Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280116 Sep 6, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry dummy but once again your own words prove you're a liar.

Insults Are Easier wrote, "<quoted text>

I didn't even know the black boxes weren't found. If true, then so much for
that picture showing a Pentagon airliner passenger's body pretty much intact
down to the skin. They claimed they found the engines inside that building
with a 14 to 18 foot wide exploded entrance hole, yet couldn't find the
black boxes or found them in an unusable state

"

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Dr_Zorderz wrote, "Where's the Boeing ?

I heard it was called a big fuhking airplane.

Or did it all go through that magic 20' rabbit hole that you say it did?

Huh Eh?!?!?!?!?!"

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Porkpie Hat wrote, "Here's a composite, from a twoofer website no less,
that shows the entry hole in the Pentagon is well over 20',

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis...

And again, one twoofer makes a claim that was utterly ridiculous and
unsupportable and all twoofers since mindlessly chant the same mantra like
cutists parroting scripture...because twooferdumb has no mechanism for
expelling stupid.

http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/5029/07mw8... ;

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Aww....Why is twoof such an abject failure?

Oh right, because of the twoofers!
You should of asked me to clarify, and I would of explained to you exactly what I meant as I did after that out of context quote that you just posted.

I have never met a person, or seen a person type on an internet forum who actually said the entire damage to the Pentagon was only 20 foot wide. We simply said that 20 foot fuselage hole had no room for the engines to fit through it. Thats why we mentioned the 15- 20 foot hole.

But you aren't interested in representing accurately the positions of the people you disagree with, are you smear campaign? And you will never respam this post, because it clarifies the truths position on the damage to the Pentagon pre-collapse.

Of course not, because

Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280117 Sep 6, 2014
And once again, the relevant question to faking a plane crash at the pentagon is why?

Why fake a bloody plane crash when it adds zero value to the alleged plan.

The answer is simple, the only reason twoofers believe such an idiotic claim is because they're just sheep and willing to believe anything their charlatan masters tell them regardless of how dumb it is.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280118 Sep 6, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
And once again, the relevant question to faking a plane crash at the pentagon is why?

Why fake a bloody plane crash when it adds zero value to the alleged plan.

The answer is simple, the only reason twoofers believe such an idiotic claim is because they're just sheep and willing to believe anything their charlatan masters tell them regardless of how dumb it is.
No, the relevant question is what, you ask the why question after you determine the what question. You needing to know why something happened to determine what happened shows the lack of logic you are operating under.

The actual why question relevant here is why do people like you constantly smear and misrepresent the positions of others to dishonestly debate.

Why does anti-truth always spam out of context quotes to misrepresent what conversation was about at the time to throw it in peoples faces later? Because you fear, or are simply incapable of having an honest debate, because you lack the logic to have an honest debate.

The failed logic of people like RADEKT, who have been here since 2007 badgering people while learning absolutely nothing, and expressing such failed logical concepts like "if NIST is wrong about 9/11, then NIST is wrong about every study it has ever performed?!?!?" When I point out this logical fallacy, he simply moves on to another fallacy, oblivious to the error you just called him on.

You operate exactly the same, except you operates as a cover for all the other logically inept sycophants. When I point out how other members of the smear campaign lie (like WasteWater did when he/she arrived at this forum pretending to be a truther while expressing only the fringe lunatic views of some truthers in a sad attempt to make all truth look like twoof) you leap to the rescue and begins posting quotes out of context to attempt to say I lie too. Another failed logical concept of yours.

But the worse thing about you, apart from his blatant dishonesty and constant spam, is his false allegations of pedophilia against a poster you disagreed with once you discovered that posters real name. You said it was a joke that turned out to be true because a name copy troll confirmed it. This is your intellect, your failed character, and the intellect of the smear campaign trolls who exist all over Topix, Youtube, and anywhere else people attempt to discuss 9/11.

The vast majority of people who believe 9/11 was an inside job do not act, or need to act like this. Yet, the vast majority of posts by people claiming the official story do, and honest people who care about their own countries and the world need to ask themselves why this dynamic is obviously true.

Because

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280119 Sep 6, 2014
And to be clear, I don't know what hit the Pentagon, my position is simply the evidence that has been publicly discussed does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that is was a 757.

Perhaps it was and the evidence has been withheld from the public to simply add confusion to cover all the other suspicious aspects of 9/11 - because across the board, the official story is completely unreasonable, as are the members of the 9/11 smear campaign who act like the official story is completely reliable and sensible.

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...

This is why

Insults Are Easier
Pegasus

Philadelphia, PA

#280120 Sep 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
And to be clear, I don't know what hit the Pentagon, my position is simply the evidence that has been publicly discussed does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that is was a 757.
Perhaps it was and the evidence has been withheld from the public to simply add confusion to cover all the other suspicious aspects of 9/11 - because across the board, the official story is completely unreasonable, as are the members of the 9/11 smear campaign who act like the official story is completely reliable and sensible.
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
This is why
Insults Are Easier
Guesswork equals zero credibility.

That would be you.

Why?

Because you were born to bullshit.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280121 Sep 6, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Very true my dear brother.
They destroyed pronto all forensic evidence present at the site. Recycled all steel members and left "Nothing" for people to investigate.
Destruction of evidence is itself a crime.
And what is more, the "Same people" ask us "Where is the evidence"?
So many people who should be behind the bars are actually "dispensing justice and holding the banner of Truth".
Bigotry is Easier.
Pure nonsense. What should they have done? Left all the debris sitting until you jerks were satisfied? FYI is was all hauled, sorted, and documented. Your post is idiotic. Say hello to your ISIS brothers before they all get killed.

ROTFLMAO

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280122 Sep 6, 2014
Guesswork is when evidence is destroyed, computer models are manipulated while the data that was used to reach those conclusions is hidden from scientific peer review.

You simply do not have the intelligence to see what should be obvious, which is why

Insults Are Easier

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280123 Sep 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
And to be clear, I don't know what hit the Pentagon, my position is simply the evidence that has been publicly discussed does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that is was a 757.
Perhaps it was and the evidence has been withheld from the public to simply add confusion to cover all the other suspicious aspects of 9/11 - because across the board, the official story is completely unreasonable, as are the members of the 9/11 smear campaign who act like the official story is completely reliable and sensible.
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a439/insu...
This is why
Insults Are Easier
1. Exhaustive DNA evidence.

2. Plane debris evidence.

3. Over one hundred witnesses saw what happened.

4. Olsen made a phone call from the plane.

5. The plane was tracked.

6. C-130 pilot

7. Flight manifests.

8. Airline personnel.

9. Airport security.

10. Jet fuel and jet fuel explosion.

MORON

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280124 Sep 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the relevant question is what, you ask the why question after you determine the what question. You needing to know why something happened to determine what happened shows the lack of logic you are operating under.
The actual why question relevant here is why do people like you constantly smear and misrepresent the positions of others to dishonestly debate.
Why does anti-truth always spam out of context quotes to misrepresent what conversation was about at the time to throw it in peoples faces later? Because you fear, or are simply incapable of having an honest debate, because you lack the logic to have an honest debate.
The failed logic of people like RADEKT, who have been here since 2007 badgering people while learning absolutely nothing, and expressing such failed logical concepts like "if NIST is wrong about 9/11, then NIST is wrong about every study it has ever performed?!?!?" When I point out this logical fallacy, he simply moves on to another fallacy, oblivious to the error you just called him on.
You operate exactly the same, except you operates as a cover for all the other logically inept sycophants. When I point out how other members of the smear campaign lie (like WasteWater did when he/she arrived at this forum pretending to be a truther while expressing only the fringe lunatic views of some truthers in a sad attempt to make all truth look like twoof) you leap to the rescue and begins posting quotes out of context to attempt to say I lie too. Another failed logical concept of yours.
But the worse thing about you, apart from his blatant dishonesty and constant spam, is his false allegations of pedophilia against a poster you disagreed with once you discovered that posters real name. You said it was a joke that turned out to be true because a name copy troll confirmed it. This is your intellect, your failed character, and the intellect of the smear campaign trolls who exist all over Topix, Youtube, and anywhere else people attempt to discuss 9/11.
The vast majority of people who believe 9/11 was an inside job do not act, or need to act like this. Yet, the vast majority of posts by people claiming the official story do, and honest people who care about their own countries and the world need to ask themselves why this dynamic is obviously true.
Because
Insults Are Easier
Keep stroking.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280125 Sep 6, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
And once again, the relevant question to faking a plane crash at the pentagon is why?
Why fake a bloody plane crash when it adds zero value to the alleged plan.
The answer is simple, the only reason twoofers believe such an idiotic claim is because they're just sheep and willing to believe anything their charlatan masters tell them regardless of how dumb it is.
Exactly. They are starting from a fallacious point of view and trying to make things fit.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280126 Sep 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Guesswork is when evidence is destroyed, computer models are manipulated while the data that was used to reach those conclusions is hidden from scientific peer review.
You simply do not have the intelligence to see what should be obvious, which is why
Insults Are Easier
There is only one peer reviewed study which is credible.

Nothing was destroyed moron.

Who would investigate if not the government?

There were independent investigators brought in.

They even investigated your BS thermite nonsense proving it to be impossible.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#280127 Sep 6, 2014
Everything you just said is simply not true, and you aren't smart or honest enough to converse with.

So enjoy your sad day of repeating yourself and pretending you are intelligent.

Insults Are Easier

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#280128 Sep 6, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
What is it you don't believe? It is easy to see what happens when a 767 is flown into a stout structure at around 500 mph. The building shreds the plane and momentum carries everything forward. A piece of the landing gear was embedded in a car on the street. Pieces of airplane skin rained down as well as an engine which was propelled out the other side of the building.
You got NO proof of any of your spurious claims . All you can say is another lie like " I already posted my proof ."
.
Or
.
"Thousands of eyewitnesses saw it ."
.
Or
.
Any of your various disingenuous stock lies when asked to prove YOUR stupid claims .
.
You're nothing but a troll here .
.
Uh Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280129 Sep 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Everything you just said is simply not true, and you aren't smart or honest enough to converse with.
So enjoy your sad day of repeating yourself and pretending you are intelligent.
Insults Are Easier
HUGE PROJECION
NEXT

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280130 Sep 6, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You got NO proof of any of your spurious claims . All you can say is another lie like " I already posted my proof ."
.
Or
.
"Thousands of eyewitnesses saw it ."
.
Or
.
Any of your various disingenuous stock lies when asked to prove YOUR stupid claims .
.
You're nothing but a troll here .
.
Uh Huh Eh !
I already posted credible sources to support my claims.

Did I post thousands or over one-hundred? You have no personal integrity troll.

STFU douche-bag.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280131 Sep 6, 2014
Dr. Z is a lying douche-bag. Here is what I posted previously.

1. Exhaustive DNA evidence.

2. Plane debris evidence.

3. Over one hundred witnesses saw what happened.

4. Olsen made a phone call from the plane.

5. The plane was tracked.

6. C-130 pilot

7. Flight manifests.

8. Airline personnel.

9. Airport security.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280132 Sep 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>You should of asked me to clarify, and I would of explained to you exactly what I meant as I did after that out of context quote that you just posted.

I have never met a person, or seen a person type on an internet forum who actually said the entire damage to the Pentagon was only 20 foot wide. We simply said that 20 foot fuselage hole had no room for the engines to fit through it. Thats why we mentioned the 15- 20 foot hole.

But you aren't interested in representing accurately the positions of the people you disagree with, are you smear campaign? And you will never respam this post, because it clarifies the truths position on the damage to the Pentagon pre-collapse.

Of course not, because

Insults Are Easier
After all the excuses you've made for all the extremely dumb things you've claimed it really doesn't require any clarification.

Your words, oh elevator boy-sheep's words, almost every idiot who's twoofed before words all mean the exact same thing. You morons mindlessly accepted some other moron claiming the entry hole was less than 20' and you all mindlessly regurgitated it.

The truth is in what you've said, not your childishly idiotic excuses after being called on it and proven wrong.

Same goes for fictitious stand downs, free fall/molten steel/symmetry = cd, bin laden was too fat, explosions = explosives, steel can't fail due to fire, plated steel melts at a lower temp than non plated steel....etc, etc, etc.

You're a liar for your cult, that's the only truth you bring to this discussion.

Thanks for playing dummy!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280133 Sep 6, 2014
All claims have been supported with credible evidence other than YouRube previously.

Let's go back to the beginning shall we? Were the planes hijacked? Yes or No.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#280134 Sep 6, 2014
Looks like this thread is over.

RIP

GLAD I COULD HELP

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#280135 Sep 6, 2014
And again, there's no mistaking that both Ignorance and elevator boy-sheep were claiming the entry hole on the pentagon was >20';
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>

I didn't even know the black boxes weren't found. If true, then so much for
that picture showing a Pentagon airliner passenger's body pretty much intact
down to the skin. They claimed they found the engines inside that building
with a 14 to 18 foot wide exploded entrance hole, yet couldn't find the
black boxes or found them in an unusable state
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Where's the Boeing ?

I heard it was called a big fuhking airplane.

Or did it all go through that magic 20' rabbit hole that you say it did?

Huh Eh?!?!?!?!?!
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Here's a composite, from a twoofer website no less,
that shows the entry hole in the Pentagon is well over 20',

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis...

And again, one twoofer makes a claim that was utterly ridiculous and
unsupportable and all twoofers since mindlessly chant the same mantra like
cutists parroting scripture...because twooferdumb has no mechanism for
expelling stupid.

http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/5029/07mw8...
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

To paraphrase exactly what you said:

"building with a 14 to 18 foot wide exploded entrance hole, "

Que whining, snivelling and more excuses from Ignorance is Bliss...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
How did black people get here ( economically) 11 min Doctor REALITY 71
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 23 min Jack in the Box 36,694
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr KENTUCKY CATHOLIC 688,651
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr CongratsYouTool 6,546
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 hr Aura Mytha 988,434
Does anyone else hate being around white women? 7 hr hmmmm 25
Main causes of bullying 7 hr Wise above all 3
More from around the web