Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#280752 Sep 15, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Was any allegedly hijacked airliner intercepted by any allegedly defensive aircraft on 9/11 ?
HAVE THEY FOUND THIS ONE YET?
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370/MAS370)[a] was a scheduled international passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing that DISAPPEARED ON 8 MARCH 2014

THE AIRCRAFT'S LAST KNOWN POSITION from secondary radar was on 8 March at 01:21 MYT at the navigational waypoint IGARI in the Gulf of Thailand, at which the aircraft made a sharp turn westwards, heading towards a waypoint called VAMPI in the Strait of Malacca, WHEN THE TRANSPONDER SIGNAL WAS LOST.

HTTP://EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG/WIKI/MALAYSIA_AIRLINE...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#280753 Sep 15, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Was any allegedly hijacked airliner intercepted by any allegedly defensive aircraft on 9/11 ?
.
iCARLY

The Payne Stewart interception was the fastest ever over North America with a active transponder, it took a 1-1/2, longer than any 9-11 plane was in the air, Why should that record be broke on 9-11 with a active transponder.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280754 Sep 15, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
What a lying, obfuscating wannabe disinfo troll you are sewerwater .
.
Let's start from the beginning again .
.
Any debwunker feel free to reply to this simple question .
.
Was any allegedly hijacked airliner intercepted by any allegedly defensive aircraft on 9/11 ?
.
This time try to answer the question . A YES or NO will suffice .
.
I bet no one is brave enough to do it !
.
I double dog dare any bwunker to answer this question !
.
Uh Huh Eh !
No hijacked planes were shot down. It has already been clearly explained why there was insufficient time to do so and the procedures in place which prevented civilian airliner shoot down.

What is your point?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#280755 Sep 15, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Was any allegedly hijacked airliner intercepted by any allegedly defensive aircraft on 9/11 ?
And iCarly the 50 year old Pedo is back to planes were involved again!

----------

LMAO!

iCarly Goes from NO PLANES to PLANES 4 times in LESS THAN 12 HOURS
NO PLANES
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Watch as the FAKE CARTOON BOEING "melts" into the steel clad exterior of the South Tower.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =AQtSa-TZ6x8XX
.
Uh Huh Eh !
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

PLANES
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
2014 WTC DRONE STRIKE PLANE PROOF (MANY WITNESSES)
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
.
Uh Huh Eh !
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

NO PLANES
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The Best 9-11 Documentary ++ Media Cover-Up ++ No Planes!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Uh Huh Eh !
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

PLANES
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Flight 93 Eyewitness Sees A Second Plane, Says Flight 93 Was Shot Down
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280756 Sep 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>False and debunked already. Numerous examples of total structural collapse has already been posted. What's more, the collapse of WTC 1, 2, and 7 prove that catastrophic failure leads to collapse. Nobody had proven their ridiculous claims to the contrary.

Proving you are a moron beyond measure.
Ok, show an example of a steel framed skyscraper completely collapsing without explosives being used.

I'll wait.

Insults Are Easier
who

Reading, UK

#280757 Sep 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would a building collapse due to structural failure look any different than a controlled demolition?
Well it would need to be a sudden and totally complete structural failure.
The question is can you give me an example from history where a steel framed building collapsed in the manner of a controlled demolition from normal office fires such as these?
http://truthalliance.net/Portals/0/Archive/Ga...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yhRPW0ao8Dg/UjBomaD...
http://www.rense.com/general65/wtc7_louvers_f...
http://www.debunking911.com/wtc7_nypd2001.jpg
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#280758 Sep 15, 2014
iCarly goes of the deep end.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Quote from Dr Zorderz
sorry charlie you forgot:
the Jews Did It
the WTC towers were NUKED
the WTC towers were victims of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON

NOBODY DIED ON 9/11

Uh Huh Eh !
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

----------
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you PROVE anybody died in 9/11 ?
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#280759 Sep 15, 2014
WHERE IS THE AUDIO !?!?!?!?!?

THIS IS WHAT A REAL CD SoUNDS LIKE



NOTHING AT ALL LIKE WTC 1,2, or 7 !!!!!!!!!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Is this real or fake ?
.
What is any debwunkers best theory ?
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
.
Uh Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280760 Sep 15, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, show an example of a steel framed skyscraper completely collapsing without explosives being used.
I'll wait.
Insults Are Easier
WTC 1 2 and 7 along with the Windsor Tower. Besides, no other buildings have had jetliners carrying over 10,000 gallons of jet fuel flown into them at around 500mph. Show me steel framed skyscrapers which have survived such an event.

I'll wait.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280761 Sep 15, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
WHERE IS THE AUDIO !?!?!?!?!?
THIS IS WHAT A REAL CD SoUNDS LIKE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =79sJ1bMR6VQXX
NOTHING AT ALL LIKE WTC 1,2, or 7 !!!!!!!!!
<quoted text>
Exactly. There were no sounds, flashed, or seismic events normally associated with controlled demolition. What's more, the coordination of aircraft impact with such an event would be impossible due to the variables.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280762 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>The speed and symmetry of the collapse is certainly consistent with a controlled demolition.....If it wasn't I wouldn't be whinging about it.
Anyway it's been an entertaining afternoon...LOL!! But I've got things to do.
Laters.
Those are assertions who.

If you can't support them they mean nothing.

Symmetry has always been a joke since twoofers seem to have redefined the word to suit their purposes. The reality is none of the collapses were actually symmetrical and simply followed the direction of force (gravity>>>down).

The speed as well, there's nothing that says the speed of a cd and a speed of a collapse due to structural failure can't be the same. In fact, why would it be any different since a cd removes just enough structural support to facilitate a gravity driven collapse.

Memes and canards have not fulfilled twoofs need for proof or evidence.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280763 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
Well it would need to be a sudden and totally complete structural failure.
The question is can you give me an example from history where a steel framed building collapsed in the manner of a controlled demolition from normal office fires such as these?
http://truthalliance.net/Portals/0/Archive/Ga...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yhRPW0ao8Dg/UjBomaD...
http://www.rense.com/general65/wtc7_louvers_f...
http://www.debunking911.com/wtc7_nypd2001.jpg
Windsor Tower core survived the fire, the structural steel frame failed and collapsed.

Now show me steel framed buildings which survived jetliners crashing into them at 500mph carrying 10,000 gallons of jet fuel.

Makes no difference though. The firemen described what happened. WTC 7 collapsed due to damage. Your hypothetical questions are irrelevant.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280764 Sep 15, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Because in a controlled demolition the entire structure is weakened by explosives to allow it to completely collapse, which is why steel framed skyscrapers do not completely collapse without explosives except on 9/11.

Where do they find you people?

Insults Are Easier
And can you show anything from a legitimate source that says global collapse can't happen from fire/damage induced failures?

Of course you can't, that's why twoof has failed for over a decade to gain any respect or credibility and it's why the vast majority of twoofers are also moon landing hoaxers, chem trailers, anti-vaxxers, general kooks.

Good luck with that!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280765 Sep 15, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>I am sure he tried, I was busy with work, did read it every few days and laughed at the no planer's.

I do like how the old Pedo wrote like he was in touch with the mods and they finally agreed with him and his 100 post rat job.

Too funny, I was actually kind of bored with the whole thing, Thanks JNJ aka Pedo Tommy for breathing some life back into the fun.
Just pedo-tommy getting caught in yet another lie.

Fougera!!!

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280766 Sep 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly. There were no sounds, flashed, or seismic events normally associated with controlled demolition. What's more, the coordination of aircraft impact with such an event would be impossible due to the variables.
http://youtu.be/t7LBq6jr1Yk

Insults Are Easier
who

Reading, UK

#280767 Sep 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
WTC 1 2 and 7 along with the Windsor Tower. Besides, no other buildings have had jetliners carrying over 10,000 gallons of jet fuel flown into them at around 500mph. Show me steel framed skyscrapers which have survived such an event.
I'll wait.
The Windsor tower burned on all floors for 24 hours, it was badly damaged, but it didn't collapse.
http://adrippingtap.files.wordpress.com/2012/...
http://www.highrisefirefighting.co.uk/images/...

Giving WTC7 as an example doesn't count as that's the building in question.
Can you find another example?
Or would you agree that there isn't one?
who

Reading, UK

#280768 Sep 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Windsor Tower core survived the fire, the structural steel frame failed and collapsed.
Now show me steel framed buildings which survived jetliners crashing into them at 500mph carrying 10,000 gallons of jet fuel.
Makes no difference though. The firemen described what happened. WTC 7 collapsed due to damage. Your hypothetical questions are irrelevant.
WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane...but never mind.
There are (as you know) no other examples of jetliners crashing into steel framed structures at 500 mph. There are however many examples of normal office fires, none of which resulted in a controlled demolition style collapse.
There are also firefighters who say that there were secondary explosions in the building

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280769 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
The Windsor tower burned on all floors for 24 hours, it was badly damaged, but it didn't collapse.
http://adrippingtap.files.wordpress.com/2012/...
http://www.highrisefirefighting.co.uk/images/...
Giving WTC7 as an example doesn't count as that's the building in question.
Can you find another example?
Or would you agree that there isn't one?
The Windsor tower had a concrete core.

The firemen said it collapsed due to damage. Unless you can prove otherwise, it counts.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280770 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane...but never mind.
There are (as you know) no other examples of jetliners crashing into steel framed structures at 500 mph. There are however many examples of normal office fires, none of which resulted in a controlled demolition style collapse.
There are also firefighters who say that there were secondary explosions in the building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =G1zED8dy63wXX
Normal office fires are irrelevant.

Secondary explosions are typical of structure fires. You would need to prove sequential explosions in order to support your bogus claim of controlled demolition.

You cherry picked YouRube nonsense means nothing and proves nothing. I can substantiate my point with the testimony of several firemen who were there. They trump your Twoof seven ways to Sunday.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280772 Sep 15, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
The Windsor tower burned on all floors for 24 hours, it was badly damaged, but it didn't collapse.
http://adrippingtap.files.wordpress.com/2012/...
http://www.highrisefirefighting.co.uk/images/...
Giving WTC7 as an example doesn't count as that's the building in question.
Can you find another example?
Or would you agree that there isn't one?
Show me a building constructed exactly like WTC7. The building would need to be trapezoid and cantilevered above the seventh floor supported by outer columns and a triangular horizontal truss system. The seventh floor would need to be loaded with transformers of a substation. Finally, if would be damaged by a multi-ton piece of Trade Tower slicing through from top to bottom and knocking out a support column holding up the transformer floor.

Good luck with that. Your comparisons are irrelevant.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 4 min lightbeamrider 30,585
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 24 min RCC satans FAKE C... 687,156
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 hr waaasssuuup 987,072
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 4 hr Here For Now 619,788
News Costa Mesa man, 50, sentenced to 25 years to li... 5 hr Voice of Reason 3
Any horny girls with snapchat looking for fun (Oct '16) 13 hr skurrrrallla 14
Girl snapchat names (Feb '15) 13 hr meetsnapgirls 3
More from around the web