Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Charleston, IL

#279389 Aug 28, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Run Manyfails! Run!!
How does your BS post have anything what to do with my post you are responding too???
Your own posing prove you are without a doubt the dumbest dickweed on here.
It is clear your comphenseion is non-existent.

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#279390 Aug 28, 2014
Unlike you and your little band of shill, neo-nazi wanna be's I don't belong to any movement
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text>Its hard to believe any movement would want THAT as a representation of its goals and objectives!
Fougera!
Hahahahaha!!
You're just such a pathetic loser!

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#279391 Aug 28, 2014
And then you wonder why we ignore your posts ?
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignored on the grounds, it was posted by a blithering idiot.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#279392 Aug 28, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignored on the grounds, it was posted by a blithering idiot.
So, you have no real arguement... what else is new???

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#279393 Aug 28, 2014
The shills are only here to disrupt any discussion about the subject at hand
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
How does your BS post have anything what to do with my post you are responding too???
Your own posing prove you are without a doubt the dumbest dickweed on here.
It is clear your comphenseion is non-existent.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#279394 Aug 28, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Run Manyfails! Run!!
How does your BS post have anything to do with my post you are responding too???
Your own posting prove you are without a doubt the dumbest dick-weed on here.
It is clear your comprehension is non-exist

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#279395 Aug 28, 2014
Another glaring example that the shills have access to a database that holds every post from this forum ..... of course they work for the government
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text><quoted text>Its hard to believe any movement would want THAT as a representation of its goals and objectives!
Fougera!
Hahahahaha!!
You're just such a pathetic loser!
onemale

Charleston, IL

#279396 Aug 28, 2014
The White House had (at least ) 28 Advanced Intelligence Warnings Prior to 9/11
28 advanced warning and what did Bush do about them ?
He goes on vacation.
It is clear Bush and company lied about foreknowledge.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/SMI402A...

onemale

Charleston, IL

#279397 Aug 28, 2014
The Bush Administration Deliberately Ignored 9 11 Warnings
This video presents evidence that the Bush Administration deliberately ignored warnings that the events of September 11, 2001 were about to happen. If they knew about 9/11 and did nothing to prevent it, that alone is enough to bring Bush and his entire administration up on charges of high treason and mass murder.

onemale

Charleston, IL

#279398 Aug 28, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
The shills are only here to disrupt any discussion about the subject at hand <quoted text>
It is so evident they not are interested in the truth.
They have repeatedly proved themselves to be anti-truth.
Somehow elementary comments prove the govie story???
Instead they prove themselves to having no real argument about the subject.
When I show evidence that Bush and company had foreknowledge, the piggy, the dumbest of them all ( a science class flunky who thinks he is a scientist) posts a worn-out formula that has absolutely no relationship to the post.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#279399 Aug 28, 2014
What Defenses?
.
http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp...
.
From this list, one can see there were many warnings specifying the type of attack, a general timeframe, and the location as either New York City or the World Trade Center. And this list only includes warnings from foreign governments, and excludes warnings from the US itself: its own communications intercepts, individuals with foreknowledge, suggestions from similar attacks, and the knowledge of American intelligence agents on the track of al-Qaeda. We know that US intelligence was suffering “warning fatigue” from so many notifications of an upcoming al-Qaeda attack. One would think that, based on these warnings, the US would have dramatically increased its security. One would be wrong.
.
But in fact, while the US recently had over 100 fighters defending the US, the number was reduced in 1997 to save money. By 9/11 there were supposedly only 14 fighters protecting the entire US, and most of those were focused on drug interdiction. Of the 14, only four were in the greater vicinity of New York or Washington.
.
Supposedly, on 9/11 there was not a single plane on alert within 100 miles of either city. With so many warnings suggesting an imminent attack would come from the air and/or target important, symbolic buildings, why weren’t New York, Washington and other probable target areas defended with fighters or antiaircraft batteries?
.
There was an antiaircraft battery permanently stationed on top of the White House, but inexplicably it wasn’t used to shoot down Flight 77, which flew low over the White House before making a sharp turn and hitting the Pentagon.[Dallas Morning News, 9/16/01, Newsday, 9/23/01]
.
The US government has not claimed it improved ground security before 9/11 at places like the Pentagon and World Trade Center either.
.
http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp...
.
Uh Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#279400 Aug 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It is so evident they not are interested in the truth.
They have repeatedly proved themselves to be anti-truth.
Somehow elementary comments prove the govie story???
Instead they prove themselves to having no real argument about the subject.
When I show evidence that Bush and company had foreknowledge, the piggy, the dumbest of them all ( a science class flunky who thinks he is a scientist) posts a worn-out formula that has absolutely no relationship to the post.
Twoof? Were is your pwoof?

Prove that Bush knew exactly what the hijackers were going to do?

Besides, you have claimed the planes were never hijacked in the first place. Prove that dumb ass.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#279401 Aug 28, 2014
“We didn't know what to do! It had never happened before? We got confused! They only trained us for the attacking planes to come in from the Atlantic or from Canada not from our own airports.
.
“We train for most scenarios every day but we never took care of 4 real hijackings at a time before. We thought it was an exercise. Geez there were like 10 hijackings going on what with all the exercises we were doing that morning and we didn't get around to all of them in time either. We didn’t know what was real and what wasn’t!”
.
"It was a glitch, a mistake, a major malfunction ! We don't know how the planes got through?
.
So many blips, without the transponders, how do you tell which ones are which ?
.
We're just glad no one lost their jobs over this little 9/11 slip up thingy. We'll do better next time."
.
Excuses, excuses, that’s all you get from our wonderfully incompetent defensive military forces.
.
Or were they just doing what they were told to do ?
.
But that "Jet Fuel" ha ha ha ha
.
That’s a Good One Eh !
.
Uh Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#279402 Aug 28, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
What Defenses?
.
http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp...
.
From this list, one can see there were many warnings specifying the type of attack, a general timeframe, and the location as either New York City or the World Trade Center. And this list only includes warnings from foreign governments, and excludes warnings from the US itself: its own communications intercepts, individuals with foreknowledge, suggestions from similar attacks, and the knowledge of American intelligence agents on the track of al-Qaeda. We know that US intelligence was suffering “warning fatigue” from so many notifications of an upcoming al-Qaeda attack. One would think that, based on these warnings, the US would have dramatically increased its security. One would be wrong.
.
But in fact, while the US recently had over 100 fighters defending the US, the number was reduced in 1997 to save money. By 9/11 there were supposedly only 14 fighters protecting the entire US, and most of those were focused on drug interdiction. Of the 14, only four were in the greater vicinity of New York or Washington.
.
Supposedly, on 9/11 there was not a single plane on alert within 100 miles of either city. With so many warnings suggesting an imminent attack would come from the air and/or target important, symbolic buildings, why weren’t New York, Washington and other probable target areas defended with fighters or antiaircraft batteries?
.
There was an antiaircraft battery permanently stationed on top of the White House, but inexplicably it wasn’t used to shoot down Flight 77, which flew low over the White House before making a sharp turn and hitting the Pentagon.[Dallas Morning News, 9/16/01, Newsday, 9/23/01]
.
The US government has not claimed it improved ground security before 9/11 at places like the Pentagon and World Trade Center either.
.
http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp...
.
Uh Huh Eh !
But you implied the planes were never hijacked. Therefore what you just posted is irrelevant to your argument.

HUGE FAIL BRO.

GLAD TO HELP

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#279403 Aug 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
The Bush Administration Deliberately Ignored 9 11 Warnings
This video presents evidence that the Bush Administration deliberately ignored warnings that the events of September 11, 2001 were about to happen. If they knew about 9/11 and did nothing to prevent it, that alone is enough to bring Bush and his entire administration up on charges of high treason and mass murder.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =XCeO2x2cx88XX
So now you imply the planes were hijacked. You previously posted they were not hijacked.

Which is it? Were the planes hijacked? YES OR NO.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#279404 Aug 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
8 reasons 9/11 was an inside job.
The White House had (at least ) 28 Advanced Intelligence Warnings Prior to 9/11
Bush and all his cronies said they had no advanced warning.
That makes 9/11 a cover up and an inside job.
Now the piggy will spew science.
Sorry Charlie will spew mommy banging or whatever flips his lid.
Sewerwater won't even know where he is.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/SMI402A...
Proves nothing.

TRY AGAIN

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#279405 Aug 28, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
“We didn't know what to do! It had never happened before? We got confused! They only trained us for the attacking planes to come in from the Atlantic or from Canada not from our own airports.
.
“We train for most scenarios every day but we never took care of 4 real hijackings at a time before. We thought it was an exercise. Geez there were like 10 hijackings going on what with all the exercises we were doing that morning and we didn't get around to all of them in time either. We didn’t know what was real and what wasn’t!”
.
"It was a glitch, a mistake, a major malfunction ! We don't know how the planes got through?
.
So many blips, without the transponders, how do you tell which ones are which ?
.
We're just glad no one lost their jobs over this little 9/11 slip up thingy. We'll do better next time."
.
Excuses, excuses, that’s all you get from our wonderfully incompetent defensive military forces.
.
Or were they just doing what they were told to do ?
.
But that "Jet Fuel" ha ha ha ha
.
That’s a Good One Eh !
.
Uh Huh Eh !
Hundreds of witnesses smelled jet fuel dummy.

It is a good one proving your foolishness.

GLAD I COULD CLEAR THAT UP

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#279407 Aug 28, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you imply the planes were hijacked. You previously posted they were not hijacked.
Which is it? Were the planes hijacked? YES OR NO.
.
Well sewerwater .....YES and NO .
.
Yeah Jet Fuel...ha ha ha...That's A Good One
.
Oh BTW How's your pelvic mesh surgery complication suit with sheen Law Office going ?
.
Uh Huh Eh !
onemale

Charleston, IL

#279408 Aug 28, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Proves nothing.
TRY AGAIN
Do you still enjoy lying???
onemale

Charleston, IL

#279409 Aug 28, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you imply the planes were hijacked. You previously posted they were not hijacked.
Which is it? Were the planes hijacked? YES OR NO.
It is clear your comprehension level is non-exist

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min Toby 974,626
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min kent 658,395
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 10 min Poppyann 2,976
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 13 min nanoanomaly 70,080
bored 41 min hotasianpussy 1
hello guys 52 min hotasianpussy 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 58 min Internet Reality 45,572
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 2 hr lightbeamrider 4,931
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) 7 hr Raspberry2129 87
More from around the web