You should of asked me to clarify, and I would of explained to you exactly what I meant as I did after that out of context quote that you just posted.<quoted text>Sorry dummy but once again your own words prove you're a liar.
Insults Are Easier wrote, "<quoted text>
I didn't even know the black boxes weren't found. If true, then so much for
that picture showing a Pentagon airliner passenger's body pretty much intact
down to the skin. They claimed they found the engines inside that building
with a 14 to 18 foot wide exploded entrance hole, yet couldn't find the
black boxes or found them in an unusable state
Dr_Zorderz wrote, "Where's the Boeing ?
I heard it was called a big fuhking airplane.
Or did it all go through that magic 20' rabbit hole that you say it did?
Porkpie Hat wrote, "Here's a composite, from a twoofer website no less,
that shows the entry hole in the Pentagon is well over 20',
And again, one twoofer makes a claim that was utterly ridiculous and
unsupportable and all twoofers since mindlessly chant the same mantra like
cutists parroting scripture...because twooferdumb has no mechanism for
Aww....Why is twoof such an abject failure?
Oh right, because of the twoofers!
I have never met a person, or seen a person type on an internet forum who actually said the entire damage to the Pentagon was only 20 foot wide. We simply said that 20 foot fuselage hole had no room for the engines to fit through it. Thats why we mentioned the 15- 20 foot hole.
But you aren't interested in representing accurately the positions of the people you disagree with, are you smear campaign? And you will never respam this post, because it clarifies the truths position on the damage to the Pentagon pre-collapse.
Of course not, because
Insults Are Easier