Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,504 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280794 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane...but never mind.
There are (as you know) no other examples of jetliners crashing into steel framed structures at 500 mph. There are however many examples of normal office fires, none of which resulted in a controlled demolition style collapse.
There are also firefighters who say that there were secondary explosions in the building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =G1zED8dy63wXX
You just debunked yourself.

1. The firemen described the explosions as "secondary explosions." Secondary explosions in firefighting lingo means explosions associated with a raging fire.

2. The firemen were talking about the Trade Tower. They were not talking about WTC7. They were talking about going upstairs in the Trade Tower. Typical cherry picked Twoofer nonsense.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#280795 Sep 15, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Took so long for why there was little or no response !....
I don't care WHY there was no response. That's another basket of worms we may address later .
.
So there was no response but there was a response?

There were planes but there were no planes?

Oh iCarly! You debunk yourself.
Willow

Lincolnton, NC

#280796 Sep 15, 2014
WOW..it's a new day in the neighborhood.So much to see that hasn't been seen before.
Where are 'Cornell's' Puppets?
EXCLUSIVE: Never Before Seen Photos from 9/11 RELEASED..Looks like a Nuclear Disaster!
http://wearechange.org/exclusive-never-seen-p...
Willow

Lincolnton, NC

#280797 Sep 15, 2014
Ricki DeSantis releases important new photos from 9/11....
http://youtu.be/5iEY0ArY9WE
Willow

Lincolnton, NC

#280798 Sep 15, 2014
Demolition access to the World Trade Center towers: Part one – Tenants
Note: The author is indebted to a few particularly useful sources of information and inspiration, including Russ Baker’s book “Family of Secrets”, the websites nndb.com , sourcewatch.org and secinfo.com , and Richard Gage.
On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush’s former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush’s spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press —“We have no response to silly conspiracy theories.” On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech —“Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.”
But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush’s own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush’s conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush’s own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary.[2, 5, 6, 7]
http://www.911truth.org/demolition-access-to-...
PART 2 (TWO)- http://www.911truth.org/demolition-access-to-...

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#280799 Sep 15, 2014
Why do Twoofers think that an explosion an hour before the building collapses is a controlled demolition ?!?!?!?!?!
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
You just debunked yourself.
1. The firemen described the explosions as "secondary explosions." Secondary explosions in firefighting lingo means explosions associated with a raging fire.
2. The firemen were talking about the Trade Tower. They were not talking about WTC7. They were talking about going upstairs in the Trade Tower. Typical cherry picked Twoofer nonsense.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#280800 Sep 15, 2014
Sheen will get a kick out of this!

The twofers NYCCAN't petition has once again failed and failed miserably because.....well twofers just seem to "think" the rules don't apply to them!

http://www.formauri.es/personal/pgimeno/xfile...

http://www.formauri.es/personal/pgimeno/xfile...

"Compliance with the MHRL is required and the Referendum Petition must fail because it does not comply with the basic requirements of the Municipal Home Rule Law and also violates New York's constitution and substantive laws"

Too funny!

A decade plus of fail just isn't enough for these morons!
Big Truth

Mesquite, NV

#280801 Sep 15, 2014
We talk about conspiracies, because conspiracies are coming true!
Uncovering the truth, that everyone is afraid to speak of.
Joseph AdamsWhite Voice Radio Show, Burning America & The Coming Race War
The White Voice Radio Show Returns 9-21-14!
New hosts, new features, new structure!
Our home, Your voice, The White Voice!
Be sure to join us and participate every Sunday! https://www.facebook.com/photo.php...
www.TheWhiteVoice.com

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#280802 Sep 15, 2014
Willow wrote:
Demolition access to the World Trade Center towers: Part one – Tenants
Note: The author is indebted to a few particularly useful sources of information and inspiration, including Russ Baker’s book “Family of Secrets”, the websites nndb.com , sourcewatch.org and secinfo.com , and Richard Gage.
On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush’s former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush’s spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press —“We have no response to silly conspiracy theories.” On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech —“Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.”
But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush’s own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush’s conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush’s own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary.[2, 5, 6, 7]
http://www.911truth.org/demolition-access-to-...
PART 2 (TWO)- http://www.911truth.org/demolition-access-to-...
Hey sPammy!

Still slurping and swallowing stupid by the bucket I see!

Say hi to gramps' corpse for me!

BTW, do you still want my kids to die just because we disagree?

Twoof! It sure knows how to pick the winners!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#280803 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
One support column and a few small office fires don't make a controlled demolition style collapse
I hope there are no other buildings exactly like WTC7......Place was a friggin death trap.
I can't be arsed with this, life's too short.
Laters
Small office fires again eh?

So you think a fully fueled jet crashing into a building would start a few small fires.

Now THAT's desperation to BLEEV!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#280804 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
One support column and a few small office fires don't make a controlled demolition style collapse
I hope there are no other buildings exactly like WTC7......Place was a friggin death trap.
I can't be arsed with this, life's too short.
Laters
Your prof they we just "small" who.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#280805 Sep 15, 2014
And who, don't bother quoting the ff who said the fire on floor 78 could be knocked down with a couple of lines.

No doubt a complete idiot like elevator boy or Ignorance or Manyfails will, but long debunked garbage is beneath you.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280806 Sep 15, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
Why do Twoofers think that an explosion an hour before the building collapses is a controlled demolition ?!?!?!?!?!
<quoted text>
I don't know what they think. My feeling is they lack the capacity to do so.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#280807 Sep 15, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Transponders cut made it about impossible.
*****
Funny you want to rig the answer so there is no explanation ,
*****
Sorry iCarrly, It won't work!
Missing Air Force A-10
One observer, an off-duty pilot, said the jet appeared to maneuver around bad weather. This observation suggested to the Air Force that the aircraft was being flown manually and purposefully.[17] The flight was tracked by radar in Phoenix, Albuquerque and Denver.
BUT BECAUSE CAPTAIN BUTTON'S TRANSPONDER WAS TURNED OFF, THE AIRCRAFT WAS ONLY TRACKED, NOT IDENTIFIED. IT WAS ONLY AFTER ANALYZING RADAR DATA LATER THAT INVESTIGATORS WERE ABLE TO TRACK BUTTON'S FLIGHT.
TWENTY DAYS AFTER BUTTON'S AIRCRAFT DISAPPEARED, AN AIR FORCE MH-53 HELICOPTER SPOTTED METAL FRAGMENTS IN THE SNOW ON GOLD DUST PEAK
HTTP://EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG/WIKI/CRAIG_D._BUTTON
Oh Waaaa ... sorry charlie don't like it when he can't answer a question everyone knows the answer to but makes him and his fellow wannabe debwunkers look bad when he answers it like it is .
.
He is crying like a little baby.
.

.
Everyone knows not one allegedly hijacked airliner was intercepted by any allegedly defensive aircraft on 9/11 ?
.
This was because everyone involved, mainly NORAD, FAA, Washington DC Air National Guard, New York Air National Guard, Northeast Air Defense Sector and the US Air Force were all just following orders .
.
But the debwunkers are afraid to answer the question cause it makes them look bad Waaa
.
That's too fuhking bad isn't it !?!?!?
.
Uh Huh Eh !
onemale

Charleston, IL

#280808 Sep 15, 2014
It is totally impossible that anyone could train on a little Cessna plane and fly a huge Boeing so precise.
1.) A Cessna plane takes one pilot
2.) A big Boeing used to take 4 in the cockpit to fly it... when they actually flew it manually, such as a Cessna.
3.) It would take years of skill to hit the Pentagon at the ground level floor and not scrape the lawn out front.
4.) How did they do all of that AND keep the jet so level to keep the wingtips from hitting?
5.) How did they do maneuvers so precise within a matter of inches.
6.) Where did they train to learn how fly a big jet so precisely?
7.) What school did they attend to learn how to override and re-program the Boeing computer?
8.) Were these so-called terrorist, computer programmers?

When you simply look at the facts as they are... it becomes obvious the 9/11 official story is a myth.





onemale

Charleston, IL

#280809 Sep 15, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Small office fires again eh?
So you think a fully fueled jet crashing into a building would start a few small fires.
Now THAT's desperation to BLEEV!
Too funny how you idiots debunk NIST

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#280810 Sep 15, 2014
onemale wrote:
It is totally impossible that anyone could train on a little Cessna plane and fly a huge Boeing so precise.
1.) A Cessna plane takes one pilot
2.) A big Boeing used to take 4 in the cockpit to fly it... when they actually flew it manually, such as a Cessna.
3.) It would take years of skill to hit the Pentagon at the ground level floor and not scrape the lawn out front.
4.) How did they do all of that AND keep the jet so level to keep the wingtips from hitting?
5.) How did they do maneuvers so precise within a matter of inches.
6.) Where did they train to learn how fly a big jet so precisely?
7.) What school did they attend to learn how to override and re-program the Boeing computer?
8.) Were these so-called terrorist, computer programmers?
When you simply look at the facts as they are... it becomes obvious the 9/11 official story is a myth.
Maybe your big Boeing took four guys in your cockpit to fly?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280811 Sep 15, 2014
onemale wrote:
It is totally impossible that anyone could train on a little Cessna plane and fly a huge Boeing so precise.
1.) A Cessna plane takes one pilot
2.) A big Boeing used to take 4 in the cockpit to fly it... when they actually flew it manually, such as a Cessna.
3.) It would take years of skill to hit the Pentagon at the ground level floor and not scrape the lawn out front.
4.) How did they do all of that AND keep the jet so level to keep the wingtips from hitting?
5.) How did they do maneuvers so precise within a matter of inches.
6.) Where did they train to learn how fly a big jet so precisely?
7.) What school did they attend to learn how to override and re-program the Boeing computer?
8.) Were these so-called terrorist, computer programmers?
When you simply look at the facts as they are... it becomes obvious the 9/11 official story is a myth.
The hijackers proved your wrong goof ball.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#280812 Sep 15, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe your big Boeing took four guys in your cockpit to fly?
Debwunkers doesn't like it when we ask questions they can't answer.
Your response is about as phoney and fake as a Sorry Charlie post.
Are you trying to be some kind of a Sorry Charile wanna be???
onemale

Charleston, IL

#280813 Sep 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The hijackers proved your wrong goof ball.
Another debwunker bites the dust when they can't answer questions.
Since your mind is too weak to handle more than one quesion at time I will just ask one.
What school did they attend to learn how to override and re-program the Boeing computer?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min It aint necessari... 865,505
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min June VanDerMark 600,025
The Christian Atheist debate 13 min Mia Copa 2,024
News Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 1 hr Your time has come 121,925
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr curtjester1 40,895
Bill Dear was PAID BY O.J. SIMPSON TO 'LIE'!!!! 1 hr Doctor REALITY 6
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 hr I Am No One_ 445,137
gay bottom in gurgaon (May '14) 7 hr Amit1989 464
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) Sat Frannie 44
More from around the web