Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#280497 Sep 12, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
And as always, TEAM TWOOF ignores all science in favour of conspirastupid!
"This article was completed prior to the public release of the FEMA/ASCE report, therefore only the generally accessible information from the media and literature were used in the analysis. The facts documenting the first phase of the main objective of the present research is to predict the amount of internal structural damage that occurred within the Towers upon the aircraft impact and that was hardly visible from the outside. Attention is focused on three main structural components of the Towers, i.e., a lattice of exterior colu mns, complex floor truss assemblies, and the core load-bearing structure. A thorough understanding of failure mechanisms and the extent of damage done when a high speed aircraft impacts a large- scale structural system is a prerequisite for undertaking the next stage of the analysis, which is the weakening effect of fire and finally the self-distracting implosion of both Towers. The airplane itself, built as an assemblage of ring and stringer-stiffened panels, was also subjected to gradual break-up and dis integration. The problem of interactive failure and fragmentation of two deformable and fracturing bodies, i.e., the aluminum airframe and steel structure, has not been addressed in the literature. Therefore, the question remains whether an estimate can be made on the internal damage of the building before the necessary computational tools are developed and small and full-scale tests are conducted? The answer to this question is yes, only if proper use is made of a few basic laws of mechanics."
http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapte...
Run twoof! Run!!!
And no proper use was ever made of a few basic laws of mechanics in the govie sham investigation of 9/11 huh pigboy .
.
Never the less:
.
Newtonian mechanics is exactly why the towers could not have fallen as fast as they did without something (explosives, quiet burning nano-thermite incendiaries ?) removing the structural system that had been happily holding it up for more than 30 years.
.
No amount of your pseudo-scientific ramblings can alter this simple fact.
.
Oh it was not UPS batteries running out the side either .
.
Office furnishing fires and gravity alone is not sufficient to accomplish what was observed by hundreds of eyewitnesses and pre-placed cameras .
.
Where is the piledriver ?
.
Uh Huh Eh !
.
You want to insert some childish ridicule along with a dose of your pseudo algebraic gobbledegook here pigboy ?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280498 Sep 12, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>And no proper use was ever made of a few basic laws of mechanics in the govie sham investigation of 9/11 huh pigboy .
.
Never the less:
.
Newtonian mechanics is exactly why the towers could not have fallen as fast as they did without something (explosives, quiet burning nano-thermite incendiaries ?) removing the structural system that had been happily holding it up for more than 30 years.
.
No amount of your pseudo-scientific ramblings can alter this simple fact.
.
Oh it was not UPS batteries running out the side either .
.
Office furnishing fires and gravity alone is not sufficient to accomplish what was observed by hundreds of eyewitnesses and pre-placed cameras .
.
Where is the piledriver ?
.
Uh Huh Eh !
.
You want to insert some childish ridicule along with a dose of your pseudo algebraic gobbledegook here pigboy ?
Says the moron who's understanding of physics is more inline with cartoons than engineering!

"Duhhhh...wuts up doc?"

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280499 Sep 12, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Face it piggy, your ass been debunked in real time and in real life.
Huge projection.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280500 Sep 12, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Hey look, it's Porkpie Hat, a member of the smear campaign who is too ignorant and deceitful to even know or acknowledge he is a member of the smear campaign.
What about spam or rules of forums, do you guys think he even understands that?
Topix TOS: You understand that no "spamming" is permitted anywhere on Topix at any time. You will not post or transmit links, identical content, or snippets of identical content to multiple threads in the discussion forums.
Ok, he dont get that.
Lets ask him about physics? But first let us ask him about simple math. He thinks the 13th anniversary of 9/11 was last years.
Ok, forget physics, he can't add.
Lets ask him about character. Wait, he accuses people of pedophilia because he thinks it's funny.
Ok, lets forget about character and intelligence.
That leaves us with no questions we can really ask him, so that's why he copy/pastes the same out of context quotes day after day, because
Insults Are Easier
Smeared what jackass?

BaaaaaWaaaaaa

Keep whining.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280501 Sep 12, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You and your fellow debwunkers by your own posts, have proven yourselves to be the real liars, and totally anti-truth.
You have any actual evidence yet?

Thought not.

ROTFLMAO

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280502 Sep 12, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
But massive steel beams 12" X 36" X 2" thick, are flimsy enough for a hollow aluminum structure to knife through them like hot butter... all from flimsy wingtip to flimsy wingtip.
Once again for your pea-brain.
How did a flimsy passenger jet penetrate the Pentagon wall that was designed to withstand a missile attack???
A wall of windows can withstand a missile attack?

REALLY?

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280503 Sep 12, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Huge projection.
Aint it always?

Insults Are Easier

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280504 Sep 12, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
If this plane atomized on impact... how did they knife through the towers like hot butter???
And how did a flimsy passenger jet penetrate the Pentagon wall that was designed to withstand a missile attack???
Thanks for a great example of why you are an outright liar.

Let's see you prove your claim. "the Pentagon wall that was designed to withstand a missile attack"

Come on lying jackass.

Let's see it.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280505 Sep 12, 2014
onemale wrote:
This is off topic but this thread is also about deception, and so many are deceived by this product:
As a lubrication consultant I am commonly asked what do I think about Lucas.
When I say it is crap they don't understand because it is so widely popular.
My reply is, the company has darn good advertising.
Basically the Lucas Oil Additive is old outdated technology, it contains additives that the oil blenders no longer use because better additives have been developed.
As always, if engine oil is worth a crap it shouldn't need additives.
Note:
Like the saying, "a picture tells a thousand words"
This video happens to be an Amsoil advertisement...
But I do NOT use Amsoil and I'm certainly NOT promoting it.
This video just happens to be a good demonstration that shows the truth about Lucas Engine Oil Additive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =s7eet8myjpcXX
Ahh. Something true. Lucas Engine Oil Additive is crap for sure.

How funny.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280506 Sep 12, 2014
onemale wrote:
This is what happens when a jet hits something solid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =4q35xHzjxB0XX#t=30
Now that you have watched the video... if this plane atomized on impact... how did they knife through the towers like hot butter???
And how did a flimsy passenger jet penetrate the Pentagon wall that was designed to withstand a missile attack???
Let's go back to the beginning.

Were the planes hijacked? Yes or no.

How does a straw pass through a tree in a tornado?

The answer is velocity. The fact of the matter is, the air frame is structurally very strong. Also the Towers were not solid but contained many windows.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280507 Sep 12, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Newtonian mechanics is exactly why the towers could not have fallen as fast as they did without something (explosives, quiet burning nano-thermite incendiaries ?) removing the structural system that had been happily holding it up for more than 30 years.
.
Oh it was not UPS batteries running out the side either .
.
Office furnishing fires and gravity alone is not sufficient to accomplish what was observed by hundreds of eyewitnesses and pre-placed cameras .
.
Where is the piledriver ?
.
Uh Huh Eh !
.
You want to insert some childish ridicule here pigboy ?
Right. Nano Thermite in the wrong place. What about Nano thermite elsewhere?

Sorry but your nano Thermite claim is ridiculous nonsense as is controlled demolition.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280508 Sep 12, 2014
OK. I just addressed every point.

TWOOF IS DUMB

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#280509 Sep 12, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
At some point this Simpsons Nelson impersonation has to get old, right?
Insults Are Easier
Then stop doing it.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280510 Sep 12, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Aint it always?

Insults Are Easier
Hey, you're twoofer buddies have spun the wheel of stupid and landed on no planes again.

Ya gonna jump on board the bus to twooferDUMB?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#280511 Sep 12, 2014
But you still haven't told us is the 300,000 pound Boeing really in there even though no one can see it ?
.

.
Uh Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#280513 Sep 12, 2014
How about nukes ?
.
Yummm
.

.
Uh Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#280514 Sep 12, 2014
Heres a good one .
.

.
Uh Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#280515 Sep 12, 2014
False Flag Black Op
.

.
Uh Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280516 Sep 12, 2014
And stupid flows like water from TEAM TWOOF!

Why oh why is twoof so put upon and mocked!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280517 Sep 12, 2014
Come on twoofers!

It's "no-planes" weak again!

Manyfails "thought" he debunked Newtonian mechanics by posting a video which debunks twoofy claims about no plane at the pentagon and oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS aka Mr. Duhhhh is spamming stupid like like he's never spammed before!

It's a twoof storm up in here!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Joe Fortuna 99,849
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 8 min bad bob 184,265
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 14 min Robert F 670,211
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 54 min Rider on the Storm 980,047
the new gay skype 1 hr thedarkone40 3
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr ChromiuMan 6,135
Wife is gonna experience another man Sunday. 11 hr The Guy 1
More from around the web