child abuser suspect: tell me how does a hollow aluminum structure knife through 4" of reinforced concrete (lengthwise and through all the steel floor beams) through fifteen floors... as if it was knifing through hot butter???
"In contrast, the jet that hit the South Tower, 18 minutes later, veered to the right just before impact and hit the rightmost third of the tower's southwest wall, producing an impact gash that extended from the 78th to the 94th floor."
In second paragraph: http://www.911review.com/attack/wtc/impacts.h...
Verbal abuse..........lol.keep goading clownfish nobody is biting...

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#281285 Sep 18, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>They're afraid to put their thermally-thin dicks in the fire .
.
Without us truth seekers they got nothing to do. Maybe we need a little vaca and let em insult each other for a couple of week .
.
Uh Huh Eh !
:)

What a gravity collapse actually looks like.

http://youtu.be/NiHeCjZlkr8

It's easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled, therefore

Insults Are Easier

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#281286 Sep 18, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
When you become intelligent, I may answer your question, until then keep laughing, because
Insults Are Easier
nice no answer, please tell us where the plane and the people are being held? Look for the answer on youtube.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min Sojurner D Truth 26,165
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min hojo 685,742
David Duke: "We're going to take our country ba... 59 min Doctor REALITY 58
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr UMORONRACEMAKEWOR... 985,692
to Maria Chapelle-Nadal: it's time to ROLL, sista' 2 hr Doctor REALITY 1
I hate Haiti (Jan '10) 3 hr Anne Nonymiss 109
"BIGGEST SCAM in WORLD HISTORY...." 3 hr YTube 1st 1
More from around the web