Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#281074 Sep 17, 2014
The only thing that gets you hard is a large dose of Viagra ...... Do your firends still call you "Limpy"
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
That no doubt gets you hard pedo Tommy!

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#281075 Sep 17, 2014
I again challenge Sheen to post proof Tom Fontain married a 14 year old bride ..... Should be very easy for a guy who saves every post
onemale

Charleston, IL

#281076 Sep 17, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you tell us what is phoney about it mother banger?
THOUGHT NOT!
You claim to an expert about everything
I will trust aviation professionals long before I trust a spies for pay" is a shill, a propaganda minister, a sell-out, a government informant, a paid troller-to generate discussion on this account, to remove any real discussion.
Aardvark Ratnick

Sonora, CA

#281077 Sep 17, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Talking to yourself MUQ1 aka Doc?
Wow, what a macaroon..
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281078 Sep 17, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
Can you prove Tom Fontain married a 14 year old ??
THOUGHT NOT!
<quoted text>
Here you go Tommy you old pedo, see the link, I can post links!

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/T1V...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281079 Sep 17, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
I again challenge Sheen to post proof Tom Fontain married a 14 year old bride ..... Should be very easy for a guy who saves every post
Tommy you old Pedo, Why do you spell your own last name wrong, are you wrtting with Pattys crayons?
onemale

Charleston, IL

#281080 Sep 17, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Mr. Mom!
It is from a professional, so why is PP formula phoney again, explain in detail or have you mom get dressed and explain it.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...
You and your pet piggy has failed to explain it...
Both of you claim to be experts at everything... which means you are a master of none.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281081 Sep 17, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You claim to an expert about everything
I will trust aviation professionals long before I trust a spies for pay" is a shill, a propaganda minister, a sell-out, a government informant, a paid troller-to generate discussion on this account, to remove any real discussion.
Mommys boy does this sound like a aviation professional?

About Me:
MS Electrical Engineering, worked with the USAF (as a civilian) on F15s doing data recording and telemetry. I've designed, built, tested, installed, and maintained flight data acquisition systems, of which the FDR is a very low-bit-rate version. It also has the unique characteristic, among data recorders, of being crash survivable.

The single most important point of this entire document is to be found here: These frames represent just that: frames. The vertical axis represents the number of samples taken during that frame, not the time those samples were taken. Many conspiracy theorists, incorrectly, believe that each row of this file represents 1/8 of a second.

The flawed interpretation is quickly disposed of by realizing a few key pieces of evidence. First of all, if you look at the longitudinal acceleration data above, you will see that it is sampled 4 times, and then the other 4 rows are blank. Without getting into the technical details, sampling at 0, 1/8, 2/8 and 3/8, and then not sampling again until 8/8 is absolutely silly. In digital signal processing, sampling out-of-phase like this would result in horrible aliasing effects and poorer reconstructed signal quality. It requires the same amount of effort, and the same amount of bandwidth to sample in equally spaced intervals, and the data is far superior. There is absolutely no way that the data was sampled “out-of-phase” like the incorrect interpretation would imply.

The second major clue is that our serial multiplexed signal is a constant bit-rate signal. This means that the same amount of data flows during the same period of time, at all times. All data points in this file are squished towards the top of the frame. This would mean much more data has to travel out from 0 to 1/8 then has to travel from 6/8 to 7/8. This violates the principle of constant bit-rate.

The key point is worth reemphasizing, so I will do it again: the proper interpretation of each frame of in the CSV file is that N samples were taken during that second. We know nothing about the time of these samples other than the fact they were taken during the frame, and are equally spaced. Pressure altitude could have been sampled at 0.0 or 0.99, and they would both show up exactly the same in the CSV file.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...
onemale

Charleston, IL

#281082 Sep 17, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
I again challenge Sheen to post proof Tom Fontain married a 14 year old bride ..... Should be very easy for a guy who saves every post
Sorry Charlie is no more than a propaganda minister and a lawyer wanna be
.


.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#281083 Sep 17, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Mommys boy does this sound like a aviation professional?
About Me:
MS Electrical Engineering, worked with the USAF (as a civilian) on F15s doing data recording and telemetry. I've designed, built, tested, installed, and maintained flight data acquisition systems, of which the FDR is a very low-bit-rate version. It also has the unique characteristic, among data recorders, of being crash survivable.
The single most important point of this entire document is to be found here: These frames represent just that: frames. The vertical axis represents the number of samples taken during that frame, not the time those samples were taken. Many conspiracy theorists, incorrectly, believe that each row of this file represents 1/8 of a second.
The flawed interpretation is quickly disposed of by realizing a few key pieces of evidence. First of all, if you look at the longitudinal acceleration data above, you will see that it is sampled 4 times, and then the other 4 rows are blank. Without getting into the technical details, sampling at 0, 1/8, 2/8 and 3/8, and then not sampling again until 8/8 is absolutely silly. In digital signal processing, sampling out-of-phase like this would result in horrible aliasing effects and poorer reconstructed signal quality. It requires the same amount of effort, and the same amount of bandwidth to sample in equally spaced intervals, and the data is far superior. There is absolutely no way that the data was sampled “out-of-phase” like the incorrect interpretation would imply.
The second major clue is that our serial multiplexed signal is a constant bit-rate signal. This means that the same amount of data flows during the same period of time, at all times. All data points in this file are squished towards the top of the frame. This would mean much more data has to travel out from 0 to 1/8 then has to travel from 6/8 to 7/8. This violates the principle of constant bit-rate.
The key point is worth reemphasizing, so I will do it again: the proper interpretation of each frame of in the CSV file is that N samples were taken during that second. We know nothing about the time of these samples other than the fact they were taken during the frame, and are equally spaced. Pressure altitude could have been sampled at 0.0 or 0.99, and they would both show up exactly the same in the CSV file.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...
Sorry Charlie is no more than a propaganda minister and a lawyer wanna be
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281085 Sep 17, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
He thinks a phoney formula he found in the internet proves everything.
Can you tell us what is phoney about it mother banger?

THOUGHT NOT!

PS; Did you mother pass away from syphilis?
onemale

Charleston, IL

#281086 Sep 17, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Mommys boy does this sound like a aviation professional?
About Me:
MS Electrical Engineering, worked with the USAF (as a civilian) on F15s doing data recording and telemetry. I've designed, built, tested, installed, and maintained flight data acquisition systems, of which the FDR is a very low-bit-rate version. It also has the unique characteristic, among data recorders, of being crash survivable.
The single most important point of this entire document is to be found here: These frames represent just that: frames. The vertical axis represents the number of samples taken during that frame, not the time those samples were taken. Many conspiracy theorists, incorrectly, believe that each row of this file represents 1/8 of a second.
The flawed interpretation is quickly disposed of by realizing a few key pieces of evidence. First of all, if you look at the longitudinal acceleration data above, you will see that it is sampled 4 times, and then the other 4 rows are blank. Without getting into the technical details, sampling at 0, 1/8, 2/8 and 3/8, and then not sampling again until 8/8 is absolutely silly. In digital signal processing, sampling out-of-phase like this would result in horrible aliasing effects and poorer reconstructed signal quality. It requires the same amount of effort, and the same amount of bandwidth to sample in equally spaced intervals, and the data is far superior. There is absolutely no way that the data was sampled “out-of-phase” like the incorrect interpretation would imply.
The second major clue is that our serial multiplexed signal is a constant bit-rate signal. This means that the same amount of data flows during the same period of time, at all times. All data points in this file are squished towards the top of the frame. This would mean much more data has to travel out from 0 to 1/8 then has to travel from 6/8 to 7/8. This violates the principle of constant bit-rate.
The key point is worth reemphasizing, so I will do it again: the proper interpretation of each frame of in the CSV file is that N samples were taken during that second. We know nothing about the time of these samples other than the fact they were taken during the frame, and are equally spaced. Pressure altitude could have been sampled at 0.0 or 0.99, and they would both show up exactly the same in the CSV file.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...
Says a shill, a propaganda minister, a sell-out, a government informant, a paid troller
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281088 Sep 17, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Charlie is no more than a propaganda minister and a lawyer wanna be


I knew you could not prove it wrong Fetal hydrometry boy!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281089 Sep 17, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You and your pet piggy has failed to explain it...
Both of you claim to be experts at everything... which means you are a master of none.
He explained it exactly, the wisky in your mothers bloodstream now makes it hard for you to understand things.

You claimed it was phoney, that means you understand it and know why it is flawed. Care to point out where the flaw is?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#281090 Sep 17, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Says a shill, a propaganda minister, a sell-out, a government informant, a paid troller
So you can't prove it wrong, LOL!

ONEMALE regarding his MOTHER!
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
She would have never do such a thing.... not ever... not in this lifetime or the next.
As a teen, I would have thought I died and went to heaven.
.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

She gave go a venereal disease didn't she!
onemale

Charleston, IL

#281092 Sep 17, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew you could not prove it wrong Fetal hydrometry boy!
Says a shill, a propaganda minister, a sell-out, a government informant, a paid troller

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#281093 Sep 17, 2014
onemale wrote:
New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon:
Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the buillding.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-from-p...
Would you like some cheese to go with your baloney?

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#281094 Sep 17, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, everyone is Dr_Zorderz huh sorry charlie ! LOL
.
Hi Deacon, hows it hanging ? You old mule eared geshutzenmeister you !
.
Uh Huh Eh !
Still have yet to shoot that mule-eared rifle, got patches for the ball in the post office to get today..bought another .50cal, Thompson Scout carbine, sweet lil' brush-gun, and a Remington 700ML inline muzzle loader too.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#281095 Sep 17, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
What would Jesus say ?
.
Drop to your knees sewerwater, squeeze your closed eyes real tight, pray really hard, and Jesus will tell you which .
.
Uh Huh Eh !
Jesus would say nothing, just roll his eyes.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#281096 Sep 17, 2014
onemale wrote:
Sorry Charlie has proven the debwunkers really hate this one:
New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon:
Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the buillding.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-from-p...
Nobody really cares about that nonsense given the fact over one hundred witnesses saw what happened. There is plenty of hard evidence, one idiotic opinion means nothing, especially coming from maladjusted morons with pretentious titles.

GLAD I COULD HELP

Now go play in your sandbox and leave the discussion to the adults.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min Seentheotherside 688,772
News Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 29 min oneear69 121,925
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 41 min Scientistalways 37,083
___End Time ISRAEL -- 2017 FOREWARNINGS___ 44 min oneear69 2
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 59 min oneear69 988,525
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 2 hr Tony 6,548
672,000 gallons of oil spilled off Louisiana co... 7 hr Freakenstein 2
More from around the web